CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Advertisements

21/05/2012LHC 8:30 meeting Overview Week 20 Injectors, LHCb polarity, Beam-Beam Coordinators: Bernhard Holzer, Jan Uythoven.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
Getting Beam to NuMI (It’s a worry!) Peter Kasper.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
LHC Beam Operation Comitte24. April INJECTION AND TRANSFER LINE STABILITY L.Drøsdal For the injection team.
Overview: Primary Sensitivities Nov S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Overview: NuMI Primary Beamline Sensitivities NuMI requirements are for a very large.
MTE vs CT D.Manglunki for BE/OP - pictures from M.Giovannozzi - details in “Fifty years of the CERN Proton Synchrotron (Vol I)” CERN
00:15: Stable beams fill 1883, 1.1E33 cm-2s-1.  Seems the 144 bunches beam 1 doe not fit properly on the injection kicker waveform. Systematically the.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
LHC Injection Sequencing MD 16/23/2009 Injection sequencing / BCM R, Giachino, B. Goddard, (D. Jacquet), V. Kain, M. Meddahi, J. Wenninger.
Orbit related issues of the spin tune control at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, M.Bai, W.MacKay, T.Roser.
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
07:00 Dump fil #2219, 123 pb -1 delivered. Trim TDI parking position to +/- 55 mm in the collimator BP trimmed the temperature kicker limit to 62 degrees.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
MPP Workshop: Injection System C. Bracco on behalf of ABT Acknowledgments: STI, ABP, BI,LHC and SPS OP.
HiRadMat Summary of Phase-I and plans for Phase-II commissioning J. Blanco, N. Conan, V. Kain, K. Cornelis, B. Goddard, C. Hessler, M. Meddahi, C. Theis,
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
Aperture measurements during LHC commissioning 2017
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
The TV Beam Observation system - BTV
Beam dump at 03:00:
Beam Loss and Radiation Working Group: Conclusions
SPS extraction, transfer lines, injection
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
LHC injection W. Bartmann, M.J. Barnes, C. Bracco, F. Burkart, E. Carlier, B. Goddard, V. Kain, R. Steerenberg, L. Stoel, F. Velotti, C. Wiesner, C. Xu.
Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.
CNGS Proton Beam: Introduction
FCC-hh injection group 7
Real-time orbit the LHC
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Thursday morning – optics correction
Machine availability reaching well over 80%
Monday – recovery from MKI flashover
Summary week 30 Week 30 R. Bailey & J. Wenninger
Use of Beam Loss Monitor type detectors in CNGS muon station
Interlocking of CNGS (and other high intensity beams) at the SPS
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Lost at 12:05 to power converter (RTQX2.R1) problem
Saturday 2/4/ :00-09:00 Problems with SPS:
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Planning at 5 o’clock meeting Friday
Wire almost entirely through beam before BLM triggers dump
Sunday
LHC Closed Orbit For Beam 2
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
CNGS Primary Beam Results
Monday 24 October hours of 25ns MD
Wednesday 10:00 test of the un-squeeze to 90 m at 4 TeV.
How to control the local beam density
Monday 8th December Morning used for RF work (IP z, injection), damper noise checks. Stable beams period with LHCb spectrometer OFF – lost beam after.
Machine protection and closed orbit
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2011
07/08/2010 Fill #1264 dump at 02:14:38.
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Thursday
Wednesday h18: 228b fill lost just before start of ramp.
Tuesday 6th April 8:00 Injection studies 16:00 RF studies
Tuesday
TT40 incident at 23:46 on 25th October 2004
Beam Stability of the LHC Beam Transfer Line TI 8
Tuesday
Presentation transcript:

CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010 J. Wenninger

Beam Intensity The SPS beam intensity per extraction reached ~ 21013 p end of May, when MTE was stopped. Number of extractions: 2.142 million ! Total intensity on T40 : 4.041 x 1019 p Presently the intensity is limited by: Losses in the PS SPS RF (no margin). Typical transmission of the CNGS beam through the SPS cycle ~ 95%. Injection losses ~ 6%. MTE

