Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Tumor-Derived Jagged1 Promotes Osteolytic Bone Metastasis of Breast Cancer by Engaging Notch Signaling in Bone Cells  Nilay Sethi, Xudong Dai, Christopher.
DNMT3B Overexpression by Deregulation of FOXO3a-Mediated Transcription Repression and MDM2 Overexpression in Lung Cancer  Yi-Chieh Yang, MS, Yen-An Tang,
Deregulation of SLIT2-Mediated Cdc42 Activity Is Associated with Esophageal Cancer Metastasis and Poor Prognosis  Ruo-Chia Tseng, PhD, Jia-Ming Chang,
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages e2 (August 2009)
G13 Controls Angiogenesis through Regulation of VEGFR-2 Expression
Myung Jin Son, Kevin Woolard, Do-Hyun Nam, Jeongwu Lee, Howard A. Fine 
Volume 133, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
HIF-Dependent Antitumorigenic Effect of Antioxidants In Vivo
Prolyl Hydroxylase-3 Is Down-regulated in Colorectal Cancer Cells and Inhibits IKKβ Independent of Hydroxylase Activity  Jing Xue, Xuebing Li, Shi Jiao,
Regulation and Function of the Caspase-1 in an Inflammatory Microenvironment  Dai-Jen Lee, Fei Du, Shih-Wei Chen, Manando Nakasaki, Isha Rana, Vincent.
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 142, Issue 7, Pages e6 (June 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Toll-Like Receptor 5 Engagement Modulates Tumor Development and Growth in a Mouse Xenograft Model of Human Colon Cancer  Sang Hoon Rhee, Eunok Im, Charalabos.
Volume 136, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
The VEGF-C/Flt-4 axis promotes invasion and metastasis of cancer cells
Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Are Activated in Incipient Neoplasia to Orchestrate Tumor-Promoting Inflammation in an NF-κB-Dependent Manner  Neta Erez,
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Melanoma Suppressor Functions of the Carcinoma Oncogene FOXQ1
Volume 142, Issue 7, Pages e2 (June 2012)
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Myeloma cell–derived Runx2 promotes myeloma progression in bone
CD63 Tetraspanin Is a Negative Driver of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Melanoma Cells  Antonella Lupia, Silvia Peppicelli, Ewa Witort,
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Figure 1. RSPO3 expression is upregulated in bladder cancer
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance  Valeria R. Fantin, Julie St-Pierre,
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase VHL Regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α to Maintain Regulatory T Cell Stability and Suppressive Capacity  Jee H. Lee, Chris Elly,
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Loss of HDAC-Mediated Repression and Gain of NF-κB Activation Underlie Cytokine Induction in ARID1A- and PIK3CA-Mutation-Driven Ovarian Cancer  Minchul.
Twist1-Induced Invadopodia Formation Promotes Tumor Metastasis
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Phosphorylation of CBP by IKKα Promotes Cell Growth by Switching the Binding Preference of CBP from p53 to NF-κB  Wei-Chien Huang, Tsai-Kai Ju, Mien-Chie.
