AVHRR operational cloud masks intercomparison

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Precipitation Products PPS Anke Thoss, SMHI User Workshop, February 2015, Madrid.
Advertisements

Cloud Product. HIMAWARI-8/9 CLOUD, VOLCANIC ASH AND DUST PRODUCTS In Response to Action CGMS-41 / JMA-WP-06.
Improved Automated Cloud Classification and Cloud Property Continuity Studies for the Visible/Infrared Imager/Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Michael J. Pavolonis.
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
1 Met Office, UK 2 Japan Meteorological Agency 3 Bureau of Meteorology, Australia Assimilation of data from AIRS for improved numerical weather prediction.
The SMHI AVHRR & Cloud Type dataset for CNN-I/II & BBC Adam Dybbroe The AVHRR dataset Navigation, Coverage, Re-mapping, Resolution The Cloud Type product.
Presenting NWCSAF products, activities by EUMeTrain Mária Putsay and Andreas Wirth Hungarian Meteorological Service ZAMG NWC SAF 2015 Users’ Workshop
16/06/20151 Validating the AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature and Height product using weather radar data COST 722 Expert Meeting Sauli Joro.
10/05/041 Utilisation of satellite data in the verification of HIRLAM cloud forecasts Christoph Zingerle and Pertti Nurmi.
Polar Atmospheric Composition: Some Measurements and Products A Report on Action item STG3-A11 Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Motivation Many GOES products are not directly used in NWP but may help in diagnosing problems in forecasted fields. One example is the GOES cloud classification.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 CLOUD MASK AND QUALITY CONTROL FOR SST WITHIN THE ADVANCED CLEAR SKY PROCESSOR.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA.
Challenges with AVHRR retrieval at high-latitudes ESA LTDP meeting DLR, Munich April 2015 Karl-Göran Karlsson SMHI, Norrköping, Sweden Öystein Godöy.
Lessons on Satellite Meteorology Part VII: Metop Introduction to Metop Instruments The sounders with focus on IASI The GRAS instrument The ASCAT scatterometer.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High Resolution Snow Analysis for COSMO
Evaluation and applications of a new satellite-based surface solar radiation data set for climate analysis Jörg Trentmann1, Richard Müller1, Christine.
New Products from combined MODIS/AIRS Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Allen Huang, Xuebao Wu, and Liam Gumley Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite.
A43D-0138 Towards a New AVHRR High Cloud Climatology from PATMOS-x Andrew K Heidinger, Michael J Pavolonis, Aleksandar Jelenak* and William Straka III.
1 Center for S a t ellite A pplications and R esearch (STAR) Applicability of GOES-R AWG Cloud Algorithms for JPSS/VIIRS AMS Annual Meeting Future Operational.
USING OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION HIGH RESOLUTION VISIBLE DATA FOR THE IMPOVEMENT OF THE RAPID DEVELOPPING THUNDERSTORM PRODUCT Oleksiy Kryvobok Ukrainian.
Initial Trends in Cloud Amount from the AVHRR Pathfinder Atmospheres Extended (PATMOS-x) Data Set Andrew K Heidinger, Michael J Pavolonis**, Aleksandar.
RDT – Rapidly Developing Thunderstorms Satellite Application Facilities (SAFs) are dedicated centres for processing satellite data, achieved by utilizing.
Towards Operational Satellite-based Detection and Short Term Nowcasting of Volcanic Ash* *There are research applications as well. Michael Pavolonis*,
POLAR MULTI-SENSOR AEROSOL PROPERTIES OVER LAND Michael Grzegorski, Rosemary Munro, Gabriele Poli, Andriy Holdak and Ruediger Lang.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
Progress in Level 1 work (calibration + navigation AVHRR GAC/LAC) ESA LTDP AVHRR LAC meeting DLR, Munich April 2015 Karl-Göran Karlsson, Abhay Devasthale,
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
Use of a high-resolution cloud climate data set for validation of Rossby Centre climate simulations Presentation at the EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite.
Cloud Products and Applications: moving from POES to NPOESS (A VIIRS/NOAA-biased perspective) Andrew Heidinger, Fuzhong Weng NOAA/NESDIS Office of Research.
METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION FROM FIRST TO SECOND GENERATION METEOSAT
1 Summary of NWCSAF/PPS PAR User Survey Presented during the NWCSAF Product Assessment Review Workshop October 2005 Prepared by : Anke Thoss, Angela.
Accurate Real-time Navigation of AVHRR data at high latitudes Introduction The position of an AVHRR footprint depends on time, satellite.
