Presentation to the Senate Jurisprudence Committee August 26, 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Advertisements

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996– charged the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) with creating health information.
Understanding Confidentiality and Education Decision Making for Youth in Foster Care Child Welfare, Education and the Courts: A Collaboration to Strengthen.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
The mission of the Office of the Child Advocate for the Protection of Children (“OCA”) continues to be legislatively mandated. The OCA has responsibility.
Who Must Comply? When is a patient authorization NOT required?  As needed for the protection of federal and state elective constitutional officers and.
Presented to: DHS Board of Directors Date: April 15, 2015 DHS Legislative Update Georgia Department of Human Services.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
Office of Children’s Services Ombudsman May 17, 2006 Marilyn Jackson Legislative Policy Analyst.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Sharing Low-Income Customer Information Water & Energy Utilities LIOB Meeting - January 2009 Seaneen M Wilson Division of Water & Audits.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
AT-RISK STUDENT ELIGIBILITY AND REQUIREMENTS State Compensatory Education Resource information from TEA.
1 Disclosures © HIPAA Pros 2002 All rights reserved.
Colorado Children and Youth Information Sharing (CCYIS) Educational Stability Summit April 10, 2015.
1 EARLY CHILDHOOD DATA SYSTEMS: ESTABLISHING A POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT October 2011.
1 CAPTA Provision on Referrals to IDEA Part C National Early Childhood Conference December 12, 2005 Catherine M. Nolan.
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
Department of Human Services
PEIMS and Identifying Students in Foster Care DAVID RAY, REGION 10 ESC.
SB1824 – Its Relevance for Education and Transition 2011 Texas Transition Conference February 7-9, 2011 Doubletree Hotel ~ Austin, TX PANEL MEMBERS Kathy.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Privacy Panel: Information Sharing Between Education and Child Welfare Agencies and Access to Records CIP Conference July 2010.
Confidentiality Region 7 Education Service Center Head Start Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. This document may be reproduced for educational.
An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
CAPTA and Beyond: Referrals for developmental screenings for children involved with child welfare Introduction to Frequently Asked Questions Online Resource.
Legislative Enhancements to Behavioral Health. Recent Legislation Behavioral Health Enhancements HB 7019/SB 7068 (2015) SB 12/HB 7097 (2016) Housing Assistance.
CCB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CALL July 12, :30-1:30 1.
Presentation to (((Funder))) by (((Judge Name))) (((Date))) Introduction to Legal Representation in CPS Cases.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Administrative Agencies
Understanding the Policy-Making Bodies of the Texas Judicial Branch
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Educational Advocacy And The CASA Volunteer.
Dependency Court Flowchart
Obligations of Educational Agencies: Parents’ Bill of Rights
Chapter 1 Overview Part 1: Process of Ethical Decisions
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
HIPAA Pros - Disclosures
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
House Human Services Committee
Refuah Community Health Collaborative (RCHC) PPS
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Children, Youth and Families Department
Foster Care Updates and Issues
Confidentiality and Interagency Sharing of Juvenile Information
Fostering Connections To Success Act And What It Means For Texas Partners In CPS Reform Meeting, Jan. 14, 2009 Liz Kromrei, Department of Family and Protective.
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Children, Youth and Families Department
Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment (CANS)
Presentation to the Senate Finance Committee
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
House Human Services Committee
Looking Ahead and the Texas Need…
Beth Engelking, Assistant Commissioner Adult Protective Services
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Presentation to the Senate Finance Article II Workgroup
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to the Senate Jurisprudence Committee August 26, 2010 Liz Kromrei, DFPS Director of Services for Child Protective Services

DFPS Data Sharing DFPS currently shares data in an effort to improve outcomes, improve coordination of services, and measure effectiveness of services to children and youth. Current data sharing: Is accomplished on a case-by-case basis for child or family specific data, with written consent from the family when appropriate. Uses federally mandated parameters to ensure individual rights are protected Ensures roles and responsibilities regarding data are understood by preceding data sharing with a fully executed Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement between all entities.

DFPS Data Sharing Types of data shared include: Client specific data – confidentiality barriers may be an issue Aggregate data How is it shared? Direct interface links between agency automation systems Manual exchange, such as with the use of data files

Barriers to DFPS Data Sharing Technical Barriers New interfaces should not jeopardize the integrity of the automation systems Some interagency data exchanges require complex technical interfaces Federal funding used to build the DFPS system (IMPACT) require prior federal approval for some interfaces Fiscal Barriers IT resource needs Software and hardware limitations Staff time

Barriers to Data Sharing Legal Barriers (Federal Law Confidentiality) Titles IV-B and IV-E of the Social Security Act and the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) limit the sharing of child welfare data with other governmental entities to specific purposes in order to protect the constitutional right to privacy of children and families involved in the child welfare system; Information regarding a parent’s abuse or neglect of their child cannot be released without first offering a due-process hearing to the parent; Federal regulations require that clients be informed when data is shared with another agency and that client consent be obtained prior to release, when possible; Another governmental agency that receives child welfare data may only use or re-disclose that data for the same purposes for which it was provided to the agency and must provide the same security safeguards with respect to confidential data received.

Efforts to overcome Data Sharing Barriers DFPS uses a variety of strategies to overcome barriers to data sharing: Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) Limit data elements to be shared Limit numbers of data exchanges Agencies agree to comply with federal and state laws and rules regarding use, security, dissemination, and retention/destruction Data is password-protected Appropriate safeguards are taken to ensure safety and confidentiality of data

Current DFPS Data Sharing

Examples of Data Sharing DFPS and Texas Youth Commission HB 3689 Rep. McClendon/Sen. Hinojosa), 81st Legislature, Regular Session. Demographic data for children in DFPS conservatorship and placed in TYC facilities is shared. Data is exchanged via an interface, on a daily and monthly schedule. Data is exchanged in order to ensure youth in DFPS conservatorship receive appropriate and continued care while in TYC custody. HB 1629 (Rep. Naishtat / Sen. Uresti), 81st Legislature, Regular Session. Requires the DFPS and TYC to enter into an MOU for data sharing with respect to common clients.

Examples of Data Sharing DFPS and Texas Education Agency Demographic data for children in DFPS conservatorship is matched with educational outcomes and school data from PEIMS. Exchange was Legislatively mandated (SB 2248 Sen. Zaffirini/ Rep. D. Patrick and SB 939 Sen. Watson/ Rep. Hughes), 81st Legislature Regular Session. Annual demographic client-specific data is manually provided to TEA by DFPS; TEA provides DFPS with aggregate outcome data Data is exchanged in order to improve educational outcomes for children and youth in DFPS conservatorship.

Examples of Data Sharing DFPS and Office of Court Administration Known as the Judicial Web Page, the data is limited to judicial access. Data includes specific court-related demographic data for children currently in DFPS conservatorship. Data is exchanged via a daily interface, using a password protected, secure website. Data is exchanged in order to ensure the Judge has the most current data required to make decisions.

Examples of Data Sharing DFPS and Texas Juvenile Probation Commission DFPS performance measures require reporting clients who received services from the Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Community Youth Development (CYD) program for youth that enter the juvenile justice system. Specific client data exchanged is limited to youth receiving CYD services, aged 10 – 16 years. Data is exchanged twice annually via a manual exchange of files; TJPC matches data with TJPC monthly extract child and referral tables. Data is exchanged in order to ensure effectiveness of DFPS CYD program.