Combination products The paradigm shift

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison GHTF/SG5/N5:2012 vs. MEDDEV 2.7/3:2010
Advertisements

Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
Fulfilling the Promise of Medicine Together New FDA Safety Reporting Requirements 2010 John McLane, Ph.D. COO & Vice President Clinical and Regulatory.
Field Investigators: ADE Detectives. Section One Introduction to the Team and Their Roles.
Pilot Risk-Ranking Model to Prioritize Manufacturing Sites for GMP Inspections Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Manufacturing Subcommittee.
Session 6: Data Integrity and Inspection of e-Clinical Computerized Systems May 15, 2011 | Beijing, China Kim Nitahara Principal Consultant and CEO META.
1 Unique Device Identification (UDI) – Enabling the Transformation of Medical Device Safety Terrie Reed, MSIE Associate Director, Informatics
GLOBAL REGULATORY STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS SCIENTIFIC SARAH POWELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, REGULATORY STRATEGIES SEPTEMBER 14-17, 2008 BOSTON, MA.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
Patient Safety Initiatives Kelly Cronin Director, Patient Safety and Outcomes Research Office of Policy and Planning Office of the Commissioner FDA.
POSTMARKETING ADVERSE DRUG EXPERIENCE INSPECTIONAL PROGRAM CDR Thomas R. Berry, RPh FDA, Investigator RAL-RP / ATL-DO.
Understanding cGMPS – What Attorneys Need to Know The Nuts + Bolts of cGMPS July 10, CFR Parts 210 and 211 cGMP case law Andrew D. Bos Senior Director.
Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) RECALLS.  21 CFR 7.40 provides guidance on the policy, procedures, and industry responsibilities for recalls. 
Patient Safety and Medical Devices Sonia Swayze, RN, MA, C and Suzanne Rich, RN, MA, CT.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
H. Lundbeck A/S21-Sep-151 Pharmacovigilance during clinical development SAE reporting, ASUR and PSUR IFF Seminar, 21. February 2007.
1Presentation Name Pre-Marketing Safety Assessment: The Safety Review Guidance Armando Oliva, M.D. Associate Director for Policy Office of New Drugs.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Rules for Supporting Part 803 and Part 806 Decision Making Page 1 Establishing Rules for: Medical Device Reports (803) & Correction and Removal Reports.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Agenda for Session Compliance in Clinical Research
Health Insurance portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)‏
REGULATION OF COMBINATION PRODUCTS Mark A. Heller Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP MassMEDIC Combination Product Program, March 28, 2006.
FDA Regulatory and Compliance Symposium
Competency-Development Project 08-October MDIC 2 What is the Competency-Development Project? ‏ Purpose: The purpose of this project is to improve.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
FDA job description  Regulates about 25% of all consumer purchases  Mission summary: protect and advance public health  Products: food, cosmetics, drugs,
Postmarketing Pharmacovigilance Practice at FDA Lanh Green, Pharm.D., M.P.H. Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology June 21, 2006.
Complaint Handling Medical Device Reporting May 19, 2016 Rita Harden, Director Customer Relations & Regulatory Reporting.
© Copyright IBM 2007DIA ERS SIAC Presentation, January 2008 The HL7 RPS and SPL Standards - A High Level View Terry Hardin Sr. IT Architect Emerging Software.
Auditing ISO Nancy Pasquan November Introductions I am….. You are….. And we are here to discuss: Auditing ISO Quality Systems for Medical.
Clinical Trials.
Bussara Sukpanichnant, Human Subject Protection Office, USAMD-AFRIMS Unanticipated Problems 15 th FERCAP International Conference 24 Nov 15 Nagasaki, Japan.
ISO/HL Specification: Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) Release 2 Lise Stevens Data Standards Project Manager FDA CBER/ADRM Bioinformatics Support.
2Exceed IFF’s ERFA gruppe for combination products Risk Management 15. sept /Ingrid Malmberg.
2009 DIA US Annual Meeting GCP Session Advisory Committee Meeting
Good Manufacturing Practices
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
GMP -Regulatory Perspective Sukanti Borkar Abbott India Ltd.
Regulatory Updates Health Sciences Authority Singapore
FDA's Two New Draft Guidance on Software and Device

Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
2009 DIA US Annual Meeting GCP Session Advisory Committee Meeting
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Implications for Medical Research
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
The Information Professional’s Role in Product Safety
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
FDA Perspective on Cardiovascular Device Development
8. Causality assessment:
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
The Current PMA Requirements
FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Summary of Public Notification of Emerging Postmarket Medical Device Signals (“Emerging Signals”) Effective: December.
American Society for Quality Region 5 Quality Conference
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
HOW TO FULFILL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ON PRODUCT RELATED HEALTH INFORMATION Samina Qureshi, M.D. PSI INTERNATIONAL Inc.
The International Drug Safety Paradigm
Patient Involvement in the Development and Safe Use of
NEW MDR Regulatory Context. NEW MDR Regulatory Context.
MEDICAL DEVICES CONTROL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA
Tobey Clark, Director*, Burlington USA
Compounded Drugs and Lack of Premarket FDA-Approval
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
PHARMACOVIGILANCE SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Combination products The paradigm shift (US / Japan / EU / Australia) Global impact Khaudeja Bano MD 5th Global Pharmacovigilance Summit Medical devices Pharmacovigilance April 28-29, 2016 Dubai, UAE

What Is An Organization To Do? Combination Products Two or more Components; Two Quality Systems; Two or more Databases; One or more Postmarketing Safety Report(s) What Is An Organization To Do?

Agenda Combination Product Regulations – FDA / Japan Expectations /Interpretation(s) and Challenges Quality and Regulatory Strategy The Right Culture Best Practices

Industry cares Safety (Patient and User) Benefit vs. Risk - Efficacy (drugs)/Effectiveness (devices) Patients Clinicians Pharmacists Regulators Payors Other users

Regulations - FDA Rule was effective 22 July 2013 The cGMP Final Rule for combination product addresses how to comply with CGMP requirements for co-packaged and single-entity combination products. It recognizes the multiple quality systems and addresses how to maintain them for combination products [21 CFR 4.4(b)(1) and (b)(2)]. Rule was effective 22 July 2013

Combination product compliance (Device) QS (Drug) cGMP Combination product compliance (Drug) cGMP + Sec. 820.20. Management responsibility. Sec. 820.30. Design controls. Sec. 820.50. Purchasing controls. Sec. 820.100. Corrective and preventive action. Sec. 820.170. Installation. Sec. 820.200. Servicing (Device) QS + Sec. 211.84. Testing and approval or rejection components, drug product containers, closures Sec. 211.103. Calculation of yield. Sec. 211.132. Tamper-evident packaging requirements for (OTC) drug products Sec. 211.137. Expiration dating. Sec. 211.165. Testing and release for distribution. Sec. 211.166. Stability testing. Sec. 211.167. Special testing requirements. Sec. 211.170. Reserve samples.

History - FDA 1970s - first sign of combination products November 2002 public hearing December 2002, Office of Combination Products created. July 2003 public workshop held 2005 - OCP Concept paper published 2009 - OCP proposed rule post-marketing safety reporting requirements • 2013 - a working group chaired by OCP to prepare a final rule and associated guidance.

Types of combination products A combination product as defined in 21 CFR § 3.2(e), as a product comprised of any combination of a drug and a device; a biological product and a device; a drug and a biological product; or a drug, device, and a biological product. (1) Single entity combination product (2) Co-packaged / Kits (3) Cross-Labeled Products (4) Cross-Labeled Investigational Products

Paradigm shift => Combination Tissue Pharma Products Devices Clinical Studies / Pre-market Software & Apps Biologics Biosimilar Generics Combination Products

What is expected Combine applicable rules for the constituent parts (CP) Follows a single set of adverse event reporting rules – marketing application under which the product was cleared / approved Apply sections of other CP rules (missing / different) Reports submitted to the lead Center Field alert reports submitted to field offices

Similarities Death SAE Periodic / Follow-up Reports Drugs Safety Signal and Expedited reporting Risk Based Drugs 21 CFR parts (310 & 314) Biologics 21 CFR parts (600 & 606) Devices 21 CFR part (803)

Differences Malfunctions Timelines Caused or Contributed Drugs Codes Investigation User requirements Design controls Devices lifecycle management Drugs 21 CFR parts (310 & 314) Biologics 21 CFR parts (600 & 606) Devices 21 CFR part (803)

Reporting Timelines Differences 3-Day field alert report for drugs 5-Day report for devices (“remedial action”) 7-Day expedited blood fatality report 15-Day “alert report” for drugs and biological product 30-Day device malfunction report

Challenges Reportability criteria for drug and device Determining which constituent part is associated with the adverse event Possible relationship (temporal, causal, none) Follow-up information Coding Multiple manufacturers / Multiple applications Inspections

Challenges Technology Component versus Constituent part Infrastructure Gateway Component versus Constituent part Cross-labeled versus concomitant Global aspects Legacy data & new regulation? Clinical trials

It takes an entire organization to make combination product happen Multiple functions – Team work / collaboration Decision making body & Rapid response team Communication Broader Impact assessment of changes Staff education & development Culture Management support & prioritization

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/PerformanceReports/CombinationProducts/UCM439389.pdf Combination Product Review. FDA received 330 original premarket applications for combination products in FY 2013. This is a 25 percent increase from 264 in FY 2012.

Best Practices Product as a whole Risk-based approach Categorize by severity Standardize Share the burden (component based) Overlap is good Build talent / Define processes

“THE PRODUCT” Too much !!! Too little !!! Perfect balance Whole or as a system Risk based review, prioritization and reporting One report with all the relevant information One integrated set of reporting timelines Reported to one system Too much !!! Too little !!! Perfect balance

Worldwide Impact Japan Europe Other Geographies

Relevant Standards/Regulations ISO 14971 Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices 21 CFR 4 Subpart B: Proposed Rule Postmarketing Safety Reporting for Combination Products 21 CFR 7.41 Health Hazard Evaluation and Recall Classification 21 CFR 803 Medical Device Reporting 21 CFR 820.30 Design Controls Medical Device Directive (MDD) 93/42/EEC

Key Definitions Adverse Event (AE) (Source: ICH E2A) Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment Complaint (Source: 21 CFR 820.3) Any written, electronic, or oral communication that alleges deficiencies related to the identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, effectiveness, or performance of a device after it is released for distribution

QUESTIONS ????