Canadian Aborginal Relations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Infer - to form (an opinion) from evidence : to reach (a conclusion) based on known facts : to hint or suggest. What Can you infer from these pictures?
Advertisements

Post-War Developments Aboriginal Rights, Land Claims, Resistance Part One.
14 land treaties were signed on Vancouver Island before Confederation between the First Nations and James Douglas 1899 – the 1 st and only land treaty.
“You Are on Indian Land”. In 1960, when “Status Indians” finally got the right to vote, most Aboriginal people were suffering through terrible living.
Brief Background Aboriginal peoples were experiencing higher infant motility rate and poverty than the rest of the Canadian population. Civil rights movement.
First Nations in Canada during the 20th Century
Treaties, Treaties, and More Treaties Understanding Current FNMI Issues.
Aboriginals and Canada
First Nations Modern Relations. What’s In a Name? Indian : Historical term. Not politically correct in British Columbia and is deemed slanderous to many.
OKA March 11, 1990 – September 26, ~background~ The crisis developed from a dispute between the town of Oka and the Mohawk community of Kanesatake.
The Canadian Identity One, Two or Many Nations???.
  Alcoholism and drug abuse are rampant within many Aboriginal communities.  Cycles of abuse are prevalent. Think yesterdays class.  Some reserve.
 Aboriginal peoples are the first people to live in any nation (in Canada, this includes Inuit, Metis and First Nations people and non-Status Indians.
Mi’kmaq Studies Citizens PlusThe White Paper Centralization Policy Indian Act
Government and Statute Law Chapter 3. Laws have to………. meet legal challenges and approval of citizens. be enforceable. present a balance between competing.
Aboriginals, Regionalism, Quebec and the Constitution.
RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA. Social and Economic Conditions Approximately 1.2 million aboriginal people Different groups –Status and non-status.
INDIAN ACT Mi’kmaq Studies 10.
Aboriginal Peoples Douglas Brown St Francis Xavier University March 2010.
Unity or Separation? Defining Canada: 1980’s-1990’s Constitution debate, Meech Lake Accord, Charlottetown Accord, 1995 Referendum.
The Parti Quebecois, Bill 101, 1980, 1982, Meech Lake, Charlottetown, 1995.
3.3 Native Peoples Historic Barriers Native Leaders and Lobby Groups Landmark Decisions Native Rights and Canada’s Constitution Into the 21 st Century.
FIRST NATIONS THE TREATY PROCESS. Native people – descendants of Canada’s original inhabitants – have had a complex, and often difficult relationship.
History of the Indian Act SOME HISTORY… 1763 – The Royal Proclamation (England Claimed Canada) -Set rules for Aboriginals to have lands -Land could be.
Understanding the Treaties A Legal Guide to understanding the Land Claim Issues in BC and Canada.
RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS Constitutional Law Part 2. Evolution of Canada’s Constitution Enacted by the British Parliament (BNA Act 1867) Any amendments had.
Aboriginal Issues  In 1960, Aboriginal people were granted the right to vote  However, they still faced many issues: land claim disputes,
Aboriginal Issues.
Fundamental Definitions and Facts
CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS A History Lesson After the Constitution of 1981.
Indian Act “The happiest future for the Indian race is absorption into the general population, and this is the object of the policy of our government.
COLLECTIVE RIGHTS Chapter 4 Review. Rights guaranteed to specific groups in Canadian society for historical and constitutional reasons.
Worldviews Perspective on historic treaties Treaties to the Europeans were originally land use agreements which were used to keep the peace and gain.
1763 Royal Proclamation is signed. This document explicitly recognizes aboriginal title; aboriginal land ownership and authority are recognized by the.
Jean Lesage. Answer: Led the “Quiet Revolution” in Quebec and campaigned on the slogan “Maitres chez nous”
MULTICULTURALISM, FIRST NATION ISSUES, CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM, AND GLOBALIZATION This is a very important Power Point. I have chosen the information that.
Indigenous Peoples.
Secondary PowerPoint 3: Governments in Canada
Rights and Freedom.
The Modernization of Quebec Society
A History of Reserves in British Columbia
Minorities and Social Conflicts
Patriating the Constitution
Using the Snapshots in Time cards:
The Constitution Debate
The Constitution Debate
Social Studies 11 Jeopardy
Canada’s Recognition and Implementation of Indigenous Rights Framework
ABORIGINAL IDENTITY Government Relations.
Road to Self-Government
Constitutional Law Part 2
Slide Deck 3: Government and Democracy
: The Royal Proclamation, 1763, and the Québec Act, 1774
History of Rights and Freedoms in Canada
Consequences of the Referendum
Slide Deck 2: Government and Democracy
The Study of First Nations
Treaties and What They Mean Today
HISTORICAL JOURNEY PART II:
Human Rights in Canada CLN 4CR Lesson 17.
Chapter 4: Societal Choices in Contemporary Quebec
Canada’s Aboriginal Population
Canada after Trudeau.
Constitutional Law Part 2
Majority and Minority Rights
The History of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada
Political Growth and Tensions
The Oka Crisis.
CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Aboriginals Peoples in Canada: Repairing the Relationship
Presentation transcript:

Canadian Aborginal Relations 1968 - 2000

Up To Now… 1960 – The right to vote Could only drink alcohol on the reserves Relations not good but not getting worst Before this if they wanted to vote they had to give up native status. Diefenbaker gave them the right to vote in federal elections with out having to give up their status.

