Geneva-based Cash Working Group   Humanitarian Networks and Partnership Week | www.hnpw.org

Humanitarian Networks and Partnership Week | www.hnpw.org 9:30 – 9:40 (1) Introduction and Overview [CaLP / OCHA] 9:40 – 10:30 (2) Global Updates (50 mins) - CaLP State of the World Cash Report - Update on Launch (CaLP – 5 mins) - CashCap Theory of Change Update (CashCap – 5 mins) - GHD task force on cash (Norway – 5 min) - Update on the Grand Bargain (DFID – 5 min) - Update on the Global Cluster Task Team (GCCG – 5 min) - Update on Global Cluster WASH session from Berlin (5 min) - Update from CaLP Regional Offices (CaLP – 5 mins) - Overview of upcoming cash based event – calendar planning (CaLP – 5 mins) - Other Global Updates (All – 10 mins) 10:30 – 10:50 (3) Coffee break (20 mins) 10:50 – 11:10 (4) Update on Global Cash Working Group Mapping Exercise (20 mins) - OCHA - Cash Working Groups: A Global Snapshot of Linkages and Integration into Existing Humanitarian Architecture 11:10 – 11:30 (5) REACH in Cash-Based Responses (20 mins) - What are the key challenges in harmonizing price monitoring tools and methodologies among partners, and how can these approaches be systematized at a global level to inform cash-transfer programming? 11:30 – 11:45 (6) Conclusions (15 mins) - AOB - Action points   Humanitarian Networks and Partnership Week | www.hnpw.org

Introduction and Overview (10 mins)

Global updates (50 mins)

Coffee break (20 mins)

Update on global cash working group mapping exercise (20 mins)

Geneva-based Cash Working Group Cash Working Groups: A Global Snapshot of Linkages and Integration into Existing Humanitarian Architecture Geneva-based Cash Working Group 6 January 2018

Cash working groups globally 2017-2018 Active Country Based Cash Working Group Regional Cash Working Groups Afghanistan Bangladesh Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon CAR Chad Colombia DRC Ethiopia Fiji Haiti Iraq Jordan Lebanon Liberia Libya Kenya Madagascar Mali Mauritania 22. Myanmar 23. Nepal 24. Niger 25. Nigeria 26. Pakistan 27. oPt 28. Philippines 29. Sierra Leone 30. Somalia South Sudan Sudan Syria/Damascus Tanzania Turkey (Syria)/ Turkey (Refugees in Turkey) Uganda Ukraine Yemen Pacific Regional Working Group (under PHT) Senegal Thailand

Cash Mapping How are cash working groups integrated into the humanitarian architecture? 26 crisis crisis-affected countries and three CaLP regional hubs surveyed GCCG Functional Mapping, Cluster Description Mapping

Out of 26 countries who completed our survey, 25 have Cash Working Groups (CWGs) or Technical Working Groups (TWGs) in place.

26 Surveyed countries 25 countries have active cash working groups. No CWG, not Exploring 1. Afghanistan 2. Burundi 3. Cameroon 4. CAR 5. Chad 6. Colombia 7. Ethiopia 8. Haiti 9. Iraq 10. Lebanon 11. Libya 12. Mali 13. Myanmar 14. Niger 15. Nigeria 16. Pakistan 17. oPt 18. Philippines 19. Somalia 20. S Sudan 21. Sudan 22. Syria 23. Turkey 24. Ukraine 25. Yemen 26. Cote d’Ivoire 26 Surveyed countries 25 countries have active cash working groups.

Overview of CaLP’s Engagement with CWGs in Asia & E.&W. Africa CaLP East Africa Engaged with CWGs in: Kenya, Somalia, Uganda, Ethiopia, Burundi, Sudan, South Sudan, Tanzania, Madagascar. CaLP West Africa Supports CWGs in: Nigeria, Cameroon, Niger, Mali, Chad, Burkina Faso, CAR, DRC, Liberia and Mauritania. CaLP Asia In Asia, CaLP supports the CWGs in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Philippines.

