The reception of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe in 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Law Access to Health Care as a Human Rights Issue Professor Fons Coomans Maastricht University Centre for Human Rights.
Advertisements

1 Essentials of Migration Management for Policy Makers and Practitioners Section 1.6 International Migration Law.
Jenni Whelan UNSW Law School Human Rights Clinic.
Proactive Interventions: Incorporating a Children’s Rights Approach
PREVENTING VIOLENCE IN THE FAMILY DAPHNE III Programme ‘Preventing and combating violence against children, young people and women and to protect victims.
SYMPOSIUM ON HIV & HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CARIBBEAN Human rights needs of PLWHIV Suzette M. Moses-Burton.
[Insert date and place of the launch]. 2 [Add Regional/National] Overview Detention is a global challenge. There is no empirical evidence that the use.
International Conference/ ‘Steps to freedom’ project Riga, December 2011 International Legal Framework on Alternatives to Detention J.E. KAUTZMANN.
Sources Of Human Rights
© 2006 Prohibition of Torture Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Austria.
Right to an Effective Remedy:
Right to Non-Refoulement – Protection Against Expulsion By Kris Spartanska.
Domestication and Implementation Package C The duty to provide redress to victims of torture and other ill treatment © The Article 5 Initiative, 2013.
Respecting the Best Interests of Children in Transnational Child Protection Cases Jyothi Kanics, Advocacy & Policy Specialist Child Rights Advocacy & Education.
HUMAN RIGHTS BASED APPROACH See Me Brewing Lab Cathy Asante.
Seminar on Migration Legislation Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala 15 – 16 February 2007.
The legal framework on alternatives to immigration detention Alice BLOOMFIELD-Lilian TSOURDI Academic Network for legal studies on asylum and immigration.
1 Critical issue module 6 Separated children in emergency settings.
FORMALISING RIGHTS The Best Interests of Separated Children in the Asylum System.
Oviedo Convention and Its Protocols – Impact on Polish Law International Bioethics Conference Oviedo Convention in Central and Eastern European Countries.
Asylum MINISTRY OF INTERIOR POLICE DIRECTORATE BORDER POLICE DIRECTORATE
European Union Reception Law Implementation - best practices evaluation Comparison of protection and reception sytems within EU Borders.
Meeting of the Liaison Officer Network to Combat Migrant Smuggling and Trafficking Regional Consultation Group on Migration (RCGM) Managua, Nicaragua June.
Seminar on Migration Legislation Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala 15 – 16 February 2007.
Mental Health Policy, Human Rights & the Law Mental Disability Advocacy Program Open Society Institute Camilla Parker October 2004.
Isabelle Mihoubi Deputy Representative UNHCR RR Kyiv International Standards of Registration of Refugees.
Isabelle Mihoubi Deputy Regional Representative UNHCR RR Kyiv Return/Readmission.
Trends in detention of illegal migrants in European Union By Juris Gromovs Kiev, 7 February 2005.
1 Foundation module 2 Child rights-based approaches.
ASSOC. PROF. DR. DOVILE GAILIUTE MYKOLAS ROMERIS UNIVERSITY 2015 POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS ON HOUSING RIGHTS.
Article 1 Everyone under the age of 18 has all the rights in the Convention. Definition of the child.
Migration and Multicultural Policy in Korea NHRCK RI Seok-jun.
Rules of International Health Law. International Legal Provisions Universal Declaration of Human Righs 1948, Article 25: “Everyone has the right to a.
Council Directive 2003/9/EC laying down standards for the reception of asylum seekers European Commission Directorate-General External Relations.
Irregular Migration in the Western Balkans Gianluca Rocco Sub-regional Coordinator for the Western Balkan Region IOM Sarajevo Annual EAASP Conference Dubrovnik.
Report of the European Parliament on the situation of women refugees and asylum seekers in the EU Rapporteur: Mary Honeyball MEP.
Introduction to Human Rights The Human Rights Act and Human Rights Based Approaches.
The revised EU Asylum Qualifications Directive WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR GRANTING INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION FOR FGM SURVIVORS OR WOMEN AND GIRLS AT RISK.
The revised EU Asylum Procedures Directive WHAT SUPPORT IS AVAILABLE TO ASYLUM SEEKERS WITH PARTICULAR NEEDS?
The fundamental rights of LGBT citizens in Europe – EU legislation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Session Community Services  Basic Principles of Community Services People Have:  Dignity and Worth  Capacity to Change  Need.
The revised EU Reception Conditions Directive WHAT KIND OF RECEPTION CONDITIONS SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS?
Claude JANIZZI Chairman of the Lanzarote Committee
The situation of men and women with disabilities seeking asylum in Sweden Arvid Lindén, international disability policy coordinator 3rd meeting on Monitoring.
Recast Directives in CEAS
Seeking Asylum BA International Relations Yang Ha Lim
International Protection of transgender refugees
Promise project – launching the European Barnahus movement
Article 3- Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4- No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave.
Human Rights approach to Refugee Protection and Asylum Policy
Right to an Effective Remedy:
Towards full participation of ageing persons with disabilities
Addressing Sexual Violence Against Refugee Women
Foundation module 2 Child rights-based approaches.
CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION
Geneva, 30th Sept-1st Oct, 2010 Gerison Lansdown
Right to an Effective Remedy:
Ministry of Social Security and Labour
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
REGIONAL GUIDELINES FOR THE PRELIMINARY IDENTIFICATION OF PROFILES AND REFERENCE MECHANISMS OF VULNERABLE MIGRANT POPULATION CRM- JUNE 2013 The answers.
ICRC THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS IN MEXICO, CENTRAL AMERICA AND CUBA REGIONAL DELEGATION FOR MEXICO, CENTRAL AMERICA AND CUBA.
FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL RIGHTS IN EU
Women’s access to justice as promoted by the Istanbul Convention
Actions of the International Committee of the Red Cross to Address
Migration and Natural Disasters
CHILDREN‘S RIGHTS Charalampos Papaioannou.
Meeting of the Liaison Officer Network to Combat
The reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Articles 2, 3 and 8 of Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001.
Effective Alternatives to the Detention of Migrants
A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS
Presentation transcript:

