Using EOP and Space Weather Data for Satellite Operations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Advertisements

Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 2 – New Event Entry.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
Create an Application Title 1A - Adult Chapter 3.
Custom Statutory Programs Chapter 3. Customary Statutory Programs and Titles 3-2 Objectives Add Local Statutory Programs Create Customer Application For.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
1 Contact details Colin Gray Room S16 (occasionally) address: Telephone: (27) 2233 Dont hesitate to get in touch.
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021
1 Correlation and Simple Regression. 2 Introduction Interested in the relationships between variables. What will happen to one variable if another is.
1 Discreteness and the Welfare Cost of Labour Supply Tax Distortions Keshab Bhattarai University of Hull and John Whalley Universities of Warwick and Western.
Stratospheric Measurements: Microwave Sounders I. Current Methods – MSU4/AMSU9 Diurnal Adjustment Merging II. Problems and Limitations III. Other AMSU.
Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.
Excel Functions. Part 1. Introduction 2 An Excel function is a formula or a procedure that is performed in the Visual Basic environment, outside the.
Using EOP and Space Weather Data for Satellite Operations
Solve Multi-step Equations
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Factoring Quadratics — ax² + bx + c Topic
Module 4. Forecasting MGS3100.
ABC Technology Project
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
VOORBLAD.
Benchmark Series Microsoft Excel 2013 Level 2
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
1 © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 1 v3.1 Module 6 Ethernet Fundamentals.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Section 5.4 Polynomials in Several Variables Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2006 Pearson Education, Inc.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
1 Using one or more of your senses to gather information.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Rational Functions and Models
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 10 Testing the Difference between Means and Variances.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Simple Linear Regression Analysis
Multiple Regression and Model Building
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS Purposeful changes of the inputs (factors) to a process in order to observe corresponding changes in the output (response). Process.
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
State Variables.
Math Review with Matlab:
Probabilistic Reasoning over Time
Benchmark Series Microsoft Excel 2013 Level 2
AGI An Analysis of State Vector Propagation Using Differing Flight Dynamics Programs David A Vallado Analytical Graphics Inc. Center for Space Standards.
Presentation transcript:

Using EOP and Space Weather Data for Satellite Operations David A. Vallado and T. S. Kelso Analytical Graphics Inc. Center for Space Standards and Innovation Paper USR S7.3, Presented at the 6th US Russian Space Surveillance Workshop, St. Petersburg, Russia, August 22-26, 2005

Outline Introduction Analysis STK Files Summary Definitions Problem Objectives Motivation Analysis EOP Space Weather STK Files Summary

Definitions Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP) Space Weather Data Assist transformation between Celestial and Terrestrial Coordinate Frames Celestial – GCRF (generic ECI) Terrestrial – ITRF (generic ECEF) UT1, LOD, xp, yp, AT Space Weather Data Incoming solar radiation effects the atmosphere Geomagnetic kp, ap Eight 3-hourly and daily averages Solar radiation F10.7 Daily values Affects upper atmospheric temperature and density Large factor in determining atmospheric drag effect on satellite orbits

Problem EOP and space weather data needed to support tasks Mission Design Fuel budgets Lifetime maneuver / orbit box planning Real-time Operations Few days into the future Mission planning a few months ahead Anomaly resolution a few months in the past Available data is “chaotic” at best Mix of predicted and observed values Post processing data often takes a month or more No synchronized update schedule for all parameters Need seamless file of data to accomplish each mission task

Objectives Analyze currently available data Recommend best option for splicing data Discuss setup of data files Available on CelesTrak website STK compatible

Summary of EOP Data Files IERS EOPC04.62-now (DUT1, xp, yp,, LOD, , , X, Y) 1962 00:00 USNO Finals.daily, Finals2000a.daily (DUT1, xp, yp,, , , X, Y) -3 months + 90 days USNO Finals.all, Finals2000a.all (DUT1, xp, yp) 1973 + 1 year NGA EOPPyddd.txt (DUT1, xp, yp) 00:00 Sunday 23:59 Saturday 14:28 PAST Current Time, T FUTURE

Summary of Space Weather Data Files 00:00 -1 month 00:00 1 month Current Year 00:00 yyyy.vm (daily F10.7, daily and 3 hrly kp, ap) Quar_dgd.txt (3 hrly kp, daily ap) Quar_dsd.txt (daily F10.7) - 3 months 45df.txt (daily F10.7, ap) + 45 days Predict.txt (monthly F10.7) - 6 months + 6 year 14:28 PAST FUTURE Current Time, T

I. EOP Data

Analyses Series are recomputed Comparisons Useful IERS USNO Twice weekly Some smoothing due to use of Vondrak algorithm Removes high-frequency noise USNO Weekly ? Comparisons Useful Within Organizations Bulletin A and B ,  X , Y Between Organizations USNO, IERS, NGA Note that axes scales and units are not constant

Analysis USNO Bltn A and Bltn B values Reasonably consistent ,  Bull B values only from Jan 1, 1989 Reasonably consistent Bltn B dpsi some anomalies Sep 1999

Analysis USNO Bltn A and Bltn B values Values before 1990 X , Y Values from 1973 Values before 1990 Additional variations Bltn B some anomalies Sep-Oct 1999

