Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Advertisements

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
Euler’s circles Some A are not B. All B are C. Some A are not C. Algorithm = a method of solution guaranteed to give the right answer.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument English 102 Argumentation.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
Logos Formal Logic.
Deductive reasoning.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
The Science of Good Reasons
Terms of Logic and Types of Argument AP English Language and Composition.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Critical Thinking (do quiz on page 21). Characteristics of a Good Critical Thinker (p. 23, 27) Truth Seeking Open Minded Analytic Systematic Persistent.
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
REASONING AS PROBLEM SOLVING DEDUCTIVE REASONING: –what, if any, conclusions necessarily follow? INDUCTIVE REASONING: –what is the probability that those.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
The construction of a formal argument
CHAPTER 9 CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS. ARGUMENTS A form of thinking in which certain reasons are offered to support conclusion Arguments are Inferences - Decide.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
Introduction to Argument Chapter 2 (Pgs ) AP Language Demi Greiner | Arlyn Rodriguez Period 4.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
CLASSICAL ORATION INDUCTION DEDUCTION TOULMIN MODEL
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive reasoning.
ARGUMENTATION AND LOGIC
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
What makes a Good Argument?
Deductive Arguments.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Deductive and Inductive REASONING
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
Validity and Soundness
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Arguments.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
Hurley … Chapter 6.5 Indirect Truth Tables
Logical Forms.
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Syllogisms and Enthymemes.
Arguments in Sentential Logic
Syllogisms.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Argumentation.
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions This chapter will cover Reality assumptions Patterns of deductive reasoning Using deductive reasoning to test logic, discover truth, make decisions, avoid stereotyping, and understand argument. Why is it useful to learn the patterns of deductive reasoning? Pg. 86

Reality Assumptions Beliefs about what is true and factual about the world. Based on unique experience of individual Discuss the notion of assumptions- often hidden and though sometimes directly stated by the speaker, they are usually implied. Also call factual or descriptive assumptions

Detecting Reality Assumptions Toulmin’s Model Issue: Should we use the SAT or ACT scores to predict success in college? When considering an issue, what are the reality assumptions?

Toulmin’s Model Claim - Students should not apply to colleges at which SAT scores are 200 points higher than theirs. Warrant (Reality Assumption) Scores are accurate predictions of how well a student is prepared Reason Students will not likely succeed Based on Value-Education is valued but how education is measured varies according to different assumptions

Test only predicts level of struggle for first year. Toulmin’s Model Claim Colleges should not use standardized test scores as a measure of success. Reason Test only predicts level of struggle for first year. Warrant (Reality Assumption) Students success based on character qualities that are not measured by the tests. Based on What is the reality assumption?

Toulmin’s Model Issue: Should trials and executions be televised

Toulmin’s Model Claim: Trials and executions should be televised Warrant (Reality Assumption) Televising trials would inform the public about our judicial system. Reason: Public has the right to have more information about the courts and the judicial system. Based on What is the reality assumption? What is the value assumption? Which has priority? Warrant (Value Assumption) Freedom of information is an important value

Reasoning Deductive Reasoning General statement to a specific instance Deductive reasoning aims to give us certainty about what is true in a given situation. Certainty is established when the premises (reasons) are true and stated in correct form.

Reasoning Deductive Inductive Aims for Certainty General to Specific Gives us Probabilities Specific to General Chapter 6

Deductive Reasoning Syllogism- a classic example All men are mortal. (major premise) Socrates is a man. (minor premise) Therefore, Socrates is mortal. (conclusion) Defining a syllogism

Deductive Reasoning Validity Correct form makes an argument valid (logical). Accurate content makes it true. When the form is valid and the content is true, the argument is sound.

Deductive Reasoning is content true? All students eat pizza. Claire is a student at CSU. Is form valid? Therefore, Claire eats pizza. Is it sound? No

Deductive Reasoning is content true? All women are terrible drivers. Jane is a woman. Is form valid? Therefore, Jane is a terrible driver. Is it sound? Yes

Deductive Reasoning Pattern of Deductive reasoning All As are Bs. Categorical statement m is A. Therefore, m is B

Deductive Reasoning Categorical Statement All As are Bs. A B A statement in which members of one class are said to be included in Another class. Example

Conditional/hypothetical syllogism Modus ponens: ‘the way of affirmation’: the antecedent leads to the consequent. If A, then B A Therefore, B B A A is the antecedent; B is the consequent.

Conditional/hypothetical syllogism Modus tollens: ‘denying the consequent.’ If A, then B Not A Therefore not B B A If I have strep throat, then the culture will be positive. But the culture is not positive. So, I don’t have strep throat.

Deductive Reasoning Questionable Premises All drivers who speed are subject to a fine. You are speeding. Which premise can be contested? Therefore, you are subject to a fine.

Deductive Reasoning Enthymeme Key part is implied rather than directly stated.

Deductive Reasoning Sound Argument: Correct Form True Premises False Sound Argument: Correct Form True Premises Unsound Argument: Correct Form Untrue Premises Valid Unsound Argument: Incorrect Form, True Premises Unsound Argument: Incorrect Form, Untrue Premises Invalid

Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning can: Uncover Reality Assumptions Discover Truth and Make Decisions Combat Prejudice and Stereotyping

Skill A critical thinker uses reasoning to discover truth and prevent stereotyping

Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions Checkup Reality versus value assumptions Validity in an argument What makes a deductive argument sound What does deductive reasoning aim to establish