Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 RISK-BASED MANAGEMENT OF GUARDRAILS: SITE SELECTION AND UPGRADING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Advertisements

Interesting Case(s) -Cartilage-
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories Risk Assessment
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
1 Impact of Changes in the Telephone Environment On RDD Telephone Surveys Mary Cay Murray Abt Associates Inc Erin Foster Abt Associates Inc Jessica Cardoni.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Superintendent Program Review Committee February 26, 2010.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Business Process Improvement in the Economic Programs Directorate at the U.S. Census Bureau Deborah M. Stempowski Shirin A. Ahmed U.S. Census Bureau ICES.
County of Fairfax, Virginia 1 Department of Transportation Bus Stop Improvement Program Fairfax County Department of Transportation Transit Services Division.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
1 DOE Safety Committee Handbook. 2 Effective Safety Committee! Make it work for you!
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
1 MAXIMIZING PUBLIC INVESTMENT Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Funding Overview Julie Ray, Deputy Director Division of Finance & Forecasting.
STRUCTURES PROJECT MANAGERS SEMINAR. HOUSEKEEPING.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
Learning to show the remainder
ZMQS ZMQS
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
1 According to PETROSAFE safety policy, the company is keen that: Introduction All Egyptian Petroleum companies and foreign companies working in A.R.E.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
Traffic Analysis Toolbox & Highway Capacity Manual Transition
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
Table 22.1 Stakeholder summary for the Odd Shoe Company
(This presentation may be used for instructional purposes)
ABC Technology Project
Slide 1 ILLINOIS - RAILROAD ENGINEERING Railroad Hazardous Materials Transportation Risk Analysis Under Uncertainty Xiang Liu, M. Rapik Saat and Christopher.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
VOORBLAD.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Ohio Planning Conference Organizing for Reliability – A State Perspective.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1 Atlantic Annual Viewing Trends Adults 35-54, Total TV, By Daypart Average Minute Audience (000) Average Weekly Reach (%) Average Weekly Hours Viewed.
Visual 3.1 Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives Unit 3: Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
PSSA Preparation.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
CpSc 3220 Designing a Database
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 RISK-BASED MANAGEMENT OF GUARDRAILS: SITE SELECTION AND UPGRADING.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 151 Safety Judgment of acceptability of risk Subjective component.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Potential for Improvement Additional data –Accidents concerning.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 101 Wyoming DOT Place guardrail when there is a fill slope of.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 126 Japan D a = expected damage in collision accidents after.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 RISK-BASED MANAGEMENT OF GUARDRAILS: SITE SELECTION AND UPGRADING.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 176 Alternative Database System HSIS (Highway Safety Information.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 RISK-BASED MANAGEMENT OF GUARDRAILS: SITE SELECTION AND UPGRADING.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 201 Data Available for Map 3 Data available on corridor level.
Presentation transcript:

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 RISK-BASED MANAGEMENT OF GUARDRAILS: SITE SELECTION AND UPGRADING Presented to Project Steering Committee Virginia Department of Transportation by the Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems April 17, 2000

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 2 Agenda Introduction Risk-based screening of corridors Data representation for site screening Multiple objectives in the selection among candidate sites Software demonstrations Discussion

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 3 Project Team Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems James H. Lambert, Research Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering, Center Associate Director Yacov Y. Haimes, Quarles Professor of Systems Engineering and Civil Engineering and Center Director Jeffrey A. Baker, BS/MS Student Christian R. Baldwin Irene A. Jacoub Mike R. Raker Virginia Transportation Research Council Wayne S. Ferguson, Research Manager VDOT Richmond District Travis Bridewell, District Traffic Engineer, Richmond District Jeff Wilkinson, Transportation Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, Richmond District Baron Gissendaner

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 4 Project Team (cont.) Additional Steering Committee Steve Edwards, Transportation Engineer Senior, Traffic Engineering Division, Central Office Paul Kelley, Transportation Engineer, Location and Design Division, Central Office Charlie Kilpatrick, Fredericksburg Resident Engineer, Fredericksburg District Bob McCarty, Senior Field Operations Engineer, Federal Highway Administration - Richmond Ginger Quinn, District Safety Officer, Traffic Engineering Section, Salem District Nancy Berry, Transportation Engineering Program Supervisor, Location and Design Division, Central Office Bill Bushman, Virginia Transportation Research Council Angela Tucker, Resident Engineer Willie Gentry, Resident Engineer Alan Leatherwood, Resident Engineer

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 5 Problem Statement Public and transportation-agency values concerning the location of roadway guardrails in need of clarification Concerns of Virginians for adequate guardrails high relative to the national norms VDOT Districts select locations for new guardrails based on citizen complaints, a general knowledge of roadway needs from local engineers, and accident history

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 6 Problem Statement (cont.) Kentucky hazard-index point system (Kentucky Transportation Center Report KTC "Warrants and Guidelines for Installation of Guardrail") Hundreds of candidate locations on the thirteen-county secondary system of Richmond District New Kent and Charles City County the focus of a related preliminary study in Richmond District

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 7 Purpose and Scope Identify attributes and develop associated cost-benefit-risk tradeoff methodology to support screening and evaluation for guardrail site selection and upgrading with limited available funding

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 8 Purpose and Scope (cont.) Objectives –Review and evaluate what others have done –Adopt assessment methods –Develop tradeoff methodology –Specify and develop prototype databases

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 9 Screening of Corridors

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 10 Evaluation of Sites

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 11 Risk Based Screening of Corridors

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 12 Motivation A data-driven approach to assess accident risk and associated guardrail needs across Districts and Residencies

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 13 Data Needs Screening –Guardrail inventories Percent unprotected hazards Percent guardrail coverage Percent substandard guardrail –Accident histories FO accidents per DVMT Fatalities caused by FO accidents –Average daily traffic –Complaint records

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 14 Data Needs (cont.) Evaluation –Cost (installation, upgrade) –Length of hazard –Severity of hazard –Shoulder width –Slope –Curvature

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 15 Accident Statistics Disadvantages –Unreported accidents –Severity iceberg –First and most harmful event –Fatalities do not occur frequently enough to be statistically predictive –Random nature of road accidents (Adams, 1996), (Michie and Bronsted, 1994)

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 16 Accident Statistics (cont.) Advantages –Available –Factual –Public interest (Adams, 1996), (Michie and Bronsted, 1994)

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 17 New Kent Case Study Initial data collection –Routes Corridor analysis –Collect data –Perform calculations (accidents per mile, accidents per DVMT) –Generate tables and graphs

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 18 Corridor Analysis Compare routes for frequency and severity of accidents Compare accident statistics with guardrail coverage Advantages –Reduce randomness of individual accidents –Use summary statistics available in HTRIS

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 19 Corridor Analysis (cont.) Disadvantages –Does not focus on individual locations –E.g., many locations of mediocre severity vs. one location of very high severity

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 20 Data Acquisition

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 21 Corridor Screening [Similar treatment of accident counts and accidents per DVMT]

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22 Corridor Screening (cont.) Example graph –Run off the road accidents per DVMT

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 23 Data Representation for Site Screening

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 24 Motivation Need to organize data on many hazards protected and unprotected by guardrail on 40,000 miles of roadway across Virginia

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 25 Sample of Guardrail Inventory