Correlations and Copulas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copula Representation of Joint Risk Driver Distribution
Advertisements

Modeling of Data. Basic Bayes theorem Bayes theorem relates the conditional probabilities of two events A, and B: A might be a hypothesis and B might.
Credit Risk Plus.
Introduction CreditMetrics™ was launched by JP Morgan in 1997.
Sampling: Final and Initial Sample Size Determination
Chapter 21 Value at Risk Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 8th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2012.
The VaR Measure Chapter 8
Chapter 21 Value at Risk Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 8th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2012.
Introduction Data and simula- tion methodology VaR models and estimation results Estimation perfor- mance analysis Conclusions Appendix Doctoral School.
RISK VALUATION. Risk can be valued using : Derivatives Valuation –Using valuation method –Value the gain Risk Management Valuation –Using statistical.
Multivariate distributions. The Normal distribution.
Visual Recognition Tutorial
Chapter 20 Basic Numerical Procedures
Chapter 23 Credit Risk Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 8th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2012.
FRM Zvi Wiener Following P. Jorion, Financial Risk Manager Handbook Financial Risk Management.
Descriptive statistics Experiment  Data  Sample Statistics Experiment  Data  Sample Statistics Sample mean Sample mean Sample variance Sample variance.
© K. Cuthbertson, D. Nitzsche FINANCIAL ENGINEERING: DERIVATIVES AND RISK MANAGEMENT (J. Wiley, 2001) K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche Lecture Credit Risk.
Volatility Chapter 9 Risk Management and Financial Institutions 2e, Chapter 9, Copyright © John C. Hull
Value at Risk (VaR) Chapter IX.
Correlations and Copulas Chapter 10 Risk Management and Financial Institutions 2e, Chapter 10, Copyright © John C. Hull
Market Risk VaR: Historical Simulation Approach
Lecture II-2: Probability Review
CREDIT RISK. CREDIT RATINGS  Rating Agencies: Moody’s and S&P  Creditworthiness of corporate bonds  In the S&P rating system, AAA is the best rating.
Credit Risk Chapter 20.
Correlations and Copulas 1. Measures of Dependence 2 The risk can be split into two parts: the individual risks and the dependence structure between them.
Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives 6 th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull Chapter 18 Value at Risk.
Value at Risk.
Lecture 7: Simulations.
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 2e, Chapter 13, Copyright © John C. Hull 2009 Chapter 13 Market Risk VaR: Model- Building Approach 1.
Alternative Measures of Risk. The Optimal Risk Measure Desirable Properties for Risk Measure A risk measure maps the whole distribution of one dollar.
The Oxford Guide to Financial Modeling by Ho & Lee Chapter 15. Risk Management The Oxford Guide to Financial Modeling Thomas S. Y. Ho and Sang Bin Lee.
Chapter 14 Monte Carlo Simulation Introduction Find several parameters Parameter follow the specific probability distribution Generate parameter.
Elements of Financial Risk Management Second Edition © 2012 by Peter Christoffersen 1 Distributions and Copulas for Integrated Risk Management Elements.
1 Value at Risk Chapter The Question Being Asked in VaR “What loss level is such that we are X % confident it will not be exceeded in N business.
Value at Risk Chapter 20 Value at Risk part 1 資管所 陳竑廷.
Fundamentals of Futures and Options Markets, 5 th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull Value at Risk Chapter 18.
Credit Risk Chapter 22 1 Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 7th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2008.
Basic Numerical Procedures Chapter 19 1 Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 7th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2008.
Value at Risk Chapter 16. The Question Being Asked in VaR “What loss level is such that we are X % confident it will not be exceeded in N business days?”
Market Risk VaR: Historical Simulation Approach N. Gershun.
Elements of Financial Risk Management Second Edition © 2012 by Peter Christoffersen 1 Simulating the Term Structure of Risk Elements of Financial Risk.
Ch22 Credit Risk-part2 資管所 柯婷瑱. Agenda Credit risk in derivatives transactions Credit risk mitigation Default Correlation Credit VaR.
: Chapter 3: Maximum-Likelihood and Baysian Parameter Estimation 1 Montri Karnjanadecha ac.th/~montri.
Value at Risk Chapter 20 Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 7th International Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2008.
Credit Risk Losses and Credit VaR
Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 5th edition © 2002 by John C. Hull 16.1 Value at Risk Chapter 16.
Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 4th edition © 1999 by John C. Hull 14.1 Value at Risk Chapter 14.
Estimating Volatilities and Correlations
Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD..  How do we evaluate a model?  How do we know if the model we are using is good?  assumptions relate to the (population)
Types of risk Market risk
5. Volatility, sensitivity and VaR
Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall
Usman Roshan CS 675 Machine Learning
Probability Theory and Parameter Estimation I
Basic simulation methodology
Market Risk VaR: Historical Simulation Approach
Types of risk Market risk
Market Risk VaR: Model-Building Approach
Volatility Chapter 10.
Basic Econometrics Chapter 4: THE NORMALITY ASSUMPTION:
Value at Risk Chapter 9.
Andrei Iulian Andreescu
EMIS 7300 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS METHODS FALL 2005
Credit Value at Risk Chapter 18
More Parameter Learning, Multinomial and Continuous Variables
Analysis of Engineering and Scientific Data
Chapter 14 Monte Carlo Simulation
Probabilistic Surrogate Models
Presentation transcript:

