Experience Survey Results CTC Practice Reporting Workgroup

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Alex Y. Chen, M.D. UCLA Children’s Hospital LA
Advertisements

Maine Quality Forum Advisory Council February 8, 2012 Public Reporting of Patient Experience Survey Data.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. MAPCP PCMH-CAHPS Surveys September 10, 2014 Presented by.
The CAHPS Health Literacy Item Set Beverly Weidmer, RAND Corporation AHRQ 2009 Annual Conference Research to Reform: Achieving Health System Change Bethesda,
Update on CAHPS ® Surveys AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING Lunch and Learn Session #46 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Judith Sangl, ScD AHRQ CAHPS Project Officer.
CAHPS Overview Clinician & Group Surveys: Practical Options for Implementation and Use AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS.
Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey September 11, 2012.
1. Confirming and Supplementing CAHPS® Communication Items Using Feedback from High-Performing Physicians. Ron D. Hays, Ph.D., Professor of Medicine and.
1 Studying the Doctor-Patient Relationship Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. - UCLA Department of Medicine: Division of General Internal.
Research AND (RAND) November 22, 2010 Westat, Rockville, MD.
Nelly Burdette, Psyd Director, Integrated Behavioral Health, PCHC Integrated Behavioral Health Practice Facilitator, CTC MHI Faculty Advisor, HMS Center.
CAHPS® Survey to Evaluate the Patient’s Experience with the Medical Home Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND Health Program November 18,
Nursing Excellence Conference April 19,2013
Survey Updates and Quality Improvement Resources Julie A. Brown, RAND Corporation AHRQ 2012 Annual Conference Bethesda, MD September 9, 2012.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Overview of CAHPS ® and the National CAHPS ® Database Assessing Patients’ Experiences with Care: Using CAHPS ® as a Standardized Quality Metric Dale Shaller,
CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey 2.0 Update Ron D. Hays RAND, Santa Monica, CA UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® Clinician & Group PCMH Survey Patricia Gallagher, PhD Center.
Assessing Patient Satisfaction Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research RAND Health Program AUA Foundation Summer.
Patient Reports about Health IT Developing & Field Testing Survey Questions for Outpatient Settings Keith McInnes Boston University School of Public Health.
CAHPS PATIENT EXPERIENCE SURVEYS AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2012 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS Project Officer.
CAHPS® Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Ernest Moy Center for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient’s Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® PCMH Survey Patricia (Trish) Gallagher, PhD Center for.
2016 Program Performance Highlights Care Transformation Collaborative of R.I. CTC-RI BREAKFAST OF CHAMPIONS JUNE 10 TH,
The Rhode Island Care Transformation Collaborative A Progress Report : Quality, Patient Experience and Service Utilization March, 2016.
Dental Patient Satisfaction Survey
Debra Hurwitz, MBA, BSN, RN CTC-RI Co-director October 20, 2016
2016 Patient Experience Survey Results Practice Reporting Workgroup
Areas for Discussion Description of plan ratings.
Dental Patient Satisfaction Survey
CTC Total COST of CARE UPDATE
Using Focus Groups & Cognitive Interviews to Re-Evaluate
Patient Centered Medical Home
The Impact of a Behavioral Health Condition on the High-Need Patient
CSI claims data collection and analyses
Manuel Angel Oscós-Sánchez MD Sandra K. Burge PhD
Ololade Olakanmi American Medical Association November 2007
Care Transformation Collaborative of Rhode Island Supporting the Implementation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) Advancing Primary Care in.
CTC Clinical Strategy and Cost Committee
Exhibit 1 Despite Much Greater Health Care Spending, High-Need Adults Reported More Unmet Needs and Mixed Care Experiences Total adult population Three.
UCSF Fresno Family and Community Medicine Dept.
Lisa Weiss, M.D. Brian F. Pendleton, Ph.D. Susan Labuda Schrop, M.S.
CTC Agreement for PCMH Kids Care Transformation Collaborative of R.I.
Melody Anthony, MS Director Provider Services
Guadalupe X. Ayala, PhD, MPH1 Jose Loredo, MD2 Elva Arredondo, PhD1
Primary Care Works! Care Transformation Collaborative of Rhode Island
Your Patient Survey Results January 2014
A feasibility study of an automated practice-based survey
Applicant Data Cycle CASPA.
Housekeeping Please DO NOT place your phone on “HOLD”
Mosaic Equity Analysis
Primary Care Alternatives PRC Results
Teen Health Perspective Results
Implementation Update on OHIC Affordability Standards
Compensation Disparities by Gender in Internal Medicine
Darwen Healthlink Patient survey – 2017/2018 Results & analysis
Teen Health Perspective Results
Care Transformation Collaborative of Rhode Island Supporting the Implementation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) Advancing Primary Care in.
Percent with good patient–provider communication
Patient Survey Results
CTC-RI Integrated Behavioral Health 2016 Pilot Practices
Section 13.4 Measures of Central Tendency
Adults with Health Problems Who Have an Excellent Patient Experience Report Greater Support to Help Manage Their Health Condition Percent of adults 18–64.
Minorities with medical homes are just as likely as whites to receive reminders for preventive care visits. Percentage of adults ages 18 to 64 receiving.
Adults with Health Problems Who Have an Excellent Patient Experience Are Most Likely to Be Well-Informed About Their Prescription Medications Percent of.
Laura K. Huete, MD, MBA, FACMQ, CMQ
Member Experience & Perception Surveys: CAHPS & HOS
Patient-reported Outcome Measures
Influenza Vaccine Delay From the Primary Care Physician’s Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Experience Survey Results CTC Practice Reporting Workgroup 2017 CAHPS PCMH Patient Experience Survey Results CTC Practice Reporting Workgroup Marie Sarrasin April 25, 2017

2017 CAHPS Survey Topics CAHPS Adult Survey Version 3.0 Survey Profile 2016/2017 Medians and Targets Cohort and Site Results Summary Questions

CAHPS Version 3.0 Version 3.0 of the CAHPS PCMH Survey released in June 2015 Version 3.0 includes the following domains: *Access - revised *Communication - revised *Office Staff Care Coordination - new Self-Management Total number of core questions was reduced from 52 to 37 Look-back period is 6 months *contract measures

2017 Adult Survey Conducted in November, 2016 – January, 2017 Mixed mode – 1 survey mailing, 5 follow-up phone calls English and Spanish Oversampling at sites with low response rates Same survey vendor as 2016, comparative contract scores Adults age 18 and older

2017 Adult Survey Thirty seven (37) sites 13,529 patients randomly selected to participate 128-1029 per site 3,857 completed surveys 2,196 mail surveys 1,661 phone surveys Response rate: 26.9% overall 2016 rate: 25.3% overall

Patient Demographics 2017 patient respondent demographics compared with 2016 survey 2016 Survey 2017 Survey Age >55 58.8% 53.2% Gender – Female 62.7% 63.3% Education High School + 58.5% 55.2% Race – White 77.8% 68.6%

Access and Communication Composites CAHPS 3.0 Survey updated Access and Communication Composites One question from Access 2016 dropped Two questions from Communication 2016 dropped

Access and Communication Composites For a fair comparison, RIQI recalculated 2016 Access and Communication scores using the 2017 composite: Access median increased from 62% to 69% Communication median increased from 84% to 86% Targets were increased to match medians

CAHPS Version 3.0 Access Composite Survey Version Q6  Always obtained appt. for urgent care as soon as needed Q9  Always obtained appt. for check-up or routine care as soon as needed Q14  Always received same day response to phone calls made during regular office hours   Q16  Always received a response as soon as needed to phone calls made after regular office hours Q18  Always saw provider within 15 minutes of appointment time Median score Target 2016 CAHPS Access Yes 61% 2016 CTC Access No 62% 60% Re-calculated 2016 CTC scores using CAHPS 2017 Access composite 69%

CAHPS Version 3.0 Communication Composite Survey Version Q12 Provider always explained things in way that was easy to understand Q20 Provider always listened carefully to you Q22 Provider always gave you easy to understand information about health questions or concerns Q23 Provider always seemed to know the important information about your medical history Q24 Provider always showed respect for what you had to say  Q25 Provider always spent enough time with you Median score Target 2016 CAHPS Communication Yes 84%  84% Re-calculated 2016 Communication No 86%

Access & Communication Score Distribution 2016 v 2017 Comparison of original CTC Access 2016, re-calculated CTC Access 2016 and 2017 score Original CTC 2016 Quartile Range 2016 # Practices in Quartile Re calculated 2016 Quartile Range 2017 Quartile Range 2017 # Practices in Quartile 25th percentile or less 37.4-54.5 19 45.4-61.9 43.1 - 59.5 10 25-50th percentile 54.9-62.1 17 62.1 - 69.1 18 60.6 - 68.2 9 50th-75th percentile 62.4-69.6 69.2 - 78.0 68.4 - 77.6 75th percentile and over 70.7-96.6 78.4 - 94.6 15 77.9 - 99.0 Median 62.0 71 69.1 68.1 37   Comparison of original CTC Communication 2016, re-calculated CTC Communication 2016 and 2017 score Original CTC Quartile Range Recalculated 2016 Quartile Range 59.2-79.6 61.3 - 81.9 64.7 - 78.6 11 80.1-84.1 82.2 - 86.1 81.5 - 86.0 8 84.3-89.2 16 86.2 - 92.1 86.2 - 91.3 89.4-97.3 20 92.2 - 100 91.4 - 98.2 84.1 86.1

2014-5 Contractual Performance Standards 2017 Contractual Standards 2014-5 Contractual Performance Standards 2014-5 Contractual Performance Standards Practices must pass Access “gate” measure Two methods for achievement Method 1 – Meets or exceeds Access target and meets or exceeds Communication OR Office Staff Method 2 - Does not meet Access target but improves score by 2.5 from prior years score and meets or exceeds Communication AND Office Staff Measure 2016 Target 2017 Target Access 60% 69% Communication 84% 86% Office Staff 76%

