Preliminary Stress Analysis of Vacuum Vessel By : Hamed Hosseini Advisor: Prof. Najmabadi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic Reviews For Unit ET156 – Introduction to C Programming Topic Reviews For Unit
Advertisements

Factor each trinomial:
/ /17 32/ / /
Reflection nurulquran.com.
You will need some paper!
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
HiRadMat Window Design report v2.0 1Michael MONTEIL- 16 March 2010.
By John Liedig & Jouline Nour
SCT End-Cap FDR1/11/01 C.J.Nelson 1 Inner Detector SCT End-Cap FDR Summary of Prototyping and FE Analysis C.J.Nelson Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, CLRC.
This Weeks Topics Review Class Concepts -Simple Pricing -Price Customization by Customer Type -Two-Part Tariff -Simple -With Two Demand Curves Review Homework.
Stresses due to fluid pressure in thin cylinders
20038 BATTERY COVER David Deng 2005/05/29.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
Solve by Substitution: Isolate one variable in an equation
INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS
Preview Warm Up California Standards Lesson Presentation.
FEM Modeling of Instrumented Indentation
1 By Terence James Haydock Pressure Vessel A simulated response in ANSYS.
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
Update on ARIES-CS Coil Structural Analysis X.R. Wang and A.R. Raffray ARIES Meeting PPPL, NJ October 4-5, 2006.
DID YOU KNOW: slender or thin structures can be modelled with Shells in ANSYS? Consider a flat plate of dimensions 6m x 6m x 0.002m (thick); evaluate the.
Copyright © 2002J. E. Akin Rice University, MEMS Dept. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress.
Update of the ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration and Maintenance Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray and the ARIES Team ARIES.
Status of the Coil Structure Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray PPPL: H.M. Fan.
Status of Coil Structural Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: ORNL: D. Williamson UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray.
LOCA/LOFA Analyses for Blanket and Shield Only Regions – LiPb/FS/He System Carl Martin, Jake Blanchard Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin.
3D Finite Element Analysis for Ribbed Structure Vacuum Vessel By: Hamed Hosseini Advisor: Prof. Farrokh Najmabadi.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
Chapter 3 Meshing Methods for 3D Geometries
Page 1 Jean Delayen HyeKyoung Park Center for Accelerator Science Department of Physics, Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator.
KDEMO Structural Analysis P. Titus June ! KDEMO coil axisymmetric analysis pfcb 21 1, 1.52,0.70,.9,1.3,8,10 !CS1 2, 1.52,2.10,.9,1.3,8,10 !CS2.
ANSYS Workbench: Mechanical Examples. Step 1. Opening ansys workbench Overview: – Start > ANSYS Workbench – Create Static Structural analysis system.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.
In these tutorials the use adaptive mesh refinement will be review Workbench 12.1 Aalborg Universitet esbjerg Søren Heide Lambertsen.
U PDATED ARIES-ACT P OWER C ORE D EFINITION AND S I C B LANKET X.R. Wang, M. S. Tillack, S. Malang F. Najmabadi and L.A. El-Guebaly ARIES-Pathways Project.
Vacuum Vessel Recent Progress. Horizontal or Vertical Rib? Over-Stressed Spots We get over-stressed spots on the horizontal ribs (Very high stress spots)
Comparing 2D and 3D Structural Analysis Workshop 4.2.
Vacuum Vessel lateral loading (Neutral beam port only)
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders A Brooks July 27, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_353BL2.
Update of Vacuum Vessel Analysis Hamed Hosseini, Farrokh Najmabadi, Xueren Wang ARIES Meeting Washington, DC, May 30-June 1, 2012.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus January 27, 2010 Umbrella Leg Sliding Blocks TF OOP Support to the Vessel Seismic (Static.
Results of Linear Stress Analyses for Modular Coils and Coil structure For 2T High Beta Currents at 0 Seconds and Initial Coil Shrinkage of in/in.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
UCLA - S.Sharafat: ITER TBM Dec. ’04 DCLL ITER-TBM: Design for Accident Relevant Loading Jaafar A. El-Awady, P. Rainsberry, S. Sharafat, and N. Ghoniem,
R EFINEMENT OF THE P OWER C ORE C ONFIGURATION OF THE ARIES-ACT SA X.R. Wang 1, M. S. Tillack 1, S. Malang 2 and F. Najmabadi 1 1 University of California,
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
Chapter 8 – Combined Loading
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
Comparing 2D and 3D Structural Analysis Winter Semester
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
Pipe Integrity Check using Finite Element Analysis
Gersemi Cryostat Mechanical analysis
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 04/22/2016
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
Preliminary analysis for the dressed LHC RF cavity (2) April 28th 2016 – EDMS L. Dassa, L. Mettler.
T2K Upgrade First look at TPC contraints (WAGASCI Constraints)
X.R. Wang, M. S. Tillack, S. Malang, F. Najmabadi and the ARIES Team
FEA Analysis of the LHCB Velo RF foil
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 09/29/2016
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
Integrated Design: APEX-Solid Wall FW-Blanket
2K Cold Box Vacuum Vessel Structure Analysis
P P 4.7 Stress Concentrations
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, All Rights Reserved
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Stress Analysis of Vacuum Vessel By : Hamed Hosseini Advisor: Prof. Najmabadi

