Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Shuhei Yoshida, Masako Kaido, Tomoya S. Kitajima  Developmental Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1  Yinghui Mao, Ariane Abrieu, Don W. Cleveland 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Rapid De Novo Centromere Formation Occurs Independently of Heterochromatin Protein 1 in C. elegans Embryos  Karen W.Y. Yuen, Kentaro Nabeshima, Karen.
LGN is essential for Plk1-dependent cortical NuMA enrichment during metaphase, but not in anaphase. LGN is essential for Plk1-dependent cortical NuMA enrichment.
Verena N. Lorenz, Michael P. Schön, Cornelia S. Seitz 
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e8 (January 2018)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e3 (September 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells
Plk1 negatively regulates NuMA cortical localization by phosphorylating at its C-terminus. Plk1 negatively regulates NuMA cortical localization by phosphorylating.
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 
Plk1 inhibition or depletion causes robust cortical NuMA localization in mitosis. Plk1 inhibition or depletion causes robust cortical NuMA localization.
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2005)
Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1  Stephanie A. Miller, Michael L. Johnson, P. Todd.
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Martin Mikl, Carrie R. Cowan  Cell Reports 
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
The Role of NEDD1 Phosphorylation by Aurora A in Chromosomal Microtubule Nucleation and Spindle Function  Roser Pinyol, Jacopo Scrofani, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages e6 (February 2019)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
HURP is an obstacle for KIF18A on K-fibers in metaphase cells.
Distinct Roles of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex in the Detection of and Response to Errors in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment  Julian Haase, Mary.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Intra-spindle Microtubule Assembly Regulates Clustering of Microtubule-Organizing Centers during Early Mouse Development  Sadanori Watanabe, Go Shioi,
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Cortical NuMA enrichment upon Plk1 inhibition is dynein independent.
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Nitobe London, Steven Ceto, Jeffrey A. Ranish, Sue Biggins 
Kristýna Kotýnková, Kuan-Chung Su, Stephen C. West, Mark Petronczki 
KIF18A sNL variants accumulate as well as WT on peripheral K-fibers.
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Chemical Inhibitors: The Challenge of Finding the Right Target
Jean-François Maure, Etsushi Kitamura, Tomoyuki U. Tanaka 
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 58-65 (July 2015) Natural Loss of Mps1 Kinase in Nematodes Uncovers a Role for Polo-like Kinase 1 in Spindle Checkpoint Initiation  Julien Espeut, Pablo Lara-Gonzalez, Mélanie Sassine, Andrew K. Shiau, Arshad Desai, Ariane Abrieu  Cell Reports  Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 58-65 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.039 Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The N-Terminal Half of KNL-1 Is a Robust Plk1 Substrate In Vitro (A) Schematic of BUB-1/BUB-3 kinetochore recruitment. Mps1 is absent in C. elegans and other nematode species. (B) Mps1 and Plk1 phosphorylation consensus sequences (Dou et al., 2011). (C) Plk1 phosphorylation of GST-KNL-11–505 and GST-KNL-1506–1010. (D) Binding of in-vitro-translated BUB-11–494 and BUB-3 to GST-KNL-11–505 with or without PLK-1 phosphorylation. Quantification (right) is from three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval. (E) Schematic of KNL-1 features, highlighting MELT repeats (green) and other PLK-1 target sites (orange) mapped in Figure S1. (F) Analysis of KNL-11–505 WT, MELT/A, 8A, and MELT/A+8A phosphorylation by PLK-1 performed as in Figure 1C. Quantification, relative to WT, from three independent experiments is shown on the right. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Reports 2015 12, 58-65DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.039) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Mutations in KNL-1 that Disrupt Plk1 Phosphorylation Perturb BUB-1 Kinetochore Recruitment and Chromosome Segregation (A) Images of the metaphase plate in one-cell embryos depleted of endogenous KNL-1 that express indicated RNAi-resistant KNL-1::mCherry variants and GFP::H2b. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Analysis of BUB-1::GFP kinetochore targeting in the indicated KNL-1 variants. Endogenous KNL-1 was depleted in each condition. Scale bar, 2 μm. (C) Quantification of BUB-1::GFP kinetochore localization in the indicated strains. Graph plots the ratio of BUB-1::GFP (green) to KNL-1::mCh (red) measured at kinetochores of aligned chromosomes. The measured ratios were normalized relative to WT KNL-1. n refers to the number of embryos analyzed. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval. (D) Images represent normal segregation (top) or segregation with lagging chromatin (bottom) in one-cell embryos at 26°C. The frequency of each for the indicated KNL-1 variants is shown on the right. Scale bar, 5 μm. Cell Reports 2015 12, 58-65DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.039) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The MELT/A+8A Mutant of KNL-1 Is Checkpoint Signaling Defective (A) Left: schematic of the experimental approach used to compare mitotic duration in the AB cell in two states: bipolar or monopolar. Monopolar second-division cells are generated by the depletion of ZYG-1, the kinase required for centriole duplication. Right: NEBD-to-decondensation interval measured for the indicated conditions. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Left: GFP::MAD-2 localization at unattached kinetochores on monopolar spindles generated by inhibiting centriole duplication. Scale bar, 5 μm. Right: GFP::MAD-2 intensity on kinetochores normalized relative to the WT KNL-1 transgene control. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2015 12, 58-65DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.039) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of Plk1 Inhibition on Knl1 Phosphorylation and Bub1 Localization in Mps1-Inhibited Human Cells (A) Schematic of the protocol used to treat cells with inhibitors prior to mitotic entry under microtubule depolymerization conditions. HeLa cells were used for this analysis and, after fixation, stained for Bub1, Mad1 or Knl1, and centromeres (ACA). h, hours. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of mitotic HeLa cells treated with the Plk1 inhibitor BI2536, the Mps1 inhibitor MPI-0479605, or both and stained for Bub1. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) Quantification of Bub1 kinetochore intensities for the indicated conditions. Values are normalized to controls. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval for all kinetochores measured. ∗∗∗p < 0.0001; n.s., not significant. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of mitotic HeLa cells stained for Knl1 pT875 under the indicated conditions. Scale bar, 5 μm. (E) Quantification of Knl1, Knl1 pT875, and Bub1 kinetochore intensities for the indicated conditions. Values are normalized to controls. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval for all kinetochores measured. See also Figures S3 and S4. Cell Reports 2015 12, 58-65DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.039) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2015 12, 58-65DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.039) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions