U TILITARIANISM PHIL 320 (Ethics) – July 3, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Advertisements

Hedonism & Utilitarianism
EVIL IS STILL A PROBLEM!!!.
John Stuart Mill ( ) Utilitarianism.
Jeremy Bentham ( CE) John Stuart Mill ( CE) Goodness/rightness and badness/wrongness are located in the consequences an act (consequentialism).
RECAP – TASK 1 What is utilitarianism? Who is Jeremy Bentham?
The Ethics of Utility The Utilitarian Theory : First, actions are to be judged right or wrong solely in virtue of their consequences. Nothing else matters.
Utilitarianism.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 11 Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.
ETHICAL THEORIES: OVERVIEW. Universal Moral Theories Utilitarianism Egoism Deontology Rules-based Rights-based Virtue ethics.
Teleological Ethics: Morality is determined by the consequences of actions u Hedonism: value (good) is pleasure/happiness l Egoism: my happiness is the.
Consequentialist Ethical Theories Egoism: the good is whatever promotes my long-term interests Hedonism: we should pursue pleasures that are not mixed.
MILL 2 GREATEST HAPPINESS: NOT AS SIMPLE AS IT MAY SEEM.
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: we are morally obligated to do X because of its good consequences l Deontological Ethics: X.
UTILITARIANISM: GREATEST HAPPINESS FOR THE GREATEST NUMBER
Standards of Conduct DoD’s Standards of Conduct
Consequentialist Ethical Theories u Egoism: the good is whatever promotes my long-term interests u Hedonism: the good is pleasure l Pursue pleasures not.
Consequentialism, Natural Law Theory, Kantian Moral Theory
Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill
Utilitarian Approach. Utilitarianism The founder of classical utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham. According to Bentham human beings always try to avoid.
What is the right thing to do?
Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a relative ethical theory It based on the concept of utility Utilitarianism is a teleological/consequentialist theory.
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Introduction to Utlilitarianism What do we already know about Utilitarianism? It’s a Consequentialist Theory: focuses on outcomes. It’s a Teleological.
T HE U TILITARIAN A PPROACH Marcie Neils, Brandon Capelle, Aaron Zimbelman, & Nate Martin Monday 1:30-4:30 LP 5: Ethical Theory Presentation November 10,
Consequentialist Theories of Ethics. Do Consequences make an action right? Many ethicists have argued that we should decide moral right and wrong by looking.
Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.
 The benefits of embryo research come mainly from stem cell usage  it is hoped that stem cells can be stimulated to develop any tissue or organ of the.
Consequentialism Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ) Principle of Utility: actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness,
Utilitarianism. English Empiricism Hume held that what is commonly taken as “knowledge” is really a set of reasonable beliefs that are well founded because.
Utilitarian approach to war and peace BY PHIL, ISAAC AND BAASIM.
Jeremy Bentham Bentham the real founder of utilitarianism Biography –Read adult literature by age 3 –Good knowledge of Greek and Latin by 6 and.
UTILITARIANISM “A moral theory according to which an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility.” (Jeremy Bentham, Introduction.
A Universal Moral Theory Dennis R. Cooley Department of History North Dakota State University 19 January 2003 Supported by a USDA/CSREES/IFAFS grant, “Consortium.
From Last Time The good will is the only good thing in an ‘unqualified way” Acting from duty vs. acting in accord with duty Categorical vs. hypothetical.
Consequentialism, Natural Law Theory, Kantian Moral Theory
Philosophy 360: Business Ethics Chapter 3. Consequentialism: Is part of a theory about what makes certain actions right or wrong. In a nutshell: Actions.
‘UTILITARIANISM FROM BENTHAM & MILL’ THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
Consequentialism (utilitarism). General description 'Consequentialist theories regard the moral value of actions, rules of conduct, and so on, as dependent.
Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities and differences.
Moral Theory An explanation of why an action is right or wrong or why a person or a person’s character is good or bad Tells us what it is about an action.
Utilitarianism.
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863) PHIL 102, UBC Summer 2015 Christina Hendricks Except parts noted otherwise, this presentation is licensed CC-BY 4.0CC-BY.
Jeremy Bentham 15 February 1748 – 6 June Jeremy Bentham (15 February 1748 – 6 June 1832) Jeremy Bentham was an English jurist, philosopher, and.
J.S. Mill Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that.
Jeremy Bentham: Psychological Hedonism An account of human nature is necessary in order to describe morals and legislation scientifically. Just as we explain.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 16 Ethics #2: Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.
 Welcome! The objective of this 26 slide presentation is to: 1. Identify the fundamental concepts and key issues of ethics and morality. 2. Describe rules.
Chapter 2: Readings in Moral Theory Jeremy Bentham, “The Principle of Utility” – Consequentialism: the rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely.
 Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill  Reason not Revelation  Consequentialism – good or bad, right or wrong, are based on outcomes.
What is intellectual property?. Three Philosophical Theories of Intellectual Property 1. Locke’s Labor Theory 2. Hegel’s Personality Theory 3. Bentham’s.
Ethical theories and approaches in Business
Utilitarianism Learning outcome:
Introduction to Ethical Theory
Utilitarianism.
Introduction to Ethical Theory
Utilitarianism.
Absolutism.
Utilitarianism - Introduction
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863)
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863)
On your whiteboard: What is teleology? What is hedonism?
Bentham’s Utilitarianism
John Stuart Mill ( ).
The Ethics of Utility The Utilitarian Theory :
The Ethics of Utility The Utilitarian Theory :
Moral Theories: Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism Morality Depends on the Consequences
Utilitarianism.
Presentation transcript:

U TILITARIANISM PHIL 320 (Ethics) – July 3, 2013

T HE G REATEST H APPINESS P RINCIPLE AND THE F ELICIFIC C ALCULUS

B ENTHAM ON P LEASURE To a person to consider by himself, the value of a pleasure or pain considered by itself, will be greater or less, according to the... following circumstances: Intensity Duration Certainty (or Uncertainty) Propinquity (or Remoteness) Fecundity Purity Extent

B ENTHAM S F ELICIFIC C ALCULUS (S TAGE 1) Of the value of each distinguishable pleasure which appears to be produced by it in the first instance. Of the value of each pain which appears to be produced by it in the first instance. Of the value of each pleasure which appears to be produced by it after the first. This constitutes the fecundity of the first pleasure and the impurity of the first pain. Of the value of each pain which appears to be produced by it after the first. This constitutes the fecundity of the first pain and the impurity of the first pleasure.

B ENTHAM S F ELICIFIC C ALCULUS (S TAGE 2) Sum up all the values of all the pleasures on the one side, and those of all the pains on the other. The balance, if it be on the side of pleasure, will give the good tendency of the act upon the whole, with respect to the interests of that individual person; if on the side of pain, the bad tendency of it upon the whole. Take an account of the number of persons whose interests appear to be concerned; and repeat the above process with respect to each.

B ENTHAM S F ELICIFIC C ALCULUS (S TAGE 3) Sum up the numbers expressive of the degrees of good tendency, which the act has, with respect to each individual, in regard to whom the tendency of it is good upon the whole: do this again with respect to each individual, in regard to whom the tendency of it is bad upon the whole. Take the balance ; which, if on the side of pleasure, will give the general good tendency of the act, with respect to the total number of community of individuals concerned; if on the side of pain, the general evil tendency, with respect to the same community.

M ILL S P ROOF OF THE G REATEST H APPINESS P RINCIPLE People desire their own happiness for its own sake. If some is desired for its own sake, then it is desirable. Thus, each persons own happiness is desirable for that person (from 1 and 2). If something is desirable, then it is intrinsically good. Therefore, ones own happiness is an intrinsic good for oneself (from 3 and 4). If each persons own happiness is an intrinsic good for that person, then the general happiness is intrinsically good for the aggregate of persons. Thus, the general happiness is an intrinsic good for the aggregate of persons (from 5 and 6). All other things besides the general happiness that are desired for themselves are really only desired as parts of the end of general happiness. THEREFORE, THE GENERAL HAPPINESS IS THE SOLE INTRINSIC GOOD (from 7 and 8).

M ILL S D EFENSE OF U TILITARIANISM (Class Handout)

U TILITARIANISM AS A M ORAL T HEORY

U TILITARIANISM AS A M ORAL T HEORY (T HEORY OF V ALUE ) HAPPINESS is intrinsically good; it is the summum bonum (the highest good). PAIN is intrinsically bad. The extrinsic value of value-neutral things or states of affairs depends on whether they contribute to happiness or not. Something is extrinsically good if it contributes to happiness without much pain. Something is extrinsically bad if it produces more pain than happiness.

U TILITARIANISM AS A M ORAL T HEORY (T HEORY OF C ONDUCT ) THE GREATEST HAPPINESS PRINCIPLE: Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. ACT-UTILITARIANISM 1. Calculate the amount of happiness produced to all of the people involved in the scenario. 2. Calculate the amount of pain produced to all of the people involved in the scenario. 3. If pain produced exceeds happiness produced, the action is FORBIDDEN. 4. If happiness produced exceeds pain produced, the action is PERMISSIBLE. 5. If the net happiness produced is greater than the net happiness produced by some other (alternative) activity, the action that produces the greatest net happiness is OBLIGATORY.

U TILITARIANISM AS A M ORAL T HEORY (T HEORY OF C HARACTER ) A person is VIRTUOUS if one has a character that overall contributes to the greatest happiness. Competent Judge Nimble Calculator of Consequences Move Beyond Act-Utilitarianism to Rule- Utilitarianism A person is VICIOUS if one has a character that does not contribute to the greatest happiness. Egoist (does not move from ones own sense of happiness to the notion of the greatest happiness) Not Nimble at Calculating Consequences Unsanctioned Moral Training

S ANCTIONS (M ORAL T RAINING ) EXTERNAL SANCTIONS are pleasures and pains meted out in response to a given behavior in order to encourage or deter the behavior Punishment of crime Detention Embarrassment INTERNAL SANCTIONS are self-produced sanctions that affirm or deny certain actions or behaviors within oneself Pride Shame