Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Advertisements

Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Centrosomes Promote Timely Mitotic Entry in C. elegans Embryos
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Caenorhabditis elegans TAC-1 and ZYG-9 Form a Complex that Is Essential for Long Astral and Spindle Microtubules  Martin Srayko, Sophie Quintin, Anne.
Volume 20, Issue 14, Pages (July 2010)
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Rapid De Novo Centromere Formation Occurs Independently of Heterochromatin Protein 1 in C. elegans Embryos  Karen W.Y. Yuen, Kentaro Nabeshima, Karen.
Terminal Cytokinesis Events Uncovered after an RNAi Screen
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Yuki Hara, Akatsuki Kimura  Current Biology 
Amy Shaub Maddox, Lindsay Lewellyn, Arshad Desai, Karen Oegema 
Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
The Survivin-like C. elegans BIR-1 Protein Acts with the Aurora-like Kinase AIR-2 to Affect Chromosomes and the Spindle Midzone  Elizabeth K. Speliotes,
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Multiple Mechanisms Contribute to Centriole Separation in C. elegans
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Annika Guse, Masanori Mishima, Michael Glotzer  Current Biology 
Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 
Xuehong Xu, Bruce E. Vogel  Current Biology 
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Differential Activation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Contributes to Asynchrony of Cell Division in C. elegans Embryos  Michael Brauchle, Karine Baumer,
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Rewiring Mid1p-Independent Medial Division in Fission Yeast
Completion of cytokinesis in C
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Justin Crest, Kirsten Concha-Moore, William Sullivan  Current Biology 
Joshua N. Bembenek, John G. White, Yixian Zheng  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (May 2002)
CK2 is required for early cell divisions in C. elegans embryos
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
The RhoGAP Domain of CYK-4 Has an Essential Role in RhoA Activation
Asymmetric Segregation of PIE-1 in C
Transcriptional and Developmental Functions of the H3
Contributions of Turgor Pressure, the Contractile Ring, and Septum Assembly to Forces in Cytokinesis in Fission Yeast  Stephen A. Proctor, Nicolas Minc,
TAC-1, a Regulator of Microtubule Length in the C. elegans Embryo
Julie C Canman, David B Hoffman, E.D Salmon  Current Biology 
The Yeast Polo Kinase Cdc5 Regulates the Shape of the Mitotic Nucleus
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 937-946 (June 2013) Condensin and the Spindle Midzone Prevent Cytokinesis Failure Induced by Chromatin Bridges in C. elegans Embryos  Joshua N. Bembenek, Koen J.C. Verbrugghe, Jayshree Khanikar, Györgyi Csankovszki, Raymond C. Chan  Current Biology  Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 937-946 (June 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.028 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Nomarski DIC Time-Lapse Analysis of Cell Division in the One-Cell and Two-Cell Embryos (A) Graph represents the percentages of P0 and AB/P1 cell divisions in wild-type and RNAi-treated embryos that exhibited a cytokinesis cleavage-furrow regression defect in the presence of chromatin obstruction as monitored indirectly by the cross-eyed nuclei phenotype. The number of P0 or AB/P1 cell divisions (n) examined per condition is provided. (B–F) Representative still images of four-cell embryos taken from Nomarski DIC time-lapse movies. Cartoon tracings show a wild-type embryo with each nucleus (gray) centered within the cell, compared with the top-2(RNAi) embryo which exhibited the defective cross-eyed nuclei morphology. (G–H) Nomarski DIC images of a condensin (G) mix-1 RNAi embryo and (H) smc-4 RNAi embryo after the P1 cell division had failed, resulting in a binucleated cell (red asterisks). Scale bar denotes 5 μm. Current Biology 2013 23, 937-946DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Quantitative Immunofluorescence Microcopy of Phosphorylated AIR-2 in One-Cell Embryos (A–C) Representative micrographs of phosphorylated Aurora kinase immunostaining recognizing phosphorylated AIR-1 at the centrosomes (asterisks) and phosphorylated AIR-2 at the spindle midzone (white arrows) of the one-cell P0 blastomere division at anaphase. Phosphorylated AIR-1 and AIR-2 staining are shown in green and DAPI-DNA fluorescence shown in red. Scale bars denote 5 μm. (D) Graph represents the average level of phosphorylated AIR-2 staining on metaphase chromosomes and at the anaphase spindle midzone normalized to the level of phosphorylated AIR-1 staining detected at the anterior spindle pole. The number of embryos (n) quantified per condition is provided. Error bars denote SEM. The p values are determined by two-tailed t tests. Current Biology 2013 23, 937-946DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Nomarski DIC Time-Lapse Analysis of Cell Division Graph represents the percentages of cell divisions exhibiting the cleavage-furrow regression defect after chromosome mis-segregations were induced in the spd-1(RNAi), spd-1(oj5) mutant, the air-2(or207) mutant (acute inactivation), the unc-59(e261);unc-61(e228) mutant, and the let-502(sb118) mutant backgrounds in the one-cell embryo. The number of cell divisions (n) examined per condition is indicated. Current Biology 2013 23, 937-946DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Quantification of the Extent of Chromosome Separation and the Onset of the Cleavage-Furrow Regression in One-Cell P0 Blastomeres (A) Graph represents the average distance spanned by the separating chromosomes (y axis) as a function of time after the onset of cleavage furrow ingression (x axis). (B) Representative still images from the mCherry fluorescence time-lapse movies used for the quantification in (A). The movies are synchronized to the onset of ingression as t = 0 min. (C and D) Graphs represent the average time after the onset of ingression when the cleavage furrow began to regress. The p values are determined by two-tailed t-tests in comparisons to top-2(RNAi) and smc-4(RNAi) as indicated. For all graphs (A, C, and D) the error bars represent SEM and n indicates the number of embryos examined for each test condition. (E) A schematic model for the response to chromosome mis-segregation mediated by AIR-2 activation to halt cytokinesis and facilitate obstruction resolution. The putative functions for condensin in aiding obstruction resolution and providing a signal to maintain the stable cleavage furrow are shown in blue. Current Biology 2013 23, 937-946DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Localization of Condensin I- but Not Condensin II-Specific Subunits at the Midzone and Midbody Immunofluorescence micrographs using antibodies to condensin I CAPG-1 and condensin II HCP-6 subunits in RNAi-treated embryos at anaphase in the P0 division (A–F, 5 μm scale bar) and at the midbody between the AB and P1 blastomeres (G–K, 10 μm scale bar). (L) The graph represents the average time duration that CAPG-1::GFP was detected at the midspindle region from the onset of anaphase. The number of embryos (n) examined per condition is indicated. Error bars represent SD. The p values are determined by two-tailed t-tests. Current Biology 2013 23, 937-946DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Condensin I and II Are Both Required for Robust Cytokinesis in Presence of Chromatin Obstruction The graph represents the percentages of mutant and RNAi-treated embryos that exhibited a cytokinesis cleavage-furrow regression defect in the AB and P1 blastomere divisions as monitored by Nomarski DIC time-lapse microscopy. The number of AB and P1 cell divisions (n) examined is provided for each test condition. Current Biology 2013 23, 937-946DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.028) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions