(L, C and X) and Full-polarization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signatures of Forest Radar Images at VHF-band. BioGeoSAR07 Overview Airborne SAR system IMARK Simultaneous radar and ground-based forest measurements.
Advertisements

Hydrological Assessment & Monitoring Plan M SekharNBSS & LUP M S Mohan Kumar UAS consortia Indian Institute of Science 8 th October 2013.
Cloud Radar in Space: CloudSat While TRMM has been a successful precipitation radar, its dBZ minimum detectable signal does not allow views of light.
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture & Snow Properties with SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR by Philip A. Townsend Neal Simpson ES 5053 Final Project.
Radar, Lidar and Vegetation Structure. Greg Asner TED Talk.
Heesam Chae, Hoonyol Lee Dept. of Geophysics, Kangwon National University, Chunchon, Kangwon-do, Korea Seong-Jun Cho, No-Wook Park Korea Institude of Geoscience.
EO data for Rice monitoring in Asia Thuy Le Toan CESBIO, Toulouse, France & The Asia-RICE team.
Application to the rice production in Southeast Asia Rice Production Research Program Agro-meteorology Division National Institute for Agro-Environmental.
On Estimation of Surface Soil Moisture from SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa Barbara.
Fig. 2 and 3 show the schematic diagram and photo of the laboratory experiment with PolScat on a drying mud. A ton of mud sample was collected from natural.
Differences b etween Red and Green NDVI, What do they predict and what they don’t predict Shambel Maru.
IGARSS’11 Compact Polarimetry Potentials My-Linh Truong-Loï, Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institue of Technology Eric Pottier, IETR, UMR CNRS.
1 Remote Sensing Laboratory Dept. of Information Engineering and Computer Science University of Trento Via Sommarive, 14, I Povo, Trento, Italy 2.
DOCUMENT OVERVIEW Title: Fully Polarimetric Airborne SAR and ERS SAR Observations of Snow: Implications For Selection of ENVISAT ASAR Modes Journal: International.
Jul. 29, 2011IGARSS [3118] RELATION BETWEEN ROCK FAILURE MICROWAVE SIGNALS DETECTED BY AMSR-E AND A DISTRIBUTION OF RUPTURES GENERATED BY SEISMIC.
- Microwave Remote Sensing Group IGARSS 2011, July 23-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 M. Brogioni 1, S. Pettinato 1, E. Santi 1, S. Paloscia 1, P. Pampaloni 1,
Use of ethylenediurea (EDU) as a research tool in assessing the impact of ambient ozone on plants Madhoolika Agrawal Professor in Botany Department of.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Active Microwave Physics and Basics 1 Simon Yueh JPL, Pasadena, CA August 14, 2014.
A Measuring Polygon with a Complex of Polarimetric, Combined Active-Passive Sensors of S-, Ku-, and Ka-band of Frequencies for Soil and Snow Remote Sensing.
IGARSS 2011 SAR Data for Subsurface Saline Lacustrine Deposits Detection and Primary Interpretation on the Evolution of the Vanished Lop Nur Lake Xiaolin.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
Synthetic Aperture Radar Specular or Bragg Scatter? OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001.
ESTIMATION OF OCEAN CURRENT VELOCITY IN COASTAL AREA USING RADARSAT-1 SAR IMAGES AND HF-RADAR DATA Moon-Kyung Kang 1, Hoonyol Lee 2, Chan-Su Yang 3, Wang-Jung.
IEEE IGARSS Vancouver, July 27, 2011 On the potential of TanDEM-X for the retrieval of agricultural crop parameters by single-pass PolInSAR Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez.
Changes in the Panicle-Related Traits of Different Rice Cultivars under High Temperature Condition Young-Jun Mo 1 *, Ki-Young Kim 1, Hyun-su Park, Jong-Cheol.
