Hélène Côté and Daniel Caya Climate Simulations Group Consortium Ouranos Variability and Extremes in the CRCM Development of Scenarios of Climate Variability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COSMO User Seminar 2012 Offenbach, 8 March 2012
Advertisements

Medium-range Ensemble Streamflow forecast over France F. Rousset-Regimbeau (1), J. Noilhan (2), G. Thirel (2), E. Martin (2) and F. Habets (3) 1 : Direction.
Intraseasonal Variability of the Surface Fluxes in Santarém Pedro L. Silva Dias (1) Pedro L. Silva Dias (1) Maria Isabel Vitorino (1) Humberto Rocha (1)
D. W. Shin, S. Cocke, Y.-K. Lim, T. E. LaRow, G. A. Baigorria, and J. J. OBrien Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies Florida State University,
Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Severe Weather Forecasts
The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
1 NCAS SMA presentation 14/15 September 2004 The August 2002 European floods: atmospheric teleconnections and mechanisms Mike Blackburn (1), Brian Hoskins.
1 03/0045a © Crown copyright Evaluating water vapour in HadAM3 with 20 years of satellite data Richard P. Allan Mark A. Ringer Met Office, Hadley Centre.
Recent Evidence for Reduced Climate Sensitivity Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D Principal Research Scientist The University of Alabama In Huntsville March 4, 2008.
Where and when should one hope to find added value from dynamical downscaling of GCM data? René Laprise Director, Centre ESCER (Étude et Simulation du.
Tuning and Validation of Ocean Mixed Layer Models David Acreman.
ISU Atmospheric Component Update – Part I Justin Glisan Iowa State University.
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.
The North American Monsoon System: Recent Evolution and Current Status Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 11 June 2012.
The North American Monsoon System: Recent Evolution and Current Status Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 07 June 2010.
The Canadian Climate Impacts Scenarios (CCIS) Project is funded by the Climate Change Action Fund and provides climate change scenarios and related information.
ICP Materials Preparation for ex post analysis Johan Tidblad and Stefan Doytchinov Co-Chiarmans ICP Materials 36 th meeting of the Task Force on Integrated.
Whitecaps, sea-salt aerosols, and climate Magdalena D. Anguelova Physical Oceanography Dissertation Symposium College of Marine Studies, University of.
COSMO General Meeting Zürich, Sept Stefan Klink, Klaus Stephan and Christoph Schraff and Daniel.
The local response to the NAO in a RegCM 30-year run Roxana Bojariu and Liliana Velea National Institute of Meteorology Bucharest, Romania
1 McGill University Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Extreme Precipitation by High Resolution RegCM3 Over East Asia Jing ZHENG, Zhenghui Xie Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP),CAS, China Institute of.
1 Trend and Year-to-year Variability of Land-Surface Air Temperature and Land-only Precipitation Simulated by the JMA AGCM By Shoji KUSUNOKI, Keiichi MATSUMARU,
June 2003Yun (Helen) He1 Coupling MM5 with ISOLSM: Development, Testing, and Application W.J. Riley, H.S. Cooley, Y. He*, M.S. Torn Lawrence Berkeley National.
Task: (ECSK06) Regional downscaling Regional modelling with HadGEM3-RA driven by HadGEM2-AO projections National Institute of Meteorological Research (NIMR)/KMA.
Mechanistic crop modelling and climate reanalysis Tom Osborne Crops and Climate Group Depts. of Meteorology & Agriculture University of Reading.
Progress in Downscaling Climate Change Scenarios in Idaho Brandon C. Moore.
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results Eric Salathé Climate Impacts Group University of Washington.
Assessment of Future Change in Temperature and Precipitation over Pakistan (Simulated by PRECIS RCM for A2 Scenario) Siraj Ul Islam, Nadia Rehman.
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results Eric Salathé Climate Impacts Group University of Washington.
Current and planned Project with the Regional Climate Model Regional climate simulations over southern South America and sensitivity experiments Silvina.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
Regional Climate Modeling in the Source Region of Yellow River with complex topography using the RegCM3: Model validation Pinhong Hui, Jianping Tang School.
© Crown copyright Met Office Climate Projections for West Africa Andrew Hartley, Met Office: PARCC national workshop on climate information and species.
NARCCAP Users Meeting April 2011 Results from NCEP-driven RCMs Overview Based on Mearns et al. (BAMS, 2011) Results from NCEP-driven RCMs Overview Based.
Development of a downscaling prediction system Liqiang Sun International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI)
Page1 PAGE 1 The influence of MM5 nudging schemes on CMAQ simulations of benzo(a)pyrene concentrations and depositions in Europe Volker Matthias, GKSS.
10th International Congress of the Hellenic Geographical Society, Thessaloniki 23 October 2014 A high resolution regional climate simulation for Greece.
Uncertainty in climate scenarios when downscaling with an RCM M. Tadross, B. Hewitson, W Gutowski & AF07 collaborators Water Research Commission of South.
Downscaling and its limitation on climate change impact assessments Sepo Hachigonta University of Cape Town South Africa “Building Food Security in the.
Tropical Domain Results Downscaling Ability of the NCEP Regional Spectral Model v.97: The Big Brother Experiment Conclusions: Motivation: The Big Brother.
Simulation of Temperature and Precipitation using Regional Climate Model (RegCM3) for Uzbekistan Central latitude of the model domain 40N Central longitude.
Dynamical downscaling of future climates Steve Hostetler, USGS Jay Alder, OSU/USGS Andrea Schuetz, USGS/OSU Environmental Computing Center, COAS/OSU.
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
Sébastien Biner*, Daniel Caya and the Ouranos Climate Simulation Team Boulder, February 2008 Narccap users’ meeting The.
Regional Climate Modeling Simulations of the West African Climate System Gregory S. Jenkins, Amadou Gaye, Bamba Sylla LPASF AF20.
Introduction to and validation of MM5/VIC modeling system.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Fine-resolution global time slice simulations Philip B. Duffy 1,2,3 Collaborators: G. Bala 1, A. Mirin 1 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2 University.
Analysis of Streamflow Characteristics over Northeastern Canada in a Changing Climate O. Huziy, L. Sushama, M.N. Khaliq, R. Laprise, B. Lehner, R. Roy.
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5 Yi-Chih Huang.
One-year re-forecast ensembles with CCSM3.0 using initial states for 1 January and 1 July in Model: CCSM3 is a coupled climate model with state-of-the-art.
GCAP (Global Climate and Air Pollution): One of six projects funded by EPA-STAR to study effect of climate change on air quality. Collaborators: Harvard.
West African Monsoon Experiment using RegCM2 + - Ernest A. Afiesimama - Ernest A. Afiesimama presenting …. presenting ….
Synthesis of work on Budget of Water Vapor and Trace gases in Amazonia Transport and Impacts of Moisture, Aerosols and Trace Gases into and out of the.
March Outline: Introduction What is the Heat Wave? Objectives Identifying and comparing the current and future status of heat wave events over.
Does nudging squelch the extremes in regional climate modeling?
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5
Tanya L. Spero1, Megan S. Mallard1, Stephany M
Overview of Downscaling
Representation of the Great Lakes in CRCM5 using 3D ocean model NEMO: impacts on simulated climate Huziy O and Sushama L.
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results
An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations and Analysis
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results
Leo Separovic, Ramón de Elía, René Laprise and Adelina Alexandru
RegCM3 Lisa C. Sloan, Mark A. Snyder, Travis O’Brien, and Kathleen Hutchison Climate Change and Impacts Laboratory Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
Presentation transcript:

Hélène Côté and Daniel Caya Climate Simulations Group Consortium Ouranos Variability and Extremes in the CRCM Development of Scenarios of Climate Variability and Extremes: Current Status and Next Steps Victoria, October 2003

Outline Current status of CRCM –Policy Run II vs Policy Run III –Production runs with version –Preliminary results (the first 5 years of the 25-year run) –Next operational version: CRCM –Development of CRCM 4.0 Variability issues in regional climate modelling Modelling the extremes –The data we have –What we plan to do Validation issues How to improve the model

From Policy Run II to Policy Run III vs RadiationFouquart and Morcrette unchanged Land surfaceBeautified Bucket ( 1 layer + force- restore) unchanged ConvectionKain-Fritsch (1990)Bechtold-Kain-Fritsch (Bechtold et al 2001) CloudsF (relative humidity)F (relative humidity) + convective clouds Boundary layerBulk transfert, mixing lengh-Kunchanged Atmospheric composition Specified [O 3 ] [CO 2 ]unchanged NestingDavies relaxationSpectral nudging ( Biner et al 2000, Denis et al) SSTsFrom Monthly GCM valuesFrom Daily GCM values or AMIP obs. Lake ModelNoMixed-layer (Goyette et al 2000) Leap-yearNoYes New featuresImplicit treatment of Tg Atmospheric budget

Current Simulations Configuration 45 km grid point spacing 193 x 145 grid points 29 vertical levels Lid: 30 km Archival : every 6 hours (pcp every timestep) Transient CO2 Spinup period: 2 years Approx. 1 month CPU time per simulated year …. 5.7Gb of model outputs per simulated month…. Topography (m) Policy Run II domain

Current Simulations Driving data OceanPeriodSpectral nudging CRCMDone (14/10/03) NRA-1AMIP yes / 364 NRA-1AMIP no / 364 CGCM2 i s92a CGCM yes / 364 CGCM2 is92a CGCM yes / 364

CO 2 Equivalent Concentration IS92aCRCM –CRCM CGCM2, ,

Precipitation rate (mm/day) 5-year mean: Summer CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2 CRU2: Climatic Research Unit TS °X 0.5° (Mitchell et al. 2003)

Precipitation rate (mm/day) 5-year mean: Winter CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Maximum Screen Temperature (ºC) 5-year mean: Summer CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Maximum Screen Temperature (ºC) 5-year mean: Winter CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Minimum Screen Temperature (ºC) 5-year mean: Summer CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Minimum Screen Temperature (ºC) 5-year mean: Winter CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

CRCM Version Improve some biases of related to the boundary layer: Retun the control from the planetary waves Too warm (Tmin) and too wet (pcp) 1-layer bucket too deep and very wet Excessive cloud cover (Tmin too high) Too much evaporation Too much preciptation

Planned Simulations Driving data OceanPeriodSpectral nudging CRCMStart CGCM2 scenario * 1xCO2 2xCO2 yes3.6.3Early 2004 CGCM2 scenario * 1xCO2 2xCO2 yes3.6.3Early 2004 GCMx 1xCO2 2xCO2 yes3.6.3Early 2004 *We have to choose from CGCM2 simulations based on different CO2 emission scenarios. GCMx: A different GCM

CRCM 4.0 Prototype in development in collaboration with the CRCM Network (R.Laprise et al) –MC2 dynamics + GCMIII physics Ed Chan MSC, Virginie Lorant CCCma –All CRCM physics and features need to be implemented –Prototype to be completed in early 2005

Variability Longer timeserie to assess variablity –25 years simulations instead of 10 years 2 compoments of the variability: –Intramonthly (seasonal) vs Interannual variabilityIntramonthly (seasonal) vs Interannual variability –Intramonthly variability: difficult to validate due to a lack of temporal resolution of gridded observed datasets Results : Validation of interannual variability

Precipitation Rate (mm/day) 5-year Interannual Standard-Deviation Summer CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Precipitation Rate (mm/day) 5-year Interannual Standard-Deviation Winter CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Maximum Screen Temperature 5-year Interannual Standard-Deviation Summer CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Maximum Screen Temperature 5-year Interannual Standard-Deviation Winter CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Minimum Screen Temperature 5-year Interannual Standard-Deviation Summer CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Minimum Screen Temperature 5-year Interannual Standard-Deviation Winter CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

CRCM monthly extremes Precipitations extremes : computed from precipitation archived every timestep (15 min) –Highest precipitation rate for different durations –Wet days for different thresholds –Dry days for different thresholds –Precipitation histogram Daily extremes of specific humidity (screen) Daily screen temperature extremes Highest gusts at the lowest level of the model

CRCM climate extremes (all in early stage of development) Records of the simulation Normals of the simulation Climate indices (Stardex, etc…) Precipitation histograms Temperature distributions

5-year January Daily Precipitation Histogram nearest gridpoint vs station data: Victoria From the 0.2 mm threashold –124 / 155 rain days in CRCM 3 events above 25 mm during the simulation On average, –MSC obs: 17.8 / 31 (57%) rain days –CRCM : 24.8 / 31 (80%) rain days Precipitation too frequent Average number of days Total number of days

5-year January Daily Precipitation Histogram nearest gridpoint vs station data: Dryden Average number of days Total number of days From the 0.2 mm threashold –106 / 155 rain days in CRCM 0 event above 25 mm during the simulation On average, from [0.2-5[ mm –MSC obs: 12.2 / 31 (39%) rain days –CRCM : 21.2 / 31 (68%) rain days Precipitation too frequent [0.2-5[

5-year January Daily Precipitation Histogram nearest gridpoint vs station data: Kuujuaq From the 0.2 mm threashold –100 / 155 rain days in CRCM 0 event above 25 mm during the simulation On average, –MSC obs: 15.4 / 31 (49.6%) rain days –CRCM : 20.0 / 31 (64.5%) rain days Precipitation too frequent [0.2-5[ Average number of days Total number of days

Validation issues Gridded climatologies –Lack of resolution –Lack of temporal resolution –Lack of variables –Lack of information about the topography (except CRU) CRCM –Limited time-series –Grid point vs station data –Interpolation of datasets on the CRCM grid

Improving regional climate models Better representation of surface caracteristics – variables used by land surface scheme Include smaller lakes –bathymetry, lake surface temperature, ice –from Better parameterisations CRCM ensembles

5-year Pressure field variability: July (mb) Interannual standard-deviationIntramonthly standard-deviation Signature of the synoptic activity

Screen Temperature (ºC) 5-year mean: Summer CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Screen Temperature (ºC) 5-year mean: Winter CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Screen Temperature 5-year Interannual Standard-Deviation Summer CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2

Screen Temperature 5-year Interannual Standard-Deviation Winter CRCM/NCEP CRU2 CRCM-CRU2