Evolution of clustering in COSMOS: a progress report Luigi Guzzo (INAF, Milano) N. Scoville, O. Le Fevre, A. Pollo, B. Meneux, & COSMOS Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Star formation histories and environment Bianca M. Poggianti INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova WE ARE ALL AFTER THE BIG PICTURE: 1)To what extent,
Advertisements

Realistic photometric redshifts Filipe Batoni Abdalla.
Quasar Clustering from SDSS DR7: Dependencies on FIRST Radio Magnitudes Andria C. Schwortz, Sarah Eftekharzadeh, Adam D. Myers, Yue Shen Clustering is.
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Clusters, Galaxies and the COSMOS J Berian James (IfA Edinburgh), John Peacock, Alexis Finoguenov, Henry Joy McCracken & Gigi Guzzo for the COSMOS collaboration.
Clustering in the Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS) Luigi Guzzo (INAF, Milano) N. Scoville, A. El Zant, O. Le Fevre, B. Meneux, A. Pollo & COSMOS Team (Fundamental.
Redshift Evolution of the Correlation Function Peter Capak J. Blazek, D. Sanders, I. Szapudi, N. Scoville Kyoto, May 23, 2005.
Evolution of Luminous Galaxy Pairs out to z=1.2 in the HST/ACS COSMOS Field Jeyhan Kartaltepe, IfA, Hawaii Dave Sanders, IfA, Hawaii Nick Scoville, Caltech.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
Redshift Evolution Of The Morphology Density Relation
Mapping with Probability – The Fortunate Isles Anthony Smith, Andrew Hopkins, Dick Hunstead.
Bell, E. F et al “Nearly 5000 distant Early-type galaxies in COMBO-17: A Red Sequence and its evolution since z~1” Presented by: Robert Lindner (Bob)‏
First Results from an HST/ACS Snapshot Survey of Intermediate Redshift, Intermediate X-ray Luminosity Clusters of Galaxies: Early Type Galaxies and Weak.
Tracing Dark and Luminous Matter in COSMOS: Key Astrophysics and Practical Restrictions James Taylor (Caltech) -- Cosmos meeting -- Kyoto, Japan -- May.
Colleen Corradi Brannigan, “Sofronia” Galaxy clustering in the Canada-France Legacy Survey H.J. McCracken and folks from TERAPIX and VVDS consortia For.
Measuring the clustering of galaxies in COSMOS Measuring the clustering of galaxies in COSMOS Olivier Le Fèvre, LAM Why ? Why ? How ? correlation function.
Relating Mass and Light in the COSMOS Field J.E. Taylor, R.J. Massey ( California Institute of Technology), J. Rhodes ( Jet Propulsion Laboratory) & the.
X-ray Source-Galaxy Angular Cross-Correlation function in the COSMOS Field Takamitsu Miyaji, Richard E. Griffiths (Carnegie Mellon Univ.) COSMOS XMM-Newton.
High Redshift Galaxies (Ever Increasing Numbers).
Modeling the 3-point correlation function Felipe Marin Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics University of Chicago arXiv: Felipe Marin Department.
Angular clustering and halo occupation properties of COSMOS galaxies Cristiano Porciani.
Evolution of Luminous Galaxy Pairs out to z=1.2 in the HST/ACS COSMOS Field Jeyhan Kartaltepe, IfA, Hawaii Dave Sanders, IfA, Hawaii Nick Scoville, Caltech.
Advanced Methods for Studying Astronomical Populations: Inferring Distributions and Evolution of Derived (not Measured!) Quantities Brandon C. Kelly (CfA,
UCL, Sept 16th 2008 Photometric redshifts in the SWIRE Survey - the need for infrared bands Michael Rowan-Robinson Imperial College London.
Tahoe, Sep Calibrating Photometric Redshifts beyond Spectroscopic Limits Jeffrey Newman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
The Clustering of AGN Using Photometric Redshifts Elias Koulouridis Antonis Georgakakis National Observatory of Athens.
박창범 ( 고등과학원 ) & 김주한 ( 경희대학교 ), J. R. Gott (Princeton, USA), J. Dubinski (CITA, Canada) 한국계산과학공학회 창립학술대회 Cosmological N-Body Simulation of Cosmic.
Environmental Properties of a Sample of Starburst Galaxies Selected from the 2dFGRS Matt Owers (UNSW) Warrick Couch (UNSW) Chris Blake (UBC) Michael Pracy.
The assembly of stellar mass during the last 10 Gyr: VVDS results B.Garilli on behalf of the VVDS consortium 1 topic, 4 approaches, concordant results.
Luminosity and Mass functions in spectroscopically-selected groups at z~0.5 George Hau, Durham University Dave Wilman (MPE) Mike Balogh (Waterloo) Richard.
