12 GeV CEBAF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Advertisements

Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
ABSTRACT The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory (IDS- NF) baseline design 1 involves a complex chain of accelerators including a single-pass.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
DESY GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 / 12 Status of RTML Design and Tuning Studies PT SLAC.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Y. R. Roblin Hall A beamline and accelerator status.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Status of Baseline Linac and RLAs Design.
Investigation of Injection Schemes for SLS 2.0
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs1 CHESS / LEPP USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs I. V. Bazarov Cornell University.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Alex.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Accelerator status after the 12 GeV upgrade
Linac and RLAs – Overview of NF-IDS
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Progress of SPPC lattice design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Simulation Calculations
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Optics and Layout of Alex Bogacz Workshop, Orsay, Feb. 23, 2017.
CEBAF Pulsed Operation for JLEIC Electron Injection
Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility Overview
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Transfer Line for EIC.
HALLA APEL REPORT Yves Roblin Hall A colllaboration Meeting
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Hall A Beam Parameters Table
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

12 GeV CEBAF

From 6 to 12 GeV

Optics layout for 12GeV ARC1,ARC2 have 16 dipoles ARC2 and beyond have 32 Split tune 5/4, ¾ with 4 superperiods. Spreader+arc+recombiner are achromatic and isochronous to first order. Sextupoles are unpowered and could be used to ensure 2nd order. We can tune them off from zero M56 if we need to manipulate the long. Phase space for recovery. Energy acceptance around +/- 3e-3. ARC1 and ARC2 can be retuned to have a low dispersion pattern.

Beam line occupancy R=4(beam + orbit) = 4beam + 2.4mm orbit <600 µm RMS Consistent with current operating practices

Transverse Emittance* and Energy Spread† Area p/p [x10-3] x [nm] y Chicane 0.5 4.00 Arc 1 0.05 0.41 Arc 2 0.03 0.26 0.23 Arc 3 0.035 0.22 0.21 Arc 4 0.044 0.24 Arc 5 0.060 0.33 0.25 Arc 6 0.090 0.58 0.31 Arc 7 0.104 0.79 0.44 Arc 8 0.133 1.21 0.57 Arc 9 0.167 2.09 0.64 Arc 10 0.194 2.97 0.95 Hall D 0.18 2.70 1.03 DBA option Damping Values are calculated at the end of each arc. Normalized emittance is beta.gamma*egeometric Point out that it is the theoritical value if everything is perfect. These calculations were checked with 3 different codes and also agree with a simpler analytical estimate (sand’s formula) which Does not take into account synch rad. Loss in quadrupoles. Sync. Rad. * Emittances are geometric † Quantities are rms

12 GeV CEBAF Top Level Parameters Comments 12 GeV Energy to Halls A,B,C / D Can tune linac gains to cover from 6 to 12 11 GeV / 12 GeV Number of passes for Halls A,B,C / D 5 / 5.5 (add a tenth arc) Duty Factor Tune mode is 60Hz, 200 μsec yielding 1.5% duty factor CW 499 Mhz, 250 Mhz,31 Mhz Max. Beam Power 1 MW Per pass tune mode dumps limited to 2kW Emittance at max. energy (unnormalized, rms): x, y We measured 3.6 nmrad at 10.5 GeV 10 nm-rad, 2 nm-rad Energy spread at max. energy Assuming linacs are crested 5 x 10-4 Here, point out that the frequency change will be explained later and is needed for the D+3 option

Coordinate system

Chicane Dipoles (doglegs) Pathlength control Chicane Dipoles (doglegs) ARC Adjustment Capacity (RF °) E1 18 W1 E2 15 W2 17 E3 W3 12 E4 10 W4 7 E5 6 Capacity limited so we also shift orbits in the arcs (up to 3mm) and slew the RF frequency from its nominal 1497 Mhz. Limited by RF cavity tuning capabilities (tuners). So far, adequate.

Quadrupoles and dipoles Field quality Dipoles were converted From C to H style Typical values for dipoles.

Start to end simulations Beamline modeled with errors, multipoles, misalignments, apertures, … Full start to end simulation including extraction Use of LQCD clusters for massive halo studies (hallD) DBA optics Arc6 thru 9 Floor coordinates HallB The purpose was to stress test the tuning knobs to see if one could always setup the line regardless of the errors in the beamline. Exit of injector

Path forward Generate a longitudinal match for the recirculation Assess magnet field qualities for recirculation design dump system and chicane Optimize transverse matches to the linacs for recirculation Integrate the FFAG arc in the design Start to end tracking, ELEGANT, ZGOUBI, etc..