Reaction Coordinates for the Flipping of Genetic Switches

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michail Stamatakis, Nikos V. Mantzaris  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Nanoparticles as Fluorescence Labels: Is Size All that Matters?
Don’t Flip Out: AChRs are Primed to Catch and Hold Your Attention
Jingkui Wang, Marc Lefranc, Quentin Thommen  Biophysical Journal 
Thomas J. English, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical Journal 
Masahiro Ueda, Tatsuo Shibata  Biophysical Journal 
Bin Wu, Jeffrey A. Chao, Robert H. Singer  Biophysical Journal 
Urea-Induced Unfolding of the Immunity Protein Im9 Monitored by spFRET
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Marc P. Scherer, Anthony W. Gummer  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Λ-Repressor Oligomerization Kinetics at High Concentrations Using Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy in Zero-Mode Waveguides  K.T. Samiee, M. Foquet,
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Perfect Sampling of the Master Equation for Gene Regulatory Networks
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
A Model of H-NS Mediated Compaction of Bacterial DNA
Jae Kyoung Kim, Krešimir Josić, Matthew R. Bennett  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Instabilities in the Transient Response of Muscle
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Systems Biophysics of Gene Expression
Michail Stamatakis, Nikos V. Mantzaris  Biophysical Journal 
Folding of the Protein Domain hbSBD
An Equilibrium Model for the Combined Effect of Macromolecular Crowding and Surface Adsorption on the Formation of Linear Protein Fibrils  Travis Hoppe,
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Christian Tischer, Pieter Rein ten Wolde, Marileen Dogterom 
Megan T. Valentine, Steven M. Block  Biophysical Journal 
Michel A. Cuendet, Olivier Michielin  Biophysical Journal 
Michał Komorowski, Jacek Miękisz, Michael P.H. Stumpf 
Thijn van der Heijden, Cees Dekker  Biophysical Journal 
Kelly E. Caputo, Dooyoung Lee, Michael R. King, Daniel A. Hammer 
Electronic Transport in DNA
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Nucleotide Effects on the Structure and Dynamics of Actin
Margaret J. Tse, Brian K. Chu, Mahua Roy, Elizabeth L. Read 
Volume 90, Issue 8, Pages (April 2006)
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 91, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Use of Helper Enzymes for ADP Removal in Infrared Spectroscopic Experiments: Application to Ca2+-ATPase  Man Liu, Eeva-Liisa Karjalainen, Andreas Barth 
A Chemically Reversible Brownian Motor: Application to Kinesin and Ncd
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Carlos Mattea, Johan Qvist, Bertil Halle  Biophysical Journal 
Yuguang Mu, Lars Nordenskiöld, James P. Tam  Biophysical Journal 
Oriol Canela-Xandri, Francesc Sagués, Javier Buceta 
Protein Grabs a Ligand by Extending Anchor Residues: Molecular Simulation for Ca2+ Binding to Calmodulin Loop  Chigusa Kobayashi, Shoji Takada  Biophysical.
Tsuyoshi Terakawa, Shoji Takada  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetics of Surface-Driven Self-Assembly and Fatigue-Induced Disassembly of a Virus- Based Nanocoating  Alejandro Valbuena, Mauricio G. Mateu  Biophysical.
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Multiple Folding Pathways of the SH3 Domain
Vladimir Avdonin, Toshinori Hoshi  Biophysical Journal 
Michel A. Cuendet, Olivier Michielin  Biophysical Journal 
Dynamics of Myosin-V Processivity
The Selectivity of K+ Ion Channels: Testing the Hypotheses
Kinetics of P2X7 Receptor-Operated Single Channels Currents
Theory in Biology: Figure 1 or Figure 7?
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Enrique M. De La Cruz, Jean-Louis Martiel, Laurent Blanchoin 
Self-Consistent Proteomic Field Theory of Stochastic Gene Switches
Maxwell Henderson, Brigita Urbanc, Luis Cruz  Biophysical Journal 
T-Cell Activation: A Queuing Theory Analysis at Low Agonist Density
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Brian M. Baynes, Bernhardt L. Trout  Biophysical Journal 
A Model of H-NS Mediated Compaction of Bacterial DNA
Bistability of Cell Adhesion in Shear Flow
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Polymerization and Bundling Kinetics of FtsZ Filaments
Presentation transcript:

Reaction Coordinates for the Flipping of Genetic Switches Marco J. Morelli, Sorin Tănase-Nicola, Rosalind J. Allen, Pieter Rein ten Wolde  Biophysical Journal  Volume 94, Issue 9, Pages 3413-3423 (May 2008) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.116699 Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Pictorial representation of the model switch, corresponding to the reaction schemes in Eqs. 2a–f. Two divergently-transcribed genes are under the control of a shared regulatory binding site on the DNA (the operator site O). Proteins A and B can bind, in homodimer form, to the operator. Each TF acts to block the production of the other species. In the exclusive switch, only one type of TF can bind at any given time (meaning that the production of both species can never be suppressed), whereas, in the general switch, both types of TF can bind (in which case the production of both species is repressed). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 3413-3423DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.116699) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 (A and B) Switching rate kAB for the exclusive switch as a function of the dimerization rate kf (A) and the rate of operator binding kon (B). Dissociation rates are scaled such that the equilibrium constants remain constant: kDd=kb/kf=1/V and kDb=koff/kon=1/(5V) Panels C and D show the probability ρ(q*) of being at the dividing surface, as a function of kf (C) and kon (D). Panels E and F show the kinetic prefactor, as defined by Eq. 1, as a function of kf (E) and kon (F). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 3413-3423DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.116699) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (A and B) Switching rate kAB for the general switch as a function of the dimerization rate kf (A) and the rate of operator binding kon (B). Dissociation rates are scaled such that the equilibrium constants remain constant: kDd=kb/kf=1/V and kDb=koff/kon=1/(5V) Panels C and D show the probability ρ(q*) of being at the dividing surface, as a function of kf (C) and kon (D). Panels E and F show the kinetic prefactor, as defined by Eq. 1, as a function of kf (E) and kon (F). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 3413-3423DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.116699) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Probability distribution as a function of the order parameter λ=nA –nB, with nX the total copy number of species X, for the exclusive switch (A) and for the general switch (B). The distributions are obtained with FFS calculations (11), for three different sets of parameters. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 3413-3423DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.116699) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Switching paths projected onto the nA, nB surface, for three different sets of parameters. (A) Paths averaged in the PB ensemble for the exclusive switch, where nA and nB are averaged over configurations with the same value of PB, where nX is the total copy number of species X. The forward paths, corresponding to transitions from A to B, are shown with solid lines, while the reverse transitions, from B to A, are shown with dashed lines. (B) Switching paths for the general switch. In this projection, the paths are highly insensitive to variations in parameters. The hypersurface λ=0 is crossed with a lower total number of A- and B-molecules. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 3413-3423DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.116699) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 (A) Exclusive switch: probability that a B2 dimer is bound to the operator, NOB2 as a function of PB for three different sets of parameters. The solid lines correspond to the transition from A to B, while the dashed lines corresponds to the reverse transition from B to A. (B) General switch: operator occupancies during the transition from A to B and vice versa (the empty state O is not shown since it is always scarcely occupied), for the baseline parameter set; the results for the other parameter sets are indistinguishable. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 3413-3423DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.116699) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The probability ρ(λ) for the transition state ensemble (PB=0.5) for the transition from A to B, where λ=nA –nB. (Top row, A) Exclusive switch. (Bottom row, B) General switch. The probability ρ(λ) is split into color-coded contributions from the three operator states; the area under each histogram gives the probability 〈NOX〉 that the operator is bound to species X (the three areas thus sum to unity). The left panels correspond to the system with slow dimerization kf=0.1; the middle panels correspond to the system with the base-line parameters; the panels on the right corresponds to the system with fast operator binding kon=500. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 3413-3423DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.116699) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions