Underwater Sensor Network Presented By: Sabbir Ahmed Khan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 22 Network Layer: Delivery, Forwarding, and Routing.
Advertisements

SELF-ORGANIZING MEDIA ACCESS MECHANISM OF A WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK AHM QUAMRUZZAMAN.
Denial of Service in Sensor Networks Szymon Olesiak.
Dario Pompili, Tommaso Melodia {dario,
GPS-less Localization Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks Othman, A.K; Wireless and Optical Communications Networks, WOCN '08. 5th IFIP International.
Phero-Trail: A Bio-inspired Location Service for Mobile Underwater Sensor Networks Luiz F. Vieira, Uichin Lee, Mario Gerla UCLA.
MANETs Routing Dr. Raad S. Al-Qassas Department of Computer Science PSUT
ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN UNDERWATER SENSOR NETWORKS A proposal for an integrated new routing protocol using existing technologies used for underwater communications.
Multicasting in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANET)
NCKU CSIE CIAL1 Principles and Protocols for Power Control in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Authors: Vikas Kawadia and P. R. Kumar Publisher: IEEE JOURNAL ON.
CS 672 Paper Presentation Presented By Saif Iqbal “CarNet: A Scalable Ad Hoc Wireless Network System” Robert Morris, John Jannotti, Frans Kaashoek, Jinyang.
Real-time Video Streaming from Mobile Underwater Sensors 1 Seongwon Han (UCLA) Roy Chen (UCLA) Youngtae Noh (Cisco Systems Inc.) Mario Gerla (UCLA)
Fault Tolerance in ZigBee Wireless Sensor Networks
UnderWater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UW-ASN) -Xiong Junjie
Deployment Analysis in Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Networks Dario Pompili, Tommaso Melodia, lan F. Akyildiz ACM WUWNet’ Ahn Jung-Sang.
Xiuzhen Cheng Xiuzhen Cheng Csci332 MAS Networks – Challenges and State-of-the-Art Research – Underwater Sensor.
Itrat Rasool Quadri ST ID COE-543 Wireless and Mobile Networks
Fault Tolerant and Mobility Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Wireless Sensor Network Name : Tahani Abid Aladwani ID :
Slide 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIED Environment monitoring Review how human activities affect the marine echosystem Undersea explorations Detect underwater oilfields.
Protocols for Self-Organization of a Wireless Sensor Network K. Sohrabi, J. Gao, V. Ailawadhi, and G. J. Pottie IEEE Personal Comm., Oct Presented.
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
UNDERWATER ACUSTIC SENSOR NETWORKS (UW-ASNs)
1 Spring Semester 2009, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #3 Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks AODV Routing.
An efficient secure distributed anonymous routing protocol for mobile and wireless ad hoc networks Authors: A. Boukerche, K. El-Khatib, L. Xu, L. Korba.
Phero-Trail: A Bio-Inspired Location Service for Mobile Underwater Sensor Networks Luiz Filipe M. Vieira †, Uichin Lee ‡ and Mario Gerla * † Department.
Multicast Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)
Routing in Ad Hoc Networks Audun Søberg Henriksen Truls Becken.
Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) and simulation in network simulator.
State of the Art in Protocol Research for UnderWater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UW-ASNs) Date : ( 木 ) Name : Jeong-Chun, Joo. 2006, ACM_WUWNet'06.
TELE202 Lecture 5 Packet switching in WAN 1 Lecturer Dr Z. Huang Overview ¥Last Lectures »C programming »Source: ¥This Lecture »Packet switching in Wide.
Dynamic Source Routing in ad hoc wireless networks Alexander Stojanovic IST Lisabon 1.
An Improved CDMA-Based MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Networks Guangyu Fan, Huifang Chen, Lei Xie, Kuang Wang IEEE WICOM 2011.
VAPR: Void Aware Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks
Cross-layer Packet Size Optimization for Wireless Terrestrial, Underwater, and Underground Sensor Networks IEEE INFOCOM 2008 Mehmet C. Vuran and Ian F.
788.11J Presentation “Deploying a Wireless Sensor Network on an Active Volcano” Presented by Ahmed Farouk Ibrahim Gaffer.
WIRELESS AD-HOC NETWORKS Dr. Razi Iqbal Lecture 6.
Packet switching network Data is divided into packets. Transfer of information as payload in data packets Packets undergo random delays & possible loss.
BY: MITALI BHOPAL TOPIC: UNDERWATER WIRELESS ITP (LAB)
Junfeng Xu, Keqiu Li, and Geyong Min IEEE Globecom 2010 Speak: Huei-Rung, Tsai Layered Multi-path Power Control in Underwater Sensor Networks.
1 Mitigate the Bottleneck of Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks via Priority Scheduling Junjie Xiong, Michael R. Lyu, Kam-Wing Ng.
S& EDG: Scalable and Efficient Data Gathering Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks 1 Prepared by: Naveed Ilyas MS(EE), CIIT, Islamabad,
Presented by: Sheeraz Ahmed 1.  ARCUN a reliable, energy-efficient and high throughput routing protocol  Cooperative routing a potential scheme for.
Multi-channel Wireless Sensor Network MAC protocol based on dynamic route.
AEDG:AUV aided Efficient Data Gathering Routing Protocol for UWSNs Prepared by: Mr. Naveed Ilyas CIIT, Islamabad, Pakistan 1.
Sanjay K. Dhurandher, Mohammad S. Obaidat, Fellow of IEEE and Fellow of SCS, Siddharth Goel and Abhishek Gupta CAITFS, Division of Information Technology,
Part 3  Transmission Media & EM Propagations.  Provides the connection between the transmitter and receiver. 1.Pair of wires – carry electric signal.
SHORT: Self-Healing and Optimizing Routing Techniques for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Presenter: Sheng-Shih Wang October 30, 2003 Chao Gui and Prasant Mohapatra.
Wireless Access and Networking Technology Lab WANT Energy-efficient and Topology-aware Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks Xiaobing Wu, Guihai Chen and.
Overview of Wireless Networks: Cellular Mobile Ad hoc Sensor.
Routing Protocols Brandon Wagner.
Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) ietf
DETECTION AND IGNORING BLACK HOLE ATTACK IN VANET NETWORKS BASED LATENCY TIME CH. BENSAID S.BOUKLI HACENE M.K.FAROUAN 1.
Peter Pham and Sylvie Perreau, IEEE 2002 Mobile and Wireless Communications Network Multi-Path Routing Protocol with Load Balancing Policy in Mobile Ad.
KAIS T Location-Aided Flooding: An Energy-Efficient Data Dissemination Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Harshavardhan Sabbineni and Krishnendu Chakrabarty.
UNDERWATER WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
A Secure Routing Protocol with Intrusion Detection for Clustering Wireless Sensor Networks International Forum on Information Technology and Applications.
Author:Zarei.M.;Faez.K. ;Nya.J.M.
Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6
Overview of Wireless Networks:
Mobicom ‘99 Per Johansson, Tony Larsson, Nicklas Hedman
Internet Networking recitation #4
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
任課教授:陳朝鈞 教授 學生:王志嘉、馬敏修
by Saltanat Mashirova & Afshin Mahini
Underwater wireless communication
Overview: Chapter 3 Networking sensors
Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6
Overview: Underwater sensing
Distributed Minimum-Cost Clustering for Underwater Sensor Networks
A Distributed Clustering Scheme For Underwater Sensor Networks
Presentation transcript:

Underwater Sensor Network Presented By: Sabbir Ahmed Khan

Contents What is Underwater Sensor Network Underwater Sensor Network: Why? Challenges Why sound is using as communication medium in UW-SN? 2D Under Water Sensor Network 3D Under Water Sensor Network Routing in UWSN Hop-by-Hop Dynamic Addressing-Based Routing (H2-DAB)

What is Underwater Sensor Network We can called Underwater sensor network simply a network that’s primary portion is built underwater. It consists of a number of underwater sensor nodes, underwater sink, surface station, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) that are deployed to perform collaborative monitoring and resource exploration tasks over a given area.

Underwater Sensor Network: Why? Undersea exploration Seismic monitoring Pollution monitoring Equipment monitoring and control Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV) Mine reconnaissance

Challenges Communication via acoustic waves in underwater environment poses a number of main challenges Long and variable propagation delay The available bandwidth is severely limited Doppler Spread Multipath Noise and high path loss Limited Battery power (This is why Low radio frequency isn’t used in underwater transmission)

Why sound is using as communication medium in UW-SN? High Radio wave is extremely attenuated in salt water. So we can Use low radio frequency. Right?? But Low radio frequency requires a very large antenna and high transmission power. So, not practical at water medium. In addition, the optical waves are not efficient in underwater environments because they may be scattered.

2D Under Water Sensor Network Figure 1: 2D Underwater Sensor Network A group of sensor nodes are anchored to the bottom of the ocean. Underwater sensor nodes are interconnected to one or more underwater sinks (uw-sink). UW-sink is used to receive data from the ocean bottom network and send to a surface station. uw-sinks are equipped with two acoustic transceivers A vertical and a horizontal transceiver.

Figure 2: 3D Underwater Sensor Network In three-dimensional underwater networks, sensor nodes float at different depths. The depth of the sensor can then be regulated by adjusting the length of the wire that connects the sensor to the anchor

Routing in UWSN Conventional Proactive and Reactive routing does not work efficiently in the networks with high propagation delay and high dynamic topology such as UWSN. For example, a path from each node to other nodes is discovered and stored in the route table. This path is expired in a short period of time due to high movement of nodes.. We can divided routing protocols into two categories: Location-Based (Geographical) Routing Vector Based Forwarding Protocol (VBF) Hop-by-Hop Vector-Based Forwarding (HH-VBF) Location-Free (Non-geographical) Routing Hop-by-Hop Dynamic Addressing-Based Routing (H2-DAB)

Hop-by-Hop Dynamic Addressing-Based Routing (H2-DAB) Figure 4:Hop ID assigning process It is a location free routing protocol. H2-DAB is composed of two phases. i ) assigning dynamic address to sensor nodes. ii) data delivery.

Hop-by-Hop Dynamic Addressing-Based Routing (H2-DAB) (Cont.) In the first phase, all initial hop ID for sensor is equal to 99. Then sinks start to send hello packet and each node that receives the hello packet should update its hop ID according to the number of hops to the sink. Therefore closer sensors to sinks have smaller hop ID. For instance, the hop ID of node N11 is equal to 34 that indicate its hop distance from one sink is equal to 3 while its distance to another sink is equal to 4. In the second phase, the data is send to the sinks. Each forwarder node sends an inquiry request message to its neighboring nodes. Nodes in the communication range receive the message and send a reply message contains their node ID and their hop ID. The forwarder node selects a node with smallest hop ID as a next hop node. Hop ID is updated after an interval of time due to movement of nodes. In this way data is send to sink.

Hop-by-Hop Dynamic Addressing-Based Routing (H2-DAB)(Cont.) Pros: i ) Handles the node movement by water flow ii ) Employs the multi-sink structure, which reduces the congestion at closer nodes to sink. iii) It works without geographical information of nodes, extra hardware Limitations: i ) It doesn’t handles void communication ii) A single forwarder node strategy at each hop without considering the link quality of the nodes results in an increase in the number of packet loss and low reliability.

Thanks for your Patience and time QUESTION???

References http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underwater_acoustics www.ee.gatech.edu/research/labs/bwn/surveys/underwater.pdf http://ftp.isi.edu/~johnh/PAPERS/Heidemann05b.pdf http://www.mit.edu/people/millitsa/resources/pdfs/royal.pdf http://www.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/bwn/UWASN/ http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijdsn/2013/701834/ I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “State-of-the-art in protocol research for underwater acoustic sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks, pp. 7–16, September 2006. I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks,” ACM Sigbed Review, vol. 1, pp. 3–8, 2004. M. Ayaz, I. Baig, A. Abdullah, and I. Faye, “A survey on routing techniques in underwater wireless sensor networks,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1908–1927, 2011.