SPS Extraction Before extraction the SPS beam is bumped out by ~ 31 mm to approach the magnetic septum. SPS beam position stability before extraction at 400 GeV ~ 1 mm over a run, dominated by systematic effects. The extraction point was readjusted twice (~ mm). Interlock reference 30.5 mm Interlock tolerance ± 2 mm Error : rms spread

Extraction Losses To minimize activation of the extraction channel and radiation levels in ECA4, the beam gap must be as clean as possible. The gap is kept clean using the injection kicker (cleaning during the second injection). In 2010 the losses on the absorber protecting the septum (TPSG) were similar to 2008-9, below 5 mGray for a good fraction of the run. 5 mGray corresponds to ~ 5109 p lost on the septa, i.e. 0.025% of the extracted batch intensity. The integrated loss on the septa in 2010 is 8.8 kGray or 8.81016 p (0.022% of the total intensity on T40). 205 extractions (0.019%) triggered a beam dump by the BLMs (above threshold). Interlock threshold 50 mGray Error : rms spread

Extraction BLM Interlocks Interlocks due to losses in the extraction channel are not randomly distributed, but occur in ‘burst’. They are usually related to problems with the CPS leading to poor capture and beam presence in the kicker gaps. 205 extractions triggered a BLM interlock in 2010.

TT41 reference trajectory Peak excursion at +- 3 mm in TT40.

TT40-TT41 Trajectory For most position monitors the rms position change over the entire run was only 0.1-0.2 mm. For some monitors the spread is larger, but it is due to : fluctuations of the dp/p error for the H plane, affecting BPMs at places of large dispersion. one important trajectory re-steering for both planes. Error : rms spread

Alignment TT41 QD4105 Large misalignment wrt 2007 survey (red) in the region 4102-4105.

Reference Trajectory Horizontal and vertical reference trajectory with corrector settings. In V the corrector No. 4, MDGV.4105, that was at the limit in 2009 is now operated at ~0 kick. >> good realignment!

Target Beam Position The position stability of the extracted beam was excellent, ~50 mm in H and 70 mm in V over the entire run. No active position feedback is necessary, 1-2 small steerings / week are sufficient ! V Extr 1 H Extr 1 Beam position on the last BPM in front of the target V Extr 2 H Extr 2

Target Beam Position The position difference extr2 – extr1 has a significantly lower RMS than the raw distributions – beam positions are correlated between the 2 extractions. In the vertical plane the rms corresponds to the BPM resolution.

Target Beam Position The beam position on target for extraction 1 and 2 are strongly correlated – as indicated by the small rms for extr2-extr1 (previous slide). In the vertical plane the beam position jumps by 0.2 mm at the end of the MTE period (higher I?). Note the steering is done to center the beam on the muon detectors. Error : rms spread

Red line is the interlock threshold Transfer Line Losses The transfer of the beam to the target is extremely clean and losses are rare – losses are concentrated in the extraction channel (septum). The higher losses on BLMs No. 19+20 correspond to the collimator in front of T40. Red line is the interlock threshold TT40 TT41

Collimator Losses The typical loss on the collimator in front of T40 are ~3 mGray.

Kicker References MKP injection settings for CNGS (kick = 49.2 kV) Delay (us) Length (us) Date Comment 1 83.7 11.0 21.04 Startup MTE 2 83.5 11.2 75.6 25.05 CT 75.3 The second kick is advanced and lengthened in order to clean the beam gap. MKE4 extraction settings for CNGS (kick = 50 kV) Extraction Delay (us) Length (us) Date Comment 1 72.0 11.5 21.04.2010 Startup MTE 71,85 30.04.2010 MTE / CT 2 59.55 12.6 59.5