The reception of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe in 2015 2 June 2016 Amanda Taylor - EDAL Coordinator

Table 1: Number of new asylum applicants Snapshot of numbers Table 1: Number of new asylum applicants GEO/TIME 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 European Union (28 countries) 152,890 195,840 206,880 263,160 278,280 372,855 562,680 1,255,685 Table 2: Number of new female asylum applicants GEO/TIME 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 European Union (28 countries) 45,605 68,745 75,530 83,340 96,125 120,975 164,155 343,830 Table 3: Unaccompanied asylum seeking children in selected AIDA countries: 2015 11/11/2018

Outline Reception definition: Conceptual uncertainty Reception in practice: Emergency-driven mind set Reception provision for vulnerable persons: Shortcomings hit the vulnerable first

Reception definition Main instrument outlining Member States obligations for reception (Reception Conditions Directive (Directive 2013/33/EU) contains no definition of the term. “Reception conditions” – Art 2(f) “full set of measures that Member States grant to applicants in accordance with this Directive” “Material reception conditions” – Art 2(g) “means the reception conditions that include housing, food and clothing provided in kind, or as financial allowances or in vouchers, or a combination of the three, and a daily expenses allowance” + Article 17 (2) ALL material reception conditions (i.e. housing or financial vouchers) need to “provide an adequate standard of living for applicants, which guarantees their subsistence and protects their physical and mental health. Member States shall ensure that that standard of living is met in the specific situation of vulnerable persons.” ONLY exception to this is where assessment of specific needs of applicant is required or housing capacity is temporarily exhausted. NONETHELESS must still ensure basic needs.

