ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
IPBI 6 April 05Ken Moffeit Polarimetry Design Updates - Dispersion in upstream chicane - 20mrad extraction line 0.75 mrad beam stay clear location of Synchrotron.
November 2005M. Woodley1 ILC Beam Delivery System layout with end-of-linac undulator.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
November 07, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beam Delivery System updates BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Andrei Seryi Valencia GDE.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Interim Working Assumption” 2006e Release European LC Workshop, January , Daresbury.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23,
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
Positron source beamline lattice Wanming Liu, ANL
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
BDS/MDI Deepa Angal-Kalinin Andrei Seryi AD&I Meeting, DESY, May 29, 2009.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
2nd ATF2 Project Meeting (May 30, 2006)M. Woodley [SLAC]1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.3) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
ILC2016x 12/08/2016 LCWS2016 (Morioka, Japan).
ILC-CR-0004 Main Linac extension: Implementation status
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Emittance Diagnostics
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
LCLS2sc MAD files: Injector to Bypass Line
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Accelerator and detector requirements specification and optimisation on example of interaction Region BDS Design Team 11-13th October 2007 BDS KOM, SLAC.
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Emittance Diagnostics
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Emittance Diagnostics
Y. Nosochkov and M. Woodley (SLAC)
Transfer Line for EIC.
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements M. Woodley, SLAC November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation Main Linac energy collimation MPS coll skew correction / emittance diagnostic septa betatron collimation polarimeter fast kickers fast sweepers tuneup dump ILC2006e electron BDS schematic β-match final transformer polarimeter energy collimation IP primary dump energy spectrometer fast sweepers final doublet energy spectrometer November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

“Legacy” BDS Design Criteria minimal deviation from linac axis (no net bending) … for possible future multi-TeV operation emittance growth from incoherent synchrotron radiation (ISR) should be “small” ILC total budgeted emittance growth from Damping Ring to IP: 20% horizontal, 100% vertical BDS budget: 5% horizontal, 30% vertical BDS design: emittance growth due to ISR < 1% @ 500 GeV (beam) bandwidth of fast abort / tuneup extraction line: ±10% BCD → RDR: BDS Design Criteria single interaction region, 14 mrad crossing angle (saves ~ 300 m of tunnel) … “push-pull” detectors start with design for 1 TeV cm (500 GeV beam) modify design for initial operation at (up to) 250 GeV; upgrade to 500 GeV to be accomplished by adding magnets only (no layout/geometry changes) decimate dipoles … reduce ∫Bdl for 250 GeV operation by reducing lengths (i.e. number of dipoles); reserve space for additional dipoles, keeping layout fixed quadrupoles & sextupoles unchanged …reduce ∫Gdl for 250 GeV operation by reducing strengths Final Doublet magnets will have to be replaced for upgrade to 500 GeV November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

Emittance Measurement & Correction MPS collimation 90° FODO cells sacrificial collimators; reserve 3 m space for each (no real design yet … tapered?) coupling correction and emittance diagnostics after main linac at entrance to BDS upstream of fast abort / tuneup extraction (FATx) line coupling correction section Paul Emma’s 4 orthonormal skew quadrupole coupling correction lattice as short as possible given quadrupole strength limits (9.6 kG @ 6 mm) and 500 GeV operation 4 station 2D emittance diagnostic section 4 laserwires 45° FODO lattice as short as possible given minimum measurable spot size (~1 µm) see http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-8581.pdf bending system to separate Compton-scattered laserwire photons from primary beam for detection 4 dipole chicane … “share” upstream polarimeter chicane since it’s the only dispersive area upstream of the FATx system, include a sacrificial collimator to define the energy acceptance of the FATx system November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation Additional Design Data Synchrotron Radiation Emittance Growth (DIMAD tracking; SYNC option 2) • ILC2006c: @ 250 GeV, emit/emit0 = 1.0075 ; @ 500 GeV, emit/emit0 = 1.0137 (emit0 = 1e-5 m) • ILC2006e: @ 250 GeV, emit/emit0 = 1.0036 ; @ 500 GeV, emit/emit0 = 1.0078 (emit0 = 1e-5 m) Laserwire Spot Size • "worst case" laserwire spot size: DR extracted emittance (2e-8 m), 500 GeV • "nominal" laserwire spot size: BSY budgeted emittance (3.4e-8 m), 500 GeV • emittance diagnostic FODO cell length: "worst case" spot > 1.0 um AND "nominal" spot > 1.5 um - L45 = 16.2 m (45° FODO cell drift length) - BETY(WS) = 64.752 m - "nominal" vertical spot size = 1.500 um - "worst case" vertical spot size = 1.150 um - skew/emit length = 247.102 m (1st skew quad to 4th wire scanner) Polarimeter Chicane • peak dispersion = 20 mm @ 250 GeV, 10 mm @ 500 GeV ... constant B-field dipoles • minimum center dipole separation = 8 m + 3.5 m (for MPS energy collimator) • energy detection resolution: for dE/E = 1%, dX > 10*sigmaX (BSY budgeted emittance) Extraction • septum aperture: R = 15 mm (+-10% dE/E acceptance) • required offset at septum entrance: dX = 35 mm • 9 kickers (9 × 2 m × 0.133 kG) - 1 TeV upgrade: 25 kickers (25 × 2 m × 0.133 kG ; Lkick/(Lkick+Ldrift) = 2/3) • 3 septa (2 × 2 m × 5 kG + 1 × 2 m × 10 kG) - 1 TeV upgrade: 5 septa (3 × 2 m × 5 kG + 2 × 2 m × 10 kG) • transverse clearance for IRT "Type B" quads: 135 mm - 0.5 * 171 mm (quad half-width) + 40 mm (extraction line beam pipe radius) + 10 mm (clearance) • transverse clearance for extraction line 8 cm bore quad QFSM1: 220 mm - 0.5 * 16 inches (quad half-width) + 6 mm (IRT beam pipe radius) + 10 mm (clearance) • 10 rastering kickers for 3 cm radius (10 × 0.8 m × 0.54 kG) - 1 TeV upgrade: 20 rastering kickers for 3 cm radius (20 × 0.8 m × 0.54 kG) • required offset at dump: dX > 3 m November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation MPS coll skew correction / emittance diagnostic polarimeter β-match Main Linac betatron collimation extraction total length ≈ 650 m November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation MPS collimation Main Linac skew correction / emittance diagnostic s (km) November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation MPS collimator skew quadrupole laserwire November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation MPS / skew correction / emittance diagnostic SQ SQ SQ SQ WS WS WS WS Main Linac polarimeter chicane MPS collimation skew correction emittance diagnostic 90° 180° 90° 45° 45° 45° worst case (500 GeV) ; nominal (250 GeV) ; phase advance 90° 90° 90° 45° 45° 45° November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation Tesla “Type B” kickers for 500 GeV beam septa and divergent E = 250 GeV εx = 9.2×10-6 m σδ = 0.06 % βx = 12.14 m ηx = 20 mm σx = 19 μm ΔE = 1% Δx = 200 μm > 10σx November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation Original Upstream Polarimeter Chicane 60.2 m 2 m November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

BDS Beam Instrumentation New Upstream Polarimeter Chicane constant integrated strength dipoles (B = 0.97 kG) dispersion = 20 mm @ 250 GeV, 10 mm @ 500 GeV dispersion scales inversely with energy (= 110 mm @ 45 GeV) transverse space for laserwire detector @ 500 GeV? (< 5 mm) magnet and vacuum chamber engineering issues? LB =2.4 m (×3) ΔLBB = 0.3 m 3 m Compton IP 250 GeV x = 20 mm 16.1 m angle = 0.837 mrad 2 m 8 m 35 GeV Cerenkov detector laserwire detector MPS Ecoll ±10% 12.3 cm 25 GeV ΔE/E BPM 18.0 cm 76.9 m November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation

Issues & Questions Nick Walker @ BDS KOM: “Question everything … “ do we really need coupling correction at the BDS entrance? can it be somehow incorporated into the Main Linac? do we really need emittance diagnostics at the BDS entrance? can it be somehow incorporated into the Main Linac? would a shorter, more invasive system (i.e. quadrupole scans) be acceptable? what is the minimum and maximum energy range required? capable of 1 TeV cm initially? or lengthened by moving back into the linac tunnel for the upgrade? do the laserwires really need a chicane for their detectors? can we just add a small bend to the beamline? what are the requirements for upstream polarimetry? is constant dipole field needed? does the sacrificial energy collimator compromise its performance? (see tomorrow’s meeting: https://www-mail.slac.stanford.edu/exchweb/bin/ redir.asp?URL=https://fnal.webex.com/fnal/j.php?ED=99109907%26UID=0) is Giga-Z operation required? what effect does this have on the polarimeter design? cost? do we need a separate location for the laserwire detectors, energy collimator, and beam energy diagnostics? another chicane? can we use 4D emittance measurement? less invasive coupling correction, but longer system … beam matrix reconstruction technique? November 28, 2007 BDS Beam Instrumentation