The Effect of Improved Manure Management on Water Quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
Advertisements

Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Hybrid Presentation By Bob Watson & Larry Stone. Hybrid Presentation In recent years at the Annual Wastewater Conference the EPA, DNR, IDALS, USDA, ISU.
Effects of Conservation Tillage Systems on Dissolved Phosphorus Dr. David Baker Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio November 15, 2012 Davenport, IA.
Essex Region Conservation Authority Brad Arsenault & Kaylyn Boyd.
SRWC Current Programs and Efforts July 24, 2013 Heidelberg University NCWQR Grant Team Mtg. SRWC Current Programs and Efforts July 24, 2013 Heidelberg.
Preparing for the Rainy Season SFWMD Operations & Actions.
Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters What has been Happening in Lake Erie? Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems.
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Indiana Confined Feeding Operations Permit Program Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Review of the 2009 Snowmelt and Rain Streamflow Forecasts & Snow Survey Advisory Team Ron Abramovich, Hydrologist Water Supply Specialist USDA Natural.
Reducing phosphorus emissions: Why voluntary programs struggle and market-based instruments are likely to work best Brent Sohngen (OSU)
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
Chris M. Kapheim General Manager May 5, AID Groundwater Map.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
LAKE OHRID MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA Experiences with Nutrient Management and Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
2 -1 Lesson 2 Whole Farm Nutrient Planning By Rick Koelsch, University of Nebraska.
BMP CHALLENGE Experience: Cannon River Watershed Partnership Information provided by: Dave Legvold Executive Director Cannon River Watershed Partnership.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.
Private Lands Voluntary Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin Vicki Anderson Great Lakes Coordinator.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Solving Water Pollution Problems in the Wakulla Springshed The City of Tallahassee’s Efforts to Reduce Stormwater Pollution Hydrogeology Workshop May 12-13,
Protecting and saving water. Partnership Overview Who we are Our accomplishments Our challenges Our priorities.
Priority Agricultural Areas Locally designated areas targeted for continued, expanded, and/or intensified agricultural activities Designated Farmland Preservation.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
Susan Sylvester Department Director Operations Control Department Mechanics of the Primary Water Management System.
Jim Stockinger, Erin Eid, Jennifer Maloney and Mike Trojan
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
1 AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION REDUCTION ACTIVITY Financed by USAID APRA ROMANIA PROJECT Project implemented by: Assistance project for MAFWE International Resources.
Prepared by the Falls and Jordan Lake Watershed Oversight Committees John Huisman - DWQ & Julie Henshaw - DSWC.
4R Tomorrow Nutrient Stewardship “ Doing RIGHT today, 4R Tomorrow!” Ohio SWCDs are Working Together to Improve the Quality of Life for All Ohioans! *Photo.
Draft Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Investment Strategy
Amy Walkenbach, Illinois EPA- Watershed Management Section
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
EVALUATING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT APPROACHES IN THE LAKE ERIE BASIN AND KEY LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE LAKE ERIE WATERSHED Ohio Stormwater.
Mulberry River Watershed
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Department of Environmental Quality
John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision
Lower Rio Grande Valley Stormwater Conference
Update on Lake Erie Nutrient and Algal Issues
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Creating Partnerships: EPA R8, NRCS, and States
Current VA Ag Initiatives
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
Annual Agriculture Progress Reports Tar-Pamlico / Neuse / Falls Lake
Georgia Agricultural Metering Program
Annual Agriculture Progress Reports Neuse & Tar-Pamlico River Basins
Watershed Management Plan Citizens Advisory Committee April 18, 2011
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
Registering County PAT & FACT Meetings
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Annual Agriculture Progress Reports Neuse & Tar-Pamlico River Basins
VOLUNTARY CONSERVATION- WORKING? STRENGTHEN PARTNERSHIPS?
Water & Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association March 22, 2017
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
October 29, 2018 Terry Lauritsen, P.E.
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Presentation transcript:

