Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
Advertisements

Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Create a “folder” called CT_Summit_presentation on your thumb/flash drive or desktop. It is best to save in at least 2 places. In this folder place your.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Maria Collins’ Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation (Capstone Project) EXPLANATION AND REQUIREMENTS.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
EXPLANATION AND REQUIREMENTS. When completed, you will post this on your website.
Welcome to CLASS Keys™ Study Session 1 February 22, 2010 Our session will begin at 4:00 p.m. While you are waiting, please do the following: Configure.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Create a “folder” called CT_Summit_presentation on your thumb/flash drive or desktop. It is best to save in at least 2 places. In this folder place your.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CLASS Keys Process Studying the Standards Marlo Mong
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Website I can not live without books. Thomas Jefferson 1.
The levels of performance considered at the element level are not intended to be used to label teachers as Not Evident, Emerging, Proficient, and Exemplary.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 9: Annual Evaluation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Formal Observation Administrator schedules and conducts one Formal Observation (50 Minutes). Administrator uses the Formative Classroom Analysis form to.
Second session of the NEPBE I in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 22, 2013.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Cathy Taylor Teaching children to count is good, but teaching what counts is better.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Laura Blake Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation “The shell must break before the bird can fly” ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson Website .
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Michael Bohannan National University Domain B: ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Lesson Plan Construction (K-12)
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Previewing New Content
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
CLASS KeysSM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement
The Framework for Teaching
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Student Assessment and Evaluation
CLASS KeysTM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010
Georgia Department of Education
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
CLASS Keys™ Strands and Elements
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
GA Association of School Personnel Administrators
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Teacher Practice Instruments
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement CLASS KeysSM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement

Resources and Materials Teachers will need the following resources and materials for this module: CLASS KeysSM Notebook Handouts 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E Handout 1F will be given out after slide 12. Module 1 PowerPoint

Module Objectives Introduces teachers to the CLASS KeysSM Evaluation System. Introduces teachers to the five CLASS KeysSM strands. Introduces teachers to the 28 CLASS KeysSM elements. Allows teachers to assess their background knowledge regarding the strands and elements. Allows teachers to begin to fill the gaps in their knowledge regarding the strands and elements.

The CLASS KeysSM Evaluation System is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess their instructional practices. Evaluate classroom teachers on the basis of the academic gains of their students. Engage teachers in their own assessment and professional growth. Increase the quantity and quality of feedback that teachers receive from their evaluator(s). Use an array of evidence collected over time to assess teacher performance and student learning.

CLASS KeysSM Foundational Documents School Keys Standards-Based Classroom High Impact Practice Rubric from the Implementation Resource Georgia Framework for Teaching (2005) Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Instrument (GTDRI) For 2009-2010 Field Study Use Only

SCHOOL KEYSSM CLASS KEYSM LEADER KEYSSM Triangulation of Evaluations SCHOOL KEYSSM CLASS KEYSM LEADER KEYSSM Differentiated Instruction Differentiated Instruction Research-Based Practices Research-Based Practices Formative Assessment Formative Assessment Differentiated Instruction Research-Based Practices Formative Assessment

The Five Strands of CLASS KeysSM Strand 1: Curriculum and Planning Strand 2: Standards-Based Instruction Strand 3: Assessment of Student Learning Strand 4: Professionalism Strand 5: Student Achievement

Continuum of Improvement CONTINUUM OF IMPROVEMENT RUBRIC STRAND STANDARD ELEMENT ASSESSMENT - The collecting and analyzing of student performance data to identify patterns of achievement and underachievement in order to design and implement appropriate instructional interventions. Assessment of Student Learning Teacher Standard 1: The teacher uses a variety of effective and balanced assessment techniques which are systematically implemented. AL 1.1 The teacher uses diagnostic assessment strategies to identify individual and class strengths, misconceptions, and areas of weaknesses in order to inform planning.  Not Evident  Emerging  Proficient  Exemplary Continuum of Improvement The teacher does not use diagnostic assessment data to determine student or class strengths and weaknesses or to plan for instruction. The teacher does not identify student or class strengths or weaknesses. The teacher uses some diagnostic strategies to identify student strengths and weaknesses and prior knowledge to guide planning for instruction; however, diagnostic assessment is not an integral part of unit planning. The teacher uses a variety of diagnostic assessment strategies to identify individual and class strengths, misconceptions, and areas of weakness. Diagnostic assessment is part of most planning. The teacher makes diagnostic assessment a systematic component of all instructional units. The teacher uses a variety of formal and informal types of diagnostic assessments to inform planning and teaching. CONTINUUM OF IMPROVEMENT RUBRIC

 Not Evident  Emerging  Proficient  Exemplary Examples of Evidence Teacher Evidence Lesson plans and units: Do not include diagnostic assessments in plans. Observation: Does not use informal or formal diagnostic assessments at the beginning of a lesson or unit. Conference: Cannot describe how a unit or lesson was planned based on diagnostic data. Student Evidence Cannot recall the teacher using diagnostic assessment strategies. Lesson plans or units: Include diagnostic assessments at the beginning of some instructional units. Uses at least one formal or informal diagnostic assessment at the beginning of a lesson or unit. Understands the need to differentiate to address the needs of students, but is not certain how to plan for a differentiated lesson. Gives limited examples of how the teacher assesses prior knowledge. Use a variety of diagnostic activities at the beginning of most lessons and units. Differentiates the lesson to address the needs of students. Describes how a unit or lesson was adapted based on diagnostic assessment data. Gives a variety of examples of how the teacher assesses prior knowledge at the beginning of most units/courses, etc. Use a variety of diagnostic assessment strategies in all instructional planning. Involves students in deciding how instruction will be differentiated based on diagnostic data results. Explains the different forms of assessments used, why diagnostic work is not graded, and how it is used. Expects diagnostic assessments to be used at the beginning point of instruction.

Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre-assessment activities, activating strategies, and planning for developing differentiated instruction based on pre-assessment data. Conference Discussion Topics: The teacher can explain how diagnostic data are used to inform instruction. Discussion Prompts: Discuss how you are using assessment data to inform your lesson or unit plans. Describe how you are differentiating based on diagnostic data. What is your process for analyzing and interpreting diagnostic data that you collect on students?

Anticipation Activity Without using the CLASS KeysSM notebooks, teachers work in small groups using one of the strand graphics to brainstorm what they would expect to see as elements (teacher performances) in that strand. Then groups refer to the notebooks to check their prior knowledge.

Student Achievement Without looking in the CLASS KeysSM notebook, teachers work in small groups and use this strand graphic to list the assessment measures that could be used to determine a teacher’s impact on student achievement.

CLASS KeysSM Strands and Elements