Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
The Pore Structure of the Closed RyR1 Channel
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Subunit Folds and Maturation Pathway of a dsRNA Virus Capsid
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
The Pore Structure of the Closed RyR1 Channel
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Solution Structures of Engineered Vault Particles
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Structural Insights into the COP9 Signalosome and Its Common Architecture with the 26S Proteasome Lid and eIF3  Radoslav I. Enchev, Anne Schreiber, Fabienne.
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Katharina Hipp, Clemens Grimm, Holger Jeske, Bettina Böttcher 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Structure and Mechanism of Imidazoleglycerol-Phosphate Dehydratase
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Huiying Li, Michael R. Sawaya, F. Robert Tabita, David Eisenberg 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains
Structural Role of the Vps4-Vta1 Interface in ESCRT-III Recycling
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Topologies of a Substrate Protein Bound to the Chaperonin GroEL
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 749-758 (May 2009) Structural Mechanism of SDS-Induced Enzyme Activity of Scorpion Hemocyanin Revealed by Electron Cryomicroscopy  Yao Cong, Qinfen Zhang, David Woolford, Thorsten Schweikardt, Htet Khant, Matthew Dougherty, Steven J. Ludtke, Wah Chiu, Heinz Decker  Structure  Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 749-758 (May 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.03.005 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of 24-mer Scorpion Hc (A and B) Typical 300 kV image of ice-embedded Hc in the resting/activated state recorded in a JEM3200FSC electron cryomicroscope. Representative particles are highlighted by white boxes. Scale bar, 245 Å. (C and D) Top view of Hc in the resting/activated state at a threshold corresponding to Hc molecular weight. Different subunits are illustrated in different colors, and labeled. The resolution is 6.8 Å and 8.0 Å for resting and activated states, respectively. The dotted circles highlight the new bridging densities absent/formed in the resting/activated state. The four hexamers are labeled as 1, 2, 1′, and 2′. Two-fold symmetry was imposed in the reconstruction. Scale bar in (D) represents 60 Å, which is applicable for (C)–(H). (E and F) Hexamer three-fold view of Hc in resting/activated state. (G and H) Bottom bow-tie view of Hc in resting/activate state. Structure 2009 17, 749-758DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.03.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Model of a Hc Monomer (A) SSEs of the linker subunit C1 in the resting state identified by SSEHunter. Eleven α helices longer than two turns (cyan cylinders) and three large β sheets (green surfaces) have been identified in this subunit. (B) SSEs of the same subunit C1 in the activated state. Ten α helices (orange cylinders) and three β sheets (pink surfaces) are identified. (C and D) Pseudoatomic model of C1 subunit fitted into the corresponding map of the resting/activated state where blue/yellow coloring represents the resting/activated state. The same color scheme is utilized in the rest of the figures. Structure 2009 17, 749-758DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.03.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Conformational Variations among the 12 Subunits within an Asymmetric Unit (A) 3D variance map (purple) among the 12 subunit map segments within an asymmetric unit of the resting state illustrating their conformational variations. The variance map is shown in the frame of the corresponding average map, with a model in light blue ribbon shown to orient the figure. Notably, domain I (highlighted by dotted circle) as a whole shows more pronounced variation than the other two domains. Overall, the outer exposed area tends to have more variations as compared with the interior, especially at the intersubunit-contacting regions indicated by arrowheads (brown, blue, and red). (B) Variance map among the 12 subunits within an asymmetric unit of the activated state with the same visualization style and labels as in (A). Structure 2009 17, 749-758DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.03.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conformational Variations between the Two Biochemical States (A) Conformational variation analysis using deduced SSEs of subunit C1 of the two states (as in Figure 2A and 2B, same color code adopted), which are aligned together and illustrated in the frame of the resting state map. The black dotted circle highlights the domain I region. Black arrows show the twisting direction of domain I as induced by SDS activation. The cyan and magenta spheres illustrate the putative locations of the Cu and oxygen atoms forming the active site. (B) Cα movement between the averaged models of the two states, mapped onto the activated state averaged Cα model. Red illustrates larger variance (Cα movement 3.8 Å and larger); blue illustrates smaller variance. (C) The aligned averaged Cα models of resting state (light blue) and activated state (gold). The same illustration style as in (A) is adopted (dotted circle, black arrow, and active site). Location of the Cα of the placeholder residue PHE49 is illustrated using blue (resting state) and red (activated state) spheres. (D) Zoom-in view of the active site with solid line circle illustrating the location of the loop region containing PHE49, which also connects to one of the domain I α helices (indicated by black straight arrow). The small curved arrow indicates the moving direction of PHE49 as a result of SDS activation. Structure 2009 17, 749-758DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.03.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Connecting Bridges in the Interdodecamer Interface (A) Overall view of the four bridges (three types) in the interface between hexamers 1 and 2′ in the resting state. The visualization angle and location with respect to the entire Hc complex are illustrated using a small reference panel in the middle column. (B) View of the four interaction bridges at the same location as in (A), but for the activated state. Maps for both states are visualized at a threshold corresponding to the molecular mass of Hc. (C and D) Bridge IV (front bridge) formed across the central cavity connecting the opposite linker subunits C1 and C1′ in the activated state, whereas no such bridge exists in the resting state, as illustrated in (C). The red stars in (C) and (D) indicate the conformational change loop regions involved in the formation of bridge IV due to activation. (E and F) Bridge V (back bridge) in the activated state across the central cavity connecting the N-terminal ends of the opposite two linker subunits C1 and C1′. The black arrows in (E) and (F) point to the N-terminal ends of subunits C1 and C1′. This bridge is extremely weak and almost invisible in the resting state (E). Structure 2009 17, 749-758DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.03.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions