KDHE Spring Combo March 8, 2018 Barbara Kramer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

LEGAL ISSUES IN AUTHORIZATION FOR ORGAN DONATION IN MISSOURI & KANSAS Laurence R. Tucker November 18, 2011.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Understanding Confidentiality and Education Decision Making for Youth in Foster Care Child Welfare, Education and the Courts: A Collaboration to Strengthen.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
Procedural Safeguards Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Potpourri: Summary of Important Points to Remember Presenters: Jill Harris Laura Duos NOVEMBER 2011.
Collaborating for Families and Young Children: Part C and CAPTA in South Carolina OSEP National Early Childhood Meeting February 9, 2005 Kristie Musick.
September/October Prerequisite Skills Policies Governing the Services for Students with Disabilities NC IEP Team….  (4) A representative.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Produced by NICHCY, 2014 Procedures for the of the IFSP D evelopment R eview, E valuation & Module 5.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Be an Expert! Using and Explaining ESIT's New Procedural Safeguards Forms Joicey Hurth, Kathi Gillaspy, Anne Lucas Cathy Buchanan & Rene’ Denman 1.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
Pre-referral, Referral, and Post-Referral Procedures Presented by: Jill Harris and Rhonda Spence NOVEMBER 16, 2011.
Michigan State Plan for Early On ® February
Ottawa Area Intermediate School District March, 2012 Adapted from Allegan Area ESA.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration Developed by Oakland Schools 2007.
PROTECTING CLIENT DATA HIPAA, HITECH AND PIPA PART 1B.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
07/20/2007 State Performance Plan Indicators Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
Referrals and linkages from Medical Homes to the Early Intervention System in Washington State May 10, 2013 Karen Walker, Program Administrator Kathy Blodgett,
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration.
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Procedural Safeguards Introduction-
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
09/13/2007 Child Find Networking Meeting Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
CCB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CALL July 12, :30-1:30 1.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
Disclaimer This presentation is intended only for use by Tulane University faculty, staff, and students. No copy or use of this presentation should occur.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Family law Who can make medical decisions for a minor child?
Module 3 Early ACCESS Process Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Iowa Department of Education.
1 Norman Services because every child deserves a home IntroductionsandRoll-Call If your name is not on the roster you must register for another session.
Special education timelines wednesday, January 20, 2016
Educational Surrogate Parents
Los Angeles Unified School District
Russellville Independent School District
ARC Chairperson Training
Understanding the Section 504 Process
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Educational Parent Surrogate
Grandparents Adult children
Understanding the Section 504 Process
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
Presented by Hill Country CASA
Foster Care Updates and Issues
Eligibility Determination IFSP Meetings IFSP Service Implementation
ARC Chairperson Training
Stanislaus SELPA Session 1
Removal and Placement FSFN
Removal and Placement FSFN
Open Adoption Agreements
Data Updates.
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
Obtaining Proof of Decision-Making Authority
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

KDHE Spring Combo March 8, 2018 Barbara Kramer Who Can Sign Documents? KDHE Spring Combo March 8, 2018 Barbara Kramer

Background Identify the “parent” in the early intervention system 45-day timeline General Background information: It is the responsibility of the Early Intervention Program to identify the child’s parent within the early intervention system. Will make early intervention service decisions for the child Deciding to participate in Infant-Toddler Services, Consenting to :screening (if conducted) evaluation, assessment provision of services. share early intervention records. The 45-day timeline from referral to Initial IFSP (34 CFR 303.310) is a protection for all children in order that they receive their early intervention services in a timely manner. Therefore, the FSC must quickly identify the person who can sign the early intervention paperwork.

IDEA Part C Definition of a Parent A biological or adoptive parent of a child; A foster parent, unless State law, regulations, or contractual obligations with a State or local entity prohibit a foster parent from acting as a parent; A guardian generally authorized to act as the child's parent, or authorized to make early intervention, educational, health or developmental decisions for the child (but not the State if the child is a ward of the State); According to the federal regs, these are the people who can sign as a “parent” in the ei system.