TropiSCAT : A MULTI-FREQUENCY POLINSAR DATA CAMPAIGN OF ACQUISITION FOR VEGETATION CHARACTERIZATION Clément ALBINET – Office National d’Etudes et de Recherches.
MULTI-FREQUENCY, MULTI-POLARIZATION AND ANGULAR MEASUREMENTS OF BARE SOIL, SNOW AND WATER ICE MICROWAVE REFLECTION AND EMISSION BY C-, Ku-, AND Ka-BAND,
SeaWiFS Views the Agulhas Retroflection Gene Feldman NASA GSFC, Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes, SeaWiFS Project Office
On Estimation of Soil Moisture with SAR Jiancheng Shi ICESS University of California, Santa Barbara.
Ocean Surface Roughness and Remote Sensing Paul Hwang Remote Sensing Division Naval Research Laboratory.
IGARSS 2011, Jul. 27, Vancouver 1 Monitoring Vegetation Water Content by Using Optical Vegetation Index and Microwave Vegetation Index: Field Experiment.
SEA ICE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF OKHOTSK SEA OBSERVED BY X- AND L- BAND SAR Hiroyuki Wakabayashi (Nihon university) Shoji Sakai (Nihon.
Morphological Characteristics of High Yielding Rice Varieties
0 Riparian Zone Health Project Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Grant S. Wiseman, BS.c, MSc. World Congress of Agroforestry Nairobi, Kenya August 23-28,
TropiSCAT : A MULTI-FREQUENCY POLINSAR DATA CAMPAIGN OF ACQUISITION FOR VEGETATION CHARACTERIZATION Clément ALBINET – Office National d’Etudes et de Recherches.
Classification Method Validation for Rice Mapping Using ENVISAT APS Data Erxue CHEN(1), Zengyuan LI(1), BingxiangTan(1) , Wei He(1), Bingbai LI(2) (1)Institute.
Dr. Joe T. Ritchie Symposium : Evaluation of Rice Model in Taiwan Authors : Tien-Yin Chou Hui-Yen Chen Institution : GIS Research Center, Feng Chia University,
CLPX Workshop May 28-29, 2003 Boulder, Colorado Ground-based Radar Measurements of LSOS Snowpack Gilles CASTRES SAINT-MARTIN Kamal SARABANDI Radiation.
IGARSS’ July, Vancouver, Canada Subsidence Monitoring Using Polarimetric Persistent Scatterers Interferometry Victor D. Navarro-Sanchez and Juan.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Localization of the study area and monitored fields superimposed with a colored.
Summary A mass field screening for heat tolerance in a large set of sweetpotato accessions (1973) was carried out in the coastal desert of Northern Peru.
1 Allocation of varieties and yield of rainfed rice cultivation in Donkhwaai village of the Vientiane plain Shuichi Miyagawa(Gifu Univ.), Yoshinao Adachi(Gifu.
JPL Technical Activities
Spring '17 EECS Intro to Radar Systems
HSAF Soil Moisture Training
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
Meng Liu,Hong Zhang,Chao Wang, Bo Zhang
Term Project Presentation
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Retrieving Extreme wind speeds using C-band instruments
WIND RETRIEVAL WITH CROSS-POLARIZED SAR RETURNS
Estimationg rice growth parameters using X-band scatterometer data
Monitoring of Rice Growth Using Polarimetric Scatterometer System
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Radar backscattering measurements of paddy rice field using L, C and X-band polarimetric scatterometer ISRS 2007.
M. L. Williams1 and T. L. Ainsworth2
WIND RETRIEVAL WITH CROSS-POLARIZED SAR RETURNS
Cross-Polarized SAR: A New Potential Technique for Hurricanes
Grass-like Crop Canopies
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Challenges towards Revitalizing Hemp: A Multifaceted Crop
M. L. Williams1 and T. L. Ainsworth2
Methods of Determining Canopy Closure in Winter Wheat
이훈열, 조성준, 성낙훈 강원대학교 지구물리학과 한국지질자원연구원 지반안전연구부
POLARIMETRIC OBSERVATION FOR RICE FIELD BY RADARSAT-2 AND ALOS/PALSAR
Challenges towards Revitalizing Hemp: A Multifaceted Crop
Presentation transcript:

