TEA Corrective Action Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Getting Ready at the Local Level Preparing for the Service Provider Self-Review.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
State Performance Plan: A Two-Way Street Ruth Ryder Larry Wexler Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
Significant Changes to the Monitoring Process  Self-assessment by school districts.  Greater involvement of parents and other stakeholders.  Improved.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Building Infrastructures: Supporting School-Based Mental Health Services.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Program Update For Compliance PBMAS (Performance Based Monitoring) –Moved from Stage 4 w/on-site TEA visit to Stage 1B ( 3 indicators caused.
Stage 4 Restructuring Stage 5 Alternative Governance.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Vaughn G. Update Idalyn Hauss Deputy Officer for Special Education Debra Y. Barbour Director of Low Incidence and Inclusion November, 2007.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
Top Ten Policy Tips for Special Education Carol Ann M. Hudgens, Ed.S Section Chief: Policy, Monitoring and Audit Exceptional Children Division April 2015.
Special Education News to Know for Building Administrators and Counselors Child Find.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Douglas Fuchs, Lynn Fuchs, Donald Compton and Joan Bryant
ARC Chairperson Training
Public School Monitoring Roadmap
SEK INTERLOCAL #637 INTERNAL FILE REVIEW
Camille Catlett and Megan Vinh
Response To Instruction
ARC Chairperson Training
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
SPR&I Regional Training
U.S. Department of education Office of Special Education Programs
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
PLACE TITLE TEXT HERE SUBTITLE
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Community Based Assessments
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

TEA Corrective Action Plan USDE, OSEP Monitoring Visit resulted in requirement of TEA to Develop Plans to address four corrective actions

Supervision of each ISD to ensure they identify, locate and evaluate all children suspected of having a disability. Increase and review the size of the Review and Support Team in Special Ed. with a minimum of one visit every six years This team will focus on legal compliance but also support most effective practices for better outcomes for students Adjust PEMS data collection components

Ensure ISDs locate and evaluate children who should have been referred for an initial evaluation and consider if additional services are needed. * Inform families by using a third party * Expand the call center * Trainings for LEAs on conducting assessments * LEA provide compensatory services

TEA will provide training to all staff to ensure that struggling learners in RTI, dyslexia, and 504 are not delayed or denied the right to an initial evaluation TEA will release resources to be shared with parents TEA will revise the dyslexia handbook to clarify for parents TEA will create and execute a statewide professional development for all educators

TEA will monitor ISDs implementation of IDEA requirements for students receiving special education services under IDEA, as well as supports through RTI, 504, and dyslexia. Create the Special Education Escalation Team If you receive a negative monitoring report (from Review and Support Team) you will be referred to the Escalation Team for intensive assistance Until team is created, the School Improvement team will focus existing activities to identify high needs LEAs TEA will help ensure a variety of third party technical assistance providers are available to districts