Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort  Dr Jennifer A Wagman, PhD, Prof Ronald H Gray, MD, Prof Jacquelyn C Campbell, PhD, Marie Thoma, PhD, Anthony Ndyanabo, MSc, Joseph Ssekasanvu, BSc, Fred Nalugoda, PhD, Joseph Kagaayi, PhD, Gertrude Nakigozi, MPH, Prof David Serwadda, MSc, Heena Brahmbhatt, PhD  The Lancet Global Health  Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages e23-e33 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4 Copyright © 2015 Wagman et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Logic model of the SHARE Project SHARE=Safe Homes and Respect for Everyone. IPV=intimate partner violence. CAC=community activism course. CCA=community counselling aides. RHSP=Rakai Health Sciences Program. HCT=HIV counselling and testing. ART=antiretroviral therapy. The Lancet Global Health 2015 3, e23-e33DOI: (10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4) Copyright © 2015 Wagman et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Study profile *Four intervention clusters from the Rakai Community Cohort Study (RCCS) randomly chosen; two of these and five RCCS control clusters became the control populations. †People who could not be re-contacted were those who could not be contacted at the first follow-up but available at follow-up 2; those lost to follow-up were individuals who were not available at first follow-up and second follow-up. The Lancet Global Health 2015 3, e23-e33DOI: (10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4) Copyright © 2015 Wagman et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND Terms and Conditions