CaLP’s Engagement with Humanitarian Actors & Architecture CaLP engages with practitioners and the wider humanitarian community through: Regional working group meetings Participation in regional IASC meetings Strengthen coordination support for cash transfer programmes Strengthen preparedness and response Regional roadmap for collective endorsement (West Africa) Support to governments CaLP engagement is responsive to needs Technical Support to CWGs: Supports the development of CWGs Organizes learning events Provides technical expertise Conducts research to aid learning and the establishments of best practices Facilitates and clarifies TORs Research

Links with coordination architecture Representation or engagement at a strategic level (HCT) Seat at the ICCG / Linkage reflected in the CWG TOR Ad-hoc reporting through attendees with an HCT/ Inter-Cluster seat 1. Pakistan 2. Yemen 3. Lebanon* Afghanistan Burundi Cameroon CAR Chad Colombia Ethiopia Haiti Iraq** Libya Mali Myanmar Niger Nigeria Philippines S. Sudan Syria/Damascus Turkey Lebanon* Ukraine oPt Somalia Sudan

Sectoral vs. Multi-Sectoral CWGs Independent / Multi-Sectoral (within humanitarian architecture) Under a Cluster/Sector Afghanistan 13. Myanmar 2. Burundi 14. Niger 3. Cameroon 15. Nigeria 4. CAR 16. Pakistan 5. Chad 17. Philippines 6. Colombia 18. Somalia 7. Ethiopia 19. South Sudan 8. Haiti 20. Sudan 9. Iraq 21. Turkey 10. Lebanon 22. Ukraine 11. Libya 23. Yemen 12. Mali 1. oPt – Food Security 2. Syria/Damascus – Food Security 3. Lebanon* - Food Security and BN

CWG Leadership UN UN + Intl NGO NGO 1. CAR: OCHA (chair) 2. Myanmar: WFP (chair) 3. Niger: OCHA (chair) 4. Pakistan: FAO (chair) + WFP (co-chair) 5. Sudan: WFP + UNHCR 6. Lebanon*: WFP Food Sec/ Basic Needs UNHCR 1. Afghanistan: NRC (chair) + WFP 2. Cameroon: WFP (chair) + IRC 3. Ethiopia: WFP + Oxfam (co-leads) + OCHA 4. Iraq: UNHCR (chair) + Mercy Corps 5. Libya: UNHCR (chair) + Mercy Corps 6. Nigeria: OCHA (chair) + INGO forum 7. South Sudan: WFP (chair) + Dan Church Aid 8. Syria (Damascus): UNRWA (chair) + pending nomination 9. Yemen: Oxfam (chair) + OCHA 1. Chad: Oxfam (chair) + CRS 2. Ukraine: Moving to I/NGO chair + OCHA

Local Govt Involved in Leadership CWG Leadership Contd. Local Govt Involved in Leadership UN + Local NGO Rotating 1. Burundi: Ministry for Human Rights & Social Welfare (chair) + WFP 2. Colombia: See rotating  3. Mali: Oxfam (chair) + Direction Nationale de la Protection Sociale et de L’Economie Solidaire) + WFP 1. Somalia: WFP (chair) + ADESO 1. Philippines: 4 month rotation, all organizations 2. Colombia: Presidential Agency for Intl Cooperation (APC) + Colombian Red Cross + WFP 3. Turkey: Rotating amongst steering committee Intl NGOs as of Feb 2018

Reporting on Cash- Information MGMT Standard Sectoral Cash Reporting/Multi-Cluster or Multi-Sectoral Cash Broken down Standard Sectoral Cash Reporting/ Multi-Cluster or Multi-Sectoral Cash Reported Separately Single Sectoral Cash Reporting, no multi-sectoral reporting. No Standard Reporting/ Standard Reporting under Development Afghanistan Syria/Damascus Syria/Turkey Columbia Chad Ethiopia Iraq Lebanon* Nigeria Phillipines* Somalia* Ukraine Haiti Libya Mali Myanmar Niger oPT Pakistan Yemen Burundi CAR - CWG only recently activated. Cameroon - orgs report their own activities per donor requirements. 3Ws being developed by OCHA. South Sudan - basic reporting developed by OCHA, rolling out. Sudan - reporting developed by OCHA, rolling out

Overview of IM Support to CWGs Dedicated IM Support and (Provider) Ad-hoc IM Support as Needed (Provider) Lack of IM Support 1. Chad (Food Security Cluster) 2. Haiti (OCHA) 3. Iraq (UNHCR) 4. Libya (UNHCR) 5. Nigeria (OCHA) 6. Pakistan (OCHA) 7. South Sudan (FSL IMO) 8. Syria/Damascus (OCHA + Food Security) 9. Ukraine (OCHA) 1. Afghanistan (OCHA) 2. Burundi (OCHA) 3. Cameroon (OCHA) 4. Colombia Information Management and Analysis Unit (UMAIC) 5. Ethiopia (OCHA) 6. Myanmar (OCHA) 7. Niger (OCHA) 8. Philippines (OCHA) 9. Turkey (OCHA) 10. Yemen (OCHA) 1. CAR* 2. Mali 3. Somalia 4. Sudan

Reach in cash-based responses (20 mins)

Conclusions (15 mins)