Brian murphy and Emily valenzuela

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lower Yellowstone River Diversion Dam Project – Phase II - Physical Modeling of the Rock Ramp BRT, COE, MTAO Update Meeting November 4, 2010.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Numerical Analysis of the Performance of River Spanning Rock Structures: Evaluating Effects of Structure.
Weirs and Canal Intakes By: Nell Kolden and Taylor Barnett Thursday April 12, 2012 CIVE 717.
Stream Geomorphology Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012.
Grade Control Structures Chris Shrimpton and Jonathan McIntosh CIVE 717 River Mechanics Spring 2012.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 7 Stream Systems on Dynamic Earth Floodplain Management Principles & Practice Prepared By Donald R. Reichmuth, PhD.
Streambank Protection Design of Riprap Protection
Introduction to Stone (riprap) Protection
Rock Riffle Design Course
Design of Hydraulic Controls & Structures
By the end of the lesson I should know:
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Fluvial Landforms – Middle course of river River Channel:  wider and deeper  Volume of water greater than that in upper course.  Gradient is less than.
HEC-RAS.
Stream Restoration Techniques
ESSP 460/460L images HydraulicsHydraulics and Stream Morphology (seeing hydraulics in the field) For image re-use please reference Doug Smith (March 2003,
“We Bring Engineering to Life” 3-D Stream Restoration Design, Monitoring and Beyond David Bidelspach, PE - Stantec Consulting Greg Jennings, PE – NCSU.
1 Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX
Modern Urbanized Stream Water Quality Improvement Technologies Creating a Net Zero Water Quality Impact Solution in the Natural Environment.
TRADITIONAL WINDROW & TRENCH-FILL REVETMENTS, & A NEW INVENTION, VEGETATED TRENCH-FILL REVETMENT {All 3 are classified as “Setback Revetments”}
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Habitat Presentation 1 Phil Kaufmann --- USEPA, Corvallis, OR
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
DESIGNING BENDWAY WEIRS
9. Seepage (Das, chapter 8) Sections: All except 8.2, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9.
Sulphur Dunnigan Burn Dump, Yolo County, CA. (30 miles north of Sacramento, CA.) BUILT 1998.
1 River features? Are facial features the same thing for rivers?
CASE STUDY- West Fork Beaver River, West Point, OH. Constructed Sept
School of Civil Engineering/Linton School of Computing, Information Technology & Engineering 1 CE 3205 Water and Environmental Engineering Stilling Basins.
Basic Hydraulics: Bridges. Definition & terminology Abutments Flow contraction.
Detroit District, Hydraulics & Hydrology Office US Army Corps of Engineers River Bank Erosion Siskiwit River, Cornucopia, WI.
BW - CHAPTER 14: CASE STUDY- NEOSHO RIVER, ALLEN COUNTY, (MIKE GEFFERT’S PROPERTY) SOUTHEAST KANSAS Constructed May-July 2000 Using Bendway Weirs for thalweg.
This training was prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) team of Otto Gonzalez-USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (Team Leader), Jon Fripp.
Design and Implementation of Large Wood Structures at Twelvemile Creek Prince of Wales Island Tongass National Forest The Nature Conservancy TEAMS Enterprise.
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Bradley Hansen John Nieber Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering For BBE 4535/5535 Fall 2011.
Fluvial Geomorphology Environmental Hydrology Lecture 20.
Esteban Quiles Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
NHACC Annual Meeting 2014 New Approaches to Restoring NH’s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal Peter J. Walker.
Yampa River Structures Project WSRA grant application 2nd reading June 15, 2011 Prepared by Friends of the Yampa.
What is the Bradshaw model?
Bridges Reach analysis Fundamental tool for design
EXAMPLE Water flows uniformly in a 2m wide rectangular channel at a depth of 45cm. The channel slope is and n= Find the flow rate in cumecs.
CASE STUDY- West Fork Beaver River, West Point, OH. Constructed Sept
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tarkan Erdik
STREAMS & RIVERS Chapter 6 1.
RIVERS AS AGENTS OF EROSION, TRANSPORTATION AND DEPOSITION
SINGLE STONE BENDWAY WEIRS
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Fluvial Geomorphology
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys
Discharge, stream flow & channel shape
Streams Hydrodynamics
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Module 5: Morphology, Facets, Ratios, and Stream Classification
Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Fluvial Hydraulics CH-3
Anthony Keene Kristin LaForge CIVE 717 Spring 2018
Module # 8 Channel Evolution Implications & Drivers of Instability
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Module # 16 Restoring Functions to Streams Through Design
Jetty Fields An Overview By David Cortese.
Longitudinal Profile Survey for Successful Culvert Replacement
In-Stream Structures & Grade Control
Shaver Creek Permitting
Presentation transcript:

Brian murphy and Emily valenzuela Overview of vanes Brian murphy and Emily valenzuela Cive 717 Homework No. 4 – Spring 2018

What are vanes Vanes are structures constructed in a stream to redirect flow by changing rotational eddies (i.e., secondary flows). They are used as part of natural stream restoration efforts to improve instream habitat and prevent bank erosion. There are several variants on vanes

