Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The RE-LY Study: Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at.
Advertisements

JOURNAL REVIEW Newer Antithrombotics in AF 1 Dr Ranjith MP Senior Resident Department of Cardiology Government Medical college Kozhikode.
Georges Ghanem MD, FESC, FACC Associate Professor, Chief of Cardiology UMC-RH/LAU-SOM Beirut, Lebanon.
Concomitant Antiplatelet and OAC Tx: Real-World Practice In the US, ~800,000 AF patients are on concomitant OAC and antiplatelet tx 1 Patients on chronic.
1 Novel Oral Anticoagulants: Benefits and risks Matthew Moles, MD December 4, 2012 University of Colorado.
Update on Anti-platelets Gabriel A. Vidal, MD Vascular Neurology Ochsner Medical Center October 14 th, 2009.
Standard Medical Therapy TRA 40 mg mg/d TRA 40 mg mg/d Placebo EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp for RI/urgent coronary revasc. 1  EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp.
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs. Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation - Japanese population in the RE-LY ® - Shinya Goto, MD., PhD. Tokai.
ARISTOTLE TRIAL Dr R Nyabadza GPST1 Ward 32. Structure AF, stroke and CHA 2 -DS 2 VASC Anticoagulant choices ARISTOTLE trial Cost NICE guidance and the.
ARISTOTLE TTR Subanalysis
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
AF and NOACs An UPDATE JULY 2014
The Definitive Thrombosis Update
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.
Randomized Evaluation of Long- term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke.
Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin and its newer alternatives
TRANSCEND: Telmisartan Randomized AssesmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease ONTARGET / TRANSCEND Investigators Koon K. Teo,
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
The Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study To reviewers and moderators: These.
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
UK/CVS (1) | February 2013 Emerging technologies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation UK/CVS (1) | Date of preparation: February 2013.
Atrial Fibrillation Management Past, Present and Future
Guillaume Pare MD Genetic determinants of dabigatran plasma levels and their relation to bleeding On behalf of RE-LY Genetics: Guillaume Pare MD, Niclas.
Stroke Prevention Using the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation SPORTIF V Trial Presented at American.
ARISTOTLE Objectives Primary: test for noninferiority of apixaban, a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, versus warfarin Secondary: test for superiority.
TRANSCEND: Telmisartan Randomized AssesmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease ONTARGET / TRANSCEND Investigators Koon K. Teo,
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial ONTARGET.
Baseline Characteristics Current or Former Smoker Diabetic Hypertension 25.7 Prior MI Prior Heart Failure.
Presented by Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, USA for the ARISTOTLE investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban.
Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation NEJM Aug 27, 2015.
The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal R3 김동연 / F. 김선혜.
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
1 Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation R3 Dae Ho Kim / Prof. Jin Bae Kim N Engl J Med 2011; DOI: Manesh R. Patel, M.D.,
The Efficacy of Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review Karim Bouferrache Pacific University.
Case 66 year old male with PMH of HTN, DM, ESRD on renal replacement TIW, stroke in 2011 with right side residual weakness, atrial fibrillation, currently.
Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated with Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Denise Sutter, PharmD, BCPS
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Update on the Watchman Device CRT 2010 Washington, DC
Harvard Medical School C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D.
You can never be too Thin…. An Update on NOACs
David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Management of AF­related stroke
No evidence that AF type significantly impacts stroke risk
on behalf of the RE-DUAL PCI Steering Committee and Investigators
RE-CIRCUIT Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation were randomized to uninterrupted dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Timothy A. Brighton, M. B. , B. S. , John W. Eikelboom, M. B. , B. S
EUCLID Trial design: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were randomized to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 6,930) vs. clopidogrel 75 mg.
Up to Date on Which NOAC for Which Patient
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Selecting NOACs for High-Risk Patients
Annals of Internal Medicine • Vol. 167 No. 12 • 19 December 2017
Dabigatran vs Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation – Results
Oral Anticoagulation in AF
Relative Risk of Events by CHA2DS2-VASc Score
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Which NOAC and When for Stroke Prevention in AF?
ACC 2003 Late Breaking Trials
5 Good Minutes on Atrial Fibrillation-related Stroke
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
RE-ALIGN Randomized, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Dabigatran Etexilate in Patients after Heart Valve Replacement.
Presenter Disclosure Information
Presentation transcript:

Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke Sponsored by Boehringer-Ingelheim 1

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke AF responsible for 1/6 of all strokes Warfarin reduces stroke in AF by 64% significant increase in intracranial and other hemorrhage Difficult to use Only 50% of eligible patients receive warfarin An alternative treatment is needed

Dabigatran Dabigatran Etexilate, a pro-drug, is rapidly converted to dabigatran 6.5% bioavailability, 80% excreted by kidney Half-life of 12-17 hours Phase 2 data identified 110 mg BID and 150 mg BID as viable doses

RE-LY: A Non-inferiority Trial Atrial fibrillation ≥1 Risk Factor Absence of contra-indications 951 centers in 44 countries R Blinded Event Adjudication. Open Blinded Warfarin adjusted (INR 2.0-3.0) N=6000 Dabigatran Etexilate 110 mg BID N=6000 Dabigatran Etexilate 150 mg BID N=6000

Trial Execution Performed December 2005-March 2009 Median Follow up 2.0 years Follow up 99.9% complete Mean TTR = 64% (patients on warfarin)

Baseline Characteristics Dabigatran 110 mg Dabigatran 150 mg Warfarin Randomized 6015 6076 6022 Mean age (years) 71.4 71.5 71.6 Male (%) 64.3 63.2 63.3 CHADS2 score (mean) 0-1 (%) 2 (%) 3+ (%) 2.1 32.6 34.7 32.7 2.2 32.2 35.2 30.9 37.0 32.1 Prior stroke/TIA (%) 19.9 20.3 19.8 Prior MI (%) 16.8 16.9 16.1 CHF (%) 31.8 31.9 Baseline ASA (%) 40.0 38.7 40.6 Warfarin Naïve (%) 49.9 49.8 51.4

Stroke or Systemic Embolism 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 Dabigatran 110 vs. Warfarin Dabigatran 150 vs. Warfarin Non-inferiority p-value <0.001 Superiority 0.34 Margin = 1.46 HR (95% CI) Dabigatran better Warfarin better

10 Outcome: Superiority Analysis D 110mg D 150mg warfarin D 110mg vs. Warfarin D 150mg vs. Warfarin Annual rate RR 95% CI P* P Stroke or systemic Embolism 1.5 % 1.1 % 1.7 % 0.91 0.74-1.11 0.34 0.66 0.53-0.82 <0.001 Stroke 1.4 % 1.0 % 1.6 % 0.92 0.74-1.13 0.41 0.64 0.51-0.81

Ischemic/Unspecified Stroke 0.08 D 110 mg vs. Warfarin D 150 mg vs. Warfarin RR =1.11 95% CI = 0.89-1.40 P = 0.35 RR = 0.76 95% CI = 0.60-0.98 P = 0.03 0.06 Cumulative Hazard Rates 0.04 Dabigatran110 Warfarin 0.02 Dabigatran150 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Years of Follow-up

Cumulative Hazard Rates Hemorrhagic Stroke 0.04 D 110 mg vs. Warfarin D 150 mg vs. Warfarin RR = 0.31 95% CI =0.17-0.56 P <0.001 RR =0.26 95% CI =0.14-0.49 0.03 Cumulative Hazard Rates 0.02 Warfarin 0.01 Dabigatran110 Dabigatran150 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Years of Follow-up

Bleeding D 110mg 150mg warfarin D 110mg vs. Warfarin Annual rate RR 95% CI p Total 14.6% 16.4% 18.2% 0.78 0.74-0.83 <0.001 0.91 0.86-0.97 0.002 Major 2.7 % 3.1 % 3.4 % 0.80 0.69-0.93 0.003 0.93 0.81-1.07 0.31 Life-Threatening major 1.2 % 1.5 % 1.8 % 0.68 0.55-0.83 0.81 0.66-0.99 0.04 Gastro-intestinal 1.1 % 1.0 % 1.10 0.86-1.41 0.43 1.50 1.19-1.89

MI, Death and Net clinical Benefit D 110mg D 150mg warfarin D 110mg vs. Warfarin D 150mg vs. Warfarin Annual rate RR 95% CI p MI 0.7% 0.7 % 0.5 % 1.35 0.98-1.87 0.07 1.38 1.00-1.91 0.048 Death 3.8 % 3.6 % 4.1 % 0.91 0.80-1.03 0.13 0.88 0.77-1.00 0.05 Net Clinical Benefit 7.1 % 6.9 % 7.6 % 0.92 0.84-1.02 0.10 0.82-1.00 0.04 Net Clinical Benefit includes vascular events, death and major bleed

*Net Clinical Benefit includes vascular events, death and major bleed Dabigatran 150 mg vs. 110 mg Dabigatran 110mg Dabigatran 150mg D 150mg vs. D 110 mg Number rate/yr Relative Risk 95% CI p Stroke and systemic embolism 1.5% 1.1 % 0.73 0.58-0.91 0.005 Hemorrhagic stroke 0.1% 0.1 % 0.85 0.39-1.83 0.67 Major Hemorrhage 2.7 % 3.1 % 1.16 1.00-1.34 0.05 Net Clinical Benefit 7.1 % 6.9 % 0.98 0.89-1.08 0.66 *Net Clinical Benefit includes vascular events, death and major bleed

Permanent Discontinuation Years of Follow-up Stopping Rates 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Dabigatran110 Dabigatran150 Warfarin

ALT or AST >3x ULN 0.04 0.03 Warfarin Dabigatran110 Cumulative Risk 0.02 Dabigatran150 0.01 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Years of Follow-up

Common Adverse Events Adverse events occurring in >5% of any group Dabigatran 110 mg % Dabigatran 150 mg Warfarin Dyspepsia * 11.8 11.3 5.8 Dyspnea 9.3 9.5 9.7 Dizziness 8.1 8.3 9.4 Peripheral edema 7.9 7.8 Fatigue 6.6 6.2 Cough 5.7 6.0 Chest pain 5.2 5.9 Arthralgia 4.5 5.5 Back pain 5.3 5.6 Nasopharyngitis 5.4 Diarrhea 6.3 6.5 Atrial fibrillation Urinary tract infection 4.8 Upper respiratory tract infection 4.7 *Occurred more commonly on dabigatran p<0.001

Conclusions Dabigatran 150 mg significantly reduced stoke compared to warfarin with similar risk of major bleeding Dabigatran 110 mg had a similar rate of stroke as warfarin with significantly reduced major bleeding Both doses markedly reduced intra-cerebral, life-threatening and total bleeding Dabigatran had no major toxicity, but did increase dyspepsia and GI bleeding

Conclusions Both Dabigatran doses offer advantages over warfarin Dabigatran 150 is more effective and dabigatran 110 has a better safety profile There is potential to tailor therapy to individual patient characteristics