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 527-538 (June 2009) Tumor Vasculature Is Regulated by PHD2-Mediated Angiogenesis and Bone Marrow- Derived Cell Recruitment  Denise A. Chan, Tiara L.A. Kawahara, Patrick D. Sutphin, Howard Y. Chang, Jen-Tsan Chi, Amato J. Giaccia  Cancer Cell  Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 527-538 (June 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 PHD2 Levels Decrease in Human Cancers (A) Variation of PHD2 levels in the NCI-60 panel of cell lines immunoblotted for PHD1, PHD2, PHD3, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and α-tubulin. (B) Immunohistochemical staining for PHD2 in colon adenocarcinoma (bottom panels) compared to corresponding normal adjacent colon tissue (top panels) from several different patients. Scale bar, 500 μm. (C) Oncomine database analysis to examine PHD2 mRNA expression levels in adjacent, nontumoral colon versus colon carcinoma (p < 0.0005). (D) HCT116 cells with shRNA designed to specifically target PHD2. Cells were treated with DFO (100 μM; 4 hr) or proteasome inhibitor (MG132: 10 μM; 4 hr) and harvested to examine protein levels of PHD2, HIF-1α, and α-tubulin. Cancer Cell 2009 15, 527-538DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Loss of PHD2 Increases Tumor Growth (A) In vivo growth of wild-type or PHD2 knockdown (Construct A) HCT116 xenograft tumors (∗p < 0.00001). (B) In vitro growth curve of HCT116 cells with or without stable knockdown to PHD2 under either normoxic (N, 21% O2) or hypoxic (H, 2% O2) conditions. (C) Growth of wild-type or PHD2 knockdown (construct C or E) HCT116 tumors in mice (∗p < 0.001). (D) Growth of wild-type SU.86.86 or cells expressing PHD2 shRNA in SCID mice (∗p < 0.000005). (E) In vivo growth of HT29 cells expressing shRNA to PHD2 (Construct A) or control (construct E) (∗p < 0.000005). (F) Growth of wild-type RKO cells or cells expressing shRNA to PHD2 in SCID mice (∗p < 0.05). All error bars represent ± SEM. Cancer Cell 2009 15, 527-538DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 HIF-Independent Tumor Suppressor Function of PHD2 (A) Tumor growth of HCT116 cells expressing shRNA to HIF-1α alone or in combination with shRNA to PHD2 (∗p < 0.05). (B) PHD2 and HIF-1α silencing is maintained in vivo. Protein extracts from tumors in Figure 3A were immunoblotted to examine levels of HIF-1α, PHD2, and α-tubulin. (C) Tumor sections of the given genotype were stained for CA-IX expression. Scale bar, 200 μm. (D) Tumor growth of SU.86.86 cells with shRNA to PHD2 or shRNA to PHD2 and HIF-1β (∗p < 0.05). (E) In vivo growth of RKO cells deficient in HIF-1α or HIF-1α-deficient cells expressing PHD2 shRNA (∗p < 0.05). (F) In vivo growth of HIF-1α-deficient HCT116 cells or those expressing PHD2 shRNA (p < 0.05). All error bars represent ± SEM. Cancer Cell 2009 15, 527-538DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PHD2 Regulates Angiogenesis and Recruitment of Bone Marrow-Derived Cells (A) CD31 staining in sections from HCT116 tumors expressing PHD2 shRNA compared to wild-type tumors (∗p < 0.01). Scale bar, 500 μm. (B) CD31 staining in sections from HCT116 tumors expressing shRNA to both PHD2 and HIF-1α compared to those expressing HIF-1α shRNA alone (∗p < 0.0005). Scale bar, 500 μm. (C) In vitro tube formation of endothelial cells in conditioned media from wild-type HCT116 cells or cells expressing PHD2 (∗p < 0.000005). Scale bar, 1 mm. (D) In vitro tube formation of endothelial cells in conditioned media from HIF-1α-deficient HCT116 or HIF-1α-deficient HCT116 cells expressing PHD2 shRNA (∗p < 0.00005). Scale bar, 1 mm. (E) Staining of HCT116 tumors for bone marrow-derived myelomonocytic cells with CD11b (red) and nuclei with DAPI (blue) (∗p < 0.005). Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) HCT116 tumor staining for CD45 (green) and nuclei with DAPI (blue) (∗p < 0.005). Scale bar, 100 μm. All error bars represent ± SEM. Cancer Cell 2009 15, 527-538DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Hydroxylase Function of PHD2 Is Not Necessary for Regulating Angiogenesis (A) The ability of conditioned media from wild-type or PHD2 shRNA expressing HCT116 cells with or without hypoxia condition (2% O2, 16 hr) in inducing in vitro tube formation (∗p < 0.001). (B) The ability of conditioned media from HIF1−/− HCT116 cells or HIF1−/− HCT116 cells expressing PHD2 shRNA under normoxia or hypoxia (2% O2, 16 hr) in inducing in vitro tube formation (∗p < 0.01). (C) Conditioned media from HCT116 HIF1−/− cells or cells expressing shRNA to PHD2 treated with DMOG (1 mM, 16 hr) was subjected to in vitro tube formation (∗p < 0.001). (D) In vitro tube formation of conditioned media from