Tapping mode AFM: simulation and experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AFM Basics Xinyong Chen.
Advertisements

AFM Basics Xinyong Chen.
Coulomb or Dry Friction Damping.
Simple Harmonic Motion and Waves December 1, 2010
Scanning Probe Microscopy
Detection of Percolating Paths in PMMA/CB Segregated Network Composites Using EFM and C-AFM Jacob Waddell, Runqing Ou, Sidhartha Gupta, Charles A. Parker,
SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY By AJHARANI HANSDAH SR NO
Lecture 10. AFM.
AFM-Raman and Tip Enhanced Raman studies of modern nanostructures Pavel Dorozhkin, Alexey Shchekin, Victor Bykov NT-MDT Co., Build. 167, Zelenograd Moscow,
Imaging of flexural and torsional resonance modes of atomic force microscopy cantilevers using optical interferometry Michael Reinstaedtler, Ute Rabe,
Basic Imaging Modes Contact mode AFM Lateral Force Microscopy ( LFM)
Atomic Force Microscopy: characterization of surface topography Andrius Martinavičius.
History and Applications of Atomic Force Microscopy Gregory James PhD Candidate Department of Chemical Engineering 1.
Get to the point!. AFM - atomic force microscopy A 'new' view of structure (1986) AlGaN/GaN quantum well waveguide CD stamper polymer growth surface atoms.
Atomic Force Microscop (AFM) 3 History and Definitions in Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) History Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) Developed.
Atomic Force Microscopy
Design of a compact AFM scanner
FORCED VIBRATION & DAMPING Damping  a process whereby energy is taken from the vibrating system and is being absorbed by the surroundings.  Examples.
Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) Real-Space Surface Microscopic Methods.
Slide # 1 SPM Probe tips CNT attached to a Si probe tip.
آشنایی با میکروسکوپ نیروی اتمی Dr. Janelle Gunther March 10, 1998 ACS Group and MENs, Beckman Institute adapted from the world wide web page at
Using Contact Probes For Nanomechanical Measurements Mark R. VanLandingham U. S. Army Research Laboratory Instrumentation and Metrology for Nanotechnology.
TAPPINGMODE™ IMAGING APPLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY
UIC Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Stephen Fahey Ph.D. Advisor: Professor Sivananthan October 16, 2009.
Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007.
NANO 225 Micro/Nanofabrication Characterization: Scanning Probe Microscopy 1.
Introduction to Atomic Force Microscopy
Feedback-induced instability in tapping mode atomic force microscopy: theory and experiment by O. Payton, A. R. Champneys, M. E. Homer, L. Picco, and M.
AFM. The cantilever holder The cantilever dimensions Tip position.
Common scanning probe modes
Scanning Probe Microscopy Colin Folta Matt Hense ME381R 11/30/04.
5 kV  = 0.5 nm Atomic resolution TEM image EBPG (Electron beam pattern generator) 100 kV  = 0.12 nm.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
Vibrations & Waves. In the example of a mass on a horizontal spring, m has a value of 0.80 kg and the spring constant, k, is 180 N/m. At time t = 0 the.
Electric Force Microscopy (EFM)
Atomic Force Microscopy Alexander Chew Florida State University BSC5936 April 2005.
Fachgebiet 3D-Nanostrukturierung, Institut für Physik Contact: Office:
Noncontact Modal Excitation of Small Structures Using Ultrasound Radiation Force Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Meeting Springfield, MA June.
EEM. Nanotechnology and Nanoelectronics
SPM Users Basic Training August 2010 Lecture VIII – AC Imaging Modes: ACAFM and MAC Imaging methods using oscillating cantilevers.
Scanning Probe Microscopy
1 Challenge the future A Study on Micro-Actuators for Atomic Force Microscopes Chonghe Zhong.
Get to the point!.
Metallurgha.ir1. Lecture 5 Advanced Topics II Signal, Noise and Bandwidth. Fundamental Limitations of force measurement metallurgha.ir2.
Get to the point!.
Objective Functions for Optimizing Resonant Mass Sensor Performance
Nanoindentation.
Scanning Probe Microscopy: Atomic Force Microscope
Period of Simple Harmonic Motion
Work done by a variable force
Scanning Probe Microscopy History
7x7 surface have been removed and deposited.
MultiView 400™ Product Presentation Nanonics MultiView 400™
Modelling of Atomic Force Microscope(AFM)
MAK4041-Mechanical Vibrations
Scanning Probe Microscopy History
Atomic Force Microscopy Samrat Dutta, Ph.D.
NANO 230 Micro/Nano characterization
Imaging Structural Proteins
Surface ultrastructure and mechanical property of human chondrocyte revealed by atomic force microscopy  C.-H. Hsieh, Ph.D., Y.-H. Lin, Ph.D., S. Lin,
INSPECTION TECHNIQUES
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Local Viscoelastic Properties of Live Cells Investigated Using Dynamic and Quasi-Static Atomic Force Microscopy Methods  Alexander Cartagena, Arvind Raman 
Lateral Mechanical Coupling of Stereocilia in Cochlear Hair Bundles
Stiffness Tomography by Atomic Force Microscopy
Atomic Force Microscope
Atomic Force Microscopy
AFM modes 1- Contact Mode
Quantitative Analysis of the Viscoelastic Properties of Thin Regions of Fibroblasts Using Atomic Force Microscopy  R.E. Mahaffy, S. Park, E. Gerde, J.
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Tapping mode AFM: simulation and experiment Wenqi Deng Supervisors: Guang-Ming Zhang,Dave Harvey, Francis Lilley

