APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Specification Issues in Relational Models David A. Kenny University of Connecticut Talk can be downloaded at:
Advertisements

Working with Under-identified Structural Equation Models
University of Connecticut
Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM David A
To go further: intra- versus interindividual variability.
Using k to Estimate and Test Patterns in the APIM David A. Kenny February 17, 2013.
Test of Distinguishability
Seven Deadly Sins of Dyadic Data Analysis David A. Kenny February 14, 2013.
G Lecture 10 SEM methods revisited Multilevel models revisited
1 Regression as Moment Structure. 2 Regression Equation Y =  X + v Observable Variables Y z = X Moment matrix  YY  YX  =  YX  XX Moment structure.
Structural Equation Modeling
Patterns of Actor and Partner Effects
Tests of Significance for Regression & Correlation b* will equal the population parameter of the slope rather thanbecause beta has another meaning with.
Social Relations Model: Estimation Indistinguishable Dyads David A. Kenny.
Social Relations Model: Estimation Distinguishable Dyads
SOC 681 James G. Anderson, PhD
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Growth Curve Model Using SEM
APIM with Between- and Within Dyads Outcomes David A. Kenny December 11, 2014.
Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Using SPSS
Multilevel Modeling: Other Topics
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Moderation in Structural Equation Modeling: Specification, Estimation, and Interpretation Using Quadratic Structural Equations Jeffrey R. Edwards University.
Moderation: Introduction
Issues in structural equation modeling Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Illustrating DyadR Using the Truth & Bias Model
One-with-Many Design: Estimation David A. Kenny June 22, 2013.
Growth Curve Models Using Multilevel Modeling with SPSS David A. Kenny January 23, 2014.
1 Analysis Consequences of Dependent Measurement Problems in Research on Older Couples Jason T. Newsom Institute on Aging Portland State University Presented.
One-with-Many Design: Introduction David A. Kenny June 11, 2013.
Estimation Kline Chapter 7 (skip , appendices)
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Regression Chapter 16. Regression >Builds on Correlation >The difference is a question of prediction versus relation Regression predicts, correlation.
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Controlling for Baseline
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny January 25, Background Introduction to Measures of Fit.
Multilevel Modeling: Other Topics David A. Kenny January 7, 2014.
Environmental Modeling Basic Testing Methods - Statistics III.
Estimating and Testing Hypotheses about Means James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Stuff I Have Done and Am Doing Now David A. Kenny.
Social Relations Model: Multiple Variables David A. Kenny.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
SEM Model Fit: Introduction David A. Kenny January 12, 2014.
Social Relations Model Designs David A. Kenny June 17, 2013.
Analysis of Experiments
Social Relations Model: Estimation (Indistinguishable) David A. Kenny.
Definitions in Dyadic Data Analysis David A. Kenny February 18, 2013.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Longitudinal Data David A. Kenny December
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM. APIM A model that simultaneously estimates actor and partner effects on an outcome variable The actor and.
Testing the Equality of Means and Variances in Over-Time Data David A. Kenny.
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny.
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation by Interactions
Statistics for Managers using Microsoft Excel 3rd Edition
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation (in development)
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation
Psychology 202a Advanced Psychological Statistics
Chapter 13 Created by Bethany Stubbe and Stephan Kogitz.
Claire A. Wood1, Heather M. Helms2, & W. Roger Mills-Koonce2
Repeated Measures Analysis Using Multilevel Modeling with SPSS
Defining, Measuring, and Dealing with Nonindependence
A New Approach to the Study of Teams: The GAPIM
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Social Relations Model: Estimation of Relationship Effects
Model Comparison: some basic concepts
Measuring Change in Two-Wave Studies
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
SEM evaluation and rules
Presentation transcript:

APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation David A. Kenny March 22, 2013

You Need to Know APIM (click for webinar) Structural Equation Modeling Amos APIM with Distinguishable Dyads Using SEM (click for webinar)

Example Dataset: Acitelli dyad dataset 148 married couples Outcome Satisfaction (Wife and Husband) Predictor Variable Other-Positivity (Wife and Husband) How positive the Wife views her Husband, and how positive the Husband views his Wife

Constraints Set six parameters equal: Two actor effects Two partner effects Two error variances Two Y intercepts Two X variances Two X means

Actor Effect: The effect of own X on Y 5

Partner Effect: The effect of partner’s X on Y 6

Intercept: The expected value for Y when both X1 and X2 equal zero 7

Error Variance: Unexplained variance in Y 8

Means: Mean for X 9

Variances: Variance of X 10

(pretending indistinguishable) Acitelli Example (pretending indistinguishable)

Meaning of the c2 c2(6) = 9.192, p = .163 What does it mean? If members were randomly assigned to 1 and 2, the value would be totally arbitrary and merely reflects the non-random assignment of persons to be a “1” and a “2.” If there was a different assignment pattern, the c2 would change, but the df and all of the estimates and their standard errors would not. Thus, if dyad members were indistinguishable, the c2 would not at all meaningful and be totally arbitrary.

I-Sat Model Because the c2 changes and is fundamentally arbitrary, it should not be interpreted. For the basic APIM, the c2 for the indistinguishable model with 6 df evaluates the non-random sorting of dyad members to the roles of 1 and 2. Because this is a saturated model, this model is designated as the I-Sat (interchangeable and saturated) model. For any non-saturated model, the I-Sat c2 (e.g., 9.192) and its df (e.g., 6) must be subtracted off. For example, for the model in which we have equal actor and partner effects, the c2(7) = 12.995, but when we adjust for the I-Sat model, we have c2(1) = 3.803.

Fit Indices: RMSEA To compute the RMSEA, we adjust the c2 and the df using the I-Sat model values. These adjusted values are then used to compute the RMSEA.

Fit Indices: TLI and CFI These indices need a null or independence model. The usual null model: variances free but correlations fixed to zero. For indistinguishable dyads Means and variances for the members from the same dyad equal. Adjust the df and c2 using the I-SAT model.

Strategy Use o&k.xls Need c2 and df for the following models Your model I-SAT model (may the same as above) Null model with mean and variances set equal for the two dyad members

o&k.xks Example

Fit Statistics Model c2 df c2’ df ’ RMSEA CFI ISAT 9.192 6 0 Null 157.863 10 p = 0 44.061 7 34.869 1 .480 .771 a = p 12.995 7 3.803 1 .138 .981

The ISAT Model The df are kq + q(q + 1) where q is the number of mixed variables in the model, k the number of between-dyads variables, and df are the total number of constraints. Check to see the “implied moment matrix” is symmetric for persons 1 and 2. If not, the equality constraints are not correct.

Standardization The standardized solution in Amos and other SEM programs are correct if dyad members are treated as completely indistinguishable.

Summary Estimation with of the APIM with indistinguishable dyads using SEM is tricky. Alternatives Multilevel Modeling Olsen & Kenny discuss using pairwise data and weighting cases by 0.5.

Additional Readings Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11, 127-141. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press, Chapter 5 (especially pp. 111-112) and Chapter 7, pp. 168-169.