Comparisons Between Organizations USNO (Bltn A and Bltn B) and IERS (EOPC04) Before 1984 Larger variations FK5 instituted Before 1997 Smaller variations Update to Equation of the equinoxes Note last few values See next slide

Comparisons (Cont) Between Organizations USNO (Bltn A and Bltn B) and IERS (EOPC04) Last few days appear to differ (IERS and USNO) On Feb 22 for xp 0.035728 IERS 0.03383 USNO On May 5 for xp 0.035699 IERS 0.035491 USNO IERS Delta = 0.000029 USNO delta = -0.031661

Comparisons (FK5 Corrections) Between Organizations USNO (Bltn A and Bltn B) and IERS (EOPC04) Data availability Bltn B values only after Jan 1, 1989 Each appear to have noise

Comparisons (IAU 2000 Corrections) Between Organizations USNO (Bltn A and Bltn B) and IERS (EOPC04) Data availability EOPCO4 Values after Jan 1, 1984 Bltn B appears to better follow EOPC04

Coefficient Approach NGA provides coefficients Continuous representation of UT1, xp, yp Lacks LOD, , , X , Y Generally smaller order effects Long-term behavior of EOP coefficients xp, yp reasonable to use past the end of a data file UT1 not recommended past about a month

Comparisons – Long Term EOPC04 to NGA Coefficients One year different epochs are shown Notice variability Runoff for UT1, xp Current week is valid (highlighted) Note 0.04 s ≈ 280m at 7 km/s

EOP – How to Splice Together EOPC04 Use 62-now file Up to current day Recomputed frequently USNO Predicted Bulletin A Use .daily file Daily values (t-3 months to t+3 months) Updated daily Use .all file 1 year predictions Data availability Use last known file of each if any are not available Values are “acceptable” for short periods of time (~week)

II. Space Weather Data

Space Weather Tracked for many years Older data Data to the 1930s Older data Has numerous missing dates Physically a zero means little here! Corrected in our files Quality flag set to 4 as an indicator Includes seasonal/solar cycle variations Observed and adjusted to 1.0 AU values DRAO and Lenhart values Atmospheric models use both

Sensitivity Results Atmospheric Drag (see Vallado AAS 05-199) Large variations Changing the atmospheric model Changing how the input data is interpreted F10.7 at 2000 UTC Last 81-day average F10.7 vs. the central 81-day average Using step functions for the atmospheric parameters vs interpolation Many others Point to take away: 1-1000 km ephemeris differences are possible Unable to determine if from data interpretation or model differences

Space Weather – Predictions Lots of Variability Constant F10.7 Not very accurate Never use 0.0! Schatten Varies with each solar cycle Polynomial Trend (Vallado 2004, 535) Matches several solar cycles F10.7 = 145 + 75*COS{ 0.001696 t – 0.35*SIN(π + 0.001696 t )} t is the number of days from Jan 1, 1981

Historical and Polynomial Trend

Schatten Predictions

Statistics Comparisons Combined Results Avg Deviation Standard Deviation Ctr 81-day – Daily F10.7 15.00 21.99 Last 81-day – Daily F10.7 17.17 24.92 Trend 81-day – Daily F10.7 20.79 29.88 Monthly Trend – Monthly F10.7 15.33 21.85 Individual Results Variability ‘same’ between 81-day averages and daily values Monthly trend and monthly averages Predicted (3-day, 45-day and 2 year) solar flux values

Observed / Adjusted values

kp – ap Conversions Rigorously defined 1940 – Chapman and Bartels – Geomagnetism Discrete values Values exist that are not in the discrete values Finding 3-hourly ap values for the last month Finding kp values from predicted ap values Some Interpolation clearly required Approaches Linear Interpolation Iteration Spline

Comparison of Conversions Techniques – Interpolate, Iterate, Splines Between approaches (left) To exact values (right)

III. File Setup

File Setup Proceeding can be complex and time consuming CSSI (Dr. Kelso) has done the work for you! http://celestrak.com/SpaceData Files updated every 3 hours STK compatible Naming indicates start date Schedule EOP and Space weather files ready today Operational in next STK release

Additional Information Common changes for both files All ASCII text Start dates can be set to a time before the current date Naming convention permits quick determination Set an end date Observed and predicted sections consistent Spacing minimized (file size) Maintain free-field read capability Indicate number of data points

Additional Information Specifics EOP Add day, month, year to data Switch to predominantly IERS EOP-C04 data from USNO Bltn A data Data now available from 1962 instead of 1973 Removed data for errors in xp, yp, and UT1 Added LOD, ,  Added AT, X, Y into one file Last values set to zero Include automatic leap second introduction Space Weather Data from 1957 to date (more is possible) Added centered 81 day in addition to last 81 day average values, observed and adjusted Spliced past, current, and predicted data New structure for predicted data Monthly and Daily sections Trend values for long term prediction possible

Conclusions EOP and Space Weather data Not high visibility However, large variations in numerical results Ap/kp conversion Recommend using Cubic Spline approach Predicted solar flux values Polynomial trend available for long term use Reasonable statistics to existing Schatten files Your single source for consolidated values available: http://celestrak.com/SpaceData/