WHO Model Formulary (WMF)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
"How's our impact?: Developing a survey toolkit to assess how health library services impact on patient care" Alison Weightman July 2008.
Advertisements

Translation and Translation Verification National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October 2006.
MEDICINES SELECTION & FORMULARY MANAGEMENT
ROLE OF THE REVIEWER ESSA KAZIM. ROLE OF THE REVIEWER Refereeing or peer-review has the advantages of: –Identification of suitable scientific material.
Editing, Peer-Reviewing and Team-Writing Editing isn’t a cosmetic process. It’s a thinking process. Richard Rhodes, author Making of the Atomic Bomb.
INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACY PRACTICE STANDARDS
SOURCES OF PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION. 1-Pharmacopeias Pharmacopoeia is a book containing an official list of the drugs used in medicine together with.
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.
1 Drug and Therapeutics Committee Session 10. Standard Treatment Guidelines.
Formulary IHE Pharmacy meeting - Den Haag 1. IHE Pharmacy white paper Formularies in the pharmaceutical practice Formularies as set of data in softwares.
Whilst the pharmaceutical industry plays a key role in developing and producing medicines, there is a tension between industry’s need to expand product.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the NHS Dr Jacqueline Dutchak, Director National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care 16 January 2004.
RPS Publishing Dr. Laszlo Horvath. Overview Brief History Brief History RPS Publishing – Imprints RPS Publishing – Imprints Pharmaceutical Press Products.
OCR National: AO3 SWS Business Presentation Monday, 14 September 2015Monday, 14 September 2015Monday, 14 September 2015Monday, 14 September 2015.
Overview of operational research in MSF Myriam Henkens, MD, MPH International Medical Coordinator MSF London 1st of June, 2006.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
The following slides were presented at a meeting of potential editors and methods advisors for the proposed Cochrane review group in February The.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
UK Wide Core Skills & Training Framework Findings of 2 nd Stage Consultation and Implications for Development of the Framework.
Organization and guideline development April 2010 ACCC The Netherlands.
 Remember, it is important that you should not believe everything you read.  Moreover, you should be able to reject or accept information based on the.
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Summary of Changes
ABSTRACT Title: Developing National Formularies Based on the WHO Model Formulary Authors: Tisocki K 3, Laing RL 1, Hogerzeil H 1, Mehta DK 2, Ryan RSM.
Legislative Texts. The legislative process in the EU Proposal, recommendation, communication from Commission, Green Paper, consultation, studies, draft.
MA Thesis/Papers-In-Lieu Overview and Process. Thesis: What is it?  A thesis is a scholarly manuscript that reports on a significant in-depth investigation.
Fire Safety in European Hotels Dr SD Christian. Fire Safety in European Hotels Council Recommendation 86/666/EEC Fire Safety in European Hotels.
February February 2008 Evidence Based Medicine –Evidence Based Medicine Centre –Best Practice –BMJ Clinical Evidence –BMJ Best.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
Harmonization Project FAS Meeting Harmonization project and ISSAI 200 Purpose and scope of the project The purpose is to provide a conceptual basis.
EMCDDA scientific publications Rosemary de Sousa, Head of Communication, 15 June 2009.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Managing Data Processing Section B.
Selection of essential medicines Richard Laing and Deidre Dimancesco TBS 2011 Department of Essential Medicines & Pharmaceutical Policies TBS 2008.
Business Registers Recommendations Manual Presentation by Eurostat
Writing Reports Workshop. 1. To share and build on good practice 2. To improve the quality of reports and meeting milestones 3. To develop guidelines.
DEVELOPING NATIONAL FORMULARIES BASED ON THE WHO MODEL FORMULARY Tisocki K, Laing RL, Hogerzeil H, Mehta DK, Ryan RSM.
Updating image To update the background image: Go to ‘View’ Select ‘Slide Master’ Select the page with the image Right click on the image and select ‘Change.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
IAEM Clinical Guidelines Development Abel Wakai, MD FRCSI FRCEM IAEM Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC) National Emergency Medicine Programme Conference.
Development of Assessments Laura Mason Consultant.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. BECOMING A SCHOLAR IN NURSING EDUCATION – Chapter 16 –
1 Improving School Leadership: Were to go from here Beatriz Pont Education and Training Policy Division Brussels, VLOR 2 nd Workshop of Participating Countries.
CAPE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Journeys into journals: publishing for the new professional
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Clinical Knowledge Summaries Overview
DRM SIAC Paper Destruction Working Group 13 September 2011
RPS Publishing Presentation to INFORMATIO MEDICATA 2006 by Maryam Kazemi 17 October 2006.
Acting Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section, NSNI, IAEA
Mexico 8th Meeting of the Steering Committee of INTOSAI Committee on
Roadmap to Enhanced Technical Regulations of WMO
Setting Actuarial Standards
05 April 2016 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on review of the draft APP - Department of Arts and Culture.
EQAVET Annual Network Meeting
Proposed ISRS 4400 (Revised)
GMP Inspection Process
Developing a Comprehensive TB Manual
WHO Guideline development
Sam Kynman – Executive Director, European Pain Federation EFIC
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy
Reference Manual update Item 6.2 of the agenda
Use of 2018 reporting – draft products
Mexico 8th Meeting of the Steering Committee of INTOSAI Committee on
Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy
LITERATURE REVIEW by Moazzam Ali.
CAPE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
MANUSCRIPT WRITING TIPS, TRICKS, & INFORMATION Madison Hedrick, MA
Presentation transcript:

WHO Model Formulary (WMF) 27 June, 2003 WHO Model Formulary (WMF) Dinesh K Mehta September 2004 Rachel and I are here to forge and strengthen the links between the WHO work that is done here and the editorial work on the WHO Model Formulary. Both of us work as editors on the BNF. Although Rachel did a lot of work on the first edition of the WHO Model Formulary, she was officially appointed to take on the prime responsibility for the WMF earlier this year. As you will all know, the WMF was published last year. I think it would be true to say that it has been met with wide acclaim and the WHO has received very positive feedback on it. We want to build on this and make it a publication that is highly valued by healthcare professionals and one that will make a real change to the treatment patients receive. This is a joint presentation. I will talk about some general concepts. Rachel will then talk much more specifically about the work and most importantly how we can all work more closely to produce reliable information on medicines. 1

What healthcare workers want to know about medicines 04/26/99 What healthcare workers want to know about medicines What medicine for a given condition? Is the medicine suitable for my patient? What else do I need to know to prescribe it? What do I need to know about a previously prescribed medicine?

Requirements for prescribing information 04/26/99 Requirements for prescribing information Authoritative Comprehensive Up-to-date Practical Widely distributed Locally relevant

Expert assessment for clinical and local relevance 04/26/99 Systematic reviews Research data Regulatory data Expert assessment for clinical and local relevance Textbooks Expert advice Dissemination Bulletins FORMULARIES Guidelines Prescriber Promotion Peers Costs Other influences

Anatomy of a formulary ‘Front matter’ Notes Monographs Appendices 04/26/99 Anatomy of a formulary ‘Front matter’ Notes Monographs Appendices

How is it presented? The book Digitally Adaptations and translations

Adapting information for local use Language Training Affordability Prevalence of conditions and priorities Healthcare provision Sophistication of technology

WHO Model Formulary: production 27 June, 2003 WHO Model Formulary: production 1995 the WHO Expert Committee on the Use of Essential Drugs recommended development of a WHO Model Formulary to complement the WHO Model List of Essential Drugs (the ‘Model List’) It was to be updated every two years. Useful resource for countries wishing to develop their own national formulary. After April 1996 work was started to draft sections of the text In November 1999 the WHO accept an offer by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain to take responsibility for final data validation, editing and layout. During the validation process all statements in the draft text were compared with the original references and checked for consistency with other WHO documents and recommendations and reputable drug information sources. As this was the first edition of work took almost two years and was completed by the end of 2001. During this process when necessary the text was updated to take into account new information that had become available since the time of writing e.g. monographs were included for the small number of essential drugs that had been added to the Model List in November 1999. Further editions of the WMF will obviously be produced differently now that the 2002 version has been produced 1

Validation of existing text Compare WMF text against New WHO publications Changes between editions of BNF Martindale

Sources BNF Martindale Drug withdrawals Textbooks Readers’ comments WHO experts and Expert Committee WHO programmes WHO publications Summaries of Product Characteristics (SPCs) Original papers and systematic reviews (e.g. Cochrane reviews) BNF Martindale Drug withdrawals Textbooks Readers’ comments

Verification of new text New and amended text: Checked independently by 2 editors Extra check of dose statements Sent to WHO for verification All new or amended text will be checked by at least 2 members of staff (including the Executive Editor) to ensure accuracy and clarity, and to make sure that the style is consistent All new or amended dose statements will also receive an extra check to ensure accuracy All new or amended text will be sent to WHO for verification (i.e. to ensure the information is correct and is consistent with WHO messages) 2

Style WHO style manual Use of XML to code database ensures consistent style of individual elements WHO style manual Use of XML to code database ensures consistent style of individual elements (unfortunately database is coded by humans who may apply codes inconsistently!) 7

How you can help Make thorough use of the resource Report: Areas of disagreement Ambiguity or incomplete information Mistakes! Make suggestions for improvement/expansion

The future Evolution of scope and extent Research on effectiveness Digital versions e.g. PDA (handheld) Translated versions (book and digital)