Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Advertisements

Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in Your Courses Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
SURVEY OF RECENT GRADUATES AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ASSISTING IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Dr. Teresa Ward Ms. Beth Katz Office of Institutional.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago Elizabeth Owolabi, Ph.D. Director.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Strategic Conversation: A Commitment to Student Engagement.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Topic #4 - EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Evidence: PowerPoint of Key Evidence Produced by AC Office of Outcomes Assessments 1.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Presentation Title (Select: View > Master > Slide Master to edit) Department Name (Select: View > Master > Slide Master to edit) Reflecting on Students’
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
First-Year Experiences & Senior Transitions
Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, & Assessment
Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE) Results 2016
Closing the Experience Gap March 30, 2017
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
UNIV 103 Assessment results Thinking about the future
NSSE Results for Faculty
NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement)
The University of Texas-Pan American
Surprise. Look who’s engaged
What’s Your Evidence? Using Data to Support Student Success
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
AUB NSSE 2018 Report K. El Hassan, PhD. OIRA, AUB.
The University of Texas-Pan American
The Heart of Student Success
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
SENSE: Survey of New Student Engagement
Preliminary Findings from the 2008 ISU Faculty Needs Assessment
Faculty In-Service Week
2013 NSSE Results.
2009 Student Opinion Survey Results
Jeanne Butler, Director Office of Assessment
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services

Background

Dimensions of Learning & Assessment Achievement ACCUMULATION OF LEARNING Outcomes: GRE, NCLEX, RD exam, etc. Learning CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR, THINKING, ETC. Outcomes: Advanced skills, critical thinking, etc. Engagement PROCESSES THAT SUPPORT LEARNING Processes: Time studying, tutoring, interaction with faculty, services, etc. Persistence CONSEQUENCES OF LEARNING Outputs: Graduation, retention, satisfaction, utilization, etc. Direct Indirect

Background What is student engagement? Amount of time and effort put into academic and co- curricular activities Ways institution allocates resources and organizes opportunities for students to participate in activities linked to student learning From the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) website, http://nsse.iub.edu/

Background What is student engagement? Amount of time and effort put into academic and co- curricular activities Ways institution allocates resources and organizes opportunities for students to participate in activities linked to student learning How can information on student engagement be used? Identify areas of excellence Identify opportunities for improvement Used in discussions related to teaching and learning From the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) website, http://nsse.iub.edu/

Background Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) Assesses* The time and effort entering, first-year students devoted to educationally purposeful activities in high school and expect to devote to during their first year of college What these entering first-year students expect their institutions to provide them regarding opportunities and emphasis Compliments the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) * From the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) website, http://bcsse.iub.edu/

Background Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) 2012 Administration at ISU During Preview sessions 2,016 incoming students responded 65% of all students who attended Preview 89% of sampled students

Background Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Survey BCSSE NSSE FSSE Student Cohort 1 B4 FY SR Student Cohort 2 Student Cohort 3

Background Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Survey BCSSE NSSE FSSE Student Cohort 1 B4 FY SR Student Cohort 2 Student Cohort 3

Background Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Survey BCSSE NSSE FSSE Student Cohort 1 B4 FY SR Student Cohort 2 Student Cohort 3

Findings

BCSSE Scales Scale Mean Standard Deviation Expected Academic Difficulty 5.0 1.6 High School Academic Engagement 5.3 1.3 Expected Academic Engagement 6.0 Expected Academic Perseverance 7.2 1.5 Importance of Campus Environment 7.3 1.7 Perceived Academic Preparation 7.4 Range: 0 - 10

BCSSE Scales Expected Academic Difficulty Details Highest means 4 items 6-point scale (higher score indicates more difficulty) Highest means Managing your time (M = 4.2; SD = 1.3) Learning course material (M = 3.9; SD = 1.0) Lowest means Interacting with faculty (M = 2.8; SD = 1.2) Getting help with school work (M = 3.1; SD = 1.1)

BCSSE Scales High School Academic Engagement Details Highest means 12 items 4-point scale (higher score indicates more often) Highest means Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions (M = 3.1; SD = 0.8) Worked with other students on projects during class (M = 2.9; SD = 0.7)

BCSSE Scales High School Academic Engagement Highest means Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions (M = 3.1; SD = 0.8) Worked with other students on projects during class (M = 2.9; SD = 0.7) Lowest means Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with teachers outside of class (M = 2.0; SD = 0.9) Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments (M = 2.3; SD = 0.7)

BCSSE Scales Expected Academic Engagement Details Highest means 8 items 4-point scale (higher score indicates more often) Highest means Work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments (M = 3.1; SD = 0.7) Ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions (M = 3.0; SD = 0.7)

BCSSE Scales Expected Academic Engagement Highest means Lowest means Work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments (M = 3.1; SD = 0.7) Ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions (M = 3.0; SD = 0.7) Lowest means Discuss ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class (M = 2.6; SD = 0.8) Discuss ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.) (M = 2.7; SD = 0.8)

BCSSE Scales Expected Academic Perseverance Details Highest means 6 items 6-point scale (higher score indicates more certainty) Highest means Finish something you have started when you encounter challenges (M = 5.0; SD = 0.9) Ask instructors for help when you struggle with course assignments (M = 4.8; SD = 1.1)

BCSSE Scales Expected Academic Perseverance Highest means Lowest means Finish something you have started when you encounter challenges (M = 5.0; SD = 0.9) Ask instructors for help when you struggle with course assignments (M = 4.8; SD = 1.1) Lowest means Participate regularly in course discussions even when you don’t feel like it (M = 4.1; SD = 1.1) Study when there are other interesting things to do (M = 4.2; SD = 1.1)

BCSSE Scales Importance of Campus Environment Details Highest means 6 items 6-point scale (higher score indicates more importance) Highest means Support to help you succeed academically (M = 5.3; SD = 0.9) Opportunities to attend campus events and activities (M = 4.9; SD = 1.1)

BCSSE Scales Importance of Campus Environment Highest means Support to help you succeed academically (M = 5.3; SD = 0.9) Opportunities to attend campus events and activities (M = 4.9; SD = 1.1) Lowest means Assistance coping with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) (M = 4.2; SD = 1.3) Support to help you thrive socially (M = 4.4; SD = 1.3)

BCSSE Scales Perceived Academic Preparation Details Highest means 7 items 6-point scale (higher score indicates more prepared) Highest means Work effectively with others (M = 5.2; SD = 0.9) Learn effectively on your own (M = 4.9; SD = 1.0) Lowest means Analyze math or quantitative problems (M = 4.2; SD = 1.3) Use computing and information technology (M = 4.4; SD = 1.1)

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year LY median = 6-10 hours per week EFY median = 16-20 hours per week

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year LY median = 11-15 hours per week EFY median = 6-10 hours per week

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Last Year vs. Expected First Year

Discussion

Discussion Summary BCSSE Scales Most difficulty expected Lowest average score – Expected Academic Difficulty Highest average score – Perceived Academic Preparation Most difficulty expected Managing time Learning course material

Discussion Summary Academic engagement Most often Ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions Work with other students (LY during class; EFY outside of class) Least often – discussing ideas with others outside of class

Discussion Summary Most certain Most important Finish something when encounter challenges Ask instructors for help Most important Support to help achieve academic success Opportunities to attend campus events and activities

Discussion Summary Most prepared Last Year vs. Expected First Year Work effectively with others Learn effectively on their own Last Year vs. Expected First Year Expected to increase – Preparing for class Expected to decrease – Participating in co-curricular activities No change expected Working for pay Relaxing and socializing

Discussion Conclusions Time management skills are a concern Lower expectations to discuss ideas with others outside of class Confident in asking instructors for help Having academic support and campus activities are important Feel prepared to work and learn with others

Discussion Implications Emphasize scheduling time for assignments Encourage discussions of course materials Be available to provide assistance Provide information on resources and support Encourage learning individually and in groups

Discussion Limitations Future directions Sample size Mean differences Continue to disseminate information Look at student engagement longitudinally with the NSSE

Questions? Comments? Concerns?

Want more information? Mr. Derek Herrmann, UAS Coordinator djherrm@ilstu.edu 309.438.7325 Dr. Ryan Smith, UAS Director rlsmith@ilstu.edu 309.438.2135 http://assessment.illinoisstate.edu/