Theories of Romantic Relationships: Equity Theory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why do relationships change or end?
Advertisements

Attraction and Love – Binding Forces
Attraction and Mate Selection
Lecture 7: Attraction (Chapter 13; Hogg & Vaughan)
Relationship formation (and breakdown) Dr. Fenja Ziegler Student Office Hours:Thursdays: 1 – 3pm Psychology, C54 Foundations in Psychology (C80FIP)
Maintenance of relationships
Interdependency How are relationships like economies? What is exchanged? What determines if we’ll stay in our current relationships? Why do some relationships.
What makes relationships successful? SuccessfulUnsuccessful.
Building Healthy Relationships
Genetic Factors Predisposing to Homosexuality May Increase Mating Success in Heterosexuals Written by Zietsch et. al By Michael Berman and Lindsay Tooley.
Exchange Theory Power And Intimate Relationships Exchange Theory Power And Intimate Relationships.
J Stacey Adams – Equity Theory On Job Motivation
Do Now……. In your notebook, write a couple of sentences explaining why relationships end.
Chapter 9 Personal Relationships. Three basic characteristics Frequent interaction over a long period of time Many different kinds of activities Strong.
Social Exchange Theory
Explain and evaluate two models of the breakdown of relationships.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Interpersonal Attraction: From First Impressions to Close Relationships Chapter 10 “Try to reason.
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9-1 Chapter 9 Organizational Commitment, Organizational Justice, and Work- Family Interface.
Relationships Formation Formation Who do we get together with? Who do we get together with? Maintenance Maintenance What keeps relationships going? What.
2. Maintenance of Relationships Key Question – Why do relationships keep going?
 Partners weigh up the inputs and outputs of a relationship to see if it is equitable.  Make a list with your study buddy of inputs and outputs of a.
Summarise what we learned about last lesson… What could be today’s lesson objective? Write an example.
SOCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS 7 © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
2 x Theories. Using what you learned on Reward/Need Satisfaction Theory from last lesson. Try and find two possible matches from Match.com. Be prepared.
Psychology.  Describe the concepts of conformity and obedience with reference to research  Evaluate two factors which affect obedience  Outline and.
Interdependence and Equity.  The previous chapter (09) focused primarily on strategies used to keep relationships: ◦1.Satisfying and in good “working.
Chapter 11: PowerPoint 11.1 Chapter 11: Motivating Employees John W. Slocum, Jr. Susan E. Jackson Don Hellriegel COMPETENCY-BASED MANAGEMENT 11 th Edition.
Biological, Cognitive and Sociocultural Explanations to the origins of attraction The Origins of Attraction.
Formation of Romantic Relationships
Role of culture in relationships Role of communication in relationships Why do relationships change or end.
We are here. How do relationships end? 2006 Rollie & Duck Six stage model of dissolution.
Formation of Romantic Relationships
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
Maintenance and Breakdown of romantic relationships
Maintenance of Relationships
Relationships Theories of Romantic Relationships
Cognitive APPROCH TO EATING DISRODER
The Investment Model Relationships
Chapter 9 Organizational Commitment, Organizational Justice, and Work-Family Interface © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Theories of Romantic Relationships: Social Exchange Theory
THEORIES OF RELATIONSHIPS
Do you interact with anyone on any form of social media that you do not actually know in real life? think about it…
Year 13: PSYA3: Relationships
Relationships The story so far
Relationships.
Breaking up is hard to do
Social Exchange Theory
Theories of romantic relationships: Rusbult’s investment model
Personal Relationships
ROLLIE & DUCK’S MODEL of relationship breakdown (2006) – put in the correct order! Dyadic processes In this phase the dissatisfied person confronts their.
The Matching Hypothesis
Power And Intimate Relationships
Lesson Objectives Thinking Ladder…
Evolutionary Theories of Relationships
Getting to know the Mark Scheme… Key Terms Explained
In pairs complete the Agony Aunt task
Social Exchange Theory
What You Need to Know.
Factors affecting attraction in romantic relationships:
Psychology 137C: Intimate Relationships Week 3, Lecture 1: Same-Sex Relationships Reminders: The web site for downloading videos was down for a while,
Relationships Lesson 1.
Relationships.
Theories of romantic relationships
Relationship formation (and breakdown)
Parasocial relationships
FACTORS AFFECTING ATTRACTION
Love and Intimacy cont’d
Relationships Part 2.
Break down (dissolution) of Relationships
Presentation transcript:

Theories of Romantic Relationships: Equity Theory Describe the main features of Equity Theory of romantic relationships Explain how relationships form, are maintained, and breakdown according to the Equity Theory Evaluate evidence to support and contradict Equity Theory What the spec says: Theories of romantic relationships: equity theory

Starter: verbal tennis We are going to play verbal tennis to evaluate Social Exchange Theory. Girls for, boys against. You have 5 mins to prepare. Use notes/textbook.

