Mechanism of Actin-Based Motility: A Dynamic State Diagram

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Growth and Morphology of Escherichia coli: Experiments and Stochastic Model  Pradeep Kumar, Albert Libchaber  Biophysical.
Dynamic Deformation and Recovery Response of Red Blood Cells to a Cyclically Reversing Shear Flow: Effects of Frequency of Cyclically Reversing Shear.
Temperature Control Methods in a Laser Tweezers System
Thomas J. English, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical Journal 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 94, Issue 12, Pages (June 2008)
3-D Particle Tracking in a Two-Photon Microscope: Application to the Study of Molecular Dynamics in Cells  Valeria Levi, QiaoQiao Ruan, Enrico Gratton 
Computational Analysis of F-Actin Turnover in Cortical Actin Meshworks Using Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy  A. Ponti, P. Vallotton, W.C. Salmon, C.M.
Non-equilibrium Membrane Homeostasis in Expanding Cellular Domains
Regular Gaits and Optimal Velocities for Motor Proteins
Oscillatory Flow Accelerates Autocrine Signaling due to Nonlinear Effect of Convection on Receptor-Related Actions  Marek Nebyla, Michal Přibyl, Igor.
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Dynamics of Membrane Nanotubulation and DNA Self-Assembly
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Jordi Soriano, Sten Rüdiger, Pramod Pullarkat, Albrecht Ott 
Micro Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomanipulation Inside Live Cells
One-Dimensional Brownian Motion of Charged Nanoparticles along Microtubules: A Model System for Weak Binding Interactions  Itsushi Minoura, Eisaku Katayama,
Multicellular Sprouting In Vitro
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
Pulsatile Lipid Vesicles under Osmotic Stress
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Instabilities in the Transient Response of Muscle
Serapion Pyrpassopoulos, Henry Shuman, E. Michael Ostap 
Enhanced Depolymerization of Actin Filaments by ADF/Cofilin and Monomer Funneling by Capping Protein Cooperate to Accelerate Barbed-End Growth  Shashank.
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Creep Function of a Single Living Cell
Singular Behavior of Slow Dynamics of Single Excitable Cells
Large Currents Generate Cardiac Ca2+ Sparks
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Alex Mogilner, Leah Edelstein-Keshet  Biophysical Journal 
Kelly E. Caputo, Dooyoung Lee, Michael R. King, Daniel A. Hammer 
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Martin Clausen, Michael Koomey, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Substrate Deformation Predicts Neuronal Growth Cone Advance
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Benjamin Pfeuty, Quentin Thommen, Marc Lefranc  Biophysical Journal 
B-S Transition in Short Oligonucleotides
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
P. Müller-Buschbaum, R. Gebhardt, S.V. Roth, E. Metwalli, W. Doster 
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Andrew E. Blanchard, Chen Liao, Ting Lu  Biophysical Journal 
Jing Chen, John Neu, Makoto Miyata, George Oster  Biophysical Journal 
An Elastic Analysis of Listeria monocytogenes Propulsion
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
Actin-Myosin Viscoelastic Flow in the Keratocyte Lamellipod
Nicholas C. Darnton, Howard C. Berg  Biophysical Journal 
Furrow Constriction in Animal Cell Cytokinesis
Main Phase Transitions in Supported Lipid Single-Bilayer
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Computational Analysis of F-Actin Turnover in Cortical Actin Meshworks Using Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy  A. Ponti, P. Vallotton, W.C. Salmon, C.M.
Jochen Zimmer, Declan A. Doyle, J. Günter Grossmann 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Regular Gaits and Optimal Velocities for Motor Proteins
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
The Effects of Force Inhibition by Sodium Vanadate on Cross-Bridge Binding, Force Redevelopment, and Ca2+ Activation in Cardiac Muscle  D.A. Martyn, L.
Volume 94, Issue 12, Pages (June 2008)
Jocelyn Étienne, Alain Duperray  Biophysical Journal 
The Stochastic Dynamics of Filopodial Growth
Presentation transcript:

Mechanism of Actin-Based Motility: A Dynamic State Diagram Anne Bernheim-Groswasser, Jacques Prost, Cécile Sykes  Biophysical Journal  Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 1411-1419 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.055822 Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A state diagram of the bead dynamics. Two distinct motion regimes are observed depending on the bead diameter D and the protein surface concentration Cs. Insets: (A) 1-μm-diameter bead moving continuously, bar=5μm; (B and C) gray-level intensity along the comet for a 4.5-μm-diameter bead at surface concentrations of active proteins of Cs=(2.2±0.3)×10−2 molecules/nm2 and Cs=(1.17±0.02)×10−2 molecules/nm2, respectively; (D) 9.1-μm-diameter bead in a saltatory regime, bar=10μm. The continuous regime (open circles) is characterized by a constant velocity and a constant gel density of the comet tail (insets A and C). The saltatory regime (open squares) is characterized by a periodic movement of the beads and also expressed by a periodic structure of the tail (insets B and D). The solid dashed-dot line marks the approximate boundary between these two regimes. At a bead diameter of 2.8μm and at saturating surface concentration Cs=Css=(6±1)×10−2 molecules/nm2, an intermittent velocity regime (open triangle) is identified. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Dependence of the thickness of the actin gel layer at symmetry breaking (triangles) as a function of the bead diameter D at a saturating surface density Css of active VCA. The thickness of the first actin burst or layer is found to be linearly dependent on the bead diameter (triangles) and regardless of the motion type, whether it is continuous or saltatory. For large beads (D>2.1μm), which perform discontinuous motion, the following layers are formed while the bead is already in motion, during each jump or velocity cycle (marked by a shaded arrow). Insets: the bead diameter is A and a, 2.8μm; B and b, 4.5μm; C and c, 6.3μm; and D and d, 9.1μm. (A–D) Bar=10μm. (a–d) Bar=2μm. Even though actin depolymerization occurs, the end of the comet remained visible until the end of the experiment. The beads that move periodically display a periodic comet structure (B–D, b–d). Visual inspection of the structure of the comet body reveals that the thickness of the gel layers is independent of the bead diameter within experimental error (a–d). Its value is e*=1.5±0.2μm (squares). The gel thickness is measured by analysis of the gray-level intensity of the actin gel along the comet on a final image. The error in the gel thickness is calculated statistically using ∼10 beads with ∼5 velocity cycles per bead. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Velocity of a 6.3-μm-diameter bead performing periodic motion, as a function of time. During one cycle, there are three phases: 1, the bead slows down from Vmax to Vmin; 2, the velocity slowly increases to an intermediate velocity; and 3, the velocity increases abruptly to the value Vmax. The timelength of each phase is characterized by τrep, τ′-τrep, and τ for phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The normalized velocity amplitude (ΔV/V) = (Vmax −Vmin)/Vmax + Vmin) as a function of the bead diameter D at saturating surface density Css is plotted. Small beads (D≤2.1μm) move smoothly, thus (ΔV/V) = 0. Increasing the bead diameter (D≥2.8μm) induces a transition to a motion type for which (ΔV/V)≠0: for intermediate bead diameters (D=2.8μm) we observe the coexistence of two regimes of motion (solid dash-dot double arrow), a steady one, where (Vmax-Vmin)=0; and a saltatory one, with (Vmax-Vmin) ≠ 0. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Scheme of the notations used in the text. The bead of diameter D is moving at a velocity V and the comet is immobile. The gel layer has a thickness e. Friction occurs between the comet and the bead surface, and the gel elasticity results in a stress σrr normal to the bead surface. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Schematic plot of the normalized elastic force per nucleator fe/fth and the normalized friction force ff(V)/fth as a function of the normalized bead velocity V/Vmax for two different bead diameters D1 and D2 (D1≤D2). The elastic force fe is independent of V (see text). The normalized friction force curve has a complex velocity dependence: at low (a-b branch) and high (c-d branch) velocities, the normalized friction force is proportional to the velocity with a large (coefficient β) and a standard (coefficient ξs) friction coefficient per nucleator, respectively. For intermediate velocities (segment b-c), the dependence on V is non-monotonous. The force normalization quotient fth corresponds to the local maximum of the friction curve and also to the elastic force threshold that delimits the saltatory and continuous regimes. When the two curves intersect at a single point, we are in the continuous regime of motion, characterized by a velocity Vcont/Vmax. When there are two intersection points (at fe ≅fth for e=e*, point b and point 1,1), we are in the saltatory regime. Note that an increase of D from D1 to D2 reduces the propulsion force and drives the system toward a saltatory regime of motion. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Schematic plot of the normalized elastic force per nucleator fe/fth and the normalized friction force ff(V)/fth as a function of the normalized bead velocity V/Vmax for two different protein surface concentrations Cs1 and Cs2 (Cs1>Cs2). The force normalization quotient fth corresponds to the maximal value of the force for the first friction branch, and also to the force threshold that delimits the saltatory and the continuous regimes. Starting from a surface concentration Cs=Cs2 and a bead diameter such that the movement is in a continuous regime (one intersection point at abscissa Vcont/Vmax) and increasing Cs to Cs1 leads to a saltatory motion characterized by the two extreme velocities Vmax and Vmin. The characteristic time τrep is the typical time during which the velocity drops from Vmax to Vmin (dashed curve), it also corresponds to the time required to repolymerize a gel of thickness e¯ after being expelled from the bead surface. The value τ′ is the time it requires to rebuild a gel of thickness e*. It also corresponds to the time it takes for the velocity to drop from Vmax to Vmin (dashed line) and to accelerate again to an intermediate velocity Vb. The time τ′-τrep represents the typical time for the gel to continue building up a gel from thickness e¯ to e* and the bead velocity to accelerate from Vmin to Vb. Finally, τ is the time it takes to expel the gel of thickness e* from the bead surface, where the velocity during this period accelerate from Vb to Vmax (horizontal arrow). The duration of one complete velocity cycle is therefore τ′+τ Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Scheme: characteristic length ℓ over which the relative velocity of the gel as referenced to the bead is Vmax. The friction is then at its minimum value. During the same time τ′, the thickness e* polymerizes at the velocity of polymerization νp, and the gel advances on the length ℓ at a velocity Vmax. Thus we obtain τ'≅e∗/νp=ℓ/Vmax. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 The maximal velocity Vmax of beads performing periodic motion at saturating protein surface density is plotted as a function of inverse bead diameter (D−1). Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1411-1419DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.055822) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions