Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allogeneic Transplant Following Brentuximab Vedotin Treatment in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30+ Lymphomas Illidge T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract.
Advertisements

Bendamustine + Rituximab (BR) Chemoimmunotherapy and Maintenance Lenalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 290.
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
1Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 114.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
Results of a Phase II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin as First Line Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory HL Prior to AHCT Chen RW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
A Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Interim Results in Patients with DLBCL.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
FDG-PET Adapted Sequential Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin and Augmented ICE Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin.
Frontline Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Younes A et al. Proc.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Involved Field Radiotherapy versus No Further Treatment in Patients with Clinical Stages IA/IIA Hodgkin Lymphoma and a “Negative” PET Scan After 3 Cycles.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC) and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) in the Brentuximab.
Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) Enables Successful Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
Rituximab Maintenance versus Wait and Watch After Four Courses of R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Previously Untreated Young.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
Brentuximab Vedotin Administered Concurrently with Multi-Agent Chemotherapy as Frontline Treatment of ALCL and Other CD30-Positive Mature T-Cell and NK-Cell.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
A Phase 2 Study of Single-Agent Brentuximab Vedotin for Front- Line Therapy of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Patients Age 60 Years and Above: Interim Results Yasenchak.
Bortezomib (BTZ) and Panobinostat (PAN) Combination Is Effective in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) or NK/T-Cell Lymphoma.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 182.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
KEYNOTE-087: Pembrolizumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Ansell SM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 798.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Gordon LI et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 415.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Zaja F et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 966.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Presentation transcript:

Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382. Three-Year Follow-Up Data and Characterization of Long-Term Remissions from an Ongoing Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Background The standard treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). However, approximately 50% of patients experience relapse of HL after auto-SCT, and this population represents a pronounced unmet need. A pivotal Phase II study demonstrated an overall response rate of 75% with complete remission (CR) in 34% of patients with relapsed/refractory HL treated with brentuximab vedotin (B-vedotin) after auto-SCT (JCO 2012;30:2183-9). Study objective: To present 3-year follow-up data from this Phase II study on the efficacy and safety of B-vedotin for relapsed or refractory HL. Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Ongoing Phase II Study Design NCT00848926 Eligibility (n = 102) Relapsed/refractory HL after auto-SCT Confirmed CD30-positive disease B-vedotin IV, 1.8 mg/kg q3wk, 8-16 cycles Primary endpoint: Objective response rate per independent review facility Secondary endpoints include: CR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and safety. Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Response by Central Independent Review 100 Complete response * Patients still on study, in remission per independent review, and have not received a new anti-cancer therapy 50 Tumor Size (Best % Change from Baseline) -50 -100 Individual Patients (n=98) Patients received a median of 9 cycles (range, 1–16) of B-vedotin Those who achieved an objective response received more cycles of therapy With permission from Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Survival Outcomes The median overall survival was 40.5 months. The estimated 3-year survival rate was 54%. At a median of 32.7 months since first dose of B-vedotin, 51 of 102 patients (50%) were alive at the time of last follow-up. The median PFS by central independent review was 5.6 months. 76 patients achieved CR/partial response: median PFS = 9 months 26 patients experienced stable/progressive disease: median PFS = 2.8 months Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Characterization of Long-Term Remissions by Central Independent Review Characteristic Still in remission and on study (N = 14) With objective response but no longer in remission* (N= 62) Non-responders (N = 26) Demographics and baseline disease characteristics Median age (range) Median number prior therapies (range) Median time (mo) from auto-SCT to relapse (range) Median PFS (wk) from last prior therapy 26.5 (15-54) 2.5 (2-7) 7.8 (2-33) 25.1 32.0 (18-77) 3.0 (1-13) 7.3 (1-131) 27.7 35.0 (18-70) 4.0 (2-8) 5.2 (0-41) 21.1 Exposure and safety information Median number of cycles (range) Patients with Grade ≥3 AEs, n (%) Patients with AE of peripheral neuropathy, n (%) 13.5 (4-16) 9 (64) 9 (64) 9.5 (3-16) 32 (52) 36 (58) 7.0 (1-16) 15 (58) 11 (42) * Includes patients still on study for survival follow-up who have experienced disease progression or initiation of new therapy and patients who have discontinued study treatment for reasons including death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent and physician decision Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Long-Term Remissions by Investigator Review Complete response Partial response End of treatment Allo-SCT Time of last contact Time of last scan PD per central independent review 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Overall Survival (months) a Allo-SCT information unknown 18 patients who remain in remission are being followed on study With permission from Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Select Adverse Events (≥20%) All grades Grade 3/4 Peripheral sensory neuropathy 47% 9% Fatigue 46% 2% Nausea 42% — Upper respiratory tract infection 37% Diarrhea 36% 1% Pyrexia 29% Neutropenia 22% 20% Other Grade 3/4 events in ≥5% of patients: thrombocytopenia (8%) and anemia (6%) Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Author Conclusions After a median observation time of approximately 3 years from the first dose of B-vedotin, 50% of patients with relapsed or refractory HL were alive at the time of last follow-up. Median overall survival was 40.5 months. Eighteen patients remain in remission per investigator review, and 14 of these patients remain in remission per central independent review. This provides an early suggestion that a fraction of these patients may be cured. A randomized Phase III study is being conducted to evaluate B-vedotin in combination with AVD versus ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) for front-line treatment of advanced classical HL (NCT01712490). Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.

Investigator Commentary: Ongoing Phase II Study of B-Vedotin in Relapsed/Refractory HL — 3-Year Follow-Up and Characterization of Long-Term Remissions This was a 3-year follow-up study of the pivotal trial of B-vedotin in patients with relapsed/refractory HL after an auto-SCT. The study reported a high overall response rate of 75%. Half of the patients were alive with a median overall survival of 40.5 months. This suggests that for patients who experience a response to B-vedotin after failure of auto-SCT, the responses are durable. The standard approach for patients with relapsed/refractory HL is salvage chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplant. B-vedotin is usually administered after auto-SCT and is a good option for these patients. In terms of the side effects of B-vedotin, neurologic toxicity is one that all physicians should be aware of. Pneumonitis is of particular concern for patients with HL because they may have received other agents like bleomycin that can cause overlapping toxicity. B-vedotin has also been associated with pancreatitis, and dermatologic problems may occur occasionally. Interview with Christopher Flowers, MD, MS, February 24, 2014