Stress Analysis of Universal Tilt Kit Attachment Points

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The sandwich effect Lecture 6.
Advertisements

August 2007 LS-DYNA Cargo Net Simulation 1 of 10 Industry standard cargo nets. The nets are made from 1.75” wide nylon or polyester webbing with nominal.
FEA of Vehicle Front Stabilizer Bar & Airfoil Design (Final Project) Name: Antonio Sevilla & Sanh Si Course: ME 272 FEA Professor: Jose Granda Date:
Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. Figure 1 Thermoelastic Analysis in Design William Bell & Paul-W. Young Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. John Stewart,
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
Beams and Frames.
CUFSM Advanced Functions
Linear Buckling Workshop 7. Workshop Supplement Linear Buckling August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS7-2 Workshop 7 - Goals The goal in this workshop is.
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
Mechanics of Materials II
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.Smarter decisions, better products. What’s New Femap /
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Mechanics of Elastic Materials
Suitability of a structure or machine may depend on the deformations in the structure as well as the stresses induced under loading. Statics analyses.
SHEAR AND BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAMS IN HORIZONTAL BEAMS WITH
The Effects of Engineering Assumptions when Designing a Plate Panel/Stiffener System Under a Uniformly Distributed Load Bernard Nasser Master of Engineering.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project 1x4 Grid Lift Fixture Weld Analysis September 19, 2003 Youssef Ismail.
Load Resistance – The Structural Properties of Materials Chapter 4.
05/04/05 FEM Analysis of PA 44 Engine Mount PIPER SEMINOLE –PA-44 TWIN ENGINE AIRCRAFT.
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Overview of Mechanical Engineering for Non-MEs Part 2: Mechanics of Materials 6 Introduction – Concept of Stress.
Vacuum Vessel lateral loading (Neutral beam port only)
ME 612 Metal Forming and Theory of Plasticity
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Task 2.2 – Identification of most suitable face-sheets and optimization of panel properties Duration: month 1 to month 12 Partners involved: MOTULAB (WP.
Mechanical Properties of Materials
Finite Element Analysis of the18 Turn Beam H. F. Fan November 5, 2004.
Model: Elasto-Plastic Plate. Introduction This model treats the elastic-plastic material behavour of a plate with a centered hole. The development of.
Engineering I – Statics. Test the Strength of Structural Members To design a structure, an engineer must be able to determine the strengths of the structural.
Beams - structural members supporting loads at various points along the member. Transverse loadings of beams are classified as concentrated loads or distributed.
Engineering Analysis October 23, 2006 Team Moondogs Chris Culver Rahul Kirtikar Elias Krauklis Christopher Sampson Michael Widerquist.
Andrew Biehl.  The objective of this project is to develop a method for determining the nut factor of a bolted joint using the finite element method.
Finite-Element Analysis
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
Mechanics of Elastic Materials. Why study mechanics? Useful for the analysis and design of load-bearing structures, such as: buildings bridges space shuttles.
Structural Integrity UNDERSTAND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH OF LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS IN MECHANICAL SYSTEM.
Engg College Tuwa Mechanics of Solids.( ) Presented by: PARMAR CHETANKUMAR VIKRAMSINH PARMAR NILESHKUMAR NATVARLAL PARMAR.
4. Local strength calculation
Bolt Pretension with Contact. Nonlinear Structural Analysis Goals Goal: – In this workshop our goal is to investigate the behavior of the pipe clamp assembly.
Material Properties and Forces. Centroid Principles Object’s center of gravity or center of mass. Graphically labeled as.
Unit 31: Force, deformation and failure Dr
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Concept of Stress.
SiD Muon Yoke Structure - Deformation Studies -
10 Columns.
Date of download: 12/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
BDA30303 Solid Mechanics II.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Chapter 3 Buckling of Column SAIFULNIZAN JAMIAN.
Stress Analysis on SunSiphon Rack Design
Material Properties and Forces
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Unit 31: Force, deformation and failure Dr
10 Columns.
Unit 31: Force, deformation and failure Dr
Unit 31: Force, deformation and failure Dr
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Mechanical properties of metals Stress and Strain in metals
Concept of Stress.
Nastran FEA Frequency Response Function for Base Input Revision B
Presentation transcript:

Stress Analysis of Universal Tilt Kit Attachment Points Project: Stress analysis of Universal Tilt Kit attachment points under worse case hurricane loading (500 lbf per attachment point). Modeling Assumptions and Details: A finite element analysis (FEA) model was constructed based on geometry provided by the Kineo Design group. The attachment point structures for the solar panel were idealized using 8-node brick elements, beam elements for the bolts and rigid links for the bolt attachments. An additional plate model was constructed to investigate the stress and buckling behavior of the rear support leg. A high-strength aluminum material model was used for all structures with a yield stress of 30,000 psi and an ultimate tensile stress of 36,000 psi at an elongation of 6% at failure. A nonlinear analysis was performed due a slight overload condition. It was assumed that the material yielded at 30,000 psi and would fail at 36,000 psi after a plastic elongation of 6%. A 500 lbf load was applied via an aluminum extrusion section of the solar panel frame. Symmetry was exploited and half-symmetric section of the structure was analyzed using a total load of 250 lbf. The Eigenvalue buckling analysis was performed on the Rear Extension Leg with the 500 lbf downward load since an uplift load would not cause buckling. Units used for this analysis are lbf, sec, in. Stress results are presented in psi and deflection in inches. All modeling work was done with FEMAP V9.3.1 and analyzed using NX Nastran V5.0.mp1 Summary: Stress results for the SunEarth Universal Tilt Kit adaptors (front and rear) indicate that they will support the one-time application of a 500 lbf load in the uplift and downward directions. A minor amount (less than 1%) of plastic yielding is indicated but the Adaptors structural integrity remains intact. An Eigenvalue buckling analysis of the Rear Adaptor Extension Leg indicates a buckling factor in excess of 5x of the applied load. As such, buckling of the leg is not predicted.