Correlations and Copulas Chapter 11

Correlation and Covariance The coefficient of correlation between two variables V1 and V2 is defined as The covariance is E(V1V2)−E(V1 )E(V2)

Independence V1 and V2 are independent if the knowledge of one does not affect the probability distribution for the other where f(.) denotes the probability density function

Independence is Not the Same as Zero Correlation Suppose V1 = –1, 0, or +1 (equally likely) If V1 = -1 or V1 = +1 then V2 = 1 If V1 = 0 then V2 = 0 V2 is clearly dependent on V1 (and vice versa) but the coefficient of correlation is zero

Types of Dependence (Figure 11.1, page 235) E(Y) E(Y) X X (a) (b) E(Y) X (c)

Monitoring Correlation Between Two Variables X and Y Define xi=(Xi−Xi-1)/Xi-1 and yi=(Yi−Yi-1)/Yi-1 Also varx,n: daily variance of X calculated on day n-1 vary,n: daily variance of Y calculated on day n-1 covn: covariance calculated on day n-1 The correlation is

Covariance The covariance on day n is E(xnyn)−E(xn)E(yn) It is usually approximated as E(xnyn)

Monitoring Correlation continued EWMA: GARCH(1,1)

Positive Finite Definite Condition A variance-covariance matrix, W, is internally consistent if the positive semi-definite condition wTWw ≥ 0 holds for all vectors w

Example The variance covariance matrix is not internally consistent

V1 and V2 Bivariate Normal Conditional on the value of V1, V2 is normal with mean and standard deviation where m1,, m2, s1, and s2 are the unconditional means and SDs of V1 and V2 and r is the coefficient of correlation between V1 and V2

Multivariate Normal Distribution Fairly easy to handle A variance-covariance matrix defines the variances of and correlations between variables To be internally consistent a variance-covariance matrix must be positive semidefinite

Generating Random Samples for Monte Carlo Simulation (pages 239-240) =NORMSINV(RAND()) gives a random sample from a normal distribution in Excel For a multivariate normal distribution a method known as Cholesky’s decomposition can be used to generate random samples

Factor Models (page 240) When there are N variables, Vi (i = 1, 2,..N), in a multivariate normal distribution there are N(N−1)/2 correlations We can reduce the number of correlation parameters that have to be estimated with a factor model

One-Factor Model continued If Ui have standard normal distributions we can set where the common factor F and the idiosyncratic component Zi have independent standard normal distributions Correlation between Ui and Uj is ai aj

Gaussian Copula Models: Creating a correlation structure for variables that are not normally distributed Suppose we wish to define a correlation structure between two variable V1 and V2 that do not have normal distributions We transform the variable V1 to a new variable U1 that has a standard normal distribution on a “percentile-to-percentile” basis. We transform the variable V2 to a new variable U2 that has a standard normal distribution on a “percentile-to-percentile” basis. U1 and U2 are assumed to have a bivariate normal distribution

The Correlation Structure Between the V’s is Defined by that Between the U’s -0.2 -6 -4 -2 2 4 6 U 1 One - to one mappings Correlation Assumption V 0.2 V 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 -0.2 0.2 0.4 V 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1 2 One - to - one mappings -6 -4 -2 2 2 4 4 6 6 -6 -4 -2 2 4 6 U U 2 1 Correlation Assumption

Example (page 241) V1 V2

V1 Mapping to U1 V1 Percentile U1 0.2 20 -0.84 0.4 55 0.13 0.6 80 0.84 95 1.64

V2 Mapping to U2 V2 Percentile U2 0.2 8 −1.41 0.4 32 −0.47 0.6 68 0.47 0.8 92 1.41

Example of Calculation of Joint Cumulative Distribution Probability that V1 and V2 are both less than 0.2 is the probability that U1 < −0.84 and U2 < −1.41 When copula correlation is 0.5 this is M( −0.84, −1.41, 0.5) = 0.043 where M is the cumulative distribution function for the bivariate normal distribution

Other Copulas Instead of a bivariate normal distribution for U1 and U2 we can assume any other joint distribution One possibility is the bivariate Student t distribution

5000 Random Samples from the Bivariate Normal

5000 Random Samples from the Bivariate Student t

Multivariate Gaussian Copula We can similarly define a correlation structure between V1, V2,…Vn We transform each variable Vi to a new variable Ui that has a standard normal distribution on a “percentile-to-percentile” basis. The U’s are assumed to have a multivariate normal distribution

Factor Copula Model In a factor copula model the correlation structure between the U’s is generated by assuming one or more factors.

Credit Default Correlation The credit default correlation between two companies is a measure of their tendency to default at about the same time Default correlation is important in risk management when analyzing the benefits of credit risk diversification It is also important in the valuation of some credit derivatives

Model for Loan Portfolio We map the time to default for company i, Ti, to a new variable Ui and assume Where F and the Zi have independent standard normal distributions The copula correlation is r=a2

Analysis To analyze the model we This leads to Calculate the probability that, conditional on the value of F, Ui is less than some value U This is the same as the probability that Ti is less that T where T and U are the same percentiles of their distributions This leads to where PD is the probability of default in time T

The Model continued The X% worst case value of F is N-1(X) The worst case default rate during time T with a confidence level of X is therefore The VaR for this time horizon and confidence limit is where L is loan principal and LGD is loss given default

Gordy’s Result In a large portfolio of M loans where each loan is small in relation to the size of the portfolio it is approximately true that

Estimating PD and r We can use data on default rates in conjunction with maximum likelihood methods The probability density function for the default rate is