Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OIL#19 Alternative warm-up procedure (JAPAN proposal) 14th of January, 2015 WLTP rev1e.
Advertisements

WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
flat belt + wind tunnel method
Working Paper No. WLTP-09-07e 1 Agenda item 5: Progress report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) by H. Steven th WLTP IG meeting, 14.
WLTP drive trace normalization
WLTP rev1e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
WLTP-11-12e Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce wind tunnel method road load.
Determination of System Equivalency – TaskForce Audi, EA-52, V4.0 WLTP-10-33e.
WLTP Road Load Family concept
CoastdownVH&C Onboard Anemometry Ford Motor Company North America WLTP-11-14e.
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
WLTP DRAFTING TF, "RECORDED" BMW, Christoph Lueginger DISTINGUISH BETWEEN MEASURED AND RECORDED.
WLTP Annex 4 and 7, delta cd*A
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Number of testsOIL#27. Starting note for IWG Meeting#7 Geneva, WLTP rev1e.
Determination of System Equivalency – Starting note for WLTP IWG Meeting #8 in Pune, India Audi, EA-52, V2.0 WLTP-08-09e.
WLTP wind tunnel concept
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
WLTP, result calculation, v6
WIND TUNNEL METHOD Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce CHASSIS DYNO PRESCRIPTION.
Analysis of Normalization Report With Focus On Rotational Masses Geneva, 14 th of January 2015 Christoph Lueginger BMW WLTP-09-25e.
GTR proposal for Roadload determination JAPAN June 2015 WLTP-11-13e.
WLTP ANNEX 4 AND 7, DELTA CD*A BMW, Christoph Lueginger, Thomas Schütz ALTERNATIVE DETERMINATION METHODS WLTP-10-21e.
WLTP gtr Annex 9 Determination of Method Equivalency - Progress Report
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Dual-axis dyno Taskforce Status Report WLTP-IWG meeting April 2016 Iddo Riemersma (T&E) Christoph Lueginger (BMW) WLTP-14-04e.
WLTP-11-5e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
WLTP IWG ISC Taskforce: Starting note
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
RLD test program : alternative method O.I.L#18
Starting notes for Annex 4 Phase2a Issues
WLTP-11-10e Summary of GTR-relevant text from the April 2015 IWG #10 and Drafting Subgroup meetings, Stockholm, plus new slides since then March 22, 2015.
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
Positions on open points WLTP DTP subgroup LabProcICE
Drafting Subgroup Meeting Part of IWG #16, The Hague, October 2016
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
Transmitted by the expert
WLTP-SG-Drafting-03-03e-Working slides
Improvement of Family definitions
NEW ISSUES TASK FORCE PROGRESS REPORT 20th IWG meeting WLTP-20-15e
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
Proposal for a mid vehicle concept
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Draft WLTP Phase 2 – carryover from 1b – Annex 4 Starting note on split runs in coast down testing WLTP-14-18e Within phase 1b, practically all tolerances.
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Handling of wind tunnel + chassis dyno method for RLD
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
01 General requirements Road load matrix family vehicle definition 02 Annex 4 Wind tunnel for road load matrix family 03 Annex 6 CO2 interpolation range.
Proposal tire & vehicle selection for WLTP
test limits for correction coefficient determination
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Correlation Improvements
WLTP-25-07e Gearshift Issues Heinz Steven
Vehicle warm up and stabilisation – RLD and dyno
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
Full load curve proposal
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
WLTP Annex 4 and 7, delta cd*A
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 5/2/2019.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 6/10/2019.
WLTP-26-03e - Revision 1 Final amendments for annex 2 and status report about the programming code development subgroup Heinz Steven
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
Maximum Load Rating Consumer Tires
Status Report of New Issues TF –CFD* sub wg
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
India Proposal on part B4 GTR-2 Amendment Criteria for % CO2 variation
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/13/2019.
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Presentation transcript:

Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report Introduction: Japan and BMW introduced proposals on improvements for the wind tunnel method during the last IWG meetings. Within the New Issues Task Force the content was agreed and a common proposal shall be developed. A first text proposal was developed via e-mail exchange. That proposals have been discussed in the New Issues Task Force on the 04.09.2017. Status: A major part is agreed, but some important points are open, these are: How to handle different cd*A over velocity (if that is the case) and if measuring more than one wind speed is a requirement or a recommendation. The text proposal is presented in the following slides and includes the following improvements: Clarifying the measurement speed and process. Adding a recommendation on measurement at more wind speeds – this is still open. WLTP Improvements And Proposals | Japan and BMW | 02.06.2017

WLTP Road Load – Annex 4 Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process 1/4 Text proposal: Add a new paragraph at the end within the wind tunnel criteria in Annex 4, §3.2: 3.2.13 Wind tunnel measurement procedure The vehicle shall be placed parallel to the longitudinal centre line of the tunnel with a maximum deviation of 10 mm. The vehicle shall be placed with a yaw angle of 0° and with a tolerance of ±0.1°. Prior to a test it shall be checked, that at 0 kph wind speed the measurement system delivers a result equal to 0. Aerodynamic drag shall be measured for at least 60 seconds and at a minimum frequency of 5 Hz. Alternatively, the drag may be measured at a minimum frequency of 1 Hz and with at least 300 subsequent samples. The result shall be the arithmetic average of the drag. …please continue on next slide… Text moved from 6.4.2. 4.9.17.: OK New. Japanese proposal, modified. 4.9.17: Under discussion. Text moved from 6.4.2. 4.9.17.: OK WLTP Improvements And Proposals | Japan and BMW | 02.06.2017

WLTP Road Load – Annex 4 Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process 2/4 Text proposal: …continuation from previous slide… Aerodynamic drag shall be measured at a wind speed of at least 80 km/h, or higher, up to a maximum of 150 km/h such, that the wind speed in the wind tunnel is stable. If for the wind tunnel concerned the accuracy can be improved, it is recommended to take the average of measurements at two or more different wind speeds. In that case one measurement point should be below 100 km/h, and one above. It is recommended to perform the measurement of aerodynamic drag according to 6.1.2.2 of ISO 10521-1 or 2.3.1.2. of JIS D1012_2005. New. BMW proposal. 4.9.17.: OK New. It is under discussion, whether there should be a rule, when 2 or more points are required.  See presentation from Japan. New. Japanese proposal, modified. 4.9.17.: OK WLTP Improvements And Proposals | Japan and BMW | 02.06.2017

WLTP Road Load – Annex 4 Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process 3/4 Text proposal: Add a sentence within§6.2.3. of Annex 4. 6.2.3. Measurement with the wind tunnel method according to paragraphs 6.3. to 6.7. inclusive of this annex shall be performed on the same three vehicles as selected in paragraph 6.2.1. of this annex and in the same conditions, and the resulting road load coefficients, f0, f1 and f2, shall be determined. The certification tests shall be performed with the procedure used at the wind tunnel approval, e.g. wind speed(s) described in paragraph 3.2.13. of this annex. If the manufacturer chooses to use one or more of the available alternative procedures within the wind tunnel method (i.e. paragraph 6.5.2.1. on preconditioning, paragraphs 6.5.2.2. and 6.5.2.3. on the procedure, including paragraph 6.5.2.3.3. on dynamometer setting), these procedures shall also be used also for the approval of the facilities. New. Japanese proposal. 4.9.17.: OK WLTP Improvements And Proposals | Japan and BMW | 02.06.2017

WLTP Road Load – Annex 4 Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process 4/4 Text proposal: Modify§6.2.4. of Annex 4: 6.4.2. Wind tunnel measurement The vehicle shall be in the condition described in paragraph 6.3. of this annex. The vehicle shall be placed parallel to the longitudinal centre line of the tunnel with a maximum deviation of 10 mm. The vehicle shall be placed with a yaw angle of 0° and with a tolerance of ±0.1°. Aerodynamic drag shall be measured for at least for 60 seconds and at a minimum frequency of 5 Hz. Alternatively, the drag may be measured at a minimum frequency of 1 Hz and with at least 300 subsequent samples. The result shall be the arithmetic average of the drag. The air drag shall be measured as described in paragraph 3.2.13. of this annex. In the case that the vehicle has movable aerodynamic body parts, paragraph 4.2.1.5. of this annex shall apply. Where movable parts are velocity-dependent, every applicable position shall be measured in the wind tunnel and evidence shall be provided to the responsible authority indicating the relationship between reference speed, movable part position, and the corresponding (CD × Af). The wind speed of the wind tunnel measurement shall not be switched to the reference speed of the reference speed point concerned, but still shall fulfill paragraph 3.2.13. of this annex. Text is moved to 3.2.13. 4.9.17.: OK New. BMW and Japanese proposal. 4.9.17.: OK New. BMW proposal. Can be skipped, if clarification not necessary. 4.9.17.: OK WLTP Improvements And Proposals | Japan and BMW | 02.06.2017

Thank you!

Appendix to WLTP-18-19e, from Japan Relevant area for WLTP (low speed cannot be measured in wind tunnel and not relevant for CO2). Example for red vehicle is approx. 0.5% delta in Cd. That refers for a typical vehicle to a difference of 0.003 m² Cd*A and a CO2 of < 0.2 g/km. WLTP Improvements And Proposals | Japan and BMW | 02.06.2017

WLTP Road Load – Annex 4 Issues Speeds and wind tunnel measurement There are some misunderstandings on speeds with the wind tunnel measurement. The target, that should be reflected in the GTR text, is presented here: reference speed wind tunnel speed vehicle with movable aero parts, e.g. spoiler 20 kph 140 kph position 1 cd*A = 0.567 measurement #1 for pos. #1 30, 40, 50 kph 60 kph 70 kph position 2 cd*A = 0.589 measurement #2 for pos. #2 80, 90, … 120 130 kph reference speed wind tunnel speed vehicle without movable aero parts 20 kph 140 kph only one configuration cd*A = 0.600 one measurement for that vehicle configuration … 130 kph vs. Explanations: The cd*A value does not depend on the velocity in that area, that is relevant for the WLTC. A wind tunnel typically cannot measure at lower speeds, as then the velocity is not constant enough to produce good results. Therefore that 140kph requirement is included in the criteria in the GTR. Movable aerodynamic parts are addressed correctly, as every position is to be measured, and then applied to the reference speed, where it is relevant. WLTP Improvements And Proposals | BMW | 11.04.2017