Outline Background of AFM Simulation and results Experiment and results Discussion Project plan

What is AFM? Image topography Mechanical, electrical, and magnetic properties of surfaces First atomic force microscope was invented in 1986 by Binnig.

How AFM works? The x and y-piezos provide lateral scanning(up to 19um), while the z-piezo extends and retracts to follow the surface topography(up to 12um) .

Image mode Tapping mode The cantilever is vibrated at its resonant frequency Intermittent contact with sample Reduce sample destruction

Phase imaging Measure the phase lag of the cantilever oscillation (solid wave) relative to the phase of the piezo drive (dashed wave). The amplitude signal is used simultaneously by the controller for Tapping Mode feedback. Spatial variations in sample properties cause shifts in the cantilever phase (bottom)

Why phase image provides more information of structure? Topography (left) & phase (right) images of a composite polymer Higher spots in the AFM topography images should correspond to the hard phase polymer? Brighter areas correspond to harder materials? We don’t have an agreement yet.

1D Lumped model of tapping mode AFM Simulation model The cantilever is treated to be a massless spring of stiffness k having an effective mass at the end and equivalent damping c. 1D Lumped model of tapping mode AFM

The tip–sample forces are modeled by three springs with spring constants kN and kS for vertical and lateral contact stiffness, respectively. 3D model tapping mode AFM

Geometry Type AC mode air Spring k (N/m) 2.8 (0.5 - 9.5) Freq (kHz) 75 (45 - 115) Length (µm) 225 (215 - 235) Width (µm) 28 (20 - 35) Thickness (µm) 3.0 (2.0 - 4.0) Shape rectangular Material Silicon Reflex Coating (nm) none A piezo (red) is attached behind the end of the cantilever. A voltage of sin(2*pi*f*t)*4 is applied to the piezo to cause the vibration of the cantilever. The free vibration amplitude is about 28nm.

Resonant frequency : 65208.9 Hz Eigenfrequency study Resonant frequency : 65208.9 Hz

Contact model Equilibrium position, the initial tip sample separation Cantilever, tip and sample are defined as elastic deformation model

Time dependent study Initial tip sample separation: 19 nm(green line) Displacement curve

Experiment results

Discussion Limitation of simulation and experiment The simulation just provides the first cycle vibration, which means it has not reached steady state yet. It may take hundreds of cycles to reach steady state, hence, based on the simulation time, it is not realistic to carry out a simulation until the steady state. However, due to the limitation of experiment, the AFM data is captured under the steady state, and it is difficult to determine the contact time. It seems a challenge to identify the bouncing effect.

Project Plan Future work Set up a different experiment to determine the contact time from the deflection data. Modify the simulation model.

Simulate tapping mode AFM separately Simulate tapping mode AFM separately. Calculate the contact stiffness between tip and sample using the model below. Investigate what parameters affect contact stiffness, such as the radius of the tip, deformation of the sample, indentation force, young’s modulus of tip and sample. Tip-sample model

In real experiment, the sample surface is not always flat In real experiment, the sample surface is not always flat. The tip may not indent normally to the surface. Especially, the tip scans across the sidewall. It is worthwhile to study how forces from different direction affect contact stiffness.

The calculated contact stiffness can be applied to the tip. Phase vs contact stiffness curve Might help to select what kind of cantilevers(soft or stiff?) for phase imaging Cantilever-tip model

While using cantilever-tip model, computation time is reduced While using cantilever-tip model, computation time is reduced. It is possible to simulate tapping mode until it becomes steady. Calculate the steady time, then we might be able to see how scan rate affects phase imaging.

Thank you!!! Any Questions?