IDEA Part C Definition of a Parent An individual acting in the place of a biological or adoptive parent (including a grandparent, stepparent, or other relative) with whom the child lives, or an individual who is legally responsible for the child's welfare (but not the State if the child is a ward of the State); or A surrogate parent who has been appropriately appointed. (See surrogate parent section of the Infant- Toddler Services manual)

When the child lives with a biological parent: For most children in our system, the child’s biological parent(s) with whom the child resides, will be identified as the early intervention parent. Only one parent signature is required to proceed with any step of the early intervention process or service delivery. We will address separated and divorced parents later on in the presentation.

When a child is in foster care: DCF or foster-parent can make referral Date of first referral to a Part C program is the referral date for the child 45-day timeline (referral date to IFSP date) applies to children in foster-care Exceptional Family Circumstances System Reasons In Kansas, the Department of Children and Families (DCF), as a Primary Referral Source, must refer a child suspected of having a developmental delay as soon as possible, but in no case more than 7 days, after the child has been identified. (34 CFR 303.303 (a)(2)(i)).   Referrals of children in foster care often come from the foster parents with whom the child resides. Anyone can make a referral to Part C and the program must respond to all referrals. If a child is referred by both DCF and the foster parent, the date of first referral is the referral date for that child. If a child is referred by the foster parent, the FSC should ask for the child’s DCF caseworker’s contact information. The post-referral, 45-day timeline applies to all children referred to Part C, including children in foster care. Regulations allow the extension of the timeline for Exceptional Family Circumstances when the child or parent is unavailable or the parent has not provided consent. Because a state’s coordinated system of child find includes the agency who administers foster care, states are expected to have policies and procedures in place to ensure children in foster care receive their services in a timely manner. Delays caused by agency processes are a systems issue, not an Exceptional Family Circumstance.

When a child is in foster care: Obtain the judicial order Determine who will act as the child’s “parent” As specified in the court order Following the part c definition Not the DCF or contracted social worker Following the referral of a child in foster care, it is the responsibility of the Family Service Coordinator (FSC) to contact the DCF Specialist or contracting agency to learn the details regarding the parent’s whereabouts, the placement of the child, Orders of the Court, etc. This contact should be the first step when working with a child who is a ward of the State.   Next, the FSC will determine who can act as the child’s “parent” in the ei system. The FSC must follow the court order as to whom may act as a “parent” to make educational decisions about education for the child. As noted above in the definition of a parent, a child’s social worker or other state DCF employee or contractor cannot sign Infant Toddler Services forms to consent for screening, evaluation, assessment, or service delivery.

When a child is in foster care: Does the biological parent retain the right to make educational decisions for the child? Does the caregiver have any contact with the biological parent? If yes, what does this look like? Will it be possible for the parent join the conversation about early intervention services for their child? What would that look like? Would the parent prefer that the foster-family make educational decisions for the child? If yes, document this decision. Questions the FSC should ask of the social worker and the foster-family: Does the biological parent retain the right to make educational decisions for the child? Does the caregiver have any contact with the biological parent? If yes, what does this look like? Will it be possible for the parent join the conversation about early intervention services for their child? What would that look like? Would the parent prefer that the foster-family make educational decisions for the child? If yes, document this decision. In this event, ask the biological parent if and how they wish to be involved in the process.

When a child is in foster care: Make reasonable efforts to work with the biological parents. If parents are responsive but timeline gets delayed- family circumstances If reasonable efforts are not possible (parents whereabouts are unknown) or if parent is unresponsive to attempts to involve them Foster parents may sign documents as the child’s early intervention parent. Programs must make reasonable efforts to obtain biological parent’s signatures on documents. If biological parent’s signatures seem imminent, the FSC should proceed with the biological family for signature to consent to screen or evaluate their child. If the parent continues to be responsive but the timeline gets delayed, the Exceptional Family Circumstances reason for delay would be appropriate. As long as the family is communicating with the DCF Specialist or FSC and coordinating with them to respond to early intervention process requests, working with the biological family is required.   If reasonable efforts to obtain a biological parent’s signature are not possible (parent’s whereabouts are unknown) or if the parent is not responsive to attempts to involve them in the early intervention process, the foster-family may act as a parent and sign consent forms for screening, evaluation, provision of services and consenting to share records.

When a child is in foster care: Engage in a simultaneous process Seek biologic parent signature- if not obtainable within a reasonable time (5 days) begin working with the foster family, continue efforts with bio-family as well. Continue to try to involve the biological family as they are willing and legally able to do so. If duplicate documents get completed, the one dated the earliest is the date entered into the database. Actions may begin as soon as the first signature is obtained.

When a child is in foster care: If the foster parent has been designated as the parent for a child and IFSP planning and implementation has occurred, a biological parent who disagrees with those decisions and who does not intend to act as a parent for the child, has the right to file a grievance with KDHE ITS. Service delivery to the child continues during the grievance process. Conversely, if you began working with a foster-parent and the biological parent is interested and responsive to attempts to be included to the extent possible, and the parent retains the legal right to make educational decision, the biological parent does retain decision making. They can end services Have services transition to them over time as they become re-integrated as a family, Leave the foster-parent in charge of day to day decisions but share or receive copies of paperwork, IFSP, transition process documents.

When children are living with extended family or friends: (not foster care) Federal regulations allow an individual acting in the place of a biological or adoptive parent (including a grandparent, stepparent, or other relative) with whom the child lives to act as a parent and sign early intervention documents. The FSC must follow any documents (court orders, power of attorney) giving the extended family member or friend the authority to make educational decisions for the child. Federal regulations allow an individual acting in the place of a biological or adoptive parent (including a grandparent, stepparent, or other relative) with whom the child lives to act as a parent and sign early intervention documents. The process the FSC must follow in this situation is similar to the process for children involved in foster care.   Are there any documents giving the extended family member or friend the authority to make educational decisions for the child? The FSC must follow the documentation as to whom may act as a “parent” to make educational decisions about education for the child.

When children are living with extended family or friends: If there are no documents, explore: Where does the child live (sleep at night) and who is taking care of them? Does the caregiver have any contact with the biological parent? If yes, what does this look like? Will it be possible for the parent to join the conversation about early intervention services for their child? What would that look like? Would the parent prefer that the extended family member or friend make educational decisions for the child? If yes, document the decision. If there are no documents, the following questions should be explored: Where does the child live (sleep at night) and who is taking care of them? Does the caregiver have any contact with the biological parent? If yes, what does this look like? Will it be possible for the parent to join the conversation about early intervention services for their child? What would that look like? Would the parent prefer that the extended family member or friend make educational decisions for the child? If yes, document the decision. In this event, ask the biological parent if and how they wish to be involved in the process.

When children are living with extended family or friends: If biological parent is available, FSC works with them to sign documents If biological parent provides written, signed permission for the friend or family member to sign documents, FSC may proceed with that individual If reasonable efforts to obtain biological parent’s signature are not possible (parent’s whereabouts are unknown) or parent is unresponsive to attempts to involve them, FSC may proceed with extended family member or friend. If the parent is available to make decisions and has the legal right to do so, the FSC must work with the biological parent to sign documents.   If the biological parent provides written permission for the extended family member or friend to sign documents, the FSC may proceed with that individual. If reasonable efforts to obtain a biological parent’s signature are not possible (parent’s whereabouts are unknown) or if the parent is not responsive to attempts to involve them in the early intervention process, the extended family member or friend may act as a parent and sign consent forms for screening, evaluation, provision of services and consenting to share records.

When children are living with extended family or friends: If a biological family signature cannot be obtained quickly, begin paperwork with the extended family member or friend while simultaneously facilitating the biological parent’s involvement. If the extended family member or friend was designated as the parent, and IFSP planning and implementation has occurred, a biological parent who disagrees and who does not intend to act as a parent for the child, has the right to file a grievance with KDHE ITS. Service delivery to the child continues during the grievance process. If duplicate documents have been obtained, the date that is the earliest date is entered into the database. Each situation will be unique. As a general guideline, if a biological family signature cannot be obtained within a brief timeframe (5 days) begin paperwork with the extended family member or friend while simultaneously continuing to facilitate the biological parent’s involvement.   If the extended family member or friend has been designated as the parent for a child and IFSP planning and implementation has occurred, a biological parent who disagrees with those decisions and who does not intend to act as a parent for the child, has the right to file a grievance with KDHE ITS. Service delivery to the child continues during the grievance process. Conversely, if the parent comes back into the picture and has the legal right and intention to act as the parent, we should transition consents over to the parents. They do have the right to stop services for the child if they retain educational decision making. If duplicate documents have been provided to both the parent and the extended family member or friend for signature, and both are provided back to the program, the date that is the earliest date is entered into the database. Edits to the database may require assistance from the KDHE ITS Data Manager.