RKO HIF1−/− cells or cells expressing shRNA to PHD2 treated with hypoxia (2% O2) or DMOG (1 mM) for 16 hr (∗p < 0.01). (E) HCT116 cells expressing PHD2 shRNA were transfected with either wild-type PHD2 or hydroxylase mutant PHD2 (H313A H315D). Conditioned media from these cells were collected and subjected to a tube formation assay (∗p < 0.001). All error bars represent ± SEM. (F) Representative photographs of primary endothelial cells seeded onto Matrigel in conditioned media from HCT116 cells stably expressing shRNA to PHD2 and transfected with either wild-type PHD2 or a hydroxylase mutant PHD2. Scale bar, 2 mm. Cancer Cell 2009 15, 527-538DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 NF-κB Regulates PHD2-Mediated Angiogenesis (A) NF-κB reporter assay of wild-type or HCT116 cells expressing PHD2 shRNA (∗p < 0.05). (B) NF-κB is hypoxia-responsive. HCT116 cells were transfected with a NF-κB luciferase reporter and treated with hypoxia (2% O2, 16 hr) (∗p < 0.005). (C) Wild-type or hydroxylase mutant PHD2 were overexpressed along with a NF-κB luciferase reporter construct in HCT116 HIF-1−/− cells stably expressing shRNA to PHD2. Following transfection, these cells were not treated or treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml; 6 hr), hypoxia (2% O2; 16 hr), or DMOG (1 mM; 16 hr) (∗p < 0.05). (D) Quantitative real-time PCR to demonstrate knockdown of RELA in HCT116 cells with HIF-1α knocked out. (E) Conditioned media from HCT116 HIF-1−/− cells expressing PHD2 shRNA transfected with pool of nontargeting siRNA or siRNA targeting RELA were subjected to a tube formation assay (∗p < 0.0005). (F) Primary endothelial cells were seeded onto Matrigel in conditioned media from HIF-1α knockout cells or those expressing shRNA to PHD2 and assayed for tube formation. Scale bar, 1 mm. (G) Angiogenesis antibody arrays were carried out in duplicate with conditioned media from either wild-type HCT116 or cells stably expressing PHD2 shRNA. (H) Reporter assays with ANG or IL-8 promoters along with the promoters with mutant NF-κB sites. Two days after transfection, cells were treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml; 6–8 hr) and luciferase activity was determined (∗p < 0.005). (I and J) RELA is recruited to the ANG promoter. HCT116 cells expressing shRNA to PHD2 were treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) for the given amount of time. ChIP with α-RELA antibodies was performed, and RELA occupancy is shown. MnSOD promoter is used as a positive control for recruitment of RELA to a NF-κB target promoter. IgG control ChIPs were also performed as a negative control. All error bars represent ± SEM. Cancer Cell 2009 15, 527-538DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 PHD2 Regulation of ANG and IL-8 Mediates Tumor Vasculature (A) Conditioned media from HCT116 cells expressing PHD2 shRNA and shRNA targeting either ANG or IL-8 were subjected to a tube formation assay (∗p < 0.05). (B) Tube formation with conditioned media from the given genotype. Scale bar, 2 mm. (C) Tumor staining for CD11b myelomonocytic precursor cells (red) and pericytes with vascular smooth muscle actin (green). Scale bar, 100 microns. Bottom panels are higher magnification of PHD2-silenced tumors. Scale bar, 500 microns. Quantification of CD11b-positive cells (∗p < 0.001). (D) Tumor staining for CD45 (red), hypoxia with pimonidazole (green), and nuclei with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 100 microns. Quantification of CD45-positive cells (∗p < 0.001). (E) Higher magnification images of wild-type HCT116 tumors stained for CD31 (red) and pimonidazole (green). Scale bar, 100 microns. (F) Tumor growth of cells expressing the given shRNA in SCID mice (∗p < 0.005). All error bars represent ± SEM. Cancer Cell 2009 15, 527-538DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Decreased PHD2 Expression Correlates with Increases in NF-κB Activity and Tumor Angiogenesis in Human Cancers (A and B) Left panels: Significant negative correlation between the expression level of PHD2 (x axis) and CD31 (y axis) in the breast cancer samples profiled in two expression studies of breast cancers. Middle panels: Significant positive correlation between NF-κB pathway activity (x axis) and expression of CD31 (y axis). Right panels: Significant negative correlation between the expression level of PHD2 (x axis) and NF-κB activity (y axis). (C) Immunohistochemical staining for PHD2 in invasive breast carcinomas (bottom panels) compared to matched, uninvolved, adjacent breast tissue (top panels) from several different patients. Scale bar, 100 μm. Cancer Cell 2009 15, 527-538DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions