Hadron PID recalibration in EMCAL GeV dataset)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PID v2 and v4 from Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
1 STAR TOF Calibration. 2 Detectors TPC(TPX) - tracking MRPC TOF (TOFr) – stop time measurement pVPD/upVPD - start time measurement Particle momentum;
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
Invariant Mass Calculation J/ψ Rosi Reed 10/31/07.
All Low Energy Events with MuDst Rosi Reed UC Davis March Events Events with at least 1 primary track Vx = Primary Vertex x position.
Study of the semileptonic decays at 4170 MeV Koloina Randrianarivony Marina Artuso (Syracuse University)
Previous Work. Gauss fit with pion, proton, electron.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
QM’05 Budapest, HungaryHiroshi Masui (Univ. of Tsukuba) 1 Anisotropic Flow in  s NN = 200 GeV Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at RHIC - PHENIX Hiroshi Masui.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
STAR Strangeness production and Cronin effect in d+Au collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV in STAR For the STAR Collaboration Xianglei Zhu (Tsinghua U / UCLA)
Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
R&D Studies of a Lead-Scintillating Fiber Calorimeter as a STAR Forward Detector Prashanth Shanmuganathan (for FCal group at STAR)  Physics and R&D goals.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
HBD Alignment in Run-10 (update) Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science HBD Meeting, 8/12/2010.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
1 Nuclear modification and elliptic flow measurements for  mesons at  s NN = 200 GeV d+Au and Au+Au collisions by PHENIX Dipali Pal for the PHENIX collaboration.
I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,
Particle Identification with TRD Prashant Shukla Institute of Physics University of Heidelberg Presentation at International Workshop on TRD 27 th September.
The Lambda (3 rd installment) Lbar+random observations Richard Seto Ppg016 meeting Jan 2, 2003.
Light Nuclei Spectra in STAR Run5 62GeV Cu+Cu Experiments Jianhang Zhou Rice University.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
Momentum vs. Angle A Loose Collection of Plots For E’, Pi+, and K+ Using e-p RAPGAP Data Created: July 2009, William Foreman, BNL Last Updated: October.
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
Data Analysis Practice looking for Φ(1020) Nuclear Physics Ⅲ Kyung-Eon,Choi.
Proton to Pion ratio in Jet and Bulk region in Heavy Ion collisions Misha Veldhoen (Utrecht University) For the ALICE collaboration Hard Probes 2012 Cagliari,
QM2002 (July / / Nantes / France)Susumu SATO (JSPS) for the PHENIX collaboration page 1 Susumu SATO Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,
IOPB Dipak Mishra (IOPB), ICPAQGP5, Kolkata Feb 8 – 12 1 Measurement of  ++ Resonance Production in d+Au sqrt(s NN ) = 200 GeV Dipak Mishra.
Pi0 Reconstruction with High p t Photons John Chin-Hao Chen.
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
Fall DNP Meeting,  meson production in Au-Au and d-Au collision at \ /s NN = 200 GeV Dipali Pal Vanderbilt University (for the PHENIX collaboration)
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
fKK analysis in Run3 d+Au collisions: Update
Software Update Takashi HACHIYA.
Status of 20 GeV Au+Au Analysis
Takafumi Niida from Univ. of Tsukuba for the PHENIX Collaborations
Tatsuya Chujo for the PHENIX collaboration
EMCal Recalibration Check
Takafumi Niida from Univ. of Tsukuba for the PHENIX Collaborations
Run4 fK+K- analysis update
Run4 f K+K- analysis: analysis train
EMCal Recalibration Check
EMCal Run4 Recalibration Check Looking at K mass centroid and width
The Study of Elliptic Flow for PID Hadron at RHIC-PHENIX
Outline Background Global Observables in Heavy Ion Collisions
Λ 1520 Invariant Mass Analisys
for the PHENIX collaboration
Run3 f analysis: Proposal for PPG formation
Energy dependence of stopping
->K+K- Production at 62.4GeV Au+Au Collisions
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
f  K+K- analysis in Run4 Au-Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV
Run4 Fiducial Match between Real and MC
“Hard” & “Soft” Interactions in Proton + Proton 200GeV
High-pT Identified Charged Hadrons in √sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions
fK+K- yield analysis update
Search for the onset of baryon anomaly at RHIC-PHENIX
Hiroshi Masui for the PHENIX collaboration August 5, 2005
Identified Charged Hadron Production at High pT
Shingo Sakai for PHENIX Collaborations (Univ. of Tsukuba)
Shingo Sakai for PHENIX Collaborations (Univ. of Tsukuba)
->K+K- Productions at 62.4GeV Au+Au Collisions
E19 result Ryuta Kiuchi (SNU)
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Presentation transcript:

Hadron PID recalibration in EMCAL (Au-Au @200 GeV dataset) Dipali Pal and Debsankar Mukhopadhyay 05/10/2005

Outline Run4 200 GeV Au-Au stripe –2 dataset PbSc east and west Timing calibration was done by SUNY Phys. PID functions: isPi, isK and isP -- Fit mass-squared distributions at different momentum slices within 0.2 < p(GeV/c) < 2.2. -- Determine centroids and s’s of m2 distribution for pi, K and p at different momenta. -- Study and parametrize s vs p and centroid vs p. -- PID function: isN = [m2(measured) – m2(parametrized)]/s N = pi, K, p

Analysis Events: Minimum-bias CNT files |bbcz| < 30 cm Tracks: 3s matching at PbSc Used Sarah’s EmcTof timing recalibrator via master recalibrator module under fun4all.

Studying PbSc PID ranges from m2 distributions (Negative tracks) -- 1

Studying PbSc PID ranges from m2 distributions (Negative tracks) -- 2 Summary: PID starts from p = 0.3 Gev/c Protons are visible from p = 0.5 GeV/c All p, K, p are separated within 0.5 – 1.0 GeV/c p and K are separated within 0.3 < p (GeV/c) < 1.0 Both p and p are visible upto p = 2.0 GeV/c

Studying PbSc PID ranges from m2 distributions (Positive tracks) -- 1

Studying PbSc PID ranges from m2 distributions (Positive tracks) -- 2 Summary: PID starts from p = 0.3 Gev/c Protons are visible from p = 0.5 GeV/c All p, K, p are separated within 0.5 – 1.0 GeV/c p and K are separated within 0.3 < p (GeV/c) < 1.0 Both p and p are visible upto p = 2.0 GeV/c

m2 distributions and fitting – p(1) Fitting function: Gaussian (signal)+ second order polynimial(BG) Centroids and s’s within 0.4 < p(GeV/c) < 1.2 GeV/c

m2 distributions and fitting – p (2) p <m2> Dm2 s Ds 0.425 1.93412e-02 5.64171e-06 1.42876e-02 6.52406e-06 0.475 2.01024e-02 6.60745e-06 1.53048e-02 7.36232e-06 0.525 2.07095e-02 8.07960e-06 1.61947e-02 9.95618e-06 0.575 2.13641e-02 1.04908e-05 1.86279e-02 1.19702e-05 0.625 2.17791e-02 1.31154e-05 2.01832e-02 1.76499e-05 0.675 2.29392e-02 1.46679e-05 2.51717e-02 1.72781e-05 0.725 2.32765e-02 1.94704e-05 2.76286e-02 2.42279e-05 0.775 2.38180e-02 2.10156e-05 3.31087e-02 2.25764e-05 0.825 2.36832e-02 2.56740e-05 3.62322e-02 2.98424e-05 0.875 2.33362e-02 3.22193e-05 3.89872e-02 4.30654e-05 0.925 2.29862e-02 4.04230e-05 4.31029e-02 5.20999e-05 0.975 2.26063e-02 5.03514e-05 4.56432e-02 7.29674e-05 1.025 2.21324e-02 6.43552e-05 4.86645e-02 1.03817e-04 1.075 2.14308e-02 8.02492e-05 5.39479e-02 1.18684e-04 1.125 2.12625e-02 1.06780e-04 5.67767e-02 1.61946e-04 1.175 2.10636e-02 1.33646e-04 5.97685e-02 2.34772e-04

m2 distributions and fitting – p (3) p <m2> Dm2 s Ds 0.425 2.04804e-02 5.78918e-06 1.43018e-02 6.81281e-06 0.475 2.14776e-02 6.77480e-06 1.47563e-02 8.29970e-06 0.525 2.22586e-02 8.38990e-06 1.67164e-02 9.37491e-06 0.575 2.29220e-02 1.05703e-05 1.84447e-02 1.21553e-05 0.625 2.33958e-02 1.31049e-05 1.98841e-02 1.75037e-05 0.675 2.47990e-02 1.40753e-05 2.52235e-02 1.68293e-05 0.725 2.52223e-02 1.84220e-05 2.77299e-02 2.24928e-05 0.775 2.59898e-02 2.12238e-05 3.28194e-02 2.34276e-05 0.825 2.60214e-02 2.55728e-05 3.58844e-02 2.97514e-05 0.875 2.59500e-02 3.18085e-05 3.87719e-02 4.04857e-05 0.925 2.58609e-02 3.91492e-05 4.27760e-02 4.87962e-05 0.975 2.59118e-02 4.94901e-05 4.58972e-02 6.79248e-05 1.025 2.57458e-02 6.26377e-05 4.88063e-02 9.46749e-05 1.075 2.53075e-02 8.07918e-05 5.42803e-02 1.08603e-04 1.125 2.55001e-02 1.00740e-04 5.73623e-02 1.50763e-04 1.175 2.53188e-02 1.29133e-04 6.06947e-02 2.14393e-04

m2 distributions and fitting – Kaon Fitting function: Gaussian (signal)+ Exponential (BG) Centroids and s’s within 0.4 < p(GeV/c) < 1.0 GeV/c

m2 distributions and fitting parameters: K+ p <m2> Dm2 s Ds 0.425 2.42185e-01 1.54022e-04 1.56553e-02 1.75595e-04 0.475 2.41220e-01 1.23618e-04 1.67816e-02 1.52291e-04 0.525 2.41406e-01 1.18921e-04 1.88056e-02 1.48399e-04 0.575 2.39767e-01 1.23953e-04 2.02986e-02 1.59360e-04 0.625 2.37315e-01 1.31139e-04 2.27624e-02 1.66675e-04 0.675 2.32722e-01 1.37072e-04 2.51006e-02 1.89110e-04 0.725 2.31749e-01 1.42129e-04 2.54891e-02 1.96155e-04 0.775 2.32595e-01 1.79950e-04 2.59691e-02 2.41474e-04 0.825 2.34370e-01 1.98838e-04 2.88962e-02 2.84968e-04 0.875 2.36403e-01 2.49191e-04 3.06145e-02 3.76220e-04 0.925 2.40170e-01 2.78700e-04 3.22710e-02 3.17807e-04 0.975 2.42863e-01 3.26675e-04 3.31647e-02 3.94016e-04

m2 distributions and fitting parameters: K- p <m2> Dm2 s Ds 0.425 2.32098e-01 8.44555e-05 1.48567e-02 1.05598e-04 0.475 2.32757e-01 7.73167e-05 1.58106e-02 9.93645e-05 0.525 2.33198e-01 8.26665e-05 1.77687e-02 1.11171e-04 0.575 2.32182e-01 8.67459e-05 2.03107e-02 1.15419e-04 0.625 2.30504e-01 9.51658e-05 2.35753e-02 1.16232e-04 0.675 2.28955e-01 1.14824e-04 2.54182e-02 1.50929e-04 0.725 2.30701e-01 1.27559e-04 2.67122e-02 1.77200e-04 0.775 2.31804e-01 1.47042e-04 2.82275e-02 1.74135e-04 0.825 2.33882e-01 1.79177e-04 3.01557e-02 2.33549e-04 0.875 2.35673e-01 2.30715e-04 3.15570e-02 2.88545e-04 0.925 2.37563e-01 3.21945e-04 3.21888e-02 4.02436e-04 0.975 2.40550e-01 3.97911e-04 3.15957e-02 4.55462e-04

m2 distributions and fitting – protons Fitting function: Gaussian (signal)+ Exponential (BG) Centroids and s’s within 0.5 < p(GeV/c) < 2 GeV/c p-bar looks different from p at higher momenta.

m2 distributions and fitting parameters anti-proton proton p <m2> Dm2 s Ds p <m2> Dm2 s Ds 0.525 8.38922e-01 2.30569e-04 7.35306e-02 3.06760e-04 0.575 8.35126e-01 1.56946e-04 6.22146e-02 2.07657e-04 0.625 8.34169e-01 1.33862e-04 5.99364e-02 1.49992e-04 0.675 8.34047e-01 1.21984e-04 5.84328e-02 1.31943e-04 0.725 8.35924e-01 1.14449e-04 6.02623e-02 1.20031e-04 0.775 8.36475e-01 1.13179e-04 6.17481e-02 1.14258e-04 0.825 8.36537e-01 1.16899e-04 6.31630e-02 1.28115e-04 0.875 8.35708e-01 1.28854e-04 6.75981e-02 1.44277e-04 0.925 8.30799e-01 1.38254e-04 7.17074e-02 1.67568e-04 0.975 8.24962e-01 1.60733e-04 7.84306e-02 1.67365e-04 1.025 8.24088e-01 1.70998e-04 8.11583e-02 1.78789e-04 1.075 8.28533e-01 1.74763e-04 8.64369e-02 1.84366e-04 1.125 8.31889e-01 1.94046e-04 8.69121e-02 2.02682e-04 1.175 8.33777e-01 2.14766e-04 9.01551e-02 2.27216e-04 1.225 8.33470e-01 2.53430e-04 9.69106e-02 2.79408e-04 1.275 8.35085e-01 2.88645e-04 1.01061e-01 3.35895e-04 1.325 8.36669e-01 3.17737e-04 1.05790e-01 3.87167e-04 1.375 8.37537e-01 3.84266e-04 1.09239e-01 4.63914e-04 1.425 8.39780e-01 4.21090e-04 1.13487e-01 5.36348e-04 1.475 8.39545e-01 4.87584e-04 1.17894e-01 6.43010e-04 1.525 8.39547e-01 5.68870e-04 1.21568e-01 7.86942e-04 1.575 8.39180e-01 6.73928e-04 1.26053e-01 9.39349e-04 1.625 8.43624e-01 7.76245e-04 1.29032e-01 1.10263e-03 1.675 8.53585e-01 7.45019e-04 1.34714e-01 8.35646e-04 1.725 8.56081e-01 8.73782e-04 1.39854e-01 1.00584e-03 1.775 8.58270e-01 1.01741e-03 1.42082e-01 1.19132e-03 1.825 8.62252e-01 1.18193e-03 1.53582e-01 1.72819e-03 1.875 8.64294e-01 1.33219e-03 1.57569e-01 1.50343e-03 1.925 8.67229e-01 1.51363e-03 1.53183e-01 1.73929e-03 1.975 8.68832e-01 1.84625e-03 1.58906e-01 2.15543e-03 0.525 8.24160e-01 1.94306e-04 5.55213e-02 2.25734e-04 0.575 8.14489e-01 1.63168e-04 5.41344e-02 1.81215e-04 0.625 8.08997e-01 1.45644e-04 5.63844e-02 1.50311e-04 0.675 8.05267e-01 1.41902e-04 5.90197e-02 1.45252e-04 0.725 8.02198e-01 1.40851e-04 6.25576e-02 1.40489e-04 0.775 7.95211e-01 1.46433e-04 7.49469e-02 1.55313e-04 0.825 7.93549e-01 1.83313e-04 6.92718e-02 2.10971e-04 0.875 7.85877e-01 1.80779e-04 7.42368e-02 1.95503e-04 0.925 7.78149e-01 2.03091e-04 7.98894e-02 2.25851e-04 0.975 7.72667e-01 2.23434e-04 8.44332e-02 2.56120e-04 1.025 7.74221e-01 2.32922e-04 8.72917e-02 2.52338e-04 1.075 7.75344e-01 2.57958e-04 9.31361e-02 2.70267e-04 1.125 7.74236e-01 2.92302e-04 9.80132e-02 3.12187e-04 1.175 7.72713e-01 3.37465e-04 1.02521e-01 3.64329e-04 1.225 7.71495e-01 3.93354e-04 1.07809e-01 4.43039e-04 1.275 7.71864e-01 4.41316e-04 1.14150e-01 9.85193e-04 1.325 7.70304e-01 5.24774e-04 1.14469e-01 5.81857e-04 1.375 7.72307e-01 5.92422e-04 1.15852e-01 6.40897e-04 1.425 7.73269e-01 7.13488e-04 1.19993e-01 7.80172e-04 1.475 7.76052e-01 8.20439e-04 1.18553e-01 9.00092e-04 1.525 7.76031e-01 1.02723e-03 1.23299e-01 1.16229e-03 1.575 7.74263e-01 1.28945e-03 1.29347e-01 1.49271e-03 1.625 7.82285e-01 1.43131e-03 1.27335e-01 1.62069e-03 1.675 7.75476e-01 1.91076e-03 1.35118e-01 2.26960e-03 1.725 7.86470e-01 2.43676e-03 1.37579e-01 3.41647e-03

m2 Centroids vs momenta Centroids are fitted with 3rd order polynimial as functions of p: p0 + p1*x + p2*x2 + p3*x3 p0 p1 p2 p3 p+ p- K+ K- P P-bar 2.29043e-02 -3.91075e-02 9.79027e-02 -5.97900e-02 1.81909e-02 -1.21184e-02 5.77247e-02 -3.82399e-02 1.45776e-01 5.37155e-01 -9.50063e-01 5.17235e-01 1.76902e-01 3.04517e-01 -5.37774e-01 3.03167e-01 8.13481e-01 1.02371e-01 -1.41322e-01 5.66948e-02 9.01126e-01 -1.63571e-01 1.31146e-02 2.67600e-02

Sigma vs momentum: pion Fitting function: p0 + p1/x + p2/x2 + p3.x2 p0 p1 p2 p3 p+ 0.048499 -0.0401503 0.00990828 0.030773 p- 0.0541103 -0.0445806 0.0108446 0.0282518

Sigma vs momentum: kaon Fitting function: p0 + p1/x + p2/x2 + p3.x2 p0 p1 p2 p3 K+ 0.0525039 -0.0278102 0.00499849 0.00406312 K- 0.135903 -0.0935004 0.0188272 -0.0295423

Sigma vs momentum: proton P-bar Fitting function: p0 + p1/x + p2/x2 + p3.x2 p0 p1 p2 p3 p 0.206892 -0.210955 0.0729115 0.0092632 p-bar 0.18808 -0.150232 0.041425 0.00795054

Identified particles

Summary PID calibration functions are completed for run4 200 GeV dataset. Need to put them in recalibrator and database.