CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
Advertisements

STFC RAL Graduate lectures 2007/8 R M Brown - RAL 1 An introduction to calorimeters for particle physics Bob Brown STFC/PPD.
Roma, 22/11/01CMS Software & Computing Workshop - E. Longo 1 Calibrazioni del calorimetro: esperienze (L3) e prospettive Egidio Longo.
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Il Calorimetro Elettromagnetico di CMS Riccardo Paramatti CERN & INFN – Roma1 IFAE 2005 Catania 31/03/2005.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
ECAL Testbeam Meeting, Rome 28 March 2007 Toyoko Orimoto Adolf Bornheim, Chris Rogan, Yong Yang California Institute of Technology Lastest Results from.
ECAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson May 25, ECAL Digitization CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) EcalElectronicsSim EBDataFrame EEDataFrame.
ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)
Cosmic Rays Data Analysis with CMS-ECAL Mattia Fumagalli (Università di Milano Bicocca) CIAO!
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, May 19, PWO Crystal ECAL Ren-yuan Zhu California Institute of Technology May 19 th 2001.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
CMS ECAL 2006 Test Beams Effort Caltech HEP Seminar Christopher Rogan California Institute of Technology May 1, 2007.
The Design of Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) October Lu Jun-guang.
Status of Projectile Spectator Detector A.Kurepin (Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow) I. Introduction to PSD. II. Conception and design. III. Development.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory CMS ECAL Split 08/09/04 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS ECAL Group.
A. Gibson, Toronto; Villa Olmo 2009; ATLAS LAr Commissioning October 5, 2009 Commissioning of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Adam Gibson University.
CMS ECAL performance and upgrade Anton Karneyeu (INR, Moscow) CMS Collaboration INSTR14, Novosibirsk, Russia, 27 February 2014.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter at the LHC
Coseners House Forum on LHC Startup 13th April 2007 David Futyan Imperial College 1 David Futyan Imperial College Calibration of the CMS ECAL Using Vector.
28 June 2010 LHCb week St Petersburg M.N Minard 1 Calorimeter status Hardware status Controls & monitoring Timing alignment Calorimeters calibration Pending.
May 1-3, LHC 2003V. Daniel Elvira1 CMS: Hadronic Calorimetry & Jet/ Performance V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Combined Longitudinal Weight Extraction and Intercalibration S.Paganis ( Wisconsin ) with K.Loureiro ( Wisconsin ), T.Carli ( CERN ) and input from F.Djama(Marseille),
PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA, Saclay, France Prague.
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
H C A L 11 th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Villa Olmo (Como - Italy), October 5 - 9, 2009 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE.
The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
Sergey BarsukElectromagnetic Calorimeter for 1 Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the LHCb experiment Perugia, Italy March 29 – April 2, 2004 ECAL CALO Sergey.
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
ECAL performance evolution plots Contact: 1.
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
G. Dissertori ETH Zürich May 1, 2003 LHCS03, CMS ECAL 1 CMS: Electromagnetic calorimetry and e/gamma performance G. Dissertori ETH Zürich LHC Symposium,
2004 LHC DAYS IN SPLIT- October 8 th 2004 L. Dobrzynski - LLR CMS - ECAL Test beam results Ludwik Dobrzynski On behalf of ECAL CMS LLR- Ecole polytechnique.
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
COMPASS calorimeters S. Platchkov IRFU, CEA-Saclay GDR, 8-9 avril 2008
Calibration of the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS detector
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
CALICE scintillator HCAL
Overview Detector details Crystals Photo-detectors
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter
A study on stochastic term of calorimetric energy resolution
I. Machikhiliyan (LAPP, Annecy) for the LHCb calorimeter group
Conceptual design and R&D Progress of STCF ECAL
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER
CMS ECAL Cosmic Calibration
Presentation transcript:

CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results Goals for ECAL Final calibration with LHC Light monitoring system for short term variations Initial calibration in lab and with cosmics Calibration with test beam Noise, time- and energy resolution Shower containment correction Conclusion 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 1

Goals for ECAL: Main goal: precise energy and position measurement of e,  Benchmark for mH < 150 GeV / c2: H   (H/mH small and large background) for higher mH : H  ZZ, WW  X+leptons Energy resolution for calorimeter: a: Stochastic term: shower fluctuations, photo-statistics, fluctuations of transverse leakage b: Noise term (5x5): electronics noise, dark current, pile-up c: Constant term: calibration, non-uniformities, fluctuations due to T, HV, longitudinal leakage 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 2

Final calibration with LHC: symmetry calibration with minimum bias events and Jet triggers: Intercalibration of rings of Xtals at equal , with min. bias. events or with Jet triggers and the energy flow from opposite (2nd) jet, to avoid trigger bias. Use Ze+e- events to intercalibrate rings. Precision of better than 2% within a few days. Energy in Xtals up to 6 GeV. Ultimate calibration with W  e n using E/p: Depends weakly on starting calibration constants. Accuracy of 0.5% within 6 months at L=1033 (5-7 fb-1 needed). Need Tracker operational and aligned. 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 3

Light monitoring system: Short term variations of calibration constants monitored with laser system. Light transmission of Xtals changes with radiation. Change depends on dose rate and on individual crystal. Difference of variation after irradiation between electrons and laser can be described by a universal  for a given producer (tested in beam). Simulation of crystal transparency evolution at LHC (L =2x1033cm-2s-1) - based on test beam irradiation results e- data laser data 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 4

Light monitoring system (2): 440 nm 796 nm An optical switch directs light to one half-supermodule or one quarter Dee at a time Transmission in CMS frequently monitored (every 20min entire ECAL) with laser light (440nm,796nm) injected through fibers into the front (Barrel) or rear (Endcap) of each Xtal. Blue laser monitors radiation effect at emission peak. Infrared laser monitors light distribution system and read-out chain. Stability of system monitored with PN diodes (0.1%). 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 5

Initial calibration in Lab and with cosmics: Intercalibration with light yield measurement in the Lab: Light yield measured with radioactive source for each Xtal. By comparison to test beam data of same Xtals, 4.6% precision achieved. Since light yield and longitudinal transmission at 360nm are correlated, combination of both measurements improves intercalibration (4.1%). Calibration with cosmic muons : Each SM passes cosmic muon stand before final installation in CMS. During 1-2 weeks up to 600k useful events. Cosmic muons aligned to Xtal axis deposit 250 MeV in Xtal. APD gain increased from 50 to 200. Signal to noise ratio: 30. Precision on inter-calibration ~2% (depending on ). ~22 SM already calibrated. 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 6

Calibration with test beam: only for a few SMs possible: Super Module Hodoscope: Scintillating fibers. For beam position in the transverse plan. (x/y)=150m. BEAM Trigger Goal is to have a < 2% accuracy for initial inter-calibration in CMS. Electrons of 120 GeV. Goal is to calibrate ≥ 10 SMs (1 twice). 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 7

Noise: With random events applying amplitude reconstruction: Σ 3x3 41.5 MeV  127.0/3 MeV  213.4/5 MeV Noise of ~ 40 MeV/Xtal. No coherent noise, if pedestal is subtracted event by event. 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 8

Resolution on time difference Time resolution: Time difference between 2 Xtals hit by same shower Resolution on time difference Signal timing must be stable in CMS. If E > 2 GeV, σ(δt) < 1 ns. If E > 40 GeV, σ(δt) ≈ 0.11 ns. (Noise/Signal)2 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 9

Energy resolution: Central impact (44 mm2) Subtraction of pedestal event by event. Reconstruction of signal amplitude with digital filtering (at low energy). Result as expected by MC studies + photostatistics + longitudinal non-uniformity. 0.5% Stochastic Noise Constant 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 10

Energy resolution (2): Central impact (44 mm2) : Stochastic Constant 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 11

Shower containment correction: Energy in a 3x3 cluster varies of ~3% with position of cluster in central Xtal. Containment effect decreases with matrix size. Correction developed using the energy distribution deposit in this 3X3 array. “Uniform” impact 3% 5x5 3x3 Hodoscope 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 12

Energy resolution (3): Central impact “Uniform” impact 0.5% 0.5% Energy resolution ≤ 0.5% at 120 GeV for any electron impact. Same shower containment correction applied (for all E and all Xtals). 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 13

Energy resolution (4): Uniform impact Beam position centered at many locations of a 3x3 matrix . Uniform impact, best simulation of situation in CMS. Resolution of 0.5% achieved at 120 GeV. Same shower containment correction applied (for all E and all Xtals). Uniform impact 44 mm2 , central impact 22 mm 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 14

Conclusions: References: Electromagnetic calorimetry with high resolution is central design feature of CMS. Final calibration in LHC with data and laser system. Light monitoring system is working as expected. Inter-calibration constants predetermined in lab, with cosmics and with test beam. Test beam results for noise, time and energy resolution confirm the ambitious design goals of ECAL. References: E resolution: CMS Note 2006/140 Cluster containment: CMS Note 2006/045 06/10/2006-LHC-days-Split Wolfgang Funk – CERN PH/CMA 15