Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALLEN BERTHOLD TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Water Quality and Copano Bay Watershed Efforts.
Advertisements

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Watershed Planning for the South and North Llano Rivers Aaron Wendt Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board Public Stakeholder Meeting August 14,
Texas Stream Team: Citizen Science Water Quality Monitoring and TMDLs Travis Tidwell The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment – Texas State University.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Steering Committee Meetings Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens March.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) (402)
Components of every Good Watershed Management Plan NDEQ – Planning Unit August 6 th, 2014 NDEQ – Planning Unit gust 6 th 2014.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
Bill Carter Nonpoint Source Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Trade Fair and Conference, May 2015.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
State Approaches to Funding Local Projects A Survey of RFPs The State/EPA NPS Partnership New Orleans, November 27, 2001.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
2011 Lower Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi.
TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research Douglas J. Norton USEPA Office of Water October 2005 Douglas J.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Update on Wyoming Draft 303(d) List and Changes to Watershed Planning.
Watershed Protection Plan for the Lower Nueces River Presentation to Nueces County Commissioners’ Court November 10, 2010 November 10, 2010.
By Mary Waters, Texas Stream Team. Outline  About the Arroyo Colorado  Basic information (geography)  History  Major uses  Water quality summary.
Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
Connecticut Watershed Conservation Network Conference May 11, 2012 Department of Energy and Environmental Protection MaryAnn Nusom Haverstock.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
2011 Upper Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi.
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
Gary Bryant Watershed Coordinator. Funding Funding and support for the development and implementation of the Pecos River Watershed Protection Plan is.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Lower Rio Grande Valley Low Impact Development (LID) Implementation and Education by Brianna Saenz,MS, EIT AUGUSTO SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, M.S, CFM. Institute.
Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.
Leveraging Resources with National Estuary Programs
EVALUATING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT APPROACHES IN THE LAKE ERIE BASIN AND KEY LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE LAKE ERIE WATERSHED Ohio Stormwater.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy - NLRS
Lower Laguna Madre Water Quality
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Texas Water Resources Institute
Water Quality Improvement Through Implementation of a Watershed Protection Plan in the Leon River Watershed Lower Rio Grande Valley Stormwater Conference.
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
State Agency Perspective of Estuary Program Subcommittees
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Leon River Watershed Protection Plan: Addressing EPA Comments
Section 319 Grant Program – writing a proposal that can be funded
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
The Nine Elements that Must Be Included in a 319 Watershed Based Plan
2018 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Revision
Nonpoint Source Program
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Lower Laguna Madre Estuary Program
Presentation transcript:

Lower Laguna Madre/ Brownsville Ship Channel Watershed Characterization Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program Jude Benavides University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

Texas Nonpoint Source Management Program Partnering with You to Restore and Protect Texas Rivers, Lakes, and Bays Local Stakeholders

Watershed Protection Plans (WPPs) WPPs are developed through local stakeholder groups, usually with funding and technical assistance from the TCEQ and/or the TSSWCB, along with the EPA. All WPPs funded with CWA Section 319(h) grant funds will be required to meet EPA’s Nine Elements for Watershed-Based Plans Four Principals: Diverse, well integrated partnerships A specific geographic focus (watershed) Action driven by environmental objectives and by strong science and data Coordinated priority setting and integrated solutions

Plans are Stakeholder Driven Stakeholders involved throughout process Approve watershed characterization and modeling results Identify and select management measures Approve plan Open and Inclusive process Anyone who lives, plays, or works in the watershed is invited to participate. Work Groups - Subject matter experts Lots of available guidance EPA – Getting in Step

Three Recommended Steps Watershed Characterization - Water Quality Monitoring, assessing existing data and information, and collecting new data and information. Modeling - Modeling or other method to estimate pollutant loads and reductions needed to meet water quality criteria or goals WPP Development

EPA’s 9-Elements A- Identify causes and sources of pollution B - Estimate pollutant loading into the watershed and the expected load reductions C - Describe management measures that will achieve load reductions and targeted critical areas D - Estimate amounts of technical and financial assistance and the relevant authorities needed to implement the plan E - Develop an information/education component F - Develop a project schedule G - Describe the interim, measurable milestones H - Identify indicators to measure progress I - Develop a monitoring component First 3 most time consuming and the reason many WPPs not accepted by EPA. Can required modeling. SELECT Model in association with LDCs typically used for bacteria.

Examples SELECT Model Arroyo Colorado Bacterial Source Tracking Estimating Septic Systems

Watershed-Based Planning in Lower Rio Grande Valley

2014 Integrated Report Water Quality Assessment

Lower Laguna Madre/ Brownsville Ship Channel

Port Isabel Fishing Harbor (2494A) Laguna Madre (2491)* Low Dissolved Oxygen Bacteria Ammonia Nitrate Chlorophyll-a Low Dissolved Oxygen Port Isabel Fishing Harbor (2494A) Bacteria Brownsville Ship Channel (2494) Bacteria Low Dissolved Oxygen

*No Bacteria data collected from 2008 - 2016 Segment Uses (Recreation, Aquatic) Criteria (Bacteria, DO) 2014 Assessment 2491_03 Lower Laguna Madre* PCR1 E/O 35/14cfu 5.0 mg/L Concern 2494 Brownsville Ship Channel* NCR E 35 cfu Impaired 2493 South Bay* 35/14 cfu 2494A Port Isabel Fishing Harbor* H 3.0 mg/L *No Bacteria data collected from 2008 - 2016 Contact Recreation: PCR = Primary Contact Recreation, NCR = Noncontact Recreation Aquatic Life Use: E = Exceptional, H = High, I = Intermediate, L = Low Other: O = Oyster Waters , DO = Dissolved Oxygen

LLM/BSC WPP Next Steps Determine Focus of WPP (Water Bodies, Water Quality Parameters, etc.) Fill Data Gaps Continue Watershed Characterization Calculate Existing Pollutant Loadings Calculate Load Reductions Needed to meet water quality goals Determine best management practices Write Plan