Obscured AGN in the (z)COSMOS survey AGN9, Ferrara, May Angela Bongiorno Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, GERMANY AND.
1 GALEX Angular Correlation Function … or about the Galactic extinction effects.
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Properties of Barred Galaxies in SDSS DR7 - OPEN KIAS SUMMER INSTITUTE - Gwang-Ho Lee, Changbom Park, Myung Gyoon Lee & Yun-Young Choi 0. Abstract We investigate.
Chapter 25 Galaxies and Dark Matter Dark Matter in the Universe We use the rotation speeds of galaxies to measure their mass:
Cosmological studies with Weak Lensing Peak statistics Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Feb/19/2008 A Demography of Galaxies in Galaxy Clusters with the Spectro-photometric Density Measurement. Joo Heon Yoon 윤주헌 Sukyoung Yi 이석영 Yoon et al.
Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 The dependence of galaxy evolution on the properties of the environment, i.e. the deviation from the average behaviour, can be detected.
Galaxy Growth: The role of environment Simone Weinmann (MPA Garching) Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann, Frank van den Bosch, Anna Pasquali, Dan McIntosh,
Testing the Shear Ratio Test: (More) Cosmology from Lensing in the COSMOS Field James Taylor University of Waterloo (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) DUEL Edinburgh,
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
Full strength of (weak) Cluster lensing
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
Disentangling dynamic and geometric distortions Federico Marulli Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Bologna Marulli, Bianchi, Branchini, Guzzo,
Baryonic signature in the large-scale clustering of SDSS quasars Kazuhiro Yahata Dept. of Phys., University of Tokyo. Issha Kayo, Yasushi Suto, Matsubara.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
6dF Workshop April Sydney Cosmological Parameters from 6dF and 2MRS Anaïs Rassat (University College London) 6dF workshop, AAO/Sydney,
Zheng Dept. of Astronomy, Ohio State University David Weinberg (Advisor, Ohio State) Andreas Berlind (NYU) Josh Frieman (Chicago) Jeremy Tinker (Ohio State)
1 Galaxy Evolution in the SDSS Low-z Survey Huan Lin Experimental Astrophysics Group Fermilab.
SIMULATING THE GROUP FINDING IN THE DEEP2 SURVEY WITH PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT INFORMATION H.-Y. Baobab Liu 1, B.-C. Paul Hsieh 2, L.-H. Lin 3 1. NTU; 2. ASIAA;
Eyal Neistein Dec 2012 MS workshop Modeling galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing with the Millennium simulation Eyal Neistein TMoX group, MPE.
The zCOSMOS 3D density field Katarina Kovač 1, Simon Lilly 1, C. Porciani 1, O. Cucciati 2, A. Iovino 2, C. Knobel 1, C.M. Carollo 1, P. Oesch 1, A. Finoguenov.
Emission Line Galaxy Targeting for BigBOSS Nick Mostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BigBOSS Science Meeting Novemenber 19, 2009.
How Different was the Universe at z=1? Centre de Physique Théorique, Marseille Université de Provence Christian Marinoni.
Clustering of BzK-selected galaxies in the COSMOS field Xu KONG collaborators : A. Renzini, E. Daddi, N. Arimoto, A. Cimatti , COSMOS.
Obscured Star Formation in Small Galaxies out to z
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
The luminosity-dependent evolution of the radio luminosity function Emma Rigby University of Nottingham Collaborators: P. Best, M. Brookes, J. Dunlop,
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
ZCOSMOS galaxy clustering: status and perspectives Sylvain de la Torre Marseille - June, 11th Clustering working group: Ummi Abbas, Sylvain de la Torre,
The Process of Creating an Illustration This illustration shows two spiral galaxies - each with supermassive black holes at their center - as they are.
VDM groups/clusters reconstruction A. Iovino - Milano - OAB O. Cucciati - Milano – Univ. Bicocca C. Marinoni - Marseille - CPT S. Bardelli Bologna – OABo.
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
The Evolving Luminosity Function of Red Galaxies
An Analytic Approach to Assess Galaxy Projection Along A Line of Sight
On the
Galaxy Cluster Mass from Spectroscopic Magnification Measurements
Voids size distribution in the 2dFGRS
Presentation transcript:

Evolution of clustering in COSMOS: a progress report Luigi Guzzo (INAF, Milano) N. Scoville, O. Le Fevre, A. Pollo, B. Meneux, & COSMOS Team

Basic goal of COSMOS: measure the interplay between the growth of large-scale structure and the formation and evolution of galaxy properties within it (morphology, SED, size, luminosity, presence of central black hole, …) Quantify local structure via moments of the galaxy distribution: mean density, two-point correlation function, higher-order moments Quantify local structure via moments of the galaxy distribution: mean density, two-point correlation function, higher-order moments Goal here: Measure two-point correlation function as a function of redshift from photo-z COSMOS catalogue Goal here: Measure two-point correlation function as a function of redshift from photo-z COSMOS catalogue Final goal: measure evolution of how clustering depends on galaxy properties Final goal: measure evolution of how clustering depends on galaxy properties

Redshift-space correlations simply destroyed by photo-z errors Redshift-space correlations simply destroyed by photo-z errors Solution: treat redshift errors as (very large) redshift-space distortions and use projected function in z slices Solution: treat redshift errors as (very large) redshift-space distortions and use projected function in z slices Usual effect of real to redshift-space mapping (using mock survey):

Destructive effect of the large photo-z errors on redshift-space correlation function:

Recover diluted signal by projecting (r p, ) along the line of sight and fitting a power-law real-space correlation function (r)=(r/r 0 ) - Recover diluted signal by projecting (r p, ) along the line of sight and fitting a power-law real-space correlation function (r)=(r/r 0 ) -

I AB < < RA < & 1.5 < DEC < 2.9 Use very thick redshift slices (>> photo-z error): 0.2 – galaxies 0.4 – galaxies 0.6 – galaxies 0.8 – galaxies and project power back onto w p (r p ) Compute and project power back onto w p (r p ) Fit power-law (r) and recover amplitude and slope at each redshift Fit power-law (r) and recover amplitude and slope at each redshift Application to May 2005 COSMOS photo-z catalogue:

Montecarlo realization of catalogue mask

Results (blue) and comparison to VVDS (red)

Old results from Nov 2004 catalogue version

Encouraging result: the catalogue has improved! The recovered evolution of the correlation length r 0 and slope of (r) is fully consistent with what is measured in the VVDS spectroscopic survey (Le Fevre et al. astro-ph/ ) Remaining problems: stars with wrong z still in Further improvements: Improve mock samples, including more realistic photo-z errors (on new Millennium simulation) Next science steps: Most obvious: measure clustering of morphological classes (with Capak et al.) Remarks and perspectives:

Test with mock COSMOS: degrade zs as for photo-z

Compute r 0 and for increasing photo-z errors Z ph =Z sp +G( z ) Where G( z ) is a random deviate extracted from a Gaussian with dispersion z = 0 (1+z sp ) z = 0 (1+z sp ) Crude first approximation Crude first approximation Comparison with VVDS indicates then that average error should be 0 ~0.01 Comparison with VVDS indicates then that average error should be 0 ~0.01 In reality, errors have more complex behaviour and systematic effect play major role (ongoing refined analysis) In reality, errors have more complex behaviour and systematic effect play major role (ongoing refined analysis)