Results – Performance Groups

Results – 50%> Medicaid vs Not 50%> Sites

2015 Top Performers Comm. Office Staff Wickford Family Medicine 99.1 Site Access Comm. Office Staff Wickford Family Medicine 99.1 Barrington Family Medicine 98.2 Solmaz Behtash 100 North Kingstown Family Practice 94.8 John Chaffey 97.3 John Chaffey DO LTD. 93.2 87.8 96.3 Internal Medicine Partners 89.3 84.8 Coventry Primary Care Associates, Inc. 96.2 88.6 83.1 94.6 Richard M Del Sesto 88.5 82.9 CNE Medical Group - Arcand Family Medicine 93.5 84.5 81.4 Primary Care of Barrington 82.3 PCHC - Prairie 92.5 SCHS - Tiverton Family Practice 81.9

Sites with Greatest Improvement 2016 Access 2016 Access Recalculated 2017 Access Difference 2016 recalculated and 2017 CNE Medical Group - Arcand Family Medicine 60.7 71.0 81.4 10.4 PCHC-Prairie 60.1 71.1 10.3 CCAP: Family Health Services - Cranston 47.8 51.5 59.2 7.7 Coventry Primary Care Associates, Inc. 73.2 76.7 83.1 6.4 SCH - Primary Care Family and Internal Medicine-Wakefield 62.1 64.3 69.1 4.8 Wickford Family Medicine Ideal Medical Practices 96.6 95.5 99.1 3.6 Charter Care Medical Associates 64.2 74.8 77.2 2.4 SCHS - Linden Tree Family Health Center 37.4 46.4 48.6 2.2 Site 2016 Communication 2016 Communication Recalculated 2017 Communication Difference 2016 Recalculated and 2017 PCHC- Chad Brown 59.22 61.3 76.8 15.6 SCHS - Linden Tree Family Health Center 72.36 75.2 86.2 11.0 PCHC- Chafee 64.71 65.4 74.8 9.3 PCHC- Prairie 65.98 69.3 78.6 PCHC- Central 69.68 71.5 7.1 SCHS - Family Medical Middletown 82.20 87.1 91.3 4.2 Solmaz Behtash - Ideal Medical Practices 92.35 92.3 96.3 4.1 Primary Care of Barrington - Ideal Medical Practices 87.56 89.8 93.5 3.6

Sites with Greatest Improvement 2016 Office Staff 2017 Office Staff Difference PCHC - Chad Brown 50.0 74.1 24.1 CharterCARE Medical Associates 59.2 77.8 18.6 John Chaffey DO LTD. 78.9 93.2 14.4 Solmaz Behtash - Ideal Medical Practices 86.9 100 13.1 SCHS - Linden Tree Family Health Center 49.5 61.7 12.2 SCHS - Family Medical Middletown 71.1 81.4 10.3 Women's Medicine Collaborative 64.6 74.4 9.8 CNE Medical Group - Brookside Family Medicine 63.5 71.7 8.2 Plan 2016 Self Management 2017 Self Management Difference PCHC - North Main 50.9 71.5 20.6 Richard M. Del Sesto M.D., M.S. 43.1 62.5 19.4 PCHC - Central 36.9 54.9 18.0 SCHS - Family Medical Middletown 48.3 65.3 17.1 SCHS - Tiverton Family Practice 43.4 60.0 16.6 PCHC - Crossroads 63.5 77.0 13.5 PCHC - Prairie 28.8 42.2 13.3 Women's Medicine Collaborative 52.8 65.7 12.9

Summary CAHPS Version 3.0 substantially different from previous Access – removal of “after hours response” and “15 minute wait time” improved scores Communication – removal of “easy to understand information about health concerns” and “always seemed to know important information about medical history” improved scores

Summary Consistent with the CAHPS Consortium’s analyses of CG-CAHPS 2.0 data from the 2014 CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey Database, which indicates that the access and communication composite measures have higher scores on the 3.0 version than on the 2.0 version of CG-CAHPS

Questions What do these analyses say about patients’ concerns about providers? How actionable is this data? Is this the best measure of RI’s patient experience?

2017 CAHPS Child Survey CAHPS Survey Version 3.0 Survey Profile Cohort Results Summary Questions

CAHPS Child Version 3.0 Version 3.0 includes the following domains: Access - revised Communication - revised Office Staff Care Coordination - new Child Development- revised (PCMH Item Set) Child Prevention – revised (PCMH Item Set) Total number of core questions was reduced from 62 to 49 Look-back period is 6 months

2017 Child Survey Nine (9) sites 3,949 patients randomly selected to participate 343-515 per site 854 completed surveys 437 mail surveys 417 phone surveys Response rate: 21.9% overall

Patient Demographics 2017 Parent/Respondent demographics 2017 Survey Education High School + 77.3% Gender – Female 89.2% Race – White 68.6% Under 18-24 4.5% 25-34 23.3% 35-44 39.5% 45-64 4.1%

PCMH Kids Results

PCMH Kids Results

PCMH Kids Access Results

PCMH Kids Communication Results

PCMH Kids Office Staff Results

PCMH Kids Care Coordination Results

PCMH Kids Child Development Results

PCMH Kids Child Prevention Results

Summary First Year All Sites Participated No Version 3.0 national results to compare More to Come Questions?