Introduction & Motivation Vacuum Vessel Vacuum Vessel provides high level vacuum environment to achieve fusion plasma. The vessel is a structure with 16 core sectors and consists of vacuum body, ports, flanges and doors. Ports allow maintenance access for replacement of sectors. ARIES-AT was designed for sector maintenance with a double wall design. Stress was not performed, and the geometry was not optimized. Can the vacuum vessel accommodate a normal pressure (0.1 MPa)? ARIES-AT Vacuum Body Ports Doors

Introduction & Motivation Vacuum Vessel Geometry of the vacuum vessel is taken from CAD, considering the very thin vacuum vessel (5 cm) and 10 cm thick. Primary stress is performed by ANSYS Workbench to see if the thinner wall can accommodate the normal pressure loads and overpressure loads ( Motivation: How thin it can be based on the stress analysis). How to mesh such a large scale model? ( Concerns : Memory, Meshing and solving time, mesh layers in thickness, convergence) 1/16 of Sectors (Symmetry ) 10 (m) 11 (m) Material : SST 316, Yield Stress: 140 MPa, and Working Temperature: 550 K 5(cm), 10(cm) Uniform Thickness

Boundary Condition Fixed Bottom (Blue area is fixed)Symmetry (Blue area) Loads: Outside pressure: 1 (atm), Inside pressure: zero, and Gravity

Meshing (Sweep Method) Door Flange Port Ports Middle Wall Creates Structured hexahedral Mesh. Saves memory, meshing time and computing time (structured Elements, less elements). Control over mesh layers in the thickness. Fast convergence. Inboard Structure

Convergence (Arbitrary Point) 6 (cm)x 6(cm)x 1(cm)10 (cm)x 10(cm) x 1(cm) 5 % Exact points on the body have 5% change in stress by changing the element size.

Convergence Element SizeNumber of Elements Max. Pressure (Pa) 20 (cm)x 20 (cm) x 1(cm) e8 10 (cm)x 10(cm) x 1(cm) e8 6 (cm)x 6(cm)x 1(cm) e8 11 % 6.3 % Convergence is checked by reducing the element size.

Results (5cm Thick Vacuum Vessel) 197 Mpa 166 Mpa Top and some parts of the ports and doors are high stress (> 140 MPa)! Material should be added to these regions to get the stress down. Low stresses are on the Inboard (< 100 MPa)! 160 Mpa 120 Mpa 130 Mpa 174 Mpa

Results (5cm Thick Vacuum Vessel) 370 Mpa 156 Mpa 120 Mpa 154 Mpa Maximum stress happens at the sharp corner (rounded corner? ) A large portion of the middle wall goes up to very high stresses ( Close to 400 Mpa). The middle wall thickness should be changed to a bigger thickness. How thick should be the middle wall ( approximately)?

Results (10cm Thick Vacuum Vessel) 120Mpa 73 Mpa 123Mpa 46 Mpa Stress in the middle wall gets very close to the yield point (140 Mpa). The maximum stress (150 Mpa) jumps from the rounded corner to the middle wall (on the port- wall interface). Inboard ports and doors are less than the yield stress.

Results (10cm Thick Vacuum Vessel) 64 Mpa 87 Mpa 45 Mpa Stress in other parts is less than the yield stress, even less than 100 Mpa. No need to add material.

Summary A preliminary structural analysis of the vacuum vessel was performed. The locations of high stresses were identified (Some region of ports and doors, corners, top of the vessel, and the worst case is the middle wall). According to the results, the middle wall thickness should be more than 10cm thick. Stress on the Inboard structure was acceptable for ~5cm thickness. So, it is always safe to design the Inboard with 5cm thickness.

Future Analysis Ribbed structure (new design) Disruption electromagnetic loads

Thanks & Questions