Flexible Body Armor Experiments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
9x19mm Luger Magtech Gold 115gr +P JHP Performance Introduction 09 January 2012.
Advertisements

“Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter”
How Does Soft Body Armor Work
Ballistic Helmet Standard Technologies for Critical Incident Preparedness Conference and Exposition San Francisco, November 6-8, 2007.
BALLASTICS TRAUMA TO THE SKULL By Clay Chastain Above: Angry murderer with a ballistic instrument of death.
General Testing Issues Issues Related to the Test Protocols and Procedures in the NIJ Standard.
SGMA Meeting October Dallas, TX University of Massachusetts Lowell Baseball Research Center 1 James A. Sherwood Patrick J. Drane SGMA Meeting.
Projectile Motion Chapter 3.
Motion in Two Dimensions
Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Dan Cundiff Deputy Director, Comparative Technology Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering)
1 Armor Protection Levels Information Briefing for EOS.
American Services And Products Walter Coelho International Sales Representative Oscar Bueso Director Sales Latin America Joe Chao Technical Advisor.
Synergistic Approach of Asteroid Exploitation and Planetary Protection From Threat to Action 9-12 May 2011 Joan-Pau.
Lesson Thread I Full Projectile Motion 12/1/20131Intellectual Property of Mr. Gary.
DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS
Transitioning NIJ Standards June 3, 2014 IAB. Restraints Standard Duty Holster Retention Standard Handheld Metal Detector Standard Walk-Through Metal.
By Kevin Renner.  Every civilization has had developed some sort of armor  But it’s purpose has remained unchanged.
BALLISTICS IN PENETRATING TRAUMA
GUNSHOT WOUNDS WOUNDING BALLISTICS.
Ballistics.
KEVLAR By: 7B Group 6 Jeremy Gemzontan Jan Hobie Sinfuego Rafael Tan Dwight Ong Miguel Pingol.
Body Protection Submitted to: Mr. Bruce Dalzell Submitted By: Tony Gillis November 18 th, 2007 Physics 12.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
UNCLASSIFIED Bonny Heet Program Manager Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) NATIONAL SBIR/STTR CONFERENCE,
Trajectory ‘08 Dennis Papesh
SACE Stage 2 Physics Motion in 2 Dimensions.
10 extra topic: Projectile Motion Greg Kelly, Hanford High School, Richland, Washington Photo by Vickie Kelly, 2002 Fort Pulaski, GA.
1 50 th Annual Joint Services Small Arms Systems 12 May 2004 Marking Ammunition Technology Presented By: Stew Gilman, Leon Manole, Erin Mc Carthy Army.
USCG 57mm / Mk 3 Gun Mount Test, Evaluation & Certification Program
TEXTILES IN DEFENCE Protective clothing.
One Way Bullet Proof Glass Engr45 Materials Instructor: Younes Ataiiyan December 1, 2004 By: Chris Rogers Bryan Clifton Nick Petrucci.
Projectile Motion Horizontally Launched Projectiles Projectiles Launched at an Angle A.S – Due Friday, 11/14 Text Reference: chapter 3.
7.62x 51 SSP Subsonic Penetrator Provides superior accuracy, stealth and penetration capability McLean, VA USA.
American Services And Products Walter Coelho International Sales Representative Oscar Bueso Sales Latin America Joe Chao Technical Advisor / Domestic.
Introduction to Projectile Motion
2-Dimensional Kinematics Unit 2 Presentation 2. Projectile Problems  Projectile Motion: The two- dimensional (x and y) motion of an object through space.
Physics Lesson 6 Projectile Motion Eleanor Roosevelt High School Mr. Chin-Sung Lin.
Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing 9/27/2011.
Projectiles Horizontal Projection Horizontally: Vertically: Vertical acceleration g  9.8 To investigate the motion of a projectile, its horizontal and.
Lelantos Group Proprietary 2015 Office:
Physics Lesson 6 Projectile Motion
10.4 Projectile Motion Fort Pulaski, GA. One early use of calculus was to study projectile motion. In this section we assume ideal projectile motion:
AMC Committed To Excellence ALACV PROGRAM ALACV Airburst Demonstration Fuze For 40mm Cannon Caliber Ammunition Fred Herr US Army ARDEC Mark Tomes Alliant.
UNCLASSIFIED CMMI Level 5, 2 nd Time Israeli BMD conference 2010Test and Demonstration 1of 13 Conducting of Exo- Atmospheric Interception Tests at Compact.
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense _APBI_JPM_CP 1 STAN ENATSKY JPM-CP Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical.
Motion in Two Dimensions Chapter 7.2 Projectile Motion What is the path of a projectile as it moves through the air? ? . What forces act on projectiles?
Motion in Two Dimensions Chapter 7.2 Projectile Motion What is the path of a projectile as it moves through the air? Parabolic? Straight up and down?
Body Armor Jalen Harris.
Projectile Motion 10/16/12 Yes, There are Notes… After Bellwork.
Lelantos Group Proprietary 2015 Office:
Physics 12 Newtonian Physics Mr. Jean. The plan: Video clip of the day Lab safety contracts Projectile Motion Phet labs.
Female Improved Outer Tactical Vest (IOTV)
1 What is ballistics? Give examples of how ballistics is used in forensic science.
Fragment and particle size distribution of impacted ceramic tiles E. Carton, J. Weerheijm, C. Ditzhuijzen, I. Tuinman, D. Mevec TNO, section Explosions,
FSCS/TRACER Wheels v. Tracks 19 January 2000 LTC Jack Reiff DPM FSCS
Tactical Patient Care.
COMPACTION BY EQUIPMENTS
“Pound for Pound the Strongest Armor Protection in the world” Office:
PRODUCT & QUOTIENT RULES & HIGHER-ORDER DERIVATIVES (2.3)
Bell Ringer pg.26 Why does a bullet that is dropped and a bullet is shot at the same time horizontally from the same height land at the same time?
Motorola Solutions Internal Information
PERFORATED FUSELAGE ARMOR (PFA) CONCEPT 1
Ammunition Data Sheet TNQ 7.62 x 51 (.308 Win) 175gr Match
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3
Agenda Overview Tactical Employment ATK 25mm Barrett HEDP System
Projectile Motion.
Water, Water, Every Where!!!
Topic 9.2 Space Projectile Motion.
Ammunition and Shell Casings
Presentation transcript:

Flexible Body Armor Experiments FY01 Mission Program FY02 Mission Program Summary Possible Additional Programs 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Phase I Testing Support Threats Clay Backed V0 V50 Comments 7.62 mm NATO M80 Ball  INSERT 16 grain RCC VEST: Need to establish zone of mixed results. 9 mm NATO M882 Ball VEST: Substituted Ammunition 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Clay Backed V0 Testing 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Two shots (both partials) of M80 Ball Projectile at: 1-3/4-inch separation (71% spacing reduction). 1-1/4-inch separation (79% spacing reduction). 1-inch separation (83% spacing reduction). Striking Velocity. 2,785 (+ 35 ft/sec) Average 31 mm penetration into clay well below maximum back-face deflection requirement. 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments 7.62 x 51 mm NATO M80 Ball V0 and V50 Testing 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Lambert/Jonas 3 X 3 4 X 4 V50 Requirement Max Likelihood 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Summary of NATO M80 Ball Ballistic Data Data Method Ballistic Limit Requirement 3/3 (or 4/4) as in “Interceptor” spec. 3,123*(3109*) 81(103) V50>2,850 <<(V50 – 2,750)/3 V0>2,750 Max likelihood 3,179 87 V0.1 = 2,912 Lambert/Jonas 3,154 810 * Exceeded velocity spread requirement – zone of mixed results > 150 ft/sec 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Fragmentation Testing 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Vest Fragmentation Requirements. Fragment Projectiles V50 @ 0 degree V50 @ 45 degree DRY: Ft/sec (min.) WET: Ft/sec (min.) 2 gr RCC 16 gr RCC 64 gr RCC 2,760 2,120 1,710 2,625 1,960 1,625 2,900 2,210 1,695 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Summary of 16 grain RCC Fragment Ballistic Data Data Method Ballistic Limit Requirement 3/3 (or 5/5) as in “Interceptor” spec. 2,298 46 >2,120 None Max likelihood 2,283 14* Lambert/Jonas 2332 114 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments 9 x 19 mm NATO M882 Ball Testing 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Testing Procedural Requirements for “Interceptor” Vest. V50 and V0 for the 9 mm, 124 gr., FMJ Remington projectile. Projectile V50 @ 0 degree; ft/sec (min.) V0 @ 0 degree; ft/sec (min.) Deformation; in (max.) 9 mm, 124 gr., FMJ, Remington 1525 (required) 1400 +50/-0 1.73 1625 (desired) 1500 +50/-0 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Summary of NATO M882 Ball Ballistic Data Data Method Ballistic Limit Requirement/Baseline 3/3 (or 5/5) as in “Interceptor” spec. 1,952 (1,938) 39 (44) V50>1,525 <<(V50 – 1,400)/3 V0>1,400 Max likelihood 1,953 51 V0.1 = 1,796 1,686 61 V0.1 = 1,498 Lambert/Jonas 2,028 674 1,721 514 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Summary 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments Successful FY01 effort has demonstrated: 83% reduction in multiple hit separation on ceramic armor inserts when compared to the “interceptor” specification. 400% improvement (with a 1,000%-1,500% improvement possible) in multiple hit capability for the ceramic armor inserts when compared to the “interceptor” specification. 8%-10% weight reduction in the soft body armor component when compared to the “interceptor” specification. Averaged less than 31 mm penetration into clay backing against the 7.62 M80 ball at impact velocities slightly above those required in the “interceptor” specification. Improved ballistic performance against the threats tested when compared to the “interceptor” specification. Total system weight comparable to “interceptor.” Ceramic insert weight is currently 12% higher than the interceptor’s insert. 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments PROPOSED MISSION PROGRAM FY02: Complete phase I SBIR with pinnacle armor Conduct 9 mm M882 V0 clay backed test against interceptor and pinnacle soft body armor components. Conduct additional 16-grain RCC tests against pinnacle soft body armor component. Support SOCOM SBIR phase II evaluation and/or program of a level IV flexible body armor by pinnacle armor. FY03: Support SOCOM SBIR phase II program for a level IV flexible body armor by pinnacle armor (if funded). 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments PROPOSED SAALT PROGRAM “Interceptor” Vest Back-fit Components Level IV (0.30 Caliber APM2 Protection) 10% Weight Reduction in Soft Armor Insert 10% Weight Reduction in Hard Armor Insert Complete set of USA and USMC First Article Testing for both inserts. 10 Vests for PM-Soldier Field Trails 18 Months /$2.2 M 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments PROPOSED AMC ACCELERATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM “Interceptor” Back-fit and New Vest Designs 10% weight Reduction in Back-fit designs 0% weight Reduction/Increased Coverage in New Vest Design Both Level III and Level IV Inserts USA First Article Testing Only 10 Vests for PM-Soldier Field Trails 18 Months /$3.6 M 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments PROPOSED USSOCOM PROGRAM New Vest Design at “Interceptor” Weight or Less Level IV + Protection with Increased Coverage Stab Protection IR Signature Reduction Complete Set of USA and USMC First Article Testing for Both Inserts. 10 Vests for USSOCOM Field Trails Time/Money To Be Determined 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

Flexible Body Armor Experiments PROPOSED USMC PROGRAM New Vest Design at “Interceptor” Weight or Less Level IV + Protection with Increased Coverage Stab Protection IR Signature Reduction Neutral Buoyancy Complete Set of USMC First Article Testing for Both Inserts. 10 Vests for USMC 2nd Expeditionary Force Field Trails Time/Money To Be Determined 21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD

21 September 2018 AMSRL-WM-TD