1969 – White and Red Papers Trudeau comes to power and stops all negotiation with Native peoples. Led by Jean Chretien – Minister of Indian Affairs Had some good and bad points. Native groups create the Red papers. his government argued that Canada shouldn't negotiate any further treaties with the Native peoples. Trudeau believed treaties were something only signed between sovereign nations. His government also did not agree with Aboriginal land rights claims, either, because they were too broad and unspecific. Aboriginals feared this stance would undermine their special rights and status within Canadian society. It set up money to help aboriginals, land control should be transferred to aboriginal peoples, etc But also stopped all treaties between the government and natives, “treaties are for countries which they aren’t”, turned down most land claims, to broad, Red papers: The government wrongly thinks that the Crown owns reserve lands. The Crown merely "holds" such lands, though they belong to Aboriginals. The government also thinks that Aboriginals only can own land in the Old World, European sense of land ownership. Therefore, the Aboriginal peoples should be allowed to control land in a way that respects both their historical and legal rights., The Department of Indian and Northern Affairs should cease to exist in its archaic and paternalistic. aboriginals reject the appointment of a sole commissioner in a royal commission because he will be appointed by the government itself to protect its interests without Aboriginal consultation. The government, instead, should call an "independent, unbiased, unprejudiced" commission that should have the power to bring any witnesses or documents that it or the Aboriginals wish to present. Its judgments should be legally binding.

1969 - 1970 – Drybones Case Joseph Drybones Wrong place, Wrong time. Goes to Supreme Court. Canadian Bill of Rights now highest law in the land. Discriminatory provisions in this act that once made it illegal for Aboriginals to vote in elections, leave their reserves without permission or drink alcohol have either since been repealed or are generally no longer enforced. In 1969, an Aboriginal man named Joseph Drybones was found drunk in a Yellowknife hotel lobby and was arrested. While the Indian Act now allowed Aboriginals to drink, they could only do so on reserves. At the time, no reserves existed in the Northwest Territories. Supreme courtwho found that the police had discriminated against him because of his race when they charged him with drunkenness. This ruling effectively caused the no-drinking clause in the Indian Act to fall into disuse. “empowered the courts to strike down federal legislation which offended its dictates”

1973 – Calder Case Frank Arthur Calder Nisga claim ownership of land in BC Goes to Supreme Court Court rejects claim but rules that Aboriginals do have a right to claim certain lands. Frank Arthur Calder, a member of the federal Cabinet, sued the British Columbian government over land claims issues outstanding in the province with the Nisga’a tribe. The issue went to the Supreme Court of Canada, which ruled that aboriginal rights to the land did exist, particularly under the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and subsequent government implementation of that proclamation. This ruling forced Pierre Trudeau's government to reconsider its federal Aboriginal policy once again, which opened the door to discussion on the intent and meaning of all Indian treaties.

James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement 1975 Cree, Inuit, vs. Quebec government / Hydro – Quebec Same old story Huge amount of land given up for $$, health care and governing rights. This was, notably, the first major land cession deal signed since the early twentieth century. It gave Inuit and Cree people in northern Québec significant amounts of money - $225 million - and hunting and fishing rights to land that was to be surrendered to the provincial government. The Québec provincial government wanted large portions of land in the northern half of the province for the purposes of building hydroelectric dams. Environmental social protections -everything about the 55th latitude belongs to Kativik Environmental Advisory Committee. Economic development -direct financial compensation – some 225 million to be managed and used for native economic development through three native-owned development corporations. Education -the agreement provided for the establishment of the Cree School Board for Cree villages, the Kativik School Board, encouraged study in their own language Local government The ran their own municipalities Health services -got money to provide better health care

Constitution - 1982 Oh, this thing again. Sets rights in stone Does it go too far? Does it go far enough? Rights – land claims, higher then law

Western Artic Claims Settlement Act 1984 Negotiation They lose land They gain control A sign of things to come It was meant to protect the area's wildlife and Inuit culture, and give the Inuit people of the Western Arctic control over their natural resources. This act cannot be changed without the approval of the Inuit living here.

Bill C-31 1985 Indian status to Métis All Aboriginals living off reserve land keep status and rights.
 All Aboriginal women who had lost their status by marrying a non-Aboriginal man gain status back.

Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords Meech Lake – Elijah Harper, Manitoban MLA and native rights advocate, votes against Meech Lake Accord. Charlottetown – self government, a seat in the senate, more land claims, but…. National votes kills accord.

The Oka Crisis - 1990 Proposal to build a golf course on land claimed by Mohawks in Kanesatake, Quebec Native protesters setup road blocks. Armed standoff with Quebec Police Never consulted Mohawk leaders, Police storm barricade but beat back, tear gas blows back at them, left 6 cars and a bulldozer, one cop killed. Native groups set up blockades all over Canada in support, becoming national problem (Montréal bridge). Comments made by politicians make situation worst.

Crisis Continues The army is sent in, looks like a war zone. Groups start to negotiate Barricades fall one by one Oka protestors start to dismantle defences They leave area, most arrested

Results 78 days one person killed millions lost relations worsen Why is this important? Opens more land claims, more blockades, even today.

Nunavut Territory - 1999 Talking does work Inuit get the power Environment saved Relations improved A new territory was created in the eastern Arctic in 1999 as a result of the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement in 1993. The federal government gave some of this land to the Inuit specifically for living, hunting and controlling sub-surface resources. The government is also now paying the territory almost $1.2 billion for the sole purpose of retaining non-Inuit property during a 15-year period.

Conclusion Relations good, but not great Land claims still occurring Blockades still being built More open dialogue