FEA Model Background

Rear Adaptor Front Adaptor Geometry for SunEarth-Kineo Design Universal Tilt Kit. The front and rear adaptors are shown that comprise the “Universal Tilt Kit”.

500 lbf load is evenly distributed over this extrusion segment 500 lbf load is evenly distributed over this extrusion segment. The same load pattern was used for the Rear Adaptor. View of the Front Adaptor. The Rear Adaptor has a similar configuration. The geometries are half-symmetric. The load is assumed to be aligned with the solar panel extrusion.

The structure was held vertically by cylindrical constraints appled along the bottom of the hole: Loads are shown for the Front Adaptor model. The half-symmetric model uses a distributed load of 250 lbf over the section of the solar panel extrusion. Beam elements are used to model the bolted connections.

Local coordinate system for solar panel extrusion. The constraint set is uses locally defined coordinate systems to enforce specific constraint actions. The solar panel is assumed to be fixed in the Z-direction within its local coordinate system. That is, the solar panel is rigid and does not move along its normal axis (z-direction). At the base of the Adaptor, local coordinate systems defined the constraints for rigid bolts.

The Rear Adaptor used the same load and constraint setup.

The Rear Adaptor used the same load and constraint setup.

The Rear Adaptor support leg was also analyzed for stress and buckling The Rear Adaptor support leg was also analyzed for stress and buckling. A simple plate model was constructed and analyzed using an Eigenvalue buckling analysis.

Stress Results for Front Adaptor under 500 lbf Load: Rev-0 Analysis Notes: Stress results are presented for the 500 lbf uplift and 500 lbf downward load cases. A nonlinear analysis was performed to allow the adaptor to slightly plastically deform around high stress regions. Stress results are presented in lbf/in2 and deflections are in inches. The deformation of the structure has been scaled by10x to better visualize the deflection behavior of the Adaptor under the various wind loads.

The maximum von Mises stress is 30,482 psi The maximum von Mises stress is 30,482 psi. This stress indicates a very minor amount of plastic yielding has occurred within the structure. Considering that the load case is assumed to be a peak, one-time load (hurracaine force event), this amount of plastic yielding is acceptable.

Another view of the uplift load case. The deflection is scaled by 10x.

Another view of the uplift load case with the extraneous parts removed from the graphics view.

This analysis has the load reversed and the solar panel extrusion is pushing down on the Front Adapter with a force of 500 lbf (250 lbf via symmetry). The maximum von Mises stress is 30,351 psi.

The maximum von Mises stress is 20,972 psi in the main structural components under the 500 lbf downward load.

Stress Results for Rear Adaptor under 500 lbf Load: Rev-0 Analysis Notes: Stress results are presented for the 500 lbf uplift and 500 lbf downward load cases. A nonlinear analysis was performed to allow the adaptor to slightly plastically deform around high stress regions. Stress results are presented in lbf/in2 and deflections are in inches. The deformation of the structure has been scaled by10x to better visualize the deflection behavior of the Adaptor under the various wind loads.

The maximum von Mises stress is 30,720 psi under the 500 lbf upward lift load. The deflection has been scaled by 10x.

Side view. The deflection has been scaled by 10x.

The maximum von Mises stress is 30,723 psi in the main structural components under the 500 lbf upward lift load.

The maximum von Mises stress is 30,415 psi under the 500 lbf downward load. The deflection has been scaled by 10x.

Side view.

The maximum von Mises stress is 30,056 is the main structural component.

Stress Results for Rear Adaptor Extension Leg under 500 lbf Load: Rev-0 Analysis Notes: Stress and Eigenvalue buckling results are presented for the 500 lbf downward load case. The 500 lbf uplift load case does not pose a structural challenge for the Extension Leg. Stress results are presented in lbf/in2 and deflections are in inches.

The maximum von Mises stress is 20,836 psi under the 500 lbf downward load.

The maximum von Mises stress is 20,836 psi is located in the bolted extrusion section.

The maximum von Mises stress is 11,629 psi in the section leg.

The Eigenvalue buckling mode is 6. 63x500 lbf The Eigenvalue buckling mode is 6.63x500 lbf. That is, buckling would occur somewhere about 3,000 lbf.

The second Eigenvalue buckling mode is at 7. 48 The second Eigenvalue buckling mode is at 7.48. It is presented just for completeness.

Appendix Executing Engineer Certification

Executing Engineer Certification

All work within this report was done by George Laird, Ph.D., P.E.