Equity Theory Relationships The evolutionary explanations for partner preferences, including the relationship between sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour. Factors affecting attraction in romantic relationships: self-disclosure; physical attractiveness, including the matching hypothesis; filter theory, including social demography, similarity in attitudes and complementarity. Theories of romantic relationships: social exchange theory, equity theory and Rusbult’s investment model of commitment, satisfaction, comparison with alternatives and investment. Duck’s phase model of relationship breakdown: intra-psychic, dyadic, social and grave dressing phases. Virtual relationships in social media: self-disclosure in virtual relationships; effects of absence of gating on the nature of virtual relationships. Parasocial relationships: levels of parasocial relationships, the absorption addiction model and the attachment theory explanation.

Equity Theory Walster et al (1978) See if you can come up with 10 characteristics of a healthy relationship.

Equity theory SET says behaviour is a series of exchanges – benefit and cost. Equity theory says people strive to achieve fairness in their relationships. Any kind of inequity can make people feel distressed. True both for the giver and the receiver!

Equity and Equality Equity doesn’t = Equality Equity = fair; a very subjective opinion So if one person thinks they are putting in less, it’s still judged equitable if they think they are getting out less. Perceived ratio of inputs and outputs

EQUITY THEORY – AO1 Equity theory has the central assumption that people strive to achieve fairness in their relationships and feel distressed if they perceive unfairness. Any kind of inequity has the potential to create distress. People who give a great deal in a relationship and get little in return would perceive inequity, but the same is true of those who receive a great deal and give little in return. The greater the perceived inequity, the greater the dissatisfaction and the greater the distress. Last rolo video?

EQUITY THEORY – AO1 What matters the most in relationships is that both partners level of profit (rewards minus costs) is roughly the same. This isn’t the same as equality where levels of costs and rewards have to be the same (or equal) for each partner. Lack of equity can lead to one partner overbenefits and the other partner underbenefits leading to dissatisfaction and and unhappiness. Underbenefitted = anger, hostility, resentment and humiliation. Overbenefitted = guilt, discomfort and shame. Satisfaction = perceived fairness. Last rolo video?

Based on equity theory, what do you think goes with each and why? I am under-benefited in my relationship Happy I am over-benefited in my relationship Guilty It seems inequity may matter more to women My relationship is equitable Angry

Equity Theory If we perceive inequality in our relationship we try to restore it. Can you think how? Put in less / more Change the amount you demand from it Change perception of inputs/outputs

Just outline Outline and evaluate one theory of maintenance of romantic relationships (16 marks)

Fill in the sheet for SET and ET. TASK- Fill in the sheet for SET and ET. Some of the boxes have been filled in to help you

EVALUATION OF EQUITY THEORY  Supporting research evidence such as Hatfield (1979), Utne et al (1984) and Van Yperen and Buunk (1990). Most of this research comes from real life accounts made by people in a relationship. What might some positives and negatives be of this kind of method (think reliability and validity)? This may be prone to social desirability bias as not only is it self report but it is asking about potentially sensitive issues (i.e. how good/bad is your relationship) and so people may not be entirely truthful when answering, thus leading to a lack of validity (accuracy/truthfulness)

Cultural Bias – AO3  Moghaddam (1998) suggests that such 'economic' theories only apply to Western relationships, and even then only to certain short-term relationships. One group of people who fit this are Western students. They are typically very mobile and experience many short-term romantic relationships. When there is little time to develop long-term commitment, it makes sense to be more concerned with give and take. Long-term relationships within other population groups are more likely to value security than personal profit.

EVALUATION OF EQUITY THEORY  Men and women might judge the equity of a relationship differently. Steil and Weltman (1991) found that among married working couples, husbands who earned more than their wives rated their own careers as the most important, and their wives tended to agree. In couples where the woman's income exceeded the man's, neither partner rated their career as more important.

EVALUATION OF EQUITY THEORY  Type of relationship. The type of relationships researched can also be criticised for focusing on heterosexual relationships and not gay or lesbian relationships. Even in cohabiting or dating couples, there can be differences in the perception of profit and loss and the relationships economics. The relationships used are often not representative of the general population, particularly in Western cultures where homosexual relationships are widely accepted.

Supporting research evidence

Cultural Influences

Individual Differences

You should now have a full answer to this 16 mark question Just evaluate Outline and evaluate one theory of maintenance of romantic relationships (16 marks) You should now have a full answer to this 16 mark question

Pick 9 terms and place them into the box Profit Complementraity Mini Max Principle Realignment Realistic Choice Sexual Selection Bargaining Commitment Social Penetration theory Computer Dance Study Anisogamy Correlational Research Intra Sexual Selection Matching Hypothesis Equity Theory Pick 9 terms and place them into the box

Homework Outline and evaluate two theories of the maintenance of romantic relationships. (16 marks)