(L, C and X) and Full-polarization IGARSS2008, Boston MA, July 6-11, 2008 Radar Backscattering Measurement of a Paddy Rice Field using Multi-frequency (L, C and X) and Full-polarization Yi-hyun Kim1*, S.Young Hong1 and Hoonyol Lee2 1 National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Korea 2 Department of Geophysics, Kangwon National University, Korea Good afternoon My name is Yi-Hyun Kim from National Institute of Agricultural Science Technology in Korea My presentation title is radar backscattering measurement of a paddy rice field using multi-frequency(L, C and X) and full-polarization  

Contents 1 Background 2 Material and Methods 3 Results 4 Conclusion My presentation contents is following

Background Rice is one of the major crops in korea Microwave radar can penetrate cloud cover regardless of weather condition Ground-based polarimetric scatterometer has advantage of monitoring crop conditions with full polarization and various frequencies Plant parameters such as LAI, biomass, plant height are highly correlated with backscattering coefficients ENVISAT SAR data (5.3 GHz, hh-, hv-polarizations, and incidence angles between 28.5° and 40.9°) to monitor rice growth and compared the data with simulation results (Le Toan et al, 1997) RADARSAT data (5.3 GHz, hh-polarization, and incidence angles between 36° and 46°) was analyzed for monitoring the rice growth in Korea (Hong et al,2000) Rice is one of the major crops in Korea Microwave radar sensing has great potential, especially in monsoon Asia, since optical observations are often hampered by cloudy conditions Especially a ground-based polarimetric scatterometer has advantage of monitoring crop conditions continuously using full polarization and various frequencies Many plant parameters such as LAI, biomass, plant height are highly correlated with backscattering coefficients. According to frequency, polarization between plant parameters and backscattering coefficients was different For example last study work, Le Toan was study ENVISAT SAR data (5.3 GHz, hh-, hv-polarizations, and incidence angles between 28.5° and 40.9°) to monitor rice growth and compared the data with simulation results and Hong was study RADARSAT data (5.3 GHz, hh-polarization, and incidence angles between 36° and 46°) was analyzed for monitoring the rice growth in Korea

Objective To measure backscattering coefficients of paddy rice using L, C, X-bands scatterometer system during the growth period Relationship between backscattering coefficients and rice growth variables with full polarization and various angles We measure backscattering coefficients of paddy rice using L, C, X-bands scatterometer system during the growth period and investigate relationship between backscattering coefficients and rice growth variables for example plant height, Leaf Area Index, Biomass with full polarization and various angles

Study site - An experimental field at NIAST, Suwon, Korea The test site was located at a NIAST experimental field Suwon, Korea. The rice cultivar was a Japonica type, called Chuchung. The size field was about 660m2 Testing varieties : Chuchoungbyeo The size field : 660m2

Dual Polarimetric Horn Antenna Materials and Methods Consist of polarimetric scatterometer system Dual Polarimetric Horn Antenna Network Analyzer L-band C-band X-band Polarimetric scatterometer system consists of dual polarimetric horn antenna, vector network analyzer (VNA), RF cables, and a personal computer The system is calibrated using a calibration kit The VNA-based polarimetric scatterometer operates in a stepped-frequency sweep mode Polarimetric scatterometer provides a time domain radar return from a target as a fully polarimetric amplitude and phase data Calibration kit

Dual polarimetric horn Materials and Methods Specification of the scatterometer system Specification L-Band C-Band X-Band Center frequency 1.27GHz 5.3GHz 9.65GHz Bandwidth 0.12GHz 0.6GHz 1GHz Number of frequency points 201 801 1601 Antenna type Dual polarimetric horn Antenna gain 12.4dB 20.1dB 22.4dB Polarization HH, VV, HV, VH Incident angle 20°~60° Platform height 4.16m This system equipped with L, C, X-bands, and with full polarization The incident angles were between 20~60

Growth data collection - Plant height, Fresh and dry weight, LAI Transplant stage (mid-May) Panicle formation stage (mid-July) Heading stage (mid-Aug) Harvesting stage (mid-Oct) Growth data for the rice canopy, such as LAI, fresh and dry weight and plant height, were acquired at time of each scatterometer measurement simultaneously

Backscattering coefficients of each band the follow expression Calculation of backscattering coefficients (apply to radar equation) Backscattering coefficients were calculated by applying radar equation. It defined as the following expression. Backscattering coefficients of each band were calculated as the follow expressions. Backscattering coefficients of each band the follow expression