Other definitional guidance Reception Conditions Directive can’t be read in a vacuum! Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 1 right to human dignity and Article 35 right to health care European Convention on Human Rights – Article 3 prohibition against inhumane treatment European Social Charter – Article 16 provision of family housing International Covenant of Economic Social and Cultural Rights – Article 11 right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the continuous improvement of living conditions. 11/11/2018

+ Case law! Court of Justice of the European Union: “Asylum seekers may not be deprived, even for a temporary period of time, of the protection of the minimum standards laid down by the RCD” “If financial assistance is provided the amount must be sufficient to ensure a dignified standard of living and adequate for the health of applicants and capable of ensuring their subsistence.” 11/11/2018

Reception definition for vulnerable persons No definition of Vulnerable Persons in RCD BUT non-exhaustive list of groups that MS must take into account when implementing Directive: Art 21 “minors, unaccompanied minors, disabled people, elderly people, pregnant women, single parents with minor children, victims of human trafficking, persons with serious illnesses, persons with mental disorders and persons who have been subjected to torture, rape or other serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence, such as victims of female genital mutilation” Reception conditions? Standard of living (adequate) met for vulnerable persons. Gender and age-specific concerns and the situation of vulnerable persons taken into consideration in relation to applicants within the premises and accommodation centres 11/11/2018

All of the above hinges on assessment of vulnerability!! Reception conditions? Art 17(2) Standard of living (adequate) met for vulnerable persons. Art 18(3) Gender and age-specific concerns and the situation of vulnerable persons taken into consideration in relation to applicants within the premises and accommodation centres. Art 18(4) MS must prevent  assault and gender-based violence, including sexual assault and harassment, within the premises and accommodation centres Art 19(2) MS shall provide necessary medical or other assistance to applicants who have special reception needs, including appropriate mental health care where needed. Art 25(1)-(2) Member States shall ensure that persons who have been subjected to torture, rape or other serious acts of violence receive the necessary treatment for the damage caused by such acts, in particular access to appropriate medical and psychological treatment or care. Those working with victims of torture, rape or other serious acts of violence shall have had and shall continue to receive appropriate training concerning their needs. All of the above hinges on assessment of vulnerability!! 11/11/2018

Reception in practice States (wilfully) lack the ability to receive those seeking refuge in appropriate, dignified conditions as mandated by their protection obligations. Proliferation of detention – blurring of lines between reception and detention; a symptom of the “hotspots” Pozzallo hotspot, Italy Moria hotspot, Lesvos, Greece 11/11/2018

Detention under EU law Applicants can be detained when it proves necessary and on the basis of an individualised assessment of each case and if less coercive alternative measures cannot be applied effectively. An applicants vulnerability may bring into question the proportionality of detaining an individual applicant. The health including the mental health of applicants in detention who are vulnerable persons shall be of primary concern to national authorities. Shall ensure regular monitoring. Minors shall be detained only as a measure of last resort and after having been established that less coercive alternative measures cannot be applied effectively. Unaccompanied minors – only detained in exceptional circumstances and never in prison accommodation. 11/11/2018

Conditions are well below the prescribed legislative standards Emergency accommodation – Germany Transit centre German-Austrian border 11/11/2018

Abandonment of any qualitative assessment Post-Idomeni, Greece 11/11/2018

Reception for vulnerable persons Identification and assessment of vulnerability is the axis upon which adequate and tailored reception facilities depend upon. Majority of AIDA countries do not provide for a procedure to identify or assess vulnerability. Where there is legislation assessment is done on obvious elements to vulnerability = limits definition attributed to VP in RCD. No further details of identifying vulnerability later on. Proliferation of detention means that avenues to identify vulnerability are extremely limited. Use of accelerated or border procedures are ill-suited for vulnerable persons Lack of foresight in resources means deficiencies in provision of substantive care, ie health care 11/11/2018

Result? Vulnerable persons are being placed in highly unsuitable conditions 11/11/2018

Conclusion Substandard living conditions and destitution risk becoming an integral part of seeking asylum in Europe. Reliance on temporary accommodation but the continued and broad use of these temporary forms of reception seems to question their exceptionality in practice. European states and EU institutions have too readily presumed deprivation of liberty as an acceptable measure for the accommodation of refugees and migrants. Unstable nature of reception in Europe has borne heavily down on the ability of states to assess special reception and procedural needs, to the point that identification of vulnerability has ultimately been omitted by a significant number of countries. Heavily curtailed provision of tailored services has led to a trivialisation of vulnerability and the normalisation of highly unsuitable environments for vulnerable persons. 11/11/2018