ITSC-1227 February-5 March 2002 Use of advanced infrared sounders in cloudy conditions Nadia Fourrié and Florence Rabier Météo France Acknowledgement G.
Visible optical depth,  Optically thicker clouds correlate with colder tops Ship tracks Note, retrievals done on cloudy pixels which are spatially uniform.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
ITSC-12 Cloud processing in IASI context Lydie Lavanant Météo-France, Centre de Météorologie Spatiale, BP 147, Lannion Cedex France Purpose: Retrieval.
(Towards) A New AVHRR Cloud Climatology Andrew Heidinger, Mitch Goldberg, Dan Tarpley NOAA/NESDIS Office of Research and Applications Michael Pavolonis.
Preliminary results from the new AVHRR Pathfinder Atmospheres Extended (PATMOS-x) Data Set Andrew Heidinger a, Michael Pavolonis b and Mitch Goldberg a.
TS 15 The Great Salt Lake System ASLO 2005 Aquatic Sciences Meeting Climatology and Variability of Satellite-derived Temperature of the Great Salt Lake.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.
Australian VLab Centre of Excellence National Himawari-8 Training Campaign Introduction to the Derived Products Compiled by Bodo Zeschke, BMTC, Australian.
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
Global Multi-layer Cloud Distribution from AVHRR
1 Topical Group ”Cloud Mask” - Outcome of presentations and discussions Karl-Göran Karlsson SMHI, Norrköping Sweden Presentation at ICWG workshop Lille,
CLAVR-x in CSPP Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Madison WI
The Convective Rainfall Rate in the NWCSAF
CMa & CT Cloud mask and type
PATMOS-x Reflectance Calibration and Reflectance Time-Series
Precipitation Classification and Analysis from AMSU
CTTH Cloud Top Temperature and Height
Robert Joycea, Pingping Xieb, and Shaorong Wua
Relationships inferred from AIRS-CALIPSO synergy
Winds in the Polar Regions from MODIS: Atmospheric Considerations
SAFNWC/MSG Cloud type/height. Application for fog/low cloud situations
Requirements for microwave inter-calibration
15 October 2004 IPWG-2, Monterey Anke Thoss
Remote Sensing of Cloud, Aerosol, and Land Properties from MODIS
VIIRS Cloud Mask Validation Exercises
Validation of Satellite-derived Lake Surface Temperatures
Global Multi-layer Cloud Distribution from AVHRR
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
First Global 1km Operational Cloud Products from NESDIS
Presentation transcript:

AVHRR operational cloud masks intercomparison Adam Dybbroe Adam.Dybbroe@smhi.se Andrew Heidinger Andrew.Heidinger@noaa.gov Lydie Lavanant lydie.Lavanant@meteo.fr AVHRR operational cloud masks intercomparison CLAVR-x PPS The Polar Platform System (PPS) software package is developed at SMHI in the frame of the EUMETSAT Nowcasting SAF to process data of polar (NOAA/MetOp) platforms in Europe. Four products are available: Cloud Mask Cloud Type Cloud top temperature and height Precipitating clouds The main characteristics of the PPS Cloud Mask and Cloud Type are very similar to those of MAIA. The version 1.0 of PPS to produce all these four products using locally received HRPT data was released to Eumetsat member (and cooperating) states in june 2004. PPS is currently run in operational mode at six European Met Services including the Ocean & Sea Ice SAF High Latitude center and the Climate SAF for cloud parameters at high latitudes. Recently its scope has been widened to the global scale. It has been validated over Europe by comparing results to interactive classified targets, and using a large database of European Synop reports. The PPS is coded in Python, C and Fortran (interfacing to AAPP, RTTOV and Grib). The output format is HDF5. Description on http://www.smhi.se/saf/ The Clouds from AVHRR Extended (CLAVR-x) series of algorithms are designed to serve two roles in the NOAA/NESDIS AVHRR processing. First it serves as the first guess cloud mask for other NESDIS applications. Secondly, it provides a full suite of global cloud properties from the AVHRR. The main characteristics of CLAVR-x are The cloud mask reports a 4-level decision – clear, probably clear, probably cloudy and cloudy Spatial uniformity tests are used to reduce cloud contamination in clear and cloudy pixels. 6 cloud types are produced (fog, water, super-cooled water, opaque ice, cirrus and multi-layer cirrus) NWP, SST weekly analyses and a Fast RTM model (PFAST) are used in cloud detection and cloud property estimation. 