Polarimetric scatterometer system

Results Temporal variations of backscattering coefficients at polarization and incident angle 30°~60° for the L-band Incident angle: 30 Incident angle: 40 Heading heading Incident angle: 50 Incident angle: 60 Radar backscattering measurements were about 5 months from before transplantation of the rice seedings to harvest of the mature rice crop. This figure shows the temporal variations of the backscattering coefficients of the rice crop at L-band after transplanting, at various incidence angles. Backscattering coefficients of paddy fields at L-band ranged from were about -55dB ~ 0dB. VV-polarized backscattering coefficients higher than hh- and hv/vh-polarized backscattering coefficients during rooting stage.  Cross polarized backscattering coefficients increased towards the heading stage (mid-Aug) and thereafter saturated, again increased near the harvesting season.

Results Temporal variations of backscattering coefficients at polarization and incident angle 30°~60° for the C-band Incident angle: 30 Incident angle: 40 heading Incident angle: 50 Incident angle: 60 This figure shows changes of backscattering coefficients at C-band during the growing period. The HH-polarized backscattering coefficients at all incident angles (except 20°) increased as growth advanced and saturate at the ripening stage.

Results Temporal variations of backscattering coefficients at polarization and incident angle 30°~60° for the X-band Incident angle: 30 Incident angle: 40 Heading heading Incident angle: 50 Incident angle: 60 This figure shows change in backscattering coefficients at X-band with growth   Backscattering coefficients of range at X-band lower than that of L-, C-band. HH-, VV-polarized σ° steadily increased toward panicle initiation stage and thereafter decreased, and again increased near the harvesting season. This dual-peak trend was clearer larger incident angles. Larger incident angles (over 50°) at cross-polarized σ° showed similar phenomena.   Fresh weight was decreased and heads of the canopy were easily show, so X-band as high frequency sensitive to heading or grain maturity after heading stage.

Results Relationship between backscattering coefficients at L-band and plant variables VV HH HV Incidentangle Plant height LAI Tfw (g/m2) Tdw 20 -0.93*** -0.81** -0.90*** -0.87*** -0.56* -0.20ns -0.37ns -0.32ns 0.21ns 0.38ns 0.29ns 0.32ns 25 -0.53* 0.24ns 0.44* 0.76** 0.85** 0.81** 30 -0.01ns 0.28ns 0.15ns 0.18ns -0.39ns -0.38ns -0.42* -0.40ns 0.91*** 0.77** 0.82** 35 -0.49* -0.63* -0.58* -0.62* 0.40ns 0.25ns 0.31ns 0.89*** 0.71** 0.80** 0.78** 40 0.58* 0.70* 0.68* 0.74** 0.73** 0.72** 0.86*** 45 0.92*** 0.87*** 0.94*** 0.90*** 50 0.63* 0.75** 0.97*** 0.98*** 55 0.62* 0.93*** 0.95*** 0.88*** 60 0.79** We conducted a correlation analysis between the backscattering coefficients from each band and plant variables such as LAI and biomass This table shows relationship between backscattering coefficients in L-band and rice growth parameters The highest correlation coefficients for LAI were found at the 50° with HH-polarization The VV polarization showed weak correlated with LAI the HH- and cross-polarization Biomass was highly correlated with larger than 50° of incident angles with hh and cross-polarization.

Results Relationship between backscattering coefficients at C-band and plant variables VV HH HV Incident angle Plant height LAI Tfw (g/m2) Tdw 20 -0.94*** -0.74*** -0.84** -0.83** -0.67* -0.76** -0.75** 0.81** 0.67* 0.74** 0.71** 25 0.72** 0.75** 0.48* 0.46* 0.96*** 0.92*** 0.95*** 30 0.82** 0.78** 0.86*** 0.83** 0.84*** 0.85** 0.94*** 35 0.70* 0.68* 0.93*** 0.84** 0.90*** 0.89*** 0.91*** 40 0.38ns 0.55* 0.50* 0.87*** 45 0.64* 0.56* 0.58* 0.88*** 50 0.76** 0.73** 55 60 0.44* 0.43* This table shows correlation coefficients between backscattering coefficients in C-band with plant variables. LAI was highly correlated with the C-band HH- and cross-polarization at incident angle over 45°

