Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
LIGO-G D 1 Toward Enabling Co-Located Interferometric Detectors to Provide Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background Nick Fotopoulos,
GWDAW9 – Annecy December 15-18, 2004 A. Di Credico Syracuse University LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses.
LIGO- G Z Optimally Combining the Hanford Interferometer Strain Channels Albert Lazzarini LIGO Laboratory Caltech S. Bose, P. Fritschel, M. McHugh,
LIGO-G W Report on LIGO Science Run S4 Fred Raab On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z External Triggers Circulation only within LIGO I authorship list Status of the Triggered Burst Search (highlights from LIGO DCC# T Z,
July 13, 2007 Robert Ward, Caltech LIGO-G Z 1 Robert Ward for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Amaldi 7 Sydney, Australia July 2007 A Radiometer.
ALLEGRO G Z LSC, Livingston 23 March, Calibration for the ALLEGRO resonant detector -- S2 and S4 Martin McHugh, Loyola University New Orleans.
Brennan Ireland Rochester Institute of Technology Astrophysical Sciences and Technology December 5, 2013 LIGO: Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
LIGO-G W Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Stackslide search for continuous gravitational.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford G Directional Stochastic Search: a Gravitational Wave Radiometer Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts.
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
Observing the Bursting Universe with LIGO: Status and Prospects Erik Katsavounidis LSC Burst Working Group 8 th GWDAW - UWM Dec 17-20, 2003.
Status of stochastic background’s joint data analysis by Virgo and INFN resonant bars G. Cella (INFN Pisa) For Auriga-ROG-Virgo collaborations Prepared.
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Silvia Poggi - GW burst detection strategy in non-homogeneus networks Detection strategies for bursts in networks of non-homogeneus gravitational waves.
A coherent null stream consistency test for gravitational wave bursts Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
10/23/2006 Stefan Ballmer, Caltech G Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves For the stochastic analysis group Stefan Ballmer California.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LIGO- G D Gravitational Wave Observations with Interferometers: Results and Prospects Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2 nd.
29 November 2001 LIGO-G Z PAC 11, LIGO Hanford Observatory 1 Proposal to NSF from Loyola University New Orleans RUI: Search for a stochastic background.
LIGO-G D Upper Limits on the Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves from LIGO Vuk Mandic Einstein2005 Conference Paris, July
LIGO-G E 06 May 2003Lazzarini - LIGO Science Seminar 1 Search implementation for the gravitational wave stochastic background applied to the S1.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
LIGO- G Z Optimally Combining the Hanford Interferometer Strain Channels - II Albert Lazzarini LIGO Laboratory Caltech S. Bose, P. Fritschel,
LIGO-G v2 The Search For Continuous Gravitational Waves Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration The.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO- G Z 11/13/2003LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 BlockNormal Performance Studies John McNabb & Keith Thorne, for the Penn State University.
LIGO-G Z 20 August, 2002 LSC meeting, LIGO Hanford Observatory 1 ALLEGRO data during E7 Presenter: Martin McHugh Orientation GPS UTC IGEC alignment.
LIGO- G D Results from the LIGO Science Runs Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
All-sky LIGO Search for Periodic Gravitational Waves in the Fourth Science Run (S4) Keith Riles University of Michigan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO Insert Name of the Meeting KAWABE K., 2006/Apr/25 APS Meeting Dallas, W DCC: LIGO-G Z Coherent searches for periodic gravitational.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Analysis of LIGO S2 data for GWs from isolated pulsars
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
A.M. Sintes for the pulgroup
GW Data Analysis (from an experimentalist’s point of view)
Bounding the strength of a Stochastic GW Background in LIGO’s S3 Data
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
Albert Lazzarini California Institute of Technology
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
Towards the first coherent multi-ifo search for NS binaries in LIGO
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Update on LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
ALLEGRO calibration for the LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Gravitational radiation from known radio pulsars using LIGO data
Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team
Presentation transcript:

Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO Martin McHugh Loyola University New Orleans on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LSU-ALLEGRO group LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

Outline Stochastic background searches Features of the LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis Calibrated response of the ALLEGRO detector LIGO S2 science run data Expected sensitivity from S2 data LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

Stochastic background searches Set of unresolved gravitational wave sources Cosmological or astrophysical in origin Characterized by Search strategy -- look for correlations between two gravitational wave detectors Assume background is isotropic, gaussian, stationary and _ over the frequency band of the measurement Assume instrument noise is uncorrelated between detectors Optimally filtered cross-correlation statistic LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

Stochastic background searches Optimal filter Weighted by the noise in each detector  is the frequency dependent overlap reduction function Optimal for given GW spectrum LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

LLO - ALLEGRO correlation Key features: Ability to modulate the signal – rotate to align/misalign antenna patterns -- get direct measure of non-GW correlations. Aligned orientation at 40km separation gives overlap near unity up to kHz frequencies -- higher range than LLO-LHO (sensitive band of resonant detector is limiting factor) 40 km apart, explore PEM correlations at intermediate distances *Modulating the experimental signature of a stochastic gravitational wave background, Finn and Lazzarini Phys. Rev. D 64, 082002 (2001)

L1 A1 LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

Overview of technique Start with A1, L1 time domain data streams A1 signal is heterodyned in hardware reference frequency 899Hz for S2 different sampling rates 250 samples/sec for A1 - complex time series, 16384 samples/sec, downsampled to 2048 for L1 Frequency domain Equal time stretches give same frequency resolution match bins over appropriate frequency band 774Hz-1024Hz for A1 0-1024Hz for L1 LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

Calibration of A1 data This analysis is a fully coherent search, combining bar and interferometer data For event list based burst searches, a full phase consistent response function of the detector is not required New calibration code needed for this analysis LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

Signal path h z[i] x xI R(f) xQ H(f) Heterodyne Bar response DAQ and Low-pass F(f) DAQ 250 samps/s xQ Feedback Damping (weak) H(f) 899Hz reference oscillator GPS clock LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

ALLEGRO S2 data LIGO S2 run -- Feb 14-Apr 14, 2003 -- is only science run for which ALLEGRO was operational Bar was operational for roughly half of S2 ~180 hrs coincident with LIGO science segments made two rotations ~101hrs in misaligned null orientation ~45.5 hrs aligned with ifo Yarm ~33 hrs aligned with if Xarm Current status of S2 analysis Preliminary calibration for bar data calibration applied to 58x600 second playground segments Matlab analysis pipeline in place, have run playground jobs LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

Frequency domain optimal filter LIGO ALLEGRO GR17, Dublin LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004

Expected S2 sensitivity Over band 850Hz-950Hz, for ~75 hrs of aligned data (SNR=1), the projected sensitivity from the noise curves gives Corresponds to gravitational waves with amplitude noise spectral density of (for flat GW this is a f -3/2 spectrum -- nearly constant over narrow band) LIGO-G040304-00-Z GR17, Dublin 23 July , 2004