When a child’s parents are separated or divorced: When parents are separated or divorced, the FSC gathers documentation as needed to determine which parent has the right to make educational decisions for the child. If one parent has sole custody of the child, that parent is identified as the early intervention parent. If custody is shared, unless a court order/custody arrangement specifically designates one of the parents as the parent with rights to make educational decisions for the child, it is assumed that parents equally share that right. When parents are separated or divorced, the Family Service Coordinator works with the family and gathers documentation as needed to determine which parent has the right to make educational decisions for the child. If one parent has sole custody of the child, that parent is identified as the early intervention parent. If custody is shared, unless a court order/custody arrangement specifically designates one of the parents as the parent with rights to make educational decisions for the child, it is assumed that parents equally share that right.

When a child’s parents are separated or divorced: When parents share custody, and are in agreement with early intervention services for their child, either parent can sign documents. When parents share custody and one parent wishes to proceed with; and the other parent declines early intervention services, the FSC Obtains consent from the parent who wishes to proceed and proceeds with the activities for which consent was given Provides the parent who disagrees a copy of the consent signed by the other parent and a copy of the Parent’s Rights and grievance procedures. When parents share custody, and are in agreement with early intervention services for their child, either parent can sign documents.   When parents share custody and one parent wishes to proceed with; and the other parent declines early intervention services, the Service Coordinator is required to obtain consent from only one parent. Upon consent from one parent, the Service Coordinator proceeds with the action for which consent was obtained. The Service Coordinator also provides the parent who disagrees with the action a copy of the consent, and a copy of the Parent’s Rights and grievance procedures. The Service Coordinator follows this same process when one parent revokes consent for early intervention services and the other parent disagrees.

When a child’s parents are separated or divorced: If one parent insists there is not joint custody and refuses to give the FSC contact information for the other parent, FSC continues to interact with the known parent. If the other (unknown) parent contacts the FSC at a later time, follow same guidance as above; provide family rights and grievance procedures as needed. If one parent insists there is not joint custody and refuses to give the Family Service Coordinator contact information for the other parent, the Family Service Coordinator continues to interact with the known parent. If the other (unknown) parent contacts the Family Service Coordinator at a later time, the guidance above regarding divorced or separated parents will be followed to determine communication and activities with that parent.  

When a child’s parents are separated or divorced: If the parents are joint legal custodians, both parents receive copies of documents. Both are not required to sign the IFSP but if both wish to sign, the IFSP is effective as of the date of the first parent’s signature. In instances of non-custodial parents, the FSC assumes the non-custodial parent has the right to access the child’s early intervention record unless legal documentation indicates differently. If the parents are separated or divorced, and both are joint legal custodians, both parents receive copies of documents such as an evaluation report or IFSP. Both are not required to sign the IFSP but if both wish to sign, the IFSP is effective as of the date of the first parent’s signature.   In instances of non-custodial parents, the family service coordinator assumes the non-custodial parent has the right to access the child’s early intervention record unless legal documentation indicates differently.

A word about the 45-day timeline late reasons: Exceptional Family Circumstances System Reasons We are planning to simplify the late reasons into the two main federal categories and implement this consistently across the state, starting July 1, 2018..

45 day timeline - Exceptional Family Circumstances Family Circumstance- Family did not respond to programs attempts to contact within the 45-day timeline. Family Circumstance- Family delayed due to child’s illness or hospitalization. Family Circumstance- Family requested a delay/reschedule for any reason. Family Circumstances-Weather delay

45 day timeline - System Reasons Part C Error- Unable to coordinate with an interpreter Part C Error- Delayed signatures due to system errors Part C Error- Staff cancels/reschedules meeting for personal/team reasons Part C Error- Other system-based reasons

Questions ?