1d var approaches are used for all cloud retrievals Cloud temperature and emissivity estimated from a split-window approach. Other products include optical depth and particle size. Products are available regionally at 1 km and globally at 4 km (pixel) or 55 km (gridded). Description available on http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/clavr MAIA The MAIA cloudmask is developed at Météo-France. It is operational at CMS for processing NOAA polar AVHRR data. MAIA V2 is incorporated in EUMETSAT Numerical Weather Prediction SAF AAPP package. MAIA V3 will be used for the operational production of SST at a global scale in the Ocean & Sea Ice SAF and is planned in AAPP6 early 2007 for NOAA and MetOp processing after a MetOp global validation stage. For NOAA, MAIA V3 has been validated to interactive classified targets. Four products are available: Cloud Mask with a confidence flag Cloud Type (10 classes) Cloud top temperature of opaque clouds SST The main characteristics of MAIA are: Grouped thresholding approach Dynamic thresholds derived from RTM (through look-up tables) Use of ancillary data: SSTand albedo climatologies, Landuse and topography maps, NWP forecast parameters. Many different spectral features (single channels and ratios and differences) + texture Products are available at 1km resolution in AAPP output format. Description on http://www.meteorologie.eu.org/ici CLAVR-x – MAIA – PPS intercomparison over European passes The classification convention is the same for MAIA and PPS but is slightly different in CLAVR-x. To conduct the intercomparison, we made the following assumptions: Cloud mask. Clear: clear , probably clear (CLAVR-x) cloud free sea, land , snow or sea ice covered (MAIA & PPS) Low clouds: Clouds with pressures greater than 680 hPa (CLAVR-x) Very-low, Low opaque clouds (Tcloudtop>T700hPa), fractional (MAIA & PPS) Mid clouds: Clouds with pressures between 440 and 680 hPa (CLAVR-x) Mid, high opaque clouds ((T500hPa+Ttropo/2)<Tcloudtop<T700hPa), (MAIA & PPS) High clouds Clouds with pressures less than 440 hPa (CLAVR-x) Very high opaque, very thin, thin, thick cirrus, cirrus above others, fractional (MAIA, PPS) Data Motivation The intercomparison activity has just started and the present results have been done on 7 scenes: 6 full daytime NOAA18 HRPT scenes acquired simultaneously at Meteo-France/CMS and SMHI and the corresponding NOAA LAC data for 6 different days in July 2006. 1 full NOAA17 HRPT winter case from SMHI station and the corresponding NOAA LAC data. Operational satellite cloud classification from AVHRR at Eumetsat has traditionally been limited to 1km locally received HRPT data and from various processing centers around the member states. In contrast, NOAA has focused on global processing of 4 km GAC AVHRR data. Eumetsat will soon launch MetOp, which will provide the first global 1km data from AVHRR. MetOp also represents a new level of cooperation between NOAA and Eumetsat in terms of data sharing. The goal of this work is to intercompare the AVHRR cloud algorithms run operationally by NOAA and Eumetsat and to begin a collaboration to jointly improve our ability to estimate cloud properties from the AVHRR. 3- Way Comparison of Cloud Detection 3- Way Comparison of Low Cloud Detection PPS. SMHI station Ex: NOAA18 – 2006-07-01 12:52 UTC MAIA. CMS station PPS RGB 124 CLAVR-x NOAA LAC 3- Way Comparison of High Cloud Detection 3- Way Comparison of Mid-Level Cloud Detection Unprocessed Cloudfree land Cloudfree sea Snow covere Sea ice Very low clouds Low clouds Medium level clouds High clouds Very high clouds Very thin cirrus Thin cirrus Thick cirrus Cirrus above low/medium Fractional clouds Unclassified Statistical agreement over the 7 orbits Sea. fraction of data = 0.51 Comparisons M & C P & C P & M cloud mask agreement = 0.922 0.918 0.941 high cloud agreement = 0.929 0.858 0.892 mid cloud agreement = 0.919 0.910 0.932 low cloud agreement = 0.924 0.896 0.929 Land. fraction of data = 0.49 Comparisons M & C P & C P & M cloud mask agreement = 0.890 0.833 0.836 high cloud agreement = 0.934 0.773 0.779 mid cloud agreement = 0.931 0.928 0.921 low cloud agreement = 0.895 0.920 0.900 The 2006 Internatioanl TOVS Study Conference (ITSC-XV) , Maratea, Italy, October 4-10. 2006 Conclusion Over water, all three cloud masks agree over 90% of the time Over land, all three cloud masks agree over 80% of the time though the agreement between CLAVR-x and MAIA approaches 90%. For layered cloud detection the best agreement (93%) is found for high clouds over land between CLAVR-x and MAIA. Here the agreement with PPS falls below 80%. Except for high clouds over land, the levels of agreement are quite uniform with all values being around 90%.