AARDVARK Trial design: Patients with small abdominal aortic aneuryms (AAAs) were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril 10 mg once daily,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/2/ Implications of ASCOT Results for ALLHAT Conclusions ALLHAT.
Advertisements

CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) Collaborative Study Group N Eng J Med 345: , 2001 Edmund J. Lewis, M.D. Muehrcke Family Professor of.
לדיובן הגנה כלייתית מוכחת בחולי סכרת מסוג 2, (היפרטנסיבים ונורמוטנסיבים) עם מיקרואלבומינוריה לדיובן הגנה כלייתית מוכחת בחולי סכרת מסוג 2, (היפרטנסיבים.
VBWG PROactive: Study design Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366: Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: Objective: Assess the effects.
The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial ONTARGET.
The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on renal function in patients with chronic heart failure: an analysis from SHIFT Systolic Heart failure.
ASCOT and Steno-2: Aggressive risk reduction benefits two different patient populations *Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or stroke, revascularization,
Efficacy and Comparability of Thiazide-type Diuretics
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
Relationship of background ACEI dose to benefits of candesartan in the CHARM-Added trial.
VBWG Growth in heart disease, 2000–2050 Deaths Population Foot DK et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:
New 2011 SHIFT quality of life substudy Quality of life ( QoL) in heart failure: where do we stand? Therapies that have survival benefits either have a.
Results from ASCOT-BPLA: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm VBWG.
IRIS Trial design: Patients without diabetes with a history of stroke or TIA within 6 months, with objective evidence of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR value.
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Aliskiren and Valsartan for Antihypertensive Therapy Trial
EARLY-BAMI Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI with a plan for primary PCI, and without evidence of cardiogenic shock, were randomized to either.
RAAS Blockade: Focus on ACEI
GAUSS-3 Trial design: Patients with objective evidence of intolerance to statin agents were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously.
BENEFIT Trial design: Patients with positive serologic tests for T. Cruzi and cardiomyopathy were randomized to benznidazole 300 mg daily for days.
Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on renal function in patients.
LEVO-CTS Trial design: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to infusion of levosimendan 0.2 µg/kg/min.
Angiography-guided PCI
BBK II Trial design: Patients undergoing a two-stent approach for a de novo bifurcation lesion were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either culotte stenting.
EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) at high risk for CV events were randomized to receive in a 1:1:1 fashion either.
EVITA Trial design: Smokers admitted with an acute coronary syndrome were randomized to varenicline 1 mg twice daily (n = 151) vs. placebo (n = 151). Study.
Primary endpoint at 1 year
MAGIC-AF Trial design: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and remaining in AF after pulmonary vein isolation alone were randomized to either.
MARFAN SARTAN Trial design: Marfan patients were randomized to losartan (n = 153) vs. placebo (n = 150). The dose of losartan was 50 mg for those
Losartan vs. Atenolol in Marfan Syndrome
ALPS Trial design: Patients with adult nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) and persistent or recurrent VT/VF after ≥1 shock were randomized.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
VALUE Trial design: Hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk were randomized to valsartan (n = 7,649) vs. amlodipine (n = 7,596). Results (p =
Why double blind, controlled randomized trials?
SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.
FAMOUS-NSTEMI Trial design: Participants with NSTEMI were randomized to an FFR-guided strategy (n = 176) vs. a coronary angiography-guided strategy (n.
TUXEDO–India Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI were randomized to receive Taxus Element.
ATMOSPHERE Trial design: Patients with symptomatic heart failure were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either aliskiren 300 mg once daily, enalapril 5.
EVERBIO II Trial design: Patients with CAD were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either Absorb BVS, Biomatrix Flex stent [BES], or Promus Element EES.
SUSTAIN-6 Trial design: Patients with DM2 at high risk for CV events were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1 mg,
PROCAMIO Trial design: Patients with hemodynamically stable wide complex monomorphic tachycardia were randomized 1:1 to either intravenous procainamide.
Time point Difference in systolic BP (mm Hg) p
BAT for HFrEF Trial design: Patients with chronic systolic HF were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) or control.
ATHENA-HF Trial design: Patients with acute heart failure were randomized to spironolactone 100 mg daily (n = 182) vs. placebo/low-dose spironolactone.
RIDDLE-NSTEMI Trial design: Patients with NSTEMI were randomized to either immediate (within 2 hours) intervention or delayed (within 72 hours) intervention.
Ranolazine in Microvascular Dysfunction
Ezetimibe/simvastatin
OSLER Trial design: Patients from five phase 2 trials and seven phase 3 trials with evolocumab were invited to participate in the OSLER extension program,
IMPRESSION Trial design: Patients presenting with acute MI and undergoing an invasive approach, along with ticagrelor loading dose, were randomized to.
HARMONIZE Trial design: Patients with hyperkalemia (K ≥5.1 mEq/L) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1.7 fashion to receive sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS)
Adjusted relative risk for developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with blood-pressure level BP level (mm Hg) Adjusted relative risk 95%
ACCELERATE Trial design: Patients at high vascular risk were randomized to either evacetrapib 130 mg daily or placebo. They were followed for 30 months.
POPE-2 Trial design: Patients with moderate to large pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery were randomized to colchicine 2 mg loading dose, then 1.
CHAMPION Trial design: Patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure were implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure monitor and randomized so.
Metoprolol for AR Trial design: Patients with chronic asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation (AR) were randomized to metoprolol CR/XL 200 mg or matching.
HOPE-3 Trial design: Patients without known cardiovascular disease, and with an intermediate risk of cardiovascular events, were randomized in a 2 x 2.
RUTHERFORD-2 Trial design: Patients with heterogeneous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) on statins were randomized in a 2:2:1:1 fashion to subcutaneous.
TRUE-AHF Trial design: Patients with acute decompensated heart failure were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either early ularitide infusion (within 12 hours)
DENERHTN Trial design: Patients with resistant hypertension were randomized to renal denervation plus standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment.
SOLID-TIMI 52 Trial design: Participants within 30 days of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were randomized to darapladib 160 mg daily (n = 6,504) versus.
STOP-CHAGAS Trial design: Asymptomatic patients with serological evidence of T. cruzi were randomized to posaconazole 400 mg BID, benznidazole 200 mg BID,
DANAMI 3-DEFER Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and in whom the operators could establish TIMI 2-3 flow without stenting or those presenting.
Primary safety endpoint
MOMENTUM 3 Trial design: Patients with advanced heart failure were randomized to a centrifugal-flow pump (n = 152) vs. an axial-flow pump (n = 142). Results.
CIRCUS Trial design: Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to IV cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg (n = 475) vs. placebo (n = 495) immediately before coronary.
Role of - Azilsartan - Azilsartan/chlorthalidone
Average change in blood pressure (BP) from recruitment to 6-month postrecruitment in intervention and control patients >50 years included due to having.
Presentation transcript:

AARDVARK Trial design: Patients with small abdominal aortic aneuryms (AAAs) were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril 10 mg once daily, amlodipine 5 mg, or placebo. Patient follow-up was 2 years. Results (p = 0.78) Primary outcome, annual AAA growth: perindopril, amlodipine, and placebo: 1.77 mm vs. 1.81 mm vs. 1.68 mm; p = 0.78 for perindopril vs. placebo. % ≥5.5 cm or referred for/undergoing AAA repair: 13.7% vs. 15.3% vs. 13.9%, p > 0.05 SBP ↓ 12 months: -9.5 vs. -6.7 vs. -0.5 mm Hg; DBP ↓ : -5.8 vs.-4.7 vs. -0.2 mm Hg; p < 0.001 for both medications vs. placebo 10 mm 5 Conclusions Perindopril was not superior to amlodipine or placebo in slowing AAA growth in patients with small AAAs, despite a greater reduction in BP Utility of both ACEi and ARBs in reducing aortic aneurysmal growth remains controversial Primary endpoint Amlodipine (n = 72) Perindopril (n = 73) Placebo (n = 79) Bicknell CD, et al. Eur Heart J 2016;Jul 1:[Epub]