The Effect of Improved Manure Management on Water Quality Nicole Hawk District Administrator/Education Specialist, Mercer SWCD Terry Mescher Agricultural Engineer, Ohio Department of Agriculture

Grand Lake St. Marys Located in West-Central Ohio Built in the late 1830’s and early 1840’s Reservoir to supply water to the Miami-Erie Canal

Grand Lake St. Marys Watershed - 58,000 acres Lake Area Originally - 17,000 acres Currently - 12,500 acres Lake Characteristics Shallow, 6’–8’ deep Internal loading Long detention time

Grand Lake – Watershed Row crop agricultural area with intensive livestock production Challenges Manure Management Nutrient Management Others

Water Quality Issues History of water quality issues prior to the 1960’s 2010 – Historic algal blooms across the entire lake ODNR “closes” the lake to recreational traffic State of Ohio drafts and implements ‘Distressed Watershed Rules’

Distressed Watershed Rules Rule package focused on livestock production facilities and manure application practices within the watershed Rules address 2 primary focus areas Manure Storage & Application Requirements Nutrient Management Planning

Distressed Watershed Rules Manure Application No manure application from Dec 15 through March 1 each year No surface application of manure on frozen or snow covered ground – Must incorporate No surface application if weather forecast indicates >50% chance of precipitation exceeding ½” or more All of the setbacks and recommendations in NRCS’s Nutrient Management Standard (590) are required

Distressed Watershed Rules Nutrient Management Planning Producers must develop a nutrient management plan (currently all producers have developed a CNMP) Plans must be approved by the Local SWCD & by the Director of Agriculture Plans are updated every 3 years Plan requires current soil tests and annual manure analysis Plan must show proper utilization of all phosphorus and nitrogen – from both manure and fertilizer

Water Quality Heidelberg University installed monitoring station on Chickasaw Creek in 2008 Water quality and quantity data is collected up to 3 times per day Monitoring data includes: Suspended Solids Nitrate Nitrogen; Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Particulate Phosphorus; Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus Other

Understanding The Data Pre / Post – refers to implementation of Distressed Watershed Rules Flow – divides channel flow into 3 equal flow ranges Regulatory period Dec 15 through March 1 Non-Regulatory period March 1 through Dec 15 Nutrient levels given in average concentration for the given flow

Total Suspended Solids 23% Reduction 29% Reduction 36% Reduction

Nitrate 32% Reduction 16% Reduction 41% Reduction 19% Reduction

Particulate Phosphorus 46% Reduction 12% Reduction 55% Reduction 57% Reduction 13% Reduction

Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus 48% Reduction 18% Reduction 28% Reduction

Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus 44% Increase 48% Reduction

Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus Loading & Timing Moderate Increase Moderate Increase Drastic Increase

In Simpler Terms… Total Suspended Solids – Reduced approximately 25% Particulate Phosphorus – Reduced approximately 26% Soluble Reactive Phosphorus – Reduced approximately 3% Nitrate Nitrogen - Reduced approximately 31% Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen - Reduced approximately 26%

Role of the Conservation District Provide voluntary assistance to producers Serve as the primary source of information in the watershed on efforts to improve water quality Use all of the “tools in the box” to get conservation on the ground Work with producers to be “shelf ready” for when funding is available to assist with the installation of conservation practices on the farm

Lessons Learned Honesty, Consistency and Communication are key Balance voluntary conservation with regulatory role – If it’s difficult to discuss, it’s important to discuss Build relationship / trust with producers Partnerships are critical - Bring your strengths and connections to the table Agree to Disagree

Take Away Messages Maintain constant communication Schedule regular updates with political and agency officials as well as your critics Don’t assume that others know what you have accomplished – TELL YOUR STORY! Keep all stakeholders and the public up-to-date on successes and challenges Utilize traditional and social media Highlight conservation efforts to other watersheds

nicole.hawk@mercercountyohio.org terry.mescher@agri.ohio.gov Questions nicole.hawk@mercercountyohio.org terry.mescher@agri.ohio.gov