Results Relationship between backscattering coefficients at X-band and plant variables VV HH HV Incident angle Plant height LAI Tfw (g/m2) Tdw 20 0.26ns 0.41* 0.32ns 0.68* 0.63* 0.64* 0.80** 0.83** 0.82** 25 0.62* 0.70* 0.67* 0.72** 0.66* 0.73** 0.74** 30 0.46* 0.57* 0.54* 0.52* 0.84** 0.65* 0.75** 0.70** 0.69** 35 0.50* 0.61* 0.81** 0.86*** 0.85** 0.71** 0.79** 40 0.43* 0.55* 0.56* 45 0.33ns 0.45* 0.42* 0.40* 0.76** 50 0.23ns 0.29ns 0.28ns 0.24ns 0.77* 55 -0.10ns -0.20ns -0.13ns -0.18ns 60 -0.25ns -0.44* -0.36ns -0.41* 0.78** 0.77** This table shows relationship between backscattering coefficients in X-band and rice growth parameters X-band is weakly correlated with mass information of the whole canopy such as LAI, biomass at incident angles

Results Correlation between L-, C-, X-band backscattering coefficients and grain dry weight L-band C-band X-band Incident angle VV HH HV 20 -0.96*** -0.85** -0.64* -0.50* -0.19ns 0.26ns -0.54* -0.05ns 0.10ns 25 -0.97*** -0.74** 0.06ns -0.39ns -0.70* -0.33ns 0.35ns 0.56* 30 -0.78** 0.53* -0.55* -0.38ns 0.51* 0.31ns -0.45* 35 0.43* 0.72* -0.81** -0.32ns 0.27ns 0.60* -0.30ns -0.40* 40 0.61* 0.40* 0.66* -0.22ns -0.86*** 0.64* -0.36ns 45 0.75** 0.23ns 0.63* -0.83** -0.13ns 0.78** 0.39ns 0.45* 50 0.71* -0.67* 0.29ns -0.16ns -0.52* 0.93*** 0.55* 0.81** 55 0.58* -0.29ns 0.07ns 0.17ns -0.77** 0.89*** 0.70* 0.87*** 60 0.30ns 0.18ns -0.10ns 0.67* 0.88*** 0.74** This figures shows correlation analysis between backscattering coefficients in L-, C-, X-band and grain weight. X band backscattering coefficients close correlation with the grain weight (ultimately the grain yield). The highest correlations for each band were VV polarization at incident angle 50° (r=0.93) at X-band. Backscattering coefficients at 55° and 60° of incident angles with VV-polarization were also highly correlated with grain weight. Contrarily, other bands were weakly correlated with the grain weight at all incident angles (except L-VV, 45°). Rice head (upper surface of the canopy) is the major scattering for high-frequency microwaves.

Conclusions The temporal variations of the backscattering coefficients of the rice crop at L-, C-, X-band during rice growth period VV-polarized backscattering coefficients higher than hh-polarized backscattering coefficients in early rice growth stage HH-polarized backscattering coefficients higher than vv-polarized backscattering coefficients after panicle initiation stage Biomass was correlated with L-band HH-polarization at large incident angle LAI was highly correlated with the C-band HH- and cross-polarizations X-band were weakly correlated with LAI and biomass Grain weight was correlated with backscattering coefficient with X-band (at larger angle, vv-polarization) In conclusion Backscattering coefficients of rice crop were measured with a ground-based scatterometer. The measurement was carried out at L-, C-, and X-band with full polarizations and different incident angles. The temporal variations of the backscattering coefficients of the rice crop at L-, C-, and X-band during a rice growth period. At larger incident angles, range of backscattering coefficients were higher than that of small incident angle. VV polarization backscattering coefficients were higher than HH-polarized backscattering coefficients in early rice growth stage. We conducted the relationship between backscattering coefficients with L-, C-, and X-band and rice growth parameters. Biomass was correlated with L-band hh-polarization at a larger incident angle. LAI was highly correlated with C band hh- and cross-polarizations. Grain weight was correlated with backscattering coefficients with X-band VV polarization at a larger incidence angle. X-band was sensitive to grain maturity at near harvesting season.

Thank You !