Physical Properties Vanes are typically formed with rock, woody debris, or the combination of the two. Vanes can also be made with concrete (i.e. iowa vanes) Large boulders are used to anchor the vane

Physical Properties Vanes consist of: an anchor section that is keyed to bank a section that extends partially or fully in to the bankfuLl width of a stream Rocks vanes should be constructed with rock that is angular, flat, or cubed Rocks used should be hard enough to resist weathering, free of cracking, and not porous

Physical processes Vanes: Modify flow direction away from streambanks The upstream angle of the structure is critical. For the structure to work properly the upstream angle needs to be into the bank in the downstream direction. The resultant flow will be at a 90 ° angle perpendicular to the vane. Create depositional zone near banks to reduce streambank erosion Create local scour near center of stream

Physical processes local scour forms a pool that Is used for energy dissipation and to increase pool habitat for fish IT IS SUGGESTED TO USE VANES IN CHANNELS THAT HAVE A WIDTH TO DEPTH RATIO OF 12 OR GREATER

Types of vanes Iowa Vanes Cross Vane Double Cross Vane J-hook cross vanes

Iowa Vane Iowa vanes are structures placed in an eroding streambed that cause the flow to be redirected, which results in the deposition of sediment on the eroding bank.

Iowa Vane Iowa vane placement details Profile view Plan view

Cross vane & Double Cross Vane cRoss vanes and double cross vanes are used to offset adverse effects from straight weirs and check dams, which create backwater and flat slopes From USDA

J-hook Cross Vane J-hooks are vanes with a downstream pointing “j” configuration J-HOOK vanes REDIRECT FLOW VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION AND HIGH VELOCITY GRADIENT IN THE NEAR BANK REGION to dissipate energy and stabilize streambanks The “j” configuration forms a scour hole for the fish habitat From USACE 2012

Vane Design Two design procedures from U.S Bureau of Reclamation (2015) Geometry based procedure Bankline velocity reduction procedure

Vane Design Geometry based procedure Determine design flows and hydraulic conditions Determine desired bank line and thalweg location Determine vane length Lw = Le/sinq where Lw = total vane length, Le = effective vane length, and Q = horizontal angle b/t bank and vane axis Determine bank vane elevation Determine positions throughout the bend Calculate vane spacing

Vane Design Geometry based procedure Determine vane orientation angle Determine vane crest slope Determine vane key length Determine riprap size Determine vane top width Estimate scour and launch riprap volume Check constructability

Vane Design Bankline velocity reduction procedure (Scurlock et al., 2012) Determine bend hydraulics and design water surface Determine bank vane elevation Estimate vane length, angle, spacing and slope Initial calculation of A* (cross sectional area of vane) Initial and iterative calculation of velocity reduction Determine vane positions throughout the bend

Vane Design Bankline velocity reduction procedure Determine final vane length, spacing, and depth to vane tip Determine the final centerline and inside-of-bend velocity changes Determine vane key length, riprap size, vane top width, scour, and launch riprap volume Review constructability

Typical vane details

Typical vane Dimensions From USACE 2012

Risks and failures Most comment vane failure undermining due to scour flanking by the river (bank erosion around and behind the structure) entrance angle changing due to upstream channel migration larger flow entrance angle with concurrent increases in velocity and scour. Bank scalloping between vanes is common

takeaways Vanes redirect flow by changing the rotational eddies Design of vanes is typically based on bankfull depth Key Design/construction elements Length Crest orientation angle Crest elevation and slope Channel Width Channel centerline radius of curvature for the bend Vanes are typically oriented upstream 20 to 30 degrees to the bank tangent

References NRCS, 2007, “Flow Changing Techniques”, In: National Engineering Handbook Part 654J, August. NRCS, 2007, “Bank stabilization Techniques”, In: National Engineering Handbook Part 654J, August. Rosgen, Dave. 2001. The Cross-Vane, W-Weir and J-Hook Vane Structures…Their Description, Design and Application for Stream Stabilization and River Restoration. Updated from the Paper Published by ASCE Conference, Reno, NV, August, 2001. Scurlock, S.M., Thornton, C.I., Baird, D.C., and Abt, S.R., 2015. “Quantification of Transverse In-Stream Structure Hydraulics” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2015.141. USACE, 2012, “RIVER TRAINING STRUCTURES AND SECONDARY CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS”, UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN HANDBOOK, Chapter 7. USBR, 2015, “BANK STABILIZATION DESIGN GUIDELINES”, Report No. SRH-2015-25, June. Iowa department of natural resources, 2006, “Iowa vanes”, in: how to control streambank erosion. “Habitat Restoration.” US Fish and Wildlife Service, Partners for Fish and Wildlife, 31 May 2016, www.fws.gov/northeast/njfieldoffice/landowners.html. Natural Channel and Floodplain Restoration, Applied Fluvial Geomorphology. USDA, Sept. 2014, www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/nd/technical/engineering/?cid=stelprdb1247762. Harman, Will, and Rachel Smith. “Using Root Wads and Rock Vanes for Streambank Stabilization.” NC State Extension, NC State Publications, 1 June 2000, content.ces.ncsu.edu/using-root-wads-and-rock-vanes-for-streambank-stabilization.