STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
Advertisements

The Fuselage and Empennage
Wall Form Design Example (Continued)
Team Flying Sheep Engineering Analysis Mark Berkobin John Nevin John Nott Christian Yaeger Michelle Rivero.
Critical Design Review AAE490 Project 1 March 2003 Nicholas Baker Brian Chernish Andrew Faust Doug Holden Mara Prentkowski Nicholas Setar.
March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
BEARING OR CRUSHING Bearing Stresses (Compression Perpendicular to the Grain) Allowable stresses for compression perpendicular to the grain are available.
Propulsion QDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 20, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
November 12, 2003QDR1 Team 5 Structures and Weights QDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
Prototype Fabrication, Economic, & Test Plan QDR Tung Tran Matt Drodofsky Haris Md Ishak Matt Lossmann Purdue University AAE 451 Fall 2006 Team 4 Mark.
Rear spar for control surface hinges Styrene foam wing core Balsa spars carry bending load 0.25 in x 0.25 in T.E. Reinforcement Materials Employed: Balsa:
Over view Landing Gear Landing Gear Weight Determination Weight Determination Geometric Layout of Wing Structure Geometric Layout of Wing Structure Analysis.
Team 5 Structures PDR Presented By: Ross May James Roesch Charles Stangle.
AAE 451 – Fall 2003 Ares Team Mir Rashiduzzaman Alethea Tan Kai-Hui Leong Darwin Lisan Jung Hyun Ahn John Ko.
Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t
CLARKSON UNIVERSITY Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering Introduction to AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES Ratan Jha (CAMP 364, ,
1 AE 440 Structures Discipline Lecture 6 Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture.
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
BSE 2294 Animal Structures and Environment
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
Dane Batema John Tapee Audrey Serra Patricia Roman Kyle RyanCarlos Vergara Benoit BlierDrew Capps Team 1: Lessons Learned and Vehicle Summary Team “Canard”
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Mechanics of Materials. To determine the loading on a body Draw a free body diagram indicating – external loads and moments – reaction loads and moments.
Aircraft Familiarization
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
December 1, 2003PDR1 Team 5 Structures and Weights PDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
Structures PDR 1 Team Boiler Xpress Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal VanMeter October 12, 2000.
ME 160 Introduction to Finite Element Method-Spring 2016 Topics for Term Projects by Teams of 2 Students Instructor: Tai-Ran Hsu, Professor, Dept. of Mechanical.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Structures Preliminary Design Review #1 October 12, 2000.
BME 315 – Biomechanics Chapter 4. Mechanical Properties of the Body Professor: Darryl Thelen University of Wisconsin-Madison Fall 2009.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS QDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 6, 2003.
Engineering Analysis & Updated Layout Drawings SofaKing 9 March 2005.
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 1
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
Basic Aircraft Structure
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
AAE 451 Senior Design – Critical Design Review
DYNAMICS & CONTROL PDR 1 TEAM 4
Tilt N’ Store Design Analysis
Structures and Weights
SAE AERO 2017 Joseph Zongolowicz, Kathy Hansen, Nick Montana, Marquis Ward, Frank Dixon, Thomas Houck, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao, Kevin Schesventer,
Structures PDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 December 2, 2003
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Introduction- The Airplane
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
Revision for Mechanics of Materials
The Fuselage and Empennage
Structures and Weights Preliminary Design Review
NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Structures Overview Material Properties Structures Construction
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 1 TEAM 4
Structures QDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 13, 2003
COST QDR TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford,
Team 5 Cost QDR Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile
Team 5 Structures and Weights QDR #1
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 3 TEAM 4
Tilt N’ Store Design Analysis
PROPULSION QDR 1 AAE 451 TEAM 4
PROPULSION PDR 1 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Structures PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 28, 2003
PROPULSION QDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS QDR 1
Presentation transcript:

STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah December 2, 2003

OVERVIEW Vertical Tail Pod Attachment Aircraft Internal Configuration Spar design Pod Attachment Aircraft Internal Configuration Internal layout Detailed weight analysis

CONCEPT REVIEW Empennage Empennage High Wing High Wing UPDATED Horizontal and Vertical Tails sized using modified Class 1 Approach (per D & C QDR 1) High Wing S = 39.3 ft2 b = 14.0 ft, c = 2.8 ft AR = 5 UPDATED Twin Booms 3 ft apart; 5.7 ft from Wing MAC to HT MAC Twin Engine 1.8 HP each Avionics Pod 20 lb; can be positioned front or aft depending on requirements Empennage Horizontal and Vertical Tails High Wing S = 47.8 ft2 b = 15.5 ft, c = 3.1 ft AR = 5 Twin Booms 3 ft apart; 7.3 ft from Wing MAC to HT MAC Twin Engine 1.8 HP each Avionics Pod 20 lb; can be positioned front or aft depending on requirements

VERTICAL TAIL Bending moment analysis Deflection analysis Spar selected based on results

VERTICAL TAIL Modeled as vertical fixed beam Equations: base fixed in horizontal stabilizer Free Body Diagram Equations: Deflection Bending Moment: q Where q is distributed load. Estimate q~8.3 lbf/ft Deflection:

VERTICAL TAIL Plotted bending moment and deflection Solved for moment of inertia Obtained spar width and height 0.5 in 1 in 3 ft 1.2 ft As seen from the rear of the aircraft

VERTICAL TAIL Bending moment decreases from root to tip Increasing deflection Deflection greatest at tip

HORIZONTAL TAIL Modeled as simply supported beam q Encountered complications that require re-evaluation More for CDR

POD ATTACHMENT 3 different analysis considerations in pod attachment (from Gere, Mechanics of Materials) : 1) allowable tensile stress in main base of connecting rail 2) allowable tensile stress around bolt holes 3) allowable shear stress in bolts

POD ATTACHMENT 1) Tensile Stress in Main Base As seen from left rear view of pod 1) Tensile Stress in Main Base where: P = load we are designing for = allowable tensile stress in material A = area under inspection d2= hole diameter t = rail thickness = 370 psi (for spruce, tension perpendicular to grain) d2= 3/8 in t = 3/8 in P = 50 lbf

POD ATTACHMENT Solve for and make sure it’s less than that for spruce =355.6 psi < 370 psi

POD ATTACHMENT 2) Tensile stress in bolt holes As seen from left rear view of pod where d1= width of hole section d1 =1.25 in Other variables remain same as before

POD ATTACHMENT Again, solve for and make sure it’s less than that for spruce = 152.4 psi < 370 psi

POD ATTACHMENT 3) Shear stress experienced in bolts As seen from left rear view of pod 3) Shear stress experienced in bolts where = allowable shear stress in bolts n = number of bolts required = 91 psi from plasticnutsandbolts.com

POD ATTACHMENT This time, solve for n and find how many bolts are required for the given allowable shear stress and load P n = 5, but use 6 for symmetry

AIRCRAFT INTERNAL LAYOUT Total Weight = 50.21 lbs

POD INTERNAL LAYOUT Avionics + Structure = 20 lbs

POD ATTACHMENT METHOD

WING CONSTRUCTION Wing + Required Structure = 13.1 lbs

CENTRAL WING INTERNAL LAYOUT

DETACHABLE SECTION INTERNAL LAYOUT

DETACHABLE SECTION INTERNAL LAYOUT

TAIL SECTION INTERNAL LAYOUT Tail Section + landing gear = 1.59 lbs

REAR LANDING GEAR CONNECTION

WEIGHTS SUMMARY Component Weight (lbf) Wing & Structure 13.1 Tail Section & rear gear 1.59 Tail Booms 4.70 Basic Flight Systems 0.849 Propulsion & Fuel 6.61 Avionics & Structure 20 Main Landing Gear 2.36 Fiber-glass & Mylar Skin 1 Total Weight 50.21

QUESTIONS? Got F.O.D. ?