Xiao-yu Zheng, Erin K. O’Shea  Cell Reports 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Image collection and region of interest assignment. Four channels were collected.
Advertisements

Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Johanna Sigl-Glöckner, Michael Brecht  Cell Reports 
Kendy K. Wong, Ronald J. deLeeuw, Nirpjit S. Dosanjh, Lindsey R
Daw Neuron Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
In Vivo Single-Cell Detection of Metabolic Oscillations in Stem Cells
Wei-Hsiang Lin, Edo Kussell  Current Biology 
Tineke L. Lenstra, Antoine Coulon, Carson C. Chow, Daniel R. Larson 
ppGpp Controls Global Gene Expression in Light and in Darkness in S
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages e5 (May 2018)
Antonio Serrano-Mislata, Katharina Schiessl, Robert Sablowski 
Volume 131, Issue 7, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Quantitative Live Cell Imaging Reveals a Gradual Shift between DNA Repair Mechanisms and a Maximal Use of HR in Mid S Phase  Ketki Karanam, Ran Kafri,
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Adam M. Corrigan, Jonathan R. Chubb  Current Biology 
Single-Cell Analysis of Growth in Budding Yeast and Bacteria Reveals a Common Size Regulation Strategy  Ilya Soifer, Lydia Robert, Ariel Amir  Current.
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Serapion Pyrpassopoulos, Henry Shuman, E. Michael Ostap 
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (May 2017)
Tineke L. Lenstra, Antoine Coulon, Carson C. Chow, Daniel R. Larson 
James G. Heys, Krsna V. Rangarajan, Daniel A. Dombeck  Neuron 
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
A Visual Framework for Classifying Determinants of Cell Size
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Johanna Sigl-Glöckner, Michael Brecht  Cell Reports 
Long-Range Directional Movement of an Interphase Chromosome Site
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
V. Vetri, G. Ossato, V. Militello, M.A. Digman, M. Leone, E. Gratton 
Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages e5 (March 2018)
An RpaA-Dependent Sigma Factor Cascade Sets the Timing of Circadian Transcriptional Rhythms in Synechococcus elongatus  Kathleen E. Fleming, Erin K. O’Shea 
The Centriolar Protein Bld10/Cep135 Is Required to Establish Centrosome Asymmetry in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Priyanka Singh, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Clemens.
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Dynamic Localization of the Cyanobacterial Circadian Clock Proteins
Phage DNA Dynamics in Cells with Different Fates
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
A Single Templating RNA in Yeast Telomerase
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Giulia Varsano, Yuedi Wang, Min Wu  Cell Reports 
Eugenia Y. Xu, Karl A. Zawadzki, James R. Broach  Molecular Cell 
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Rsp1p, a J Domain Protein Required for Disassembly and Assembly of Microtubule Organizing Centers during the Fission Yeast Cell Cycle  Sabina Zimmerman,
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages e4 (January 2019)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages e14 (May 2017)
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Pervasive Targeting of Nascent Transcripts by Hfq
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages e2 (September 2017)
Self-Organization of Minimal Anaphase Spindle Midzone Bundles
Mutational Analysis of Ionizing Radiation Induced Neoplasms
Timothy O’Leary, Eve Marder  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Cyanobacteria Maintain Constant Protein Concentration despite Genome Copy-Number Variation  Xiao-yu Zheng, Erin K. O’Shea  Cell Reports  Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 497-504 (April 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.067 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 19, 497-504DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.067) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Protein Concentration Is Constant in Cells with Different Chromosome Copy Numbers (A) Each chromosome was labeled with mTurquoise2-tagged tetracycline repressor protein (TetR-mTurq2) and tetracycline operator arrays (tetO). The YFP marker protein was integrated into each chromosome. (B) Using a fluorescence microscope, chromosomes can be visualized and YFP fluorescence can be measured. A single z section of representative images in each channel is shown. (C) Computational analysis enabled automatic cell segmentation and chromosome foci identification. Green lines outline the cells segmented by the Oufti software, overlaid with a single z section of the image from the YFP channel (top). Red dots show chromosomes identified by custom-written scripts, overlaid with the maximal projection from the z stack image from the CFP channel (bottom). (D) YFP fluorescence intensity concentration in arbitrary units per cubic micrometer (A.U./μm3) for each cell is plotted against chromosome copy number. Data shown are from the strain with BbbJ23119::YFP. Each blue point represents one single-cell measurement. Violin plots represent distributions of single-cell data. Yellow diamonds represent the sample mean. Error bars represent SD. Top panel bar graph shows the coefficient of variation from cells with the same chromosome copy number. Bottom histogram shows the distribution of chromosome copy numbers. N shows the total sample size. Data from one biological replicate is shown, but similar results were obtained in three biological replicates. (E) Mean YFP concentrations from groups of cells with the same chromosome copy number for the pkaiBC::YFP strain are shown. Blue and red colors represent data obtained at the peak phase and trough phase of the circadian cycle, respectively. The corresponding distributions of chromosome copy numbers are presented in the top and bottom histograms. Error bars represent SD. Data from one biological replicate is shown, but similar results were obtained in two biological replicates. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2017 19, 497-504DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.067) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cell Volume and Total YFP Amount, Respectively, Are Positively, Linearly Correlated with Chromosome Copy Number (A and B) Data of cell volume (A) and total YFP amount (B) from the S. elongatus strain with BbbJ23119::YFP is presented. Each blue point represents one single-cell measurement. Violin plots represent distributions of single-cell data. Yellow diamonds represent the sample mean. Error bars represent SD. The histogram shows the distribution of chromosome copy numbers. N shows the total sample size. The red line shows the best linear fit, the parameters of which are listed in Table S1. (C) Total YFP fluorescence intensity was plotted against cell volume. Each point represents a single-cell measurement. Green, blue, and red represent cells with two, four, and six chromosome copies, respectively. Histograms show the corresponding volume distributions. For chromosome copy number 2 and 6, data presented are from all 185 cells and 184 cells measured, respectively. For chromosome copy number 4, a random 180-cell subset of 876 cells is shown. The black line shows the best linear fit of total YFP intensity versus cell volume based on data from all 2,575 cells. For all subfigures, data are from the same biological replicate as that shown in Figure 1D. Similar results were obtained from three biological replicates. See also Figure S2 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2017 19, 497-504DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.067) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cells Grown in Low Light Intensity or Darkness Maintain the Linear Correlation between Cell Volume and Genome Copy Number and Maintain Homogeneous Protein Concentration Despite Genome Copy-Number Variation (A) Cells (the BbbJ23119::YFP strain) were grown under constant illumination at low light intensity (9 μE m−2s−1). (B) Cells (the BbbJ23119::YFP strain) were first grown in constant light (30 μE m−2s−1) until reaching exponential growth, then shifted to darkness for 24 hr. The histogram shows the distribution of chromosome copy numbers. Data from cells with a chromosome copy number frequency less than 20 are not shown. N shows the total sample size presented. Each blue point represents one single-cell measurement. Violin plots represent distributions of single-cell data. Yellow diamonds represent the sample mean. Error bars represent SD. The red line shows the best linear fit, the parameters of which are listed in Table S1. Data shown are from one biological replicate. Similar results were obtained in two biological replicates for the low light intensity growth condition. See also Figure S3 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2017 19, 497-504DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.067) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The ΔminD Mutant that Is Defective in the Correct Placement of the Division Septum Still Maintains Homogeneous Protein Concentration in Cells with Different Chromosome Copy Numbers (A) In wild-type cells, the division septum is placed in the middle of the cell and chromosome copies are evenly distributed along the long axis of the cell; thus, daughter cells inherit approximately equal numbers of chromosome copies from the mother cell. In the ΔminD mutant, the division septum is randomly placed but the chromosome spatial ordering maintains; thus, daughter cells inherit unequal numbers of chromosome copies. (B–D) For the ΔminD mutant strain with BbbJ23119::YFP, YFP fluorescence concentration (B), cell volume (C), and total YFP intensity (D) were plotted against chromosome copy number, respectively. The histogram shows the distribution of chromosome copy numbers. N shows the total sample size presented. Each blue point represents one single-cell measurement. Violin plots represent distributions of single-cell data. Yellow diamonds represent the sample mean. Error bars represent SD. The red line shows the best linear fit, the parameters of which are listed in Table S1. Similar results were obtained in three biological replicates. See also Figure S4 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2017 19, 497-504DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.067) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions