Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March 2014 1 questions to:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WELCOME BUDGET MANAGERS AND CHIEF FISCAL OFFICERS
Advertisements

1 FM 2499 From: Spinks Road To: FM 1171 PUBLIC HEARING November 16, 2004.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Refugee Protection Division Navigating the Sea of Change – Refugee Lawyers Group CLE 2013.
for Cabin Safety Inspectors
Herbert Maguire, CPA, CGFM, MBA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
The Basel Convention and its application to ship recycling
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
ODOT's Environmental Site Assessment Process
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
BLR’s Safety Training Presentations
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
What Is Cost Control? 1 Controlling Foodservice Costs OH 1-1.
Update on FHWA/FTA Proposed Rulemaking. MAP-21 Requirements Section 1318(a)(3) o Solicit requests from state DOTs, transit authorities, and MPOs, for.
ABC Technology Project
AAAE Airport Finance & Administration Conference Daytona Beach, Florida March 4-7, 2012 Federal Controls on the Use of Airport Revenue Pablo O. Nüesch.
VOORBLAD.
Checking & Corrective Action
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Determining the Significant Aspects
Environmental Prescreening Training
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Updates questions to:
SAFETEA-LU Rollout WebCast Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads (ERFO) Program February 2006 David Hilgendorf, WFLHD ERFO Coordinator February 2006.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Presented to: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce October 1, 2012.
Watershed Staff Videoconference October 17, 2012.
A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
FEMA PROGRAMS II Session Name: FEMA Programs II Coastal Hazards Management Course Amends the Stafford Act Establishes a Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) Permanency
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation Categorical Exclusions.
Categorical Exclusion (CE) Training Class
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
PSSA Preparation.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
NEPA and Property Acquisition May 19, 2014 Elizabeth Patel Environmental Protection Specialist FTA Office of Planning and Environment.
Federal Highway Administration Emergency Relief (ER) Program Brian Hogge Field Operations Team Leader July 2013.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Presentation transcript:

Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:

MAP-21  Congress mandated that certain actions be categorically excluded from requirements related to EA’s and EIS’s Section 1315 (Emergency repairs) Section 1316 (Operational right-of-way) Section 1317 (Limited Federal funds) EUM – March

FHWA Rulemaking  Amended 23 CFR (c) to add new CEs (c)(9) Emergency Repair Projects (2/19/13) (c)(22) Operational Right-of-Way (2/12/14) (c)(23) Limited Federal Funds (2/12/14)  Rulemaking did not change procedural requirements for approval of projects Environmental requirements under Federal and State statutes and regulations still apply o e.g. Endangered Species Act, Public Involvement, EJ EUM – March

Level of Impacts 4 EUM – March 2014

Documentation The new CEs are considered to meet the c-list (undocumented CE) criteria, however…  FHWA required documentation to ensure a higher level of NEPA document is not warranted No significant impacts will occur No unusual circumstances exist  An Environmental Verification Form was developed in accordance with rulemaking Only for projects that meet new CE criteria Shows due diligence performed EUM – March

No Anticipated Impact  Actions related to Emergency Repairs (c)(9), Operational Right-of-Way (c)(22), and Limited Federal Funds (c)(23), are not anticipated to have impacts to: Air Quality & Noise (conduct proper studies, as appropriate) Hazardous Materials (limited to petroleum related underground storage tanks/releases) Farmland Drinking Water  No documentation required EUM – March

No Significant Impact Specific environmental resource areas require documentation to illustrate allowable thresholds are not exceeded  Waterway Permits Nationwide or Regional General Permits May include PCNs  Endangered Species No Effect or May Effect, But Not Likely to Adversely Effect  100-year Floodplain No substantial impacts EUM – March

No Significant Impact  Section 4(f)/6(f) No permanent incorporation of land or conversion o No 4(f), No Use, or Exceptions (e.g. Temporary No Use), and Maintenance or Temporary Non-Conforming Use  Cultural Resources Minimal Potential to Cause Effect or No Historic Properties Affected EUM – March

EJ and PI  For Operational Right-of-Way (c)(22) and Limited Federal Funds (c)(23), the following applies Follow OES EJ Guidance o If an EJ Analysis Report is needed or if impacts rise to disproportionate and adverse, cannot apply new CEs PI is commensurate to project’s type and scope 9 EUM – March 2014

Guidance 10 EUM – March 2014

FHWA  Based on FHWA Ohio Division correspondence of 2/18/2014, the new CE’s can be applied to projects in accordance with 23 CFR (c)  OES Guidance and Environmental Verification Form was accepted 11 EUM – March 2014

Exempt per CE PA  If a project qualifies as an Exempt Action Type under the existing CE PA, it can be processed as such with no additional documentation Complete Online CE Exempt Form Tab 12 EUM – March 2014

Exempt Exceeded  When a project exceeds the limits of an Exempt Action Type under the existing CE PA, it may meet the criteria of one of the new CE’s Environmental Verification Form required Include documentation in Project File  Potential impacts to environmental resources will follow coordination requirements per ODOT’s typical environmental process  If thresholds exceeded altogether, a higher level of NEPA document would be required 13 EUM – March 2014

(c)(9) Emergency Repair Projects 14 EUM – March 2014

Definition  Transportation facilities damaged by an incident resulting in an emergency declared by the Governor of the State or a disaster or emergency declared by the President  Damage must be caused by a natural disaster or a catastrophic failure from an external cause  The repair occurs within existing right-of-way and in a manner that substantially conforms to pre-existing design, function, and location 15 EUM – March 2014

Process  Perform Damage Survey Assessment The assessment will help determine if a higher level of NEPA document is warranted based on the context and intensity of impacts Prepare Damage Survey Report (DSR) o Upload to the Project File  Upload Environmental Verification Form Document Level Tab is left blank o Exempt Form Tab not generated EUM – March

(c)(22) Operational ROW 17 EUM – March 2014

Definition  ROW disturbed for an existing transportation facility OR Is maintained for a transportation purpose See guidance for specific definitions/examples  Portions of ROW that have not been disturbed or that are not maintained for a transportation purpose do not qualify as existing operational ROW 18 EUM – March 2014

Temporary ROW  Temporary easements and takings needed for construction purposes are covered even if that work is located outside existing operational ROW  Areas acquired as temporary easements or ROW for past projects are not considered part of the existing transportation facility o Easements end once the original project is complete 19 EUM – March 2014

Process  Upload all pertinent documentation to the Project File  Upload Environmental Verification Form Document Level Tab is left blank o Exempt Form Tab not generated EUM – March

(c)(23) Limited Federal Funds 21 EUM – March 2014

Definition  A project must receive federal transportation funds in order to qualify under this CE May include funds from a variety of Federal sources, but only applies to FHWA actions  Projects receiving limited funds are those that: Receive less than $5,000,000 OR Have a total estimated cost of not more than $30,000,000 and Federal funds comprise less than 15% of the total estimated project cost o Includes all phases 22 EUM – March 2014

Re-Evaluation  When federal funds for the project increase beyond established thresholds  An FHWA action needed when changes occur  FHWA approvals or grants needed during construction  If federal funds are in excess of the established threshold, the project will not qualify under (c)(23) 23 EUM – March 2014

Process  Upload all pertinent documentation to the Project File  Upload Environmental Verification Form Document Level Tab is left blank o Exempt Form Tab not generated EUM – March

Future Updates 25 EUM – March 2014

More to Come…  Another Final Rule to follow soon… Four new c-list CE’s Three d-list moving to c-list  Develop new CE PA  BIG changes to Online CE Feature sets